Re: Thinking ahead: Atom Extension Proposals on the Wiki?
I will start working on the template this week and will get something posted by the weekend. On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:46:14 +0100, Danny Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:27:28 -0500, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > James Snell wrote: > > >>>I'm just thinking ahead a bit on this, but I am wondering if it would > > >>>be possible for those of us interested in proposing non-core > > >>>extensions to Atom to use the Wiki as the forum for sharing proposals > > >>>for extensions once the core syntax has been finalized? > > > Go4it. > > Yep, good idea. I can see a few in the intray: ipaddress/host (for > anon posts to Wikis etc); the ENT (Easy News Topics) RSS 2.0 extension > is in the process of being revised, and an Atom-compatible syntax is > planned; Yahoo's media object extension. > > A Wiki template would be nice - have you started writing anything up yet, > James? > > Cheers, > Danny. > > > -- > > http://dannyayers.com > -- - James Snell http://www.snellspace.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Thinking ahead: Atom Extension Proposals on the Wiki?
On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:27:28 -0500, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > James Snell wrote: > >>>I'm just thinking ahead a bit on this, but I am wondering if it would > >>>be possible for those of us interested in proposing non-core > >>>extensions to Atom to use the Wiki as the forum for sharing proposals > >>>for extensions once the core syntax has been finalized? > Go4it. Yep, good idea. I can see a few in the intray: ipaddress/host (for anon posts to Wikis etc); the ENT (Easy News Topics) RSS 2.0 extension is in the process of being revised, and an Atom-compatible syntax is planned; Yahoo's media object extension. A Wiki template would be nice - have you started writing anything up yet, James? Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
Re: Thinking ahead: Atom Extension Proposals on the Wiki?
James Snell wrote: On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 15:18:46 -0800, Tim Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Feb 2, 2005, at 11:58 AM, James Snell wrote: I'm just thinking ahead a bit on this, but I am wondering if it would be possible for those of us interested in proposing non-core extensions to Atom to use the Wiki as the forum for sharing proposals for extensions once the core syntax has been finalized? Sounds like a good idea to me. Mind you, it's Sam's wiki :) -Tim Heh, good point ;-) ... Sam? Ultimately it is your call. Go4it. - Sam Ruby
Re: Thinking ahead: Atom Extension Proposals on the Wiki?
On Feb 2, 2005, at 11:58 AM, James Snell wrote: I'm just thinking ahead a bit on this, but I am wondering if it would be possible for those of us interested in proposing non-core extensions to Atom to use the Wiki as the forum for sharing proposals for extensions once the core syntax has been finalized? Sounds like a good idea to me. Mind you, it's Sam's wiki :) -Tim
Re: Thinking ahead: Atom Extension Proposals on the Wiki?
On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 15:18:46 -0800, Tim Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Feb 2, 2005, at 11:58 AM, James Snell wrote: > > > > > I'm just thinking ahead a bit on this, but I am wondering if it would > > be possible for those of us interested in proposing non-core > > extensions to Atom to use the Wiki as the forum for sharing proposals > > for extensions once the core syntax has been finalized? > > Sounds like a good idea to me. Mind you, it's Sam's wiki :) -Tim > > Heh, good point ;-) ... Sam? Ultimately it is your call. -- - James Snell http://www.snellspace.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thinking ahead: Atom Extension Proposals on the Wiki?
I'm just thinking ahead a bit on this, but I am wondering if it would be possible for those of us interested in proposing non-core extensions to Atom to use the Wiki as the forum for sharing proposals for extensions once the core syntax has been finalized? What I imagine is a system similar to Pace proposals except using a naming prefix such as Ext instead. E.g. ExtLinkContentDigest or ExtFeedEntryLicense etc. Discussion about the proposals would be limited to the wiki or "private" email conversations (e.g. kept off the ietf mailing list unless, for whatever reason, it is deemed appropriate for list discussion by the WG chairs). Thoughts? -- - James Snell http://www.snellspace.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
