Re: [Asterisk-Users] FC3 or FC1 (or something else?)
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 11:34:44AM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: I presume you mean 2.4 and 2.6. Six months ago the Stable release of Debian couldn't run 2.6 kernels without installing a few updated packages from their backports.org repository. There has been a release since then that includes native 2.6 support. Six monthes ago Debian 3.1 was released. Let's forget ancient history (Woody was released in 2002. Hmm... still a bit after XP). BTW: Sid now has 1.2.1 packages for the braves among you. Expect a Sarge backport this weekend. There are many areas where 2.6 improves upon 2.4 from processor and interrupt scalability to latency improvements. I would recommend any new server be installed with a 2.6 kernel unless there is some workload that requires a specific 2.4 kernel. I believe most of those were removed with the 2.6.5 to 2.6.8 anonVMA changes by Andrea. Right. Though 2.6 is kind of a moving target that keeps mutating -- Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | best ICQ# 16849755 | | friend ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] FC3 or FC1 (or something else?)
From what ive read on this list and the wiki, centos 4.x has issues with the TE110P card ( a lot of people having issues after first reboot).Would 3.5 be better (I know [EMAIL PROTECTED] uses this) Am I right in saying that OS's with the 1.6 kernel still require a lot more tinkering than those with the 1.4 kernel ?? Does anybody know what Digiums stance on OS is , I remember speaking to them about 6 months ago and they were recommending a 1.4 kernel version of Debian. Are there any specific disadvantages to running 1.4 kernel ??, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert La Ferla Sent: 04 January 2006 02:16 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] FC3 or FC1 (or something else?) Michael Stearne wrote: I am having trouble with FC3. After doing a yum update (of 1264 packages) I still cannont compile 1.2.1 from source: make[1]: `libedit.a' is up to date. make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/editline' make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/db1-ast' make[1]: `libdb1.a' is up to date. make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/db1-ast' make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/stdtime' make[1]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.2/include/stddef.h', needed by `localtime.o'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/stdtime' make: *** [stdtime/libtime.a] Error 2 and when I try to update from binary: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -Uvh asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386.rpm warning: asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 66534c2b error: Failed dependencies: libpri.so.1 is needed by asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386 libspandsp.so.0 is needed by asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386 libtonezone.so.1 is needed by asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386 I have compiled from source 1.0.9 without problem on this machine. Any ideas why my attempts are now failing? To use the binary, it appears that you need libpri. Look at http://www.asterisk.org (top right hand side) Did you try getting the latest source via svn subversion? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FC3 or FC1 (or something else?)
Brett, Gary wrote: From what ive read on this list and the wiki, centos 4.x has issues with the TE110P card ( a lot of people having issues after first reboot).Would 3.5 be better (I know [EMAIL PROTECTED] uses this) Am I right in saying that OS's with the 1.6 kernel still require a lot more tinkering than those with the 1.4 kernel ?? Does anybody know what Digiums stance on OS is , I remember speaking to them about 6 months ago and they were recommending a 1.4 kernel version of Debian. Are there any specific disadvantages to running 1.4 kernel ??, I presume you mean 2.4 and 2.6. Six months ago the Stable release of Debian couldn't run 2.6 kernels without installing a few updated packages from their backports.org repository. There has been a release since then that includes native 2.6 support. There are many areas where 2.6 improves upon 2.4 from processor and interrupt scalability to latency improvements. I would recommend any new server be installed with a 2.6 kernel unless there is some workload that requires a specific 2.4 kernel. I believe most of those were removed with the 2.6.5 to 2.6.8 anonVMA changes by Andrea. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] FC3 or FC1 (or something else?)
IMHO use FC4. Also after the install of the OS and all the required packages do a 'yum update'. Bogdan Moldovan MODULO Consulting The Future Is Not What It Used To Be http://www.modulo.ro -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett, Gary Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 6:34 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FC3 or FC1 (or something else?) Hi I wish to install asterisk 1.2 (the latest tar.gz from the site not the CVS version) on an HP box with a TE110P (single port E1/T1) My question is which OS would be preferred in this configuration Fedora Core 1 or Fedora Core 3, and are there any install guides out there that are recent enough for asterisk 1.2 I am also open to suggestions for other Operating Systems if any of you feel that FC1/3 are not the best for the job, my only definates are that I use the latest tar.gz from the asterisk.org website not the CVS and also that I will be using the TE110p Any help would be greatly appreciated Gary ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FC3 or FC1 (or something else?)
Brett, Gary wrote: My question is which OS would be preferred in this configuration Fedora Core 1 or Fedora Core 3, and are there any install guides out there that are recent enough for asterisk 1.2 Try Fedora Core 4 (FC4). Works great. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FC3 or FC1 (or something else?)
