Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: yakuake-git2
On 10/28/2012 06:54 AM, Jekyll Wu wrote: > It[1] is now the same as yakuake-git[2]. > > Actually that user "caemir" should not create this yakuake-git2 at all. > He/She should have sent a mail to this list asking for orphaning > yakuake-git. > > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63945 > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41530 Removed, thank you. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski Arch Linux Trusted User http://archlinux.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] Deletion request: yakuake-git2
It[1] is now the same as yakuake-git[2]. Actually that user "caemir" should not create this yakuake-git2 at all. He/She should have sent a mail to this list asking for orphaning yakuake-git. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63945 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41530
Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Status of sigurd.archlinux.org/aur.archlinux.org
Lukas Fleischer wrote: >The AUR has been moved to alderaan -- if there's any issues with the new >setup, please let us know. Just one: the Death Star
Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Status of sigurd.archlinux.org/aur.archlinux.org
Wait for an update ;) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_301
Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Status of sigurd.archlinux.org/aur.archlinux.org
2012/10/28 Mateusz Loskot > On 27 October 2012 18:08, Lukas Fleischer > wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 02:32:03PM +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > >> Just a short note to everybody: sigurd is down due to maintenance works. > >> We noticed several disk read failures lately and decided that one of > >> disks needs to be replaced. The replacement was performed yesterday on > >> ~20:00 CEST and finished on ~20:45 CEST. > >> > >> The support set up a live environment after the replacement was > >> completed for some reason. Unfortunately, I wasn't online at that time, > >> so I couldn't react immediately -- sorry for that. > >> > >> We are currently working on getting access to the rescue environment and > >> trying to figure out what happened here. > >> > >> I will keep you updated. Thanks for your patience! > > > > sigurd is up again. TUs should be able to use SVN and devtools as > > before. > > > > The AUR has been moved to alderaan -- if there's any issues with the new > > setup, please let us know. Thanks to Ionut and Pierre who helped me with > > migrating to the new server. > > yaourt gives an error 301... what can/should I do? sorry if the answer is so obvious
Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Status of sigurd.archlinux.org/aur.archlinux.org
On 27 October 2012 18:08, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 02:32:03PM +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote: >> Just a short note to everybody: sigurd is down due to maintenance works. >> We noticed several disk read failures lately and decided that one of >> disks needs to be replaced. The replacement was performed yesterday on >> ~20:00 CEST and finished on ~20:45 CEST. >> >> The support set up a live environment after the replacement was >> completed for some reason. Unfortunately, I wasn't online at that time, >> so I couldn't react immediately -- sorry for that. >> >> We are currently working on getting access to the rescue environment and >> trying to figure out what happened here. >> >> I will keep you updated. Thanks for your patience! > > sigurd is up again. TUs should be able to use SVN and devtools as > before. > > The AUR has been moved to alderaan -- if there's any issues with the new > setup, please let us know. Thanks to Ionut and Pierre who helped me with > migrating to the new server. Folks, thanks for your great work! Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
[aur-general] Delete request
I am requesting gtk-engine-pixbuf [1], fontconfig-cleratype (sic) [2], and thunar-thumbnailers [3] for deletion. The feature that [1] provides has been added to the gtk-engine itself and therefor is obsolete. [2] is a misspelling of fontconfig-cleartype, which is well-maintained as of now. [3] has been superceded by extra/tumbler, and the project itself hasn't been updated in over a year. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16862 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63367 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49990
Re: [aur-general] unicon packages orphaned and broken.
Tried to fix it myself, and didn't get too far. I fixed minor things, like dependencies and such (in both versions), and uploaded; however, I don't know how to get it to build properly. Orphaning.
Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Status of sigurd.archlinux.org/aur.archlinux.org
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 07:13:39PM +0200, Antoine Lubineau wrote: > Le 27/10/2012 19:08, Lukas Fleischer a écrit : > > The AUR has been moved to alderaan -- if there's any issues with the new > > setup, please let us know. Thanks to Ionut and Pierre who helped me with > > migrating to the new server. > > > > https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgsubmit.php gives an Internal Server Error > (500). This should be fixed now.
Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Status of sigurd.archlinux.org/aur.archlinux.org
Le 27/10/2012 19:08, Lukas Fleischer a écrit : > The AUR has been moved to alderaan -- if there's any issues with the new > setup, please let us know. Thanks to Ionut and Pierre who helped me with > migrating to the new server. > https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgsubmit.php gives an Internal Server Error (500).
Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Status of sigurd.archlinux.org/aur.archlinux.org
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 02:32:03PM +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > Just a short note to everybody: sigurd is down due to maintenance works. > We noticed several disk read failures lately and decided that one of > disks needs to be replaced. The replacement was performed yesterday on > ~20:00 CEST and finished on ~20:45 CEST. > > The support set up a live environment after the replacement was > completed for some reason. Unfortunately, I wasn't online at that time, > so I couldn't react immediately -- sorry for that. > > We are currently working on getting access to the rescue environment and > trying to figure out what happened here. > > I will keep you updated. Thanks for your patience! sigurd is up again. TUs should be able to use SVN and devtools as before. The AUR has been moved to alderaan -- if there's any issues with the new setup, please let us know. Thanks to Ionut and Pierre who helped me with migrating to the new server.
Re: [aur-general] Is aur.archlinux.org down?
There was just a post on the Arch-Dev ml. https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-October/023905.html
[aur-general] Status of sigurd.archlinux.org/aur.archlinux.org
Just a short note to everybody: sigurd is down due to maintenance works. We noticed several disk read failures lately and decided that one of disks needs to be replaced. The replacement was performed yesterday on ~20:00 CEST and finished on ~20:45 CEST. The support set up a live environment after the replacement was completed for some reason. Unfortunately, I wasn't online at that time, so I couldn't react immediately -- sorry for that. We are currently working on getting access to the rescue environment and trying to figure out what happened here. I will keep you updated. Thanks for your patience!
