Hello James,
So, with that, let me go ahead and open it up to a vote with the caveat
that votes from folks with concrete plans to implement the spec will
carry more weight so I'd appreciate a heads up.
1. Do I change in-reply-to id=... / to in-reply-to ref=... / ?
and.. to address David's concerns about extending atom:link...
+1
2. Do I change thr:count and thr:when to extension elements instead of
attributes on atom:link?
+1 although I'm less annoyed by this one if you keep it as it is now.
My apologies if I came across a little too heavy handed on this. That
was most definitely *not* the intention.
Thank you very much for the feedback then as I was getting afraid we
would not be able to simply discuss around here :D
So thank you.
- Sylvain
