Re: [aur-general] Package Removal Requests
On 23/11/12 10:07 PM, Josh Klar wrote: > To whom it may concern, > > Please remove my packages, urbanterror42 and urbanterror42-data. They > were created during the time when the [community] version was > temporarily rolled back to 4.1.x. The maintainer of the [community] > packages has now brought it back to 4.2.x and seems to be reasonably on > the ball for updates, so these AUR packages are no longer needed. > > URLs (albeit thanks to the new AUR code it's probably not needed): > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/urbanterror42/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/urbanterror42-data/ > > Thanks! Deleted, thanks! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] Package Removal Requests
To whom it may concern, Please remove my packages, urbanterror42 and urbanterror42-data. They were created during the time when the [community] version was temporarily rolled back to 4.1.x. The maintainer of the [community] packages has now brought it back to 4.2.x and seems to be reasonably on the ball for updates, so these AUR packages are no longer needed. URLs (albeit thanks to the new AUR code it's probably not needed): https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/urbanterror42/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/urbanterror42-data/ Thanks! -- Josh Klar
Re: [aur-general] Orphan/Removal request
On 11/24/2012 08:14 AM, OmeGa wrote: > Hi. Could you please orphan these two packages: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gmpc-albumview/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gmpc-mmkeys/ > > Both are outdated and I couldn't contact the maintainers by email. Both disowned. > > And please remove these orphaned packages, they're obsolete: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gmpc-stopbutton/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gmpc-serverstats/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gmpc-mserver/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gmpc-favorites/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gmpc-autoplaylist/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gmpc-lastfmradio-git/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gmpc-osd/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gmpc-notify-osd-plugin/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gmpc-mdcover-git/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gmpc-last-fm/ > > Thanks. > All removed. Thanks! -- Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] AUR blacklist
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 06:09:30PM -0600, Doug Newgard wrote: > I've emailed with Ronald van Haren a bit about taking over the svn versions > of the e17 packages. He said I should be fine just uploading them to the AUR > after he deleted them from Community. He emailed me on Wed 11/21/12 at 4:00 > AM CST that he had deleted them from Community and I should be able to upload > them, but two and a half days later, it's still giving me an error that > "ecore-svn is on the package blacklist, please check if it's available in the > official repos." Is there a separate blacklist that's causing me problems? I think the problem is that we didn't setup the blacklist cron job on alderaan yet -- I will try to fix that tomorrow. Thanks for reporting. > > Scimmia >
[aur-general] Orphan/Removal request
Hi. Could you please orphan these two packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gmpc-albumview/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gmpc-mmkeys/ Both are outdated and I couldn't contact the maintainers by email. And please remove these orphaned packages, they're obsolete: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gmpc-stopbutton/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gmpc-serverstats/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gmpc-mserver/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gmpc-favorites/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gmpc-autoplaylist/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gmpc-lastfmradio-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gmpc-osd/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gmpc-notify-osd-plugin/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gmpc-mdcover-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gmpc-last-fm/ Thanks.
[aur-general] AUR blacklist
I've emailed with Ronald van Haren a bit about taking over the svn versions of the e17 packages. He said I should be fine just uploading them to the AUR after he deleted them from Community. He emailed me on Wed 11/21/12 at 4:00 AM CST that he had deleted them from Community and I should be able to upload them, but two and a half days later, it's still giving me an error that "ecore-svn is on the package blacklist, please check if it's available in the official repos." Is there a separate blacklist that's causing me problems? Scimmia
Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: rabbitmq-systemd-unit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 23/11/12 15:16, Gianni Vialetto wrote: > Hi, > > could someone remove my rabbitmq-systemd-unit package [1]? With the > new release of rabbitmq i merged it in the AUR rabbitmq package > [2], so now it's redundant. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rabbitmq-systemd-unit/ [2] > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rabbitmq/ Done, Thanks for rabbitmq in AUR anyway :) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQr7/oAAoJEEKh2xXsEzutPxMIALclwfnE84vVOj9KYQEB4GtK 3HTg1u102nQY9TwNyxa42npdT/IqAoveu9GV8F9G9kq9sQ+TdxC2weuo9VJaxnsK nlNlN19wX6z1mcNgJkCIOFeqI0o6SP+uEXJtlALQJl8c7etEIZmhf/m/SjjtTZ/E AespwvhpHSGNHdzN6B7hfZ9p6ZCVC3DABtyndNHtXSrx9aHi9+AnIz62Xrrl/L03 +g378xCbCn0hQ9TS/cGHFaXqLthWhcKd/9riAAZtv6VDWddt1Y3uM+5ZnOzsBPwr 9c0jyJCEWpOq4FF2fOhmyOiCy75KwD5orbIJPr24JRzH/1zaR3VztA99g6Nsf9Y= =dZ0Y -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[aur-general] Deletion request: rabbitmq-systemd-unit
Hi, could someone remove my rabbitmq-systemd-unit package [1]? With the new release of rabbitmq i merged it in the AUR rabbitmq package [2], so now it's redundant. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rabbitmq-systemd-unit/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rabbitmq/ Thanks, -- Gianni Vialetto "To see things in the seed, that is genius." - Lao Tzu
Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: a few packages
On 11/23/2012 11:37 PM, Jekyll Wu wrote: > 于 2012年11月23日 23:08, Felix Yan 写道: >> All removed except pcmanfm-experimental, which have a lot of votes, not >> marked as out-of-date, and maintainer is still active on AUR. I guess it >> would be better if you could contact him and ask if there is a special >> reason why he still keeps the specific old version. > > Well, I just tried to contact him (twice), but got this : > > Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: > > finswim...@flossenschwimmen-berlin.de > > Technical details of permanent failure: > Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the > recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for > further information about the cause of this error. The error that the > other server returned was: 550 550 sorry, no mailbox here by that name. > (#5.7.17) > (state 13). > > Also, I left a comment about the build failure about 0.5 years ago, yet > no action so far. Is that user really still active *as maintainer* ? > > Regards > Jekyll > > Okay, seems no problem to me then, and removed. Thanks a lot! -- Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: a few packages