Re: [aur-general] Is aur.archlinux.org down?
On 27 October 2012 13:12, Florian Pritz wrote: > On 27.10.2012 14:04, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >>> https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2012-October/002220.html >> >> Yes, that's very helpful note. >> >> I honestly wonder, why this motion hasn't been >> announced in https://www.archlinux.org/news/ > > That's not what's happening. It's just a broken hard disk. > > We don't yet know when sigurd will be back online, Understood > stay calm and check arch-dev-public for further updates. I will :) Thanks, good luck! Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Re: [aur-general] Is aur.archlinux.org down?
On 27.10.2012 14:04, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >> https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2012-October/002220.html > > Yes, that's very helpful note. > > I honestly wonder, why this motion hasn't been > announced in https://www.archlinux.org/news/ That's not what's happening. It's just a broken hard disk. We don't yet know when sigurd will be back online, stay calm and check arch-dev-public for further updates. -- Florian Pritz signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] Is aur.archlinux.org down?
On 27 October 2012 12:41, Stefan Husmann wrote: > Am 27.10.2012 01:40, schrieb Mateusz Loskot: >> On 27 October 2012 00:36, Dave Reisner wrote: >>> On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 12:34:33AM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote: Is it my local problem or https://aur.archlinux.org is offline now? >>> >>> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=151509 >>> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=151502 >>> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=151496 >> >> I hardly ever read Web forum. >> (rant: I wish the ml's were major communication channel.) >> >>> >>> https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2012-October/031778.html >> >> >> I missed that one. I just realised I haven't re-subscribed since leaving >> arch-general after the systemd flame war :) >> >> Besides, my question is about AUR. > > Maybe this ? > > https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2012-October/002220.html Yes, that's very helpful note. I honestly wonder, why this motion hasn't been announced in https://www.archlinux.org/news/ Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Re: [aur-general] Is aur.archlinux.org down?
Am 27.10.2012 01:40, schrieb Mateusz Loskot: On 27 October 2012 00:36, Dave Reisner wrote: On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 12:34:33AM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote: Is it my local problem or https://aur.archlinux.org is offline now? https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=151509 https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=151502 https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=151496 I hardly ever read Web forum. (rant: I wish the ml's were major communication channel.) https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2012-October/031778.html I missed that one. I just realised I haven't re-subscribed since leaving arch-general after the systemd flame war :) Besides, my question is about AUR. Best regards Maybe this ? https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2012-October/002220.html
Re: [aur-general] Motif is opensource now
On 26 October 2012 21:47, Sergej Pupykin wrote: > On 26.10.2012 22:48, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote: >> >> Care to create a cons and pros list for lesstiff/motif? Lukas > > > I am not so familiar with motif, but I see at least following reasons to > replace: > - lesstif stil does not support utf8 > (http://lesstif.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html) > - IEEE 1295 and stable ABI compatible with all commercial applications With the addition that it resolves bugs mentioned in the forum thread it sounds good enough for me. So count "+1" from me, too. Lukas
[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 88 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * calibre-0.9.4-2 (i686) * xbmc-11.0-11 (i686) * calibre-0.9.4-2 (x86_64) * xbmc-11.0-11 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (84 total) == * lastfmsubmitd-1.0.6-7 (any) 0/2 signoffs * transmageddon-0.25-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.10.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * blender-5:2.64a-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.9.4-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cegui-0.7.7-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cinelerra-cv-1:2.2-11 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clementine-1.1.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * connman-1.8-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * converseen-0.5.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cuneiform-1.1.0-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * darktable-1.0.5-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * devil-1.7.8-14 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * freewrl-1.22.13.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * frogatto-1.2-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.3.3-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gedit-plugins-3.6.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gmic-1.5.1.8-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.6.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.6.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-3.6.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gource-0.38-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtk-engine-unico-1.0.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * luminancehdr-2.3.0-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * luxrays-1.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * luxrender-1.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lxdm-0.4.1-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * megaglest-3.6.0.3-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openimageio-1.0.9-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * performous-0.6.1-17 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * projectm-2.1.0-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0rc-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rss-glx-0.9.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sfml-2.0rc1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.13.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * spring-0.91.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * supertux-0.3.3-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vdrift-2012.07.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * widelands-17-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-11 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.10.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * blender-5:2.64a-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-0.9.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cegui-0.7.7-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinelerra-cv-1:2.2-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clementine-1.1.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * connman-1.8-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * converseen-0.5.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cuneiform-1.1.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * darktable-1.0.5-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * devil-1.7.8-14 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * freewrl-1.22.13.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * frogatto-1.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.3.3-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gedit-plugins-3.6.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gmic-1.5.1.8-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.6.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.6.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-3.6.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gource-0.38-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtk-engine-unico-1.0.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luminancehdr-2.3.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luxrays-1.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luxrender-1.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lxdm-0.4.1-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * megaglest-3.6.0.3-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openimageio-1.0.9-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * performous-0.6.1-17 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * projectm-2.1.0-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0rc-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rss-glx-0.9.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sfml-2.0rc1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.13.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * spring-0.91.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * supertux-0.3.3-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vdrift-2012.07.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * widelands-17-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (4 total) == * activity-log-manager-0.9.4-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * zeitgeist-datahub-0.9.5-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * activity-log-manager-0.9.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * zeitgeist-datahub-0.9.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. stephane - 4 signoffs 2. ibiru - 2 signoffs 3. thomas - 1 signoffs
