[aur-general] Quick Access Plasmoid appears more than once in AUR
Hello, The Quick Access Plasmoid appears more than once in AUR. [1] is orphaned but has more votes. [2] still has a maintainer. So I would suggest to remove [1] from AUR. Kind regards, [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18854 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18893 -- Bram Schoenmakers What is mind? No matter. What is matter? Never mind. (Punch, 1855)
Re: [aur-general] Quick Access Plasmoid appears more than once in AUR
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 07:03, Bram Schoenmakers li...@bramschoenmakers.nl wrote: Hello, The Quick Access Plasmoid appears more than once in AUR. [1] is orphaned but has more votes. [2] still has a maintainer. So I would suggest to remove [1] from AUR. Kind regards, [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18854 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18893 -- Bram Schoenmakers What is mind? No matter. What is matter? Never mind. (Punch, 1855) kdeplasma-quickaccess deleted as it doesn't match the common naming conventions.
Re: [aur-general] Arch's Vim Failings Solution Suggestions
Hi! On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Tobias Kieslich tob...@justdreams.de wrote: Hi, I was reaaly busy lately so I wasn't able to push tha changes I made locally. I got rid of gvimrc in etc, I still wonder thought why they would have such a file upstream. Also virc is gone. Since we won't ship a vim based vi package anymore. Why not? vi will be besad on nvi. that has lot's of advantages: - smaller for the iso - no waiting on testing that stalls vim and gvim - vi and vim are separated Why base vi on nvi? nvi aren't updated (on website) since 4/14/01. The last version of vi was based on vim and its a bit different for compiling options only. I think this is fine for most of users. I think in vi like a vim without X improvements, so, why not still with vi based on vim? Maybe you can provide nvi in a different package, which can provide vi, i dont know. I was not aware of the double loading, a testbuild showed me that it is easy to build both packages (vim/gvim) without the path specified. The idea behind specifying was that gvim and vim use the same runtime but only one package ships it. So being explicit instead of implicit seemed like a good idea to me. Anyway, that will be gone as well in the new layout. I understand the python idea here about explicit is better than explicit, but vim dont need that, really. Hopefully tonight I can push them to testing. For the update people will be forced to remove the /usr/bin/vim and I think the /usr/bin/rview symlink manually. I tried to find a way around that, but no dice. -T We are waiting until that... Well, for not be so long, I made some packages for vi/vim/gvim with ruby1.9, for that I made a patch for vim (sent for vim_dev today) and uploaded for ArchLinux-BR repository [repo.archlinux-br.org]. I uploaded the packages with the PKGBUILD's on my home [http://even.archlinux-br.org/things/arch/packages]. For that I solve some bugs from flyspray[#13937 and #12440] and also the questions in the main of this thread. If you have any doubts, please reply me. -- Kessia Pinheiro Computer Science Student - Brazil, UFBa Linux System Administrator Arch Linux Trusted User Linux User #389695 http://even.archlinux-br.org --- X Fórum Internacional Software Livre - fisl10 24 a 27 de junho de 2009 PUCRS - Porto Alegre - Brasil
[aur-general] Integrity Check community i686 27-03-2009
= = Integrity Check i686 of community = = Performing integrity checks... == parsing pkgbuilds == checking mismatches == checking archs == checking dependencies == checking makedepends == checking for circular dependencies Missing PKGBUILDs --- /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/daemons/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/devel/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/editors/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/emulators/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/games/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/gnome/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/i18n/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/kde/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/lib/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/modules/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/multimedia/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/multimedia/libflashsupport-oss/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/network/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/office/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/science/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/system/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/x11/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/xfce/CVS Missing Dependencies -- flumotion -- 'twisted-web' open-vm-tools-modules -- 'kernel262.6.28' eclipse-ve -- 'eclipse3.3' cdfs -- 'kernel262.6.28' virtualbox-ose-additions-modules -- 'kernel262.6.28' Missing Makedepends - splix -- 'jbigkit' Summary - Missing PKGBUILDs: 19 Invalid PKGBUILDs: 0 Mismatching PKGBUILD names:0 Duplicate PKGBUILDs: 0 Invalid archs: 0 Missing (make)dependencies:6 Repo hierarchy problems: 0 Circular dependencies: 0
[aur-general] Integrity Check community x86_64 27-03-2009
