Re: [ath9k-devel] ad-hoc mode

2010-05-05 Thread LIGEO_GEORGE
Ok. Thanks. I will try that. 

Reading an earlier post, 
https://lists.ath9k.org/pipermail/ath9k-devel/2009-November/002670.html , 
I thought there was a problem with IBSS mode, but maybe its fixed now or I 
probably have an older driver.. 

To reiterate an earlier question, does the current driver in git support 
11N in ad-hoc mode? I haven't been able to figure out the current status 
of 11N + IBSS development from the mailing list. Please let me know. 
Thanks!


- Lig

ath9k-devel-boun...@lists.ath9k.org wrote on 05/05/2010 02:02:28 PM:

 Le 05/05/2010 20:07, ligeo_geo...@denso-diam.com a écrit :
 
  After going through older posts - I found this one
  
https://lists.ath9k.org/pipermail/ath9k-devel/2009-December/002808.html
 
  I use the config script in that post and can get the ad-hoc mode to 
work
  - the main reason why I think it didn't work earlier for me was that I
  didn't specify the fixed BSSID/cell number at both ends.
 
  But, I observe the exact same behavior as reported by the post - if I
  change the frequency to 2412, pings stop working in ad-hoc mode. Even 
if
  I re-insert the ath9k, it seem like the new frequency I set (2412)
  doesn't work. If I go back to the 5200 frequency after re-inserting
  ath9k module, pings start working again. Again, like the post stated,
  when I set 2412 using iw, I still see the old 5200 frequency in 
iwconfig.
 
  hm...
 
 You don't need to use a fixed frequency, nor fixed BSSID. Just use :
 
 iw dev wlan0 ibss join YourSSIID YourFrequency
 
 YourFrequency is only used if scanning did not find a neighbor node.
 
 Regards,
 Benoit
 ___
 ath9k-devel mailing list
 ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
 https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel


Re: [ath9k-devel] Ad-Hoc Mode under 802.11n

2010-01-31 Thread Benoit PAPILLAULT
Rakesh Kumar a écrit :
 Hey Benoit,

 Did you get the patch to work?

Yup, I work on it. However, i still miss some stuff to have an 
interesting throughput. Moreover, ath5k/ath9k beaconing code needs to be 
rewritten from scratch IMHO (I will probably use the madwifi code I did 
to propose some new code).

The work I've done so far is in my git tree (ath9k branch) : 
http://git.popipo.fr/?p=rt2x00.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/ath9k

Regards,
Benoit

___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel


Re: [ath9k-devel] ad-hoc

2009-10-08 Thread Rakesh Kumar
I don't think there are any hardware limitations on using HT rates on ad-hoc
mode but I may be wrong, maybe Louis or Johannes can clarify. If not then
what is a good way to think about a hack?

--
Rakesh

On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:01 PM, xxiao austinxxh-at...@yahoo.com wrote:

 that's true, ath9k/adhoc works well under non-HT mode only.

 --- On Wed, 10/7/09, Rakesh Kumar gopchand...@gmail.com wrote:

  From: Rakesh Kumar gopchand...@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] ad-hoc
  To: hong zhang henryzhan...@yahoo.com
  Cc: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
  Date: Wednesday, October 7, 2009, 5:29 PM
  For what I recall from your previous
  discussion on this list, the answer is NO, it does not
  support HT rates on adhoc mode. But I have used my ath9k
  device on non-HT rates.
 
  On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:44 PM,
  hong zhang henryzhan...@yahoo.com
  wrote:
 
  Luis,
 
 
 
  I have a AR5008 NIC. it But does not work on ad-hoc mode.
 
  Does ath9k support ad-hoc?
 
 
 
  ---henry
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  ___
 
  ath9k-devel mailing list
 
  ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
 
  https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
 
 
 
 
  -Inline Attachment Follows-
 
  ___
  ath9k-devel mailing list
  ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
  https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
 

___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel


Re: [ath9k-devel] ad-hoc

2009-10-07 Thread Rakesh Kumar
For what I recall from your previous discussion on this list, the answer is
NO, it does not support HT rates on adhoc mode. But I have used my ath9k
device on non-HT rates.

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:44 PM, hong zhang henryzhan...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Luis,

 I have a AR5008 NIC. it But does not work on ad-hoc mode.
 Does ath9k support ad-hoc?

 ---henry



 ___
 ath9k-devel mailing list
 ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
 https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel

___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel


Re: [ath9k-devel] ad-hoc mode using 5 GHz channel (A band)

2009-06-10 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Pavel Roskinpro...@gnu.org wrote:
 On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 11:35 +0200, Peter Tarjan wrote:

 I am not sure what does it mean. It is clear that Band 2 frequencies
 are unavailable in ad-hoc mode. Is it a limitation that I can bypass?

 If your regulatory settings are correct, you shouldn't.  But it looks
 like you are using world regulatory settings.  Try using iw reg set HU
 if you are in Hungary.

Have you installed crda and wireless-regdb?