于 2012年11月23日 23:08, Felix Yan 写道: All removed except pcmanfm-experimental, which have a lot of votes, not marked as out-of-date, and maintainer is still active on AUR. I guess it would be better if you could contact him and ask if there is a special reason why he still keeps the specific old version. Well, I just tried to contact him (twice), but got this : Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: finswim...@flossenschwimmen-berlin.de Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.7.17) (state 13). Also, I left a comment about the build failure about 0.5 years ago, yet no action so far. Is that user really still active *as maintainer* ? Regards Jekyll
Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: some mono packages
On 11/23/2012 08:56 AM, Jekyll Wu wrote: > All following packages are orphaned (for quite some time). > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/monotorrent/ fail to build > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/monsoon/ depend upon monotorrent > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/monsoon-svn/ same as above > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openvpn-admin/ fail to patch > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mono-nat/fail to build All removed, thanks. -- Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: a few packages
On 11/23/2012 10:18 PM, Jekyll Wu wrote: > All following packages are orphaned. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cairo-gtk-engine-cvs > cvs repo is gone > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cssed/ > fail to build > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ed2k-gtk-gui/ > fail to build > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gideo/ > fail to build > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gitg3/ > fail to build > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eiskaltdc-gtk > fail to build > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/epiphany-gecko/ > fail to build > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gwget-standalone > fail to build > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kwebget > for KDE3, fail to build > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pana/ > dependencies gone, upstream dead > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pcmanfm-experimental/ > very old and experimental version , fail to build > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/quicksand > fail to build, already part of krunner All removed except pcmanfm-experimental, which have a lot of votes, not marked as out-of-date, and maintainer is still active on AUR. I guess it would be better if you could contact him and ask if there is a special reason why he still keeps the specific old version. -- Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] removal request
On 11/23/2012 10:30 PM, Nuno Araujo wrote: > Hello > > Could you please remove the following obsolete packages? > - gimp-plugin-file-ora-git[1] > - bzr-fastimport-russo79-bzr[2] > > Thank you. > > [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gimp-plugin-file-ora-git/ > [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bzr-fastimport-russo79-bzr/ > Both removed, thanks. -- Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] removal request
Hello Could you please remove the following obsolete packages? - gimp-plugin-file-ora-git[1] - bzr-fastimport-russo79-bzr[2] Thank you. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gimp-plugin-file-ora-git/ [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bzr-fastimport-russo79-bzr/ -- Nuno Araujo signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] Deletion request: a few packages
All following packages are orphaned. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cairo-gtk-engine-cvs cvs repo is gone https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cssed/ fail to build https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ed2k-gtk-gui/ fail to build https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gideo/ fail to build https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gitg3/ fail to build https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eiskaltdc-gtk fail to build https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/epiphany-gecko/ fail to build https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gwget-standalone fail to build https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kwebget for KDE3, fail to build https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pana/ dependencies gone, upstream dead https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pcmanfm-experimental/ very old and experimental version , fail to build https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/quicksand fail to build, already part of krunner
[aur-general] Merge request: lxdm-svn ==> lxdm-git
The upstream has switched to git. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lxdm-svn/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lxdm-git/
Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: two ktouch packages
On 11/23/2012 07:24 PM, Jekyll Wu wrote: > All following three packages are created by the same user, and he has > clearly stated only ktouch-git is intended. Please remove the other two > accidental packages. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ktouch-git/ > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ktouch-next/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ktouch-next-git/ Both removed, thanks. -- Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] Deletion request: ktouchpadenabler-git
The upstream repo has gone, because ktouchpadenabler has been merged into the kde-workspace repo. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ktouchpadenabler-git/
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On 11/23/2012 07:10 PM, Nuno Araujo wrote: > Could you please delete python2-uinput0.5[1] and g19d[2]. > These packages are now obsolete. > > Thank you. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-uinput0.5/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/g19d/ > Both removed, thanks. -- Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] Deletion request: two ktouch packages
All following three packages are created by the same user, and he has clearly stated only ktouch-git is intended. Please remove the other two accidental packages. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ktouch-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ktouch-next/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ktouch-next-git/
[aur-general] Removal request
Could you please delete python2-uinput0.5[1] and g19d[2]. These packages are now obsolete. Thank you. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-uinput0.5/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/g19d/ -- Nuno Araujo signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * python-matplotlib-1.2.0-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-matplotlib-1.2.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-25 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 6 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 3. dreisner - 2 signoffs