Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk, QSIG and Tenovis PBX?
On 03/31/06 23:29 Jim Houser said the following: Looking at the TE100P I don't see it listed Q.SIG as supported. We have it working great as PRI. Am I wrong about the Q.SIG support? Q.SIG and the like are supported from libpri. we got it working with a TE410P, but i'm sure getting to work with the single span cards shouldnt be much different. -- Regards, /\_/\ All dogs go to heaven. [EMAIL PROTECTED](0 0)http://www.alphaque.com/ +==oOO--(_)--OOo==+ | for a in past present future; do| | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b. | | done; done | +=+ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk, QSIG and Tenovis PBX?
Hi Johann, Johann Hanne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, we are still trying to properly connect a Tenovis PBX to an Asterisk server (asterisk 1.2.6, libpri 1.2.2, zaptel 1.2.5, Digium Wildcard TE110P), this time with QSIG. I tried with asterisk 1.2.2 against Alcactel 4400 on Monday. We had partially success. But at a specific config on the Alcatel side, the called number was not set by the SETUP message but via INFORMATION messages. Well, libpri doesn't like it this way. AFAIR, libpri does Q.SIG basic call, so you should set the Tenovis also to basic call. If this doesn't help, please run a pri debug span 1 while you make calls and post the output. My conclusion with Q.SIG: do not use it at this implementation level. YMMV. cu, Wolfgang ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk, QSIG and Tenovis PBX?
On 03/31/06 19:49 Wolfgang Zweimueller said the following: My conclusion with Q.SIG: do not use it at this implementation level. YMMV. i'll beg to differ. we've used Q.SIG successfully with an Ericsson MD110 for a customer in thailand. -- Regards, /\_/\ All dogs go to heaven. [EMAIL PROTECTED](0 0)http://www.alphaque.com/ +==oOO--(_)--OOo==+ | for a in past present future; do| | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b. | | done; done | +=+ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk, QSIG and Tenovis PBX?
Hello Dinesh I got a Panasonic KX-TDA100, can you tell me please how can you configure the PBX side? Qsig slave? master? and the other side of the asterisk? I got TE100P Regards, Daniel Dinesh Nair wrote: On 03/31/06 19:49 Wolfgang Zweimueller said the following: My conclusion with Q.SIG: do not use it at this implementation level. YMMV. i'll beg to differ. we've used Q.SIG successfully with an Ericsson MD110 for a customer in thailand. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk, QSIG and Tenovis PBX?
Looking at the TE100P I don't see it listed Q.SIG as supported. We have it working great as PRI. Am I wrong about the Q.SIG support? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 9:04 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk, QSIG and Tenovis PBX? Hello Dinesh I got a Panasonic KX-TDA100, can you tell me please how can you configure the PBX side? Qsig slave? master? and the other side of the asterisk? I got TE100P Regards, Daniel Dinesh Nair wrote: On 03/31/06 19:49 Wolfgang Zweimueller said the following: My conclusion with Q.SIG: do not use it at this implementation level. YMMV. i'll beg to differ. we've used Q.SIG successfully with an Ericsson MD110 for a customer in thailand. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender, or [EMAIL PROTECTED], immediately by return e-mail and destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. Unless otherwise stated, opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and are not endorsed by the author's employer. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk, QSIG and Tenovis PBX?
Dinesh Nair [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 03/31/06 19:49 Wolfgang Zweimueller said the following: My conclusion with Q.SIG: do not use it at this implementation level. YMMV. i'll beg to differ. we've used Q.SIG successfully with an Ericsson MD110 for a customer in thailand. Well, that's the YMMV. I have it also running with an Alcatel 4200. But my last experience with the 4400 showed me that there is something missing in the Q.SIG implementation. I also have seen some weird things with Q.SIG on BRI. And as long as I don't know what will happen when I connect * to some PBX, I won't tell my customers about Q.SIG. cu, Wolfgang ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
