Robert,
Thanks, but you didn't answer all of my question. Has someone (you?)
confirmed that the schema and examples are consistent? I really don't have
the time to double-check something that the working group should have done
itself if that means installing and getting familiar with a new software
package.
I saw your follow-up; thanks.
-Scott-
-Original Message-
From: Robert Sayre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 12:05 PM
To: Scott Hollenbeck
Cc: atom-syntax@imc.org
Subject: RNG and examples (was: AD Review Comments and
Questions: draft-ietf-atompub-format-07)
Scott Hollenbeck wrote:
The document includes an informative RELAX NG schema and
several examples.
What has been done to confirm that the schema is free of
errors and that all
of the examples given in the document are valid according
to the schema? (I
could check an XML Schema myself, but I don't have the
tools I need to check
RELAX NG.)
The draft is generated from an RFC2629 XML file which
contains no schema
fragments or examples. The schema fragments are generated
from the full
schema. To create the text version, the schema, fragments,
and examples
are inserted in a SAX pipeline, and xml2rfc.tcl generates the
draft from
the resulting document. Since the schema and examples are stored in
separate files, it's easy to check them with a command-line
validator. I
use James Clark's Jing[0].
Robert Sayre
[0] http://www.thaiopensource.com/relaxng/jing.html
