Re: [asterisk-users] chan_zap.so missing
markus wrote: I installed Asterisk following the instructions of the book Asterisk: The Future of Telephony. (very nice book) However, I failed. You 'failed' because you installed Asterisk 1.6.0.6, which contains a very large number of changes compared to Asterisk 1.4, which is what the Asterisk: TFOT book was written about. If you want to be able to follow the book and get the same results, you'll have to install the same major versions of the software as the book tells you to. If instead you wish to use Asterisk 1.6.0.6 (which is not a bad idea G), then you'll need to read (at least) the UPGRADE.txt file that explains about the important differences between Asterisk 1.4 and Asterisk 1.6, and also contains a link to the Zaptel-to-DAHDI.txt file which has documentation specifically on the subject you posted about. -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA skype: kpfleming | jabber: kpflem...@digium.com Check us out at www.digium.com www.asterisk.org ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] chan_zap.so missing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 markus wrote: Hello everyone! I installed Asterisk following the instructions of the book Asterisk: The Future of Telephony. (very nice book) However, I failed. I installed zaptel, libpri and asterisk (in this order). If you are using Asterisk 1.6.x then you need to use DAHDI, not Zaptel. Barry -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJttR6CFu3bIiwtTARAqrjAJ9UsxkBxhylB5iuBw9ph794mj/ohACgkRyX lXV6JzAaJwj70ZWIHJLSUZ8= =2UlA -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] chan_zap.so missing
--- On Tue, 3/10/09, markus antro...@googlemail.com wrote: Now I am missing /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_zap.so. I searched through the mailing list and forums. They say, that chan_zap.so is build in channels/ in my working directory. But it's not too strange, that chan_zap.so was not built, since there's not even the file chan_zap.c . Isn't it supposed to be there? Sorry to barge in like this but I would like to know if chan_zap.c is supposed to be present in 1.4.23.1. Vieri ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] chan_zap.so missing
Vieri wrote: Sorry to barge in like this but I would like to know if chan_zap.c is supposed to be present in 1.4.23.1. As documented in the CHANGES file that comes with 1.4.23, the answer is no. chan_zap.c was renamed to chan_dahdi.c, but still supports Zaptel. Please read the Zaptel-to-DAHDI.txt file in the 1.4.23 source tree *carefully* to understand what you should see when you build this version of Asterisk. -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA skype: kpfleming | jabber: kpflem...@digium.com Check us out at www.digium.com www.asterisk.org ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] chan_zap.so missing
Vieri wrote: --- On Tue, 3/10/09, markus antro...@googlemail.com wrote: Now I am missing /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_zap.so. I searched through the mailing list and forums. They say, that chan_zap.so is build in channels/ in my working directory. But it's not too strange, that chan_zap.so was not built, since there's not even the file chan_zap.c . Isn't it supposed to be there? Sorry to barge in like this but I would like to know if chan_zap.c is supposed to be present in 1.4.23.1. Vieri The actual file chan_zap.c is not in 1.4.23. It is called chan_dahdi.c instead, BUT using Zaptel with 1.4.23 is fully supported. In addition, the use of channel names like Zap/1 is supported in 1.4.23 as well. In fact, to make the policy a bit more clear, all releases of 1.4 will work with Zaptel and should not require any special configuration changes when upgrading to a version with DAHDI support. All variants of Asterisk 1.6 only support the use of DAHDI. Mark Michelson ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] chan_zap.so missing
--- On Tue, 3/10/09, Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com wrote: Sorry to barge in like this but I would like to know if chan_zap.c is supposed to be present in 1.4.23.1. As documented in the CHANGES file that comes with 1.4.23, the answer is no. chan_zap.c was renamed to chan_dahdi.c, but still supports Zaptel. Please read the Zaptel-to-DAHDI.txt file in the 1.4.23 source tree *carefully* to understand what you should see when you build this version of Asterisk. OK, thanks for pointing that out. It's just that chan_dahdi.so simply doesn't build on my system which has zaptel, not dahdi. Anyway, never mind, I'll migrate to Dahdi instead. Thanks for your time. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] chan_zap.so missing
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 15:44 -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: markus wrote: I installed Asterisk following the instructions of the book Asterisk: The Future of Telephony. (very nice book) However, I failed. You 'failed' because you installed Asterisk 1.6.0.6, which contains a very large number of changes compared to Asterisk 1.4, which is what the Asterisk: TFOT book was written about. If you want to be able to follow the book and get the same results, you'll have to install the same major versions of the software as the book tells you to. If instead you wish to use Asterisk 1.6.0.6 (which is not a bad idea G), then you'll need to read (at least) the UPGRADE.txt file that explains about the important differences between Asterisk 1.4 and Asterisk 1.6, and also contains a link to the Zaptel-to-DAHDI.txt file which has documentation specifically on the subject you posted about. Thanks for the help! My analog telephones are working now =) But I hear the first time about dahdi. I red the wrong articles. Seems like asterisk version 1.4.23.2 also supports only dahdi. You know, first I followed exactly the instructions of the book and did # wget http://downloads.digium.com/pub/asterisk/asterisk-1.4-current.tar.gz, got 1.4.23.2 and ran into the same problem. So at the first glance both major versions showed no difference to me, and I had no idea. I need 1.6 because of some sip problems in 1.4 . Now all is up and running, sip and dahdi, thank you guys! ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] chan_zap.so missing
Vieri escribió: --- On Tue, 3/10/09, Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com wrote: Sorry to barge in like this but I would like to know if chan_zap.c is supposed to be present in 1.4.23.1. As documented in the CHANGES file that comes with 1.4.23, the answer is no. chan_zap.c was renamed to chan_dahdi.c, but still supports Zaptel. Please read the Zaptel-to-DAHDI.txt file in the 1.4.23 source tree *carefully* to understand what you should see when you build this version of Asterisk. OK, thanks for pointing that out. It's just that chan_dahdi.so simply doesn't build on my system which has zaptel, not dahdi. Anyway, never mind, I'll migrate to Dahdi instead. Thanks for your time. Something like that happened to me when I tried to reinstall asterisk 1.4 with DAHDI when I had it installed before with zaptel, and because of the urgency I had to forget about DAHDI, reinstall zaptel again and leave the installation working that way. I think that most of the compiler errors occur because of the include files that changed from zaptel to DAHDI. Is there any way to remove entirely zaptel so a total DAHDI+asterisk 1.4 installation works with no fails on a situation like this? Thanks in advance. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Ing. Miguel Molina Grupo de Tecnología Millenium Phone Center PBX: (+57 1)6500800 ext. 1201 Fax: (+57 1)6500816 Móvil: (+57)3138873587 ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