Brett, Gary wrote: My question is which OS would be preferred in this configuration Fedora Core 1 or Fedora Core 3, and are there any install guides out there that are recent enough for asterisk 1.2 Use Debian or Centos (Free RHEL). ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FC3 or FC1 (or something else?)
On 1/3/06, Bogdan Moldovan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IMHO use FC4. Also after the install of the OS and all the required packages do a 'yum update'. I am using FC3 right now with 1.0.9 and I am having a problem updating to 1.2.1. I am trying to avoid upgrading to FC4 and I'll try a yum update hopefully that will work without breaking anything. Michael ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FC3 or FC1 (or something else?)
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 04:33:49PM -, Brett, Gary wrote: Hi I wish to install asterisk 1.2 (the latest tar.gz from the site not the CVS version) on an HP box with a TE110P (single port E1/T1) My question is which OS would be preferred in this configuration Fedora Core 1 or Fedora Core 3, and are there any install guides out there that are recent enough for asterisk 1.2 Why not latest Fedora? I am also open to suggestions for other Operating Systems if any of you feel that FC1/3 are not the best for the job, my only definates are that I use the latest tar.gz from the asterisk.org website not the CVS and also that I will be using the TE110p I don't know Fedora that well to give you recomendations here. I have my own preferences. But there is a point worthmentioning regarding Fedora: Fedora does not seem to provide long-term maintinance. Security updates for Fedora are provided for a relatively short period. there is a community project called Fedora Legacy to provide maintinance for older Fedoras, but it has ggained reputation of not providing timely updates. So: 1. is there a decent upgrade path? Would you use 'yum upgrade' (or whatever the command is) to upgrade your server from FC3 to FC4? from FC1 to FC4? 2. Alternatively: how well does Fedora Legacy is lately? -- Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | best ICQ# 16849755 | | friend ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FC3 or FC1 (or something else?)
We do a lot of installs on Fedora (slowly becoming our favorite). Initially clients asked for FC because of compatibility with Red Hat, great package management, etc. With FC4, you get a great set of packages, and not a lot of add-ons required. Asterisk has perfect compatibility with FC3 FC4 - a good choice. Michelle Dupuis Technical Support Specialist Oxford Consulting Group Ltd. Making IT work for your business... T: (519) 672-8238 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.ocg.ca Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 09:57:17 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] FC3 or FC1 (or something else?) To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Brett, Gary wrote: My question is which OS would be preferred in this configuration Fedora Core 1 or Fedora Core 3, and are there any install guides out there that are recent enough for asterisk 1.2 Use Debian or Centos (Free RHEL). -- ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FC3 or FC1 (or something else?)
On 1/3/06, Technical Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We do a lot of installs on Fedora (slowly becoming our favorite). Initially clients asked for FC because of compatibility with Red Hat, great package management, etc. With FC4, you get a great set of packages, and not a lot of add-ons required. Asterisk has perfect compatibility with FC3 FC4 - a good choice. I am having trouble with FC3. After doing a yum update (of 1264 packages) I still cannont compile 1.2.1 from source: make[1]: `libedit.a' is up to date. make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/editline' make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/db1-ast' make[1]: `libdb1.a' is up to date. make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/db1-ast' make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/stdtime' make[1]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.2/include/stddef.h', needed by `localtime.o'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/stdtime' make: *** [stdtime/libtime.a] Error 2 and when I try to update from binary: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -Uvh asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386.rpm warning: asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 66534c2b error: Failed dependencies: libpri.so.1 is needed by asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386 libspandsp.so.0 is needed by asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386 libtonezone.so.1 is needed by asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386 I have compiled from source 1.0.9 without problem on this machine. Any ideas why my attempts are now failing? Thanks, Michael ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FC3 or FC1 (or something else?)
Look like this thread will become distro war ;) Im using FC3 - * 1.2.1, make sure #up2date b4 compile from tar.gz source working fine... Latest CentOS/Debian should be choice for production. L ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FC3 or FC1 (or something else?)
Michael Stearne wrote: I am having trouble with FC3. After doing a yum update (of 1264 packages) I still cannont compile 1.2.1 from source: make[1]: `libedit.a' is up to date. make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/editline' make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/db1-ast' make[1]: `libdb1.a' is up to date. make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/db1-ast' make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/stdtime' make[1]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.2/include/stddef.h', needed by `localtime.o'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/stdtime' make: *** [stdtime/libtime.a] Error 2 and when I try to update from binary: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -Uvh asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386.rpm warning: asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 66534c2b error: Failed dependencies: libpri.so.1 is needed by asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386 libspandsp.so.0 is needed by asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386 libtonezone.so.1 is needed by asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386 I have compiled from source 1.0.9 without problem on this machine. Any ideas why my attempts are now failing? To use the binary, it appears that you need libpri. Look at http://www.asterisk.org (top right hand side) Did you try getting the latest source via svn subversion? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
