On a different note using Fedora Core 3 I get
CC [M] /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.o
/usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c: In function `zt_chan_write':
/usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c:1745: warning: ignoring return value of
`copy_from_user', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
/usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c: In function `ioctl_load_zone':
/usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c:2392: warning: ignoring return value of
`copy_from_user', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
/usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c: In function `zt_common_ioctl':
/usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c:2744: warning: ignoring return value of
`copy_from_user', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
/usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c:2804: warning: ignoring return value of
`copy_to_user', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
/usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c:2807: warning: ignoring return value of
`copy_from_user', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
/usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c:2889: warning: ignoring return value of
`copy_from_user', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
/usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c:2919: warning: ignoring return value of
`copy_to_user', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
/usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c: In function `zt_chanandpseudo_ioctl':
/usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c:3641: warning: ignoring return value of
`copy_from_user', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
/usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c:3651: warning: ignoring return value of
`copy_to_user', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
/usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c:3654: warning: ignoring return value of
`copy_from_user', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
/usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c:3713: warning: ignoring return value of
`copy_to_user', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
/usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c:3717: warning: ignoring return value of
`copy_from_user', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
/usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c: At top level:
/usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c:176: warning: 'fcstab' defined but not used
When building the stable or head zaptel with kernel linux-2.6.11-1.35_FC3.
The module compiles but it never used to give this message on FC2.
Anyone got any ideas?
Regards
Lee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Cotton
Sent: 22 July 2005 08:10
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: zaptel make problems
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 07:59 +0200, Aldo Bergamini wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] is believed to have said:
>
> >
> >and watch linus himself rant about how this is incorrect to do (yet
> >all the distros do it) :P
> >
>
> Well, this is reassuring for a newbie like me.
>
> Even the pros (as anybody building a distro ought to be, and most of
> the times, really is) can do obvious errors...
Who said it's an error, Linus just does not like it and thinks says it's
incorrect, it causes no errors, and when you have multiple kernel sources on
the same machine it makes life much easier.
I would agree that going through multiple symlinks is bad practice, this could
also be Linus' argument, or maybe it's multiple times through the same symlink
in the case of a kernel compile.
--
Dave Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.9.2/55 - Release Date: 21/07/2005
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.9.2/55 - Release Date: 21/07/2005
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