=== = Integrity Check x86_64 of community = === Performing integrity checks... == parsing pkgbuilds == checking mismatches == checking archs == checking dependencies == checking makedepends == checking for circular dependencies Missing PKGBUILDs --- /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/daemons/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/devel/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/editors/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/emulators/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/games/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/gnome/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/i18n/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/kde/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/lib/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/lib32/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/modules/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/multimedia/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/network/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/office/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/science/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/system/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/x11/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/xfce/CVS Missing Dependencies -- eclipse-ve -- 'eclipse3.3' flumotion -- 'twisted-web' gg2 -- 'arts' perl-ldap -- 'perl-xml-sax-writer' thunderbird-spell-pl -- 'thunderbird=2.0.0.19' cdfs -- 'kernel262.6.28' Missing Makedepends - splix -- 'jbigkit' Summary - Missing PKGBUILDs: 19 Invalid PKGBUILDs: 0 Mismatching PKGBUILD names:0 Duplicate PKGBUILDs: 0 Invalid archs: 0 Missing (make)dependencies:7 Repo hierarchy problems: 0 Circular dependencies: 0
Re: [aur-general] Arch's Vim Failings Solution Suggestions
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Kessia 'even' Pinheiro wrote: Hi! On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Tobias Kieslich tob...@justdreams.de wrote: Hi, I was reaaly busy lately so I wasn't able to push tha changes I made locally. I got rid of gvimrc in etc, I still wonder thought why they would have such a file upstream. Also virc is gone. Since we won't ship a vim based vi package anymore. Why not? becuase it is obviously missleading and a fair sourcve of confusion. vi will be besad on nvi. that has lot's of advantages: - smaller for the iso - no waiting on testing that stalls vim and gvim - vi and vim are separated Why base vi on nvi? nvi aren't updated (on website) since 4/14/01. The last version of vi was based on vim and its a bit different for compiling options only. I think this is fine for most of users. I think in vi like a vim without X improvements, so, why not still with vi based on vim? Maybe you can provide nvi in a different package, which can provide vi, i dont know. We will base that on the devel version from 2007, whic is stable and works fine. Many other distros do the same. The advantages are listed above and there is a long thread on the bugtracker. The main advantage is that nvi is samller and as such much better suited for the base/core stuff. And if we move vi to extra there is hardly any point for having a vi over a vim package becuase the saving in space is marginal. Leaving KISS alone ... I was not aware of the double loading, a testbuild showed me that it is easy to build both packages (vim/gvim) without the path specified. The idea behind specifying was that gvim and vim use the same runtime but only one package ships it. So being explicit instead of implicit seemed like a good idea to me. Anyway, that will be gone as well in the new layout. I understand the python idea here about explicit is better than explicit, but vim dont need that, really. Well that iss the whole assumption theory. We 'assume' that the pathes are the same, but then the beginning of every catastrophy is a bloody assumption :P Hopefully tonight I can push them to testing. For the update people will be forced to remove the /usr/bin/vim and I think the /usr/bin/rview symlink manually. I tried to find a way around that, but no dice. -T We are waiting until that... Yeah, there was a little issue called food poising, not pretty but well it happened. Well, for not be so long, I made some packages for vi/vim/gvim with ruby1.9, for that I made a patch for vim (sent for vim_dev today) and uploaded for ArchLinux-BR repository [repo.archlinux-br.org]. I I hope that will hit the vim upstream soon as it would help to keep the package clean. Thanks for the work. -T
Re: [aur-general] Integrity Check community i686 27-03-2009
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 4:10 PM, repoma...@archlinux.org wrote: = = Integrity Check i686 of community = = Performing integrity checks... == parsing pkgbuilds == checking mismatches == checking archs == checking dependencies == checking makedepends == checking for circular dependencies Missing PKGBUILDs --- /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/daemons/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/devel/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/editors/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/emulators/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/games/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/gnome/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/i18n/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/kde/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/lib/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/modules/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/multimedia/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/multimedia/libflashsupport-oss/CVS fixed /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/network/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/office/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/science/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/system/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/x11/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/xfce/CVS Missing Dependencies -- flumotion -- 'twisted-web' open-vm-tools-modules -- 'kernel262.6.28' eclipse-ve -- 'eclipse3.3' cdfs -- 'kernel262.6.28' virtualbox-ose-additions-modules -- 'kernel262.6.28' Missing Makedepends - splix -- 'jbigkit' Summary - Missing PKGBUILDs: 19 Invalid PKGBUILDs: 0 Mismatching PKGBUILD names: 0 Duplicate PKGBUILDs: 0 Invalid archs: 0 Missing (make)dependencies: 6 Repo hierarchy problems: 0 Circular dependencies: 0
Re: [aur-general] Voting period: Chris Brannon
Allan McRae wrote: Hi TUs, It is time to vote so head to the AUR voting interface. You can refresh your memory here: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-March/004104.html Bump! There is two days voting left and we have not reached quorum. Go there now and vote! Allan