 A neat trick to get around passive-scan/no-ibss flag requirements is
to scan. If you're lucky and have an AP nearby on that same channel
those restrictions will be lifted as it is assumed APs can be trusted
and should be beaconing only if allowed regulatory-wise. This is a
feature enhancement of world roaming. If your card has a programmed
regulatory domain for a country you are not world roaming.

 Luis
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel


Re: [ath9k-devel] ad-hoc mode using 5 GHz channel (A band)

2009-06-09 Thread xxiao

you probably should use iw to config ath9k instead of using iwconfig. 
something like:

iw dev wlan0 set freq 2412
-or-
iw dev wlan0 set channel 1

cheers,
xxiao
--- On Tue, 6/9/09, Peter Tarjan peter.tar...@birdtelecom.hu wrote:

 From: Peter Tarjan peter.tar...@birdtelecom.hu
 Subject: [ath9k-devel] ad-hoc mode using 5 GHz channel (A band)
 To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
 Date: Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 11:08 AM
 Hi,
 
 I downloaded and compiled a 2.6.30rc7 kernel with ath9k.
 The kernel then recognised the following card:
 
 00:0e.0 Network controller: Atheros Communications Inc.
 Device 0027 (rev 01)
     Subsystem: Device 0777:4082
 
     Flags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel,
 latency 168, IRQ 11
     Memory at e008 (32-bit,
 non-prefetchable) [size=64K]
     Capabilities: [44] Power Management version
 2
     Kernel driver in use: ath9k
 
 
 Then I switched it into ad-hoc mode by iwconfig wlan0
 mode ad-hoc and tried to set frequency to a 5 GHz
 channel:
 
 $ iwconfig wlan0 channel 36 
 Error for wireless request Set Frequency (8B04)
 :
 
     SET failed on device wlan0 ; Invalid argument.
 
 although there are 5 Ghz channels listed:
 
 $ iwlist wlan0 channel
 wlan0 24 channels in total; available frequencies
 :
   Channel 01 : 2.412 GHz
 
   Channel 02 : 2.417 GHz
   Channel 03 : 2.422 GHz
   Channel 04 : 2.427 GHz
   Channel 05 : 2.432 GHz
   Channel 06 : 2.437 GHz
   Channel 07 : 2.442 GHz
   Channel 08 : 2.447 GHz
 
   Channel 09 : 2.452 GHz
   Channel 10 : 2.457 GHz
   Channel 11 : 2.462 GHz
   Channel 36 : 5.18 GHz
   Channel 40 : 5.2 GHz
   Channel 44 : 5.22 GHz
   Channel 48 : 5.24 GHz
 
   Channel 52 : 5.26 GHz
   Channel 56 : 5.28 GHz
   Channel 60 : 5.3 GHz
   Channel 64 : 5.32 GHz
   Channel 149 : 5.745 GHz
   Channel 153 : 5.765 GHz
   Channel 157 : 5.785 GHz
 
   Channel 161 : 5.805 GHz
   Channel 165 : 5.825 GHz
   Current Frequency=2.412 GHz (Channel 1)
 
 So my question is whether there is a way to use A-band
 channel in ad-hoc mode.
 
 Thanks for any answer in advance.
 
 
 --
 Peter Tarjan
 
 
 -Inline Attachment Follows-
 
 ___
 ath9k-devel mailing list
 ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
 https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
 
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel


Re: [ath9k-devel] ad-hoc mode using 5 GHz channel (A band)

2009-06-09 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:35 -0700, xxiao wrote:
 you probably should use iw to config ath9k instead of using iwconfig. 
 something like:
 
 iw dev wlan0 set freq 2412
 -or-
 iw dev wlan0 set channel 1

I don't think that would make any difference.  However, iw list would
show which frequencies are enabled for the device and iw reg get would
show the regulatory settings.

I guess the regulatory setting disables beaconing in the 5 GHz range.

-- 
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel


Re: [ath9k-devel] ad-hoc mode using 5 GHz channel (A band)

2009-06-09 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Pavel Roskinpro...@gnu.org wrote:
 On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:35 -0700, xxiao wrote:
 you probably should use iw to config ath9k instead of using iwconfig. 
 something like:

 iw dev wlan0 set freq 2412
 -or-
 iw dev wlan0 set channel 1

 I don't think that would make any difference.  However, iw list would
 show which frequencies are enabled for the device and iw reg get would
 show the regulatory settings.

 I guess the regulatory setting disables beaconing in the 5 GHz range.

Beaconing is disabled when no-ibss or passive scan flags are enabled
(or dfs) . You would see something like this:

* 5180 MHz [36] (30.0 dBm) (passive scanning, no IBSS)
* 5200 MHz [40] (30.0 dBm) (passive scanning, no IBSS)
* 5220 MHz [44] (30.0 dBm) (passive scanning, no IBSS)
* 5240 MHz [48] (30.0 dBm) (passive scanning, no IBSS)

If you don't see these flags then beaconing should be allowed.

  Luis
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel