[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2012-10-24 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 8 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 35 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (8 total) ==

* catalyst-dkms-12.10-1 (i686)
* catalyst-utils-12.10-1 (i686)
* lxdm-0.4.1-18 (i686)
* unbound-1.4.18-2 (i686)
* catalyst-dkms-12.10-1 (x86_64)
* catalyst-utils-12.10-1 (x86_64)
* lxdm-0.4.1-18 (x86_64)
* unbound-1.4.18-2 (x86_64)


== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (31 total) ==

* transmageddon-0.25-1 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* almanah-0.10.0-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* catalyst-dkms-12.10-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* catalyst-utils-12.10-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* connman-1.8-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* espeakup-0.71-5 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gedit-plugins-3.6.1-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* glabels-3.0.1-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gnome-packagekit-3.6.0-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.6.1-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gnote-3.6.0-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* gtk-engine-unico-1.0.2-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* lxdm-0.4.1-18 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* qtcreator-2.6.0rc-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* shotwell-0.13.1-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* unbound-1.4.18-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* almanah-0.10.0-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* catalyst-dkms-12.10-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* catalyst-utils-12.10-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* connman-1.8-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* espeakup-0.71-5 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gedit-plugins-3.6.1-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* glabels-3.0.1-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gnome-packagekit-3.6.0-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.6.1-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gnote-3.6.0-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gtk-engine-unico-1.0.2-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* lxdm-0.4.1-18 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* qtcreator-2.6.0rc-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* shotwell-0.13.1-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* unbound-1.4.18-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (4 total) ==

* activity-log-manager-0.9.4-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* zeitgeist-datahub-0.9.5-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* activity-log-manager-0.9.4-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* zeitgeist-datahub-0.9.5-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. bisson - 14 signoffs
2. eric - 10 signoffs
3. thomas - 7 signoffs
4. dan - 6 signoffs
5. allan - 5 signoffs



[aur-general] Deletion requests

2012-10-24 Thread Doug Newgard
ConnMan-Gnome was merged with Moblin (renamed Carrick) which became part of 
Meego. These packages no longer exist and all are orphans.
connman-gnome
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25182
connman-gnome-git
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48009
carrick-git
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27512
carrick-ng
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27076
The ConnMan api has changed, so even if someone is using one of these, 
it will not work with any version of ConnMan released in the last year 
or more.

The following are also from Moblin, so the git repositories are all gone. 
Again, all orphans.
dalston-git
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27078
hornsey-git
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27080
moblin-image-creator
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28292
moblin-panel-media-git
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29892
moblin-session-git
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27090
moblin-web-browser-git
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27091
mutter4moblin-git
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29789

  

Re: [aur-general] Deletion requests

2012-10-24 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Hi,

Thanks for reporting and for including links. The packages in question
have been removed.

-- 
Cordially,
 Alexander Rødseth
 Arch Linux Trusted User
 (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)


[aur-general] nvidia-ice needs to be updated

2012-10-24 Thread Cian Mc Govern
The nvidia-ice package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15441 hasn't
been updated in over a year. Can the powers at be transfer the maintenance
of the package over to me? My username is cian1500ww.

Thanks.


Re: [aur-general] nvidia-ice needs to be updated

2012-10-24 Thread Alexandre Ferrando
On 24 October 2012 22:47, Cian Mc Govern c...@cianmcgovern.com wrote:
 The nvidia-ice package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15441 hasn't
 been updated in over a year. Can the powers at be transfer the maintenance
 of the package over to me? My username is cian1500ww.

 Thanks.

Have you contacted the maintainer over e-mail and waited two weeks for
response? If yes, ask for orphaning the package. If not, contact him.

Trusted Users can't just transfer maintenance of one package from one
person to another.


Re: [aur-general] nvidia-ice needs to be updated

2012-10-24 Thread Cian Mc Govern
No, I'll send the maintainer an email now. I didn't think there would
be any need seeing as it hasn't been updated in over a year.

On 24 October 2012 22:00, Alexandre Ferrando alfer...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 24 October 2012 22:47, Cian Mc Govern c...@cianmcgovern.com wrote:
 The nvidia-ice package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15441 
 hasn't
 been updated in over a year. Can the powers at be transfer the maintenance
 of the package over to me? My username is cian1500ww.

 Thanks.

 Have you contacted the maintainer over e-mail and waited two weeks for
 response? If yes, ask for orphaning the package. If not, contact him.

 Trusted Users can't just transfer maintenance of one package from one
 person to another.


Re: [aur-general] nvidia-ice needs to be updated

2012-10-24 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
Shameless plug - why not just use nvidia-all (or nvidia-beta-all if
that floats your boat). nvidea-X packages, where X is some custom
kernel, tend to have very low usage since usage of X kernel to begin
with is pretty low, and nvidia-X usage must be a subset of that.

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Cian Mc Govern c...@cianmcgovern.com wrote:
 No, I'll send the maintainer an email now. I didn't think there would
 be any need seeing as it hasn't been updated in over a year.

 On 24 October 2012 22:00, Alexandre Ferrando alfer...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 24 October 2012 22:47, Cian Mc Govern c...@cianmcgovern.com wrote:
 The nvidia-ice package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15441 
 hasn't
 been updated in over a year. Can the powers at be transfer the maintenance
 of the package over to me? My username is cian1500ww.

 Thanks.

 Have you contacted the maintainer over e-mail and waited two weeks for
 response? If yes, ask for orphaning the package. If not, contact him.

 Trusted Users can't just transfer maintenance of one package from one
 person to another.


[aur-general] Merge request

2012-10-24 Thread Schala Zeal

Please merge:

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20819 (dpgconverter)

into

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27883 (dpgconv)

dpgconv is being maintained and up-to-date while dpgconverter is the 
same thing but orphaned and out of date.


Re: [aur-general] Merge request

2012-10-24 Thread Connor Behan
On 24/10/12 10:37 PM, Schala Zeal wrote:
 Please merge:

 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20819 (dpgconverter)

 into

 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27883 (dpgconv)

 dpgconv is being maintained and up-to-date while dpgconverter is the
 same thing but orphaned and out of date.
Merged, thanks!



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature