Re: [aur-general] Attempt to upload llvm35 to AUR gets rejected

[Albert Graef via aur-general]

On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 9:51 AM, Albert Graef  wrote:
> Thanks, Eli! I'll give it another go immediately.

Worked, thanks again!

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Computer Music Research Group, JGU Mainz, Germany
Email:  aggr...@gmail.com
WWW:https://plus.google.com/+AlbertGraef

Re: [aur-general] Attempt to upload llvm35 to AUR gets rejected

[Albert Graef via aur-general]

On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 9:40 AM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general
 wrote:
> I've removed it manually, we're looking at a more permanent solution.

Thanks, Eli! I'll give it another go immediately.

Albert

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Computer Music Research Group, JGU Mainz, Germany
Email:  aggr...@gmail.com
WWW:https://plus.google.com/+AlbertGraef

Re: [aur-general] Attempt to upload llvm35 to AUR gets rejected

[Albert Graef via aur-general]

LoneVVolf wrote:
> AUR has llvm33 , llvm38, llvm39, llvm4 and llvm 5 . Maybe your packages
> can use one of those ?

LLVM 3.5 is the last version which still has the old JIT backend,
which is what Pure still needs right now. LLVM 3.4 would work just as
well, but that's not available in the AUR, and LLVM 3.3 is 2 years
older than 3.5, so I'd rather not use it if I can avoid it.

You might ask why I've not updated Pure to the new JIT yet. In fact,
that has been on my TODO list for a long time, but I've been busy with
other projects, and it's not straightforward because Pure needs the
ability to recompile a function on the spot, which the new MCJIT
doesn't offer any more, so I'll have to rewrite Pure's entire code
generator for the MCJIT.

Albert

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Computer Music Research Group, JGU Mainz, Germany
Email:  aggr...@gmail.com
WWW:https://plus.google.com/+AlbertGraef

Re: [aur-general] Attempt to upload llvm35 to AUR gets rejected

[Albert Graef via aur-general]

On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 5:56 AM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general
 wrote:
> Explicitly contrary to the PKGBUILD spec; if pkgbase is unset, makepkg
> sets it from the first element of pkgname, and this is why the .SRCINFO
> still shows it.

I can add an explicit pkgbase=llvm35 again. (I already tried that
before and it didn't fix the upload problem, so I removed it again,
because that's the way it was in the original PKGBUILD from extra.)

> The blacklist currently contains llvm35, which I think is because it is
> erroring when running updates.

It sure is. Can anyone of the admins remove it, please?

Thanks
Albert

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Computer Music Research Group, JGU Mainz, Germany
Email:  aggr...@gmail.com
WWW:https://plus.google.com/+AlbertGraef

[aur-general] Attempt to upload llvm35 to AUR gets rejected

[Albert Graef via aur-general]

The llvm35 package recently got kicked from extra, but I need it for
my Pure package (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pure/) which in
turn is needed for a bunch of other packages I maintain in the AUR.

So I resurrected llvm35 from extra, brushed it up a little so that it
compiles again (also bumped the package revision), and tried to upload
it to the AUR under the previous package name llvm35. All I get is:

Writing objects: 100% (8/8), 4.76 KiB | 2.38 MiB/s, done.
Total 8 (delta 1), reused 0 (delta 0)
remote: error: package already provided by []: llvm35
remote: error: hook declined to update refs/heads/master
To ssh://aur.archlinux.org/llvm35.git
 ! [remote rejected] master -> master (hook declined)
error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://a...@aur.archlinux.org/llvm35.git'

My version of the PKGBUILD is available here:
https://bitbucket.org/agraef/llvm35-pkgbuild

It's a split package, but isn't that supposed to be supported by the
AUR? Anything else wrong with it?

Any help appreciated, many thanks in advance.
Albert

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Computer Music Research Group, JGU Mainz, Germany
Email:  aggr...@gmail.com
WWW:https://plus.google.com/+AlbertGraef