Re: [PATCH 1/4] ath10k: improve tx status reporting

2022-05-16 Thread Sergey Ryazanov
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 6:25 AM Sergey Ryazanov  wrote:
> We use ieee80211_tx_status() to report each completed tx frame.
> Internally, this function calls sta_info_get_by_addrs(), what has a
> couple of drawbacks:
> 1. additional station lookup causes a performance degradation;
> 2. mac80211 can not properly account Ethernet encapsulated frames due
>to the inability to properly determine the destination (station) MAC
>address since ieee80211_tx_status() assumes the frame has a 802.11
>header.
>
> The latter is especially destructive if we want to use hardware frames
> encapsulation.
>
> To fix both of these issues, replace ieee80211_tx_status() with
> ieee80211_tx_status_ext() call and feed it station pointer from the tx
> queue associated with the transmitted frame.
>
> Tested-on: QCA9888 hw 2.0 10.4-3.9.0.2-00131
> Tested-on: QCA6174 hw 3.2 PCI WLAN.RM.4.4.1-00157-QCARMSWPZ-1
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Ryazanov 
> Tested-by: Oldřich Jedlička  # TP-Link Archer C7 v4 & 
> v5 (QCA9563 + QCA9880)
> Tested-by: Edward Matijevic  # TP-Link Archer C2600 
> (IPQ8064 + QCA9980 10.4.1.00030-1)
> Tested-by: Edward Matijevic  # QCA9377 PCI in Sta mode
> Tested-by: Zhijun You  # NETGEAR R7800 (QCA9984 
> 10.4-3.9.0.2-00159)
> ---
>
> Changes since RFC:
>  * new Tested-on and Tested-by tags
>
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c | 12 +++-
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c 
> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c
> index 10123974c3da..72540434c75b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ static void ath10k_report_offchan_tx(struct ath10k *ar, 
> struct sk_buff *skb)
>  int ath10k_txrx_tx_unref(struct ath10k_htt *htt,
>  const struct htt_tx_done *tx_done)
>  {
> +   struct ieee80211_tx_status status;
> struct ath10k *ar = htt->ar;
> struct device *dev = ar->dev;
> struct ieee80211_tx_info *info;
> @@ -128,7 +129,16 @@ int ath10k_txrx_tx_unref(struct ath10k_htt *htt,
> info->status.flags |= IEEE80211_TX_STATUS_ACK_SIGNAL_VALID;
> }
>
> -   ieee80211_tx_status(htt->ar->hw, msdu);
> +   memset(, 0, sizeof(status));
> +   status.skb = msdu;
> +   status.info = info;
> +
> +   rcu_read_lock();
> +   if (txq && txq->sta)
> +   status.sta = txq->sta;

Just noticed that since we do not dereference the txq->sta pointer
here, the above code can be simplified to:

if (txq)
status.sta = txq->sta;

Kalle, should I send V2 or can you change this in your tree?

> +   ieee80211_tx_status_ext(htt->ar->hw, );
> +   rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> /* we do not own the msdu anymore */
>
> return 0;

-- 
Sergey

___
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k


Re: [PATCH] ath10k: fix misreported tx bandwidth for 160Mhz

2022-05-16 Thread Kalle Valo
Maxime Bizon  writes:

> On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 19:11 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
>
>> On what ath10k hardware and afirmware version did you test this? I
>> can add that to the commit log.
>> 
>
> QCA9984 
> 10.4-3.10-00047

Thanks, I added that in the pending branch.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

___
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k


Re: [PATCH] ath10k: fix misreported tx bandwidth for 160Mhz

2022-05-16 Thread Maxime Bizon


On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 19:11 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:

Hello Kalle,

> On what ath10k hardware and afirmware version did you test this? I
> can add that to the commit log.
> 

QCA9984 
10.4-3.10-00047

-- 
Maxime




___
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k


Re: [PATCH] ath10k: fix misreported tx bandwidth for 160Mhz

2022-05-16 Thread Kalle Valo
Maxime Bizon  writes:

> Because of this missing switch case, 160Mhz transmit was reported as
> 20Mhz, leading to wrong airtime calculation and AQL limiting max
> throughput.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Bizon 

On what ath10k hardware and afirmware version did you test this? I can
add that to the commit log.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

___
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k


[PATCH] ath10k: fix misreported tx bandwidth for 160Mhz

2022-05-16 Thread Maxime Bizon
Because of this missing switch case, 160Mhz transmit was reported as
20Mhz, leading to wrong airtime calculation and AQL limiting max
throughput.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Bizon 
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c | 4 
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c 
b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
index 771252dd6d4e..e8727c0b0171 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
@@ -3884,6 +3884,10 @@ ath10k_update_per_peer_tx_stats(struct ath10k *ar,
arsta->tx_info.status.rates[0].flags |=
IEEE80211_TX_RC_80_MHZ_WIDTH;
break;
+   case RATE_INFO_BW_160:
+   arsta->tx_info.status.rates[0].flags |=
+   IEEE80211_TX_RC_160_MHZ_WIDTH;
+   break;
}
 
if (peer_stats->succ_pkts) {
-- 
2.17.1



___
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k