[aur-general] Removal requests
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63728 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63396 In order to allow users to have more customization to the addons, I've adjusted these packages in such a way that their package names seem unsuitable and have reuploaded them with new names.
Re: [aur-general] Removal requests
On 21/10/12 11:37 PM, Schala Zeal wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63728 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63396 In order to allow users to have more customization to the addons, I've adjusted these packages in such a way that their package names seem unsuitable and have reuploaded them with new names. Deleted, thanks. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 8 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 27 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (8 total) == * gedit-plugins-3.6.1-1 (i686) * gnote-3.6.0-1 (i686) * gedit-plugins-3.6.1-1 (x86_64) * gnote-3.6.0-1 (x86_64) * activity-log-manager-0.9.4-2 (i686) * zeitgeist-datahub-0.9.5-2 (i686) * activity-log-manager-0.9.4-2 (x86_64) * zeitgeist-datahub-0.9.5-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (23 total) == * transmageddon-0.25-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.10.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * espeakup-0.71-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gedit-plugins-3.6.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.6.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.6.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-3.6.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtk-engine-unico-1.0.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lxdm-0.4.1-17 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0rc-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.13.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.10.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * espeakup-0.71-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gedit-plugins-3.6.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.6.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.6.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-3.6.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtk-engine-unico-1.0.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lxdm-0.4.1-17 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0rc-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.13.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (4 total) == * activity-log-manager-0.9.4-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * zeitgeist-datahub-0.9.5-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * activity-log-manager-0.9.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * zeitgeist-datahub-0.9.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. guillaume - 6 signoffs 2. allan - 2 signoffs 3. dan - 1 signoffs
[aur-general] [Removal Request] nvidia-hook-beta
Hi all, I've modified the way my hook works, now nvidia-hook will work with whichever nvidia version people use, no need for the beta hook anymore. Here is the link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63752 Thx in advance. -- Alucryd In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished into eternal damnation. Amen.
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] nvidia-hook-beta
On 22 October 2012 10:08, Maxime Gauduin aluc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I've modified the way my hook works, now nvidia-hook will work with whichever nvidia version people use, no need for the beta hook anymore. Here is the link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63752 Thx in advance. -- Alucryd In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished into eternal damnation. Amen. Removed, thx
[aur-general] Request AUR package removal
Requesting the removal of AUR package fgx-cvs as it has been renamed (due to incorrect naming). https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63646 Thank you.
Re: [aur-general] Request AUR package removal
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Martynas Januškauskas marty...@januskauskas.eu wrote: Requesting the removal of AUR package fgx-cvs as it has been renamed (due to incorrect naming). https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63646 Thank you. Done. Thanks. -- Sébastien Seblu Luttringer https://www.seblu.net GPG: 0x2072D77A
[aur-general] (no subject)
pa href=http://www.femsmahus.se/associatechair/40jonathanwallace/;http://www.femsmahus.se/associatechair/40jonathanwallace//abr/p
Re: [aur-general] ibus orphans in [community]
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Pham Bao Trung pham.bao.tr...@gmail.com wrote: I am using ibus-unikey and have not tried fcitx. On ibus or scim, unikey is better than m17n. Ready to move to fcitx if it is really better and can be used for Vietnamese input. Hi, I've packaged fcitx-unikey in AUR [1], maybe you could give it a try :) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63735 Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at
[aur-general] Removal requests
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59982 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59981 These are essentially Python modules, which is why I resubmitted them with a conventional python2-* prefix
Re: [aur-general] Removal requests
On 22/10/12 08:22 PM, Schala Zeal wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59982 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59981 These are essentially Python modules, which is why I resubmitted them with a conventional python2-* prefix Thanks... deleted! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] Oops, one more to remove
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59984 Apparently the GUI client is also a module, as it needs to be invoked through a script instead of a standalone program. Renamed it as well
[aur-general] unscribe
unscribe
Re: [aur-general] unscribe
On 10/22/2012 08:52 PM, 金 戈 wrote: unscribe It's 'unsubscribe', you forgot 'sub'
Re: [aur-general] Oops, one more to remove
On 22/10/12 08:36 PM, Schala Zeal wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59984 Apparently the GUI client is also a module, as it needs to be invoked through a script instead of a standalone program. Renamed it as well Ok, this is gone too now. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
