Re: Mount return values are wrong in the new aufs mount location

2011-12-14 Thread Vasanth Ragavendran
--
Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future?
This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits? 
Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls?
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/

Re: Mount return values are wrong in the new aufs mount location

2011-12-14 Thread Michael S. Zick
On Wed December 14 2011, Vasanth Ragavendran wrote:
 
 
 
  So I am saying Try moving jffs2 and sqfsh before switch_root, not only
  /tmp.
  You may need to change their mount-points. For example,
  # mkdir /jffs2 /sqfsh /tmp
  # mount ... /tmp
  # mount ... /jffs2
  # mount ... /sqfsh
  # mount ... /aufs
  # mount -o move /tmp /aufs/tmp
  # mount -o move /jffs2 /aufs/tmp/jffs2
  # mount -o move /sqfsh /aufs/tmp/sqfsh
  # swtich_root ...
 
 
  I was doing something similar only before. it was like this
 
 mount ... /tmp
 mount ... /tmp/jffs2
 mount ... /tmp/sqfsh
 mount ... /aufs
 mount -o move /tmp /aufs/tmp
 switch_root
 
 and now even though it wouldn't make any difference i tried even ur
 suggestion
 mount ... /tmp
 mount ... /tmp/jffs2
 mount ... /tmp/sqfsh
 mount ... /aufs
 mount -o move /tmp/jffs2 /aufs/tmp/jffs2
 mount -o move /tmp/sqfsh /aufs/tmp/sqfsh
 switch_root
 
 mount -o move are successful both the time. however after doing switch_root
 what i see using mount(8) is
 
 rootfs on / type rootfs (rw)
 tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw,relatime)
 /dev/mtdblock2 on /tmp/jffs2 type jffs2 (rw,relatime)
 /dev/loop0 on /tmp/sqfsh type squashfs (ro,relatime)
 aufs on / type aufs (rw,relatime,si=c50d132a)
 /proc on /proc type proc (rw,relatime)
 devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,relatime,mode=622)
 none on /tmp type ramfs (rw,relatime)
 

Which looks exactly as expected from the previous condition
you listed before the move.

What do you want different about it?

Yes there are two file systems mounted on /
Which is expected, the kernel supplied one (type rootfs)
and you over-mounted it with one (type aufs).

I have to ask, what else do you want?

Mike
 
 
 
 
  You can see the version string with release-date in the boot-time
  message from kernel, or include/linux/aufs_type.h.
  If you run git-clone after 2011-08-02, then it must the last version
  which is OK.
 
 
   Oh okay but mine says 2011-08-01 so does that mean i have the older
 version? and do i need to update?
 
 
 
  Ah, you are writing only text/html and the text/plain part is generated
  by your MUA, right? What is your MUA (mail reader)? It seems broken.
  But I never mean you should fix it nor report it its deverloper. Of
  course, I never mean stop you using it.
 
 
   yeah i'm gmail actually and probably that's why its creating such
 troubles apologies! :(
 
 Regards
 R.Vasanth Ragavendran.
 



--
Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future?
This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits? 
Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls?
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/


Re: Mount return values are wrong in the new aufs mount location

2011-12-14 Thread sfjro

Vasanth Ragavendran:
  I was doing something similar only before. it was like this

 mount ... /tmp
 mount ... /tmp/jffs2
 mount ... /tmp/sqfsh
 mount ... /aufs
 mount -o move /tmp /aufs/tmp
 switch_root

 and now even though it wouldn't make any difference i tried even ur
 suggestion
 mount ... /tmp
 mount ... /tmp/jffs2
 mount ... /tmp/sqfsh
 mount ... /aufs
 mount -o move /tmp/jffs2 /aufs/tmp/jffs2
 mount -o move /tmp/sqfsh /aufs/tmp/sqfsh
 switch_root

Sigh,,,
Look at what I wrote closer and compare what your wrote with it.
Ah ok, I will try explain differently again.
You have three mount-points, so I am suggesting to move those three, all
three.
What you tried previously is moving one mount-point, and now moving two
mount-points, right?
Do I make myself clear?


  You can see the version string with release-date in the boot-time
  message from kernel, or include/linux/aufs_type.h.
  If you run git-clone after 2011-08-02, then it must the last version
  which is OK.
 
   Oh okay but mine says 2011-08-01 so does that mean i have the older
 version? and do i need to update?

I don't know because it is the aufs version that I want to know.


J. R. Okajima

--
Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future?
This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits? 
Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls?
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/


Re: Mount return values are wrong in the new aufs mount location

2011-12-14 Thread Vasanth Ragavendran
--
Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future?
This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits? 
Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls?
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/

Re: Mount return values are wrong in the new aufs mount location

2011-12-14 Thread Vasanth Ragavendran
--
10 Tips for Better Server Consolidation
Server virtualization is being driven by many needs.  
But none more important than the need to reduce IT complexity 
while improving strategic productivity.  Learn More! 
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51507609/