Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi
Robert, It's been a few weeks since this came up. I was wondering if you'd be able to give some kind of estimate on when you might have a chance to document what you had in mind for mozilla/firefox/thunderbird. No pressure, of course, I just don't want this issue to stall out for lack of discussion. - James James M Snell wrote: Yeah, for now I'm going to keep this bidi code off in an out of the way corner in the Abdera CVS until there's any more movement. Now that I've addressed a short term need I've had on my list for a while, I'll be holding off at least a few weeks to see what Sayre comes up with before deciding whether to update the I-D and I'll hold off making any further updates to Abdera until after the WG makes a clear decision. - James James Holderness wrote: Well I'm glad somebody pointed it out because I certainly missed it. Anyway, for now I'm just checking for an unprefixed dir attribute. If and when RFC 4287 is ever updated I'll ammend my code accordingly. Regards James James M Snell wrote: I know there's no such thing :-)... which is precisely why the code I implemented is temporary and experimental :-). - James Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:32:46 +0200, James M Snell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2. Look for the xhtml:dir attribute There's no such thing. (Except perhaps with this new XHTML Modularization madness, but that's best ignored.)
Re: How to do RESTful SEARCH (was Re: Adding POST capability to atom:link)
On 11/2/06, Lisa Dusseault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is an interesting assertion about REST. I don't yet agree with it as stated though I might after further discussion and elaboration. To provide a possible counter-example, I always found the HTTP SEARCH proposal http://www.greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-webdav-search-latest.html to be RESTful because - The results of a search are returned as a set of resource identifiers I'm not sure exactly what you mean by that Lisa, but AFAICT, the results of a SEARCH request does not have an identifier. A RESTful solution would be publish a form that could be used by a client to construct a URI that would return the search results (with GET, of course). Cheers, Mark.
Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi
James M Snell wrote: Robert, It's been a few weeks since this came up. I was wondering if you'd be able to give some kind of estimate on when you might have a chance to document what you had in mind for mozilla/firefox/thunderbird. No pressure, of course, I just don't want this issue to stall out for lack of discussion. I still have something coming. The IETF meeting means the secretariat won't process a draft right now. -Rob
Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi
Cool thx. I'll watch for it following the IETF meeting. - James Robert Sayre wrote: James M Snell wrote: Robert, It's been a few weeks since this came up. I was wondering if you'd be able to give some kind of estimate on when you might have a chance to document what you had in mind for mozilla/firefox/thunderbird. No pressure, of course, I just don't want this issue to stall out for lack of discussion. I still have something coming. The IETF meeting means the secretariat won't process a draft right now. -Rob
Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi
At 1:32 PM -0800 11/3/06, James M Snell wrote: Cool thx. I'll watch for it following the IETF meeting. Actually, the window opens again the first day of the meeting (Monday).
