RE: [Asterisk-Users] Just saw your [Asterisk] xJack Segfault in Asterisk
Not yet solved ! Serge Rodrigues Research Development * e-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Tel +32 (02) 649 80 89 PERIACTES * Fax +32 (02) 648 27 22 Av. de l'hippodrome 147 * Webhttp://www.periactes.be B-1050 Brussels - Belgium -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de cmould Envoyé : lundi 3 janvier 2005 13:18 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : [Asterisk-Users] Just saw your [Asterisk] xJack Segfault in Asterisk Hi: Just saw your post while trying to solve a similar asterisk problem. Did not see any responses. Was your problem solved and what was the solution? Carey ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Just saw your [Asterisk] xJack Segfault in Asterisk
cmould wrote: Hi: Just saw your post while trying to solve a similar asterisk problem. Did not see any responses. Was your problem solved and what was the solution? well, i'm working on that problem for not a long time, before i was doing something else, so i had little time to discover some solution... regards Cyprian -- The paranoids' way... // Networked Electronic ___ ___ ___ ___ (___ ( ___ Unit Responsible for | )|___)| )| )| )|| | Online Troubleshooting | / |__ |__/ ||__/ |__ | |__ and Intensive Calculation ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Just saw your [Asterisk] xJack Segfault in Asterisk
cmould wrote: Hi: Just saw your post while trying to solve a similar asterisk problem. Did not see any responses. Was your problem solved and what was the solution? Carey To what problem are you referring? There are multiple issues I've discussed on the list and I can't remember the topic of this particular one. Please enlighten me and I will attempt to enlighten you. -Chris -- Christopher L. Wade Unistar-Sparco Computers, Inc. Senior Systems Administratordba Sparco.com Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7089 Ryburn Drive Phone: (901) 872 2272 / (800) 840 8400Millington, TN 38053 Fax: (901) 872 8482 USA ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Just saw your [Asterisk] xJack Segfault in Asterisk
Sorry list - this was meant to go off list. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Just saw your [Asterisk] xJack Segfault in Asterisk
On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 13:28 -0500, Brian Capouch wrote: Christopher L. Wade wrote: Sorry list - this was meant to go off list. That's OK, the list is set up that way on purpose. It makes people's lives more exciting to see other embarrassed that way by their inadvertent posts. Well, more importantly it encourages community building by keeping conversations on topic and on list instead of going off list and not contributing to the communal knowledge. Of course, there are those who say we love to see people embarrassed or hurt. -- Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Just saw your [Asterisk] xJack Segfault in Asterisk
Well, I had to compile the Mepis source and install it again. It did compile the Zaptel drivers but then is started giving other problems. Like it would not instalel ztdummy. Therefore I have given up on Mepis and downloading Red Hat 8.0 now. I will install Asterisk on that now. Thanks for the interest. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of cmould Sent: Tuesday, 4 January 2005 1:18 a.m. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Just saw your [Asterisk] xJack Segfault in Asterisk Hi: Just saw your post while trying to solve a similar asterisk problem. Did not see any responses. Was your problem solved and what was the solution? Carey ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Just saw your [Asterisk] xJack Segfault in Asterisk
Steven Critchfield wrote: On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 13:28 -0500, Brian Capouch wrote: Christopher L. Wade wrote: Sorry list - this was meant to go off list. That's OK, the list is set up that way on purpose. It makes people's lives more exciting to see other embarrassed that way by their inadvertent posts. Well, more importantly it encourages community building by keeping conversations on topic and on list instead of going off list and not contributing to the communal knowledge. I'm a broken record in this regards, sorry. My browser allows me to Reply or Reply All, and I think a list is *broken* when both buttons cause the same thing to happen, which is to send the mail back to the list always. That seems like a particularly egregious sort of thing on a list with as much traffic as this one has; taking things off the list that don't belong there is of course still doable, but the disincentive is steep since the intuitive way of doing it is *intentionally* broken. MHO, of course, which I already know is in the minority. B. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Just saw your [Asterisk] xJack Segfault in Asterisk
On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 17:05 -0500, Brian Capouch wrote: I'm a broken record in this regards, sorry. My browser allows me to Reply or Reply All, and I think a list is *broken* when both buttons cause the same thing to happen, which is to send the mail back to the list always. I think if they do the same thing, your browser(?) is broken. Reply should honor the reply-to and will send to just the list. The Reply-all might go a step farther and grab the From header, but the result would be different. -- Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Just saw your [Asterisk] xJack Segfault in Asterisk
It had to do with improper versions of zaptel and libpri. I installed the correct versions pertaining to the version of Asterisk that I am running and it worked fine. On Monday 03 January 2005 12:18 pm, cmould wrote: Hi: Just saw your post while trying to solve a similar asterisk problem. Did not see any responses. Was your problem solved and what was the solution? Carey ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Brian Wilkins Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Heritage Communications Corporation Melbourne, FL USA 32935 321.308.4000 x33 http://www.hcc.net ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Just saw your [Asterisk] xJack Segfault in Asterisk
cmould wrote: Hi: Just saw your post while trying to solve a similar asterisk problem. Did not see any responses. Was your problem solved and what was the solution? Carey ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users Haven't used an xJack for at least 2 years. How long ago was that post? Maybe you replied to the wrong post. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Just saw your [Asterisk] xJack Segfault in Asterisk
The the two legs of the call are using different codecs then reinvites won't work. If you are using t or T option to dial (maybe others), Asterisk has to stay in the media stream to listen for the #. Check your codecs. - Original Message - From: cmould [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 8:18 AM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Just saw your [Asterisk] xJack Segfault in Asterisk Hi: Just saw your post while trying to solve a similar asterisk problem. Did not see any responses. Was your problem solved and what was the solution? Carey ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Just saw your [Asterisk] xJack Segfault in Asterisk
I'm sorry. I've posted so many times here's no way I can know what you're referring to. Please elaborate. -Original Message- From: cmould [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 2:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Just saw your [Asterisk] xJack Segfault in Asterisk Hi: Just saw your post while trying to solve a similar asterisk problem. Did not see any responses. Was your problem solved and what was the solution? Carey ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
