Re: [aur-general] Removal request: cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc-base and cross-arm-none-eabi-newlib

2012-11-29 Thread Felix Yan
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Martin Schmölzer
martin.schmoel...@student.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
 Hi!

 I recently adopted and updated the following orphaned packages:
   - cross-arm-none-eabi-binutils
   - cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc
   - cross-arm-none-eabi-gdb

 Two packages from the cross-arm-none-eabi-* series remain as orphans in the
 AUR:
   - cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc-base
   - cross-arm-none-eabi-newlib

 In the past, the cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc-base package was used to bootstrap
 the GCC compiler for the ARM EABI target, which is no longer needed [1].

 The cross-arm-none-eabi-newlib package was then built using the
 cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc-base package, which is no longer needed because my
 PKGBUILD does a combined source tree build, where the compilation of newlib
 is integrated with the GCC autotools build.

 Please remove the no longer needed cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc-base and
 cross-arm-none-eabi-newlib packages.

 Thanks!

 [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html - section Building a cross
 compiler

 Best regards,
 Martin Schmölzer
Both removed, thanks.

--

Felix Yan
Twitter: @felixonmars
Wiki: http://felixc.at


[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2012-11-29 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 8 packages missing signoffs
* 6 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) ==

* catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* python-matplotlib-1.2.0-4 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* python-matplotlib-1.2.0-4 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) ==

* catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686), since 2012-10-25
* catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-25
* catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686), since 2012-10-25
* catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-25
* shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28
* shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. eric - 8 signoffs
2. stephane - 2 signoffs
3. tomegun - 2 signoffs
4. thomas - 1 signoffs



[aur-general] Merge request rsibreak-svn == rsibreak-git

2012-11-29 Thread Jekyll Wu
The upstream has switched to git. And the two packages are maintained by 
the same user.


https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rsibreak-svn/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rsibreak-git/



Re: [aur-general] Merge request rsibreak-svn == rsibreak-git

2012-11-29 Thread Felix Yan
On 11/29/2012 05:28 PM, Jekyll Wu wrote:
 The upstream has switched to git. And the two packages are maintained by
 the same user.
 
 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rsibreak-svn/
 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rsibreak-git/
 
Merged, thanks.

-- 
Felix Yan
Twitter: @felixonmars
Wiki: http://felixc.at



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[aur-general] Deletion request: a few random packages

2012-11-29 Thread Jekyll Wu

All packages below are orphaned.


https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/billreminder-svn/svn repo gone
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/taglib-gio/  tarball gone, 
upstream seems dead

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnet1tarball gone
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gromit   fail to build
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gssdp-devel  tarball gone
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gupnp-ui tarball gnoe
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/online-desktop   fail to build
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jana-git fail to build
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/librest-git  git repo gone


Regards
Jekyll


Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: a few random packages

2012-11-29 Thread Felix Yan
On 11/29/2012 07:56 PM, Jekyll Wu wrote:
 All packages below are orphaned.
 
 
 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/billreminder-svn/svn repo gone
 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/taglib-gio/  tarball gone,
 upstream seems dead
 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnet1tarball gone
 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gromit   fail to build
 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gssdp-devel  tarball gone
 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gupnp-ui tarball gnoe
 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/online-desktop   fail to build
 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jana-git fail to build
 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/librest-git  git repo gone
 
 
 Regards
 Jekyll
All removed, thanks.

-- 
Felix Yan
Twitter: @felixonmars
Wiki: http://felixc.at



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: a few random packages

2012-11-29 Thread Andreas Wagner
I just noticed the librest-git repository has been moved to github.

Maybe we shouldn't be so trigger-happy with the delete button. Being
orphaned or having a change in the download url is not enough reason
to delete a package. Packages that don't build may need to be updated
or patched.

-Andreas

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Felix Yan felixonm...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 11/29/2012 07:56 PM, Jekyll Wu wrote:
 All packages below are orphaned.


 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/billreminder-svn/svn repo gone
 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/taglib-gio/  tarball gone,
 upstream seems dead
 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnet1tarball gone
 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gromit   fail to build
 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gssdp-devel  tarball gone
 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gupnp-ui tarball gnoe
 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/online-desktop   fail to build
 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jana-git fail to build
 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/librest-git  git repo gone


 Regards
 Jekyll
 All removed, thanks.

 --
 Felix Yan
 Twitter: @felixonmars
 Wiki: http://felixc.at



[aur-general] [Package Removal Request]

2012-11-29 Thread Diogo Bento
Greetings,
I'd like to ask for the removal of the following AUR packages:
lxinput-gtk3: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lxinput-gtk3/lxtask-gtk3: 
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lxtask-gtk3/lxterminal-gtk3: 
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lxterminal-gtk3/
Thank you for your attention,D.B. (3V0LU710N)
p.s.: [Offtopic] Maybe this is not the right place to ask this, but I'd like to 
suggest the compilation of lxde packages with gtk3 instead of gtk2... =) [most 
of them seem to work properly, with the exception of lxterminal, which gives a 
bug when tabs are closed]. [/Offtopic]  

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: a few random packages

2012-11-29 Thread Felix Yan
On 11/29/2012 11:10 PM, Andreas Wagner wrote:
 I just noticed the librest-git repository has been moved to github.
 
 Maybe we shouldn't be so trigger-happy with the delete button. Being
 orphaned or having a change in the download url is not enough reason
 to delete a package. Packages that don't build may need to be updated
 or patched.
 
 -Andreas

Yeah, I remove packages often when they are orphaned _and_ flagged
out-of-date for long _and_ on request.

There have to be someone updating or patching such a package but in
fact, there haven't been one, for long, and we donno even if anyone is
still using it, that's the enough reason for at least me to delete it.

If anyone would pick it up, they could still add it back and it's not
hard, thanks to the simplicity of pacman.

-- 
Felix Yan
Twitter: @felixonmars
Wiki: http://felixc.at



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature