[Aus-soaring] Soaring Australia November

2008-09-16 Thread Anne Elliott
A reminder that articles for inclusion in the November issue of Soaring
Australia should reach me by September 25. Regards Anne [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

Keith Dixon and Anne Elliott

(GFA Sub-editor Soaring Australia magazine)

PO Box 189

Narromine NSW 2821 Australia

Email:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Web: www.ourafricansafari.com.au

www.vintageglidersaustralia.org.au

 

___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Re: [Aus-soaring] Soaring Australia November

2008-09-16 Thread Patching

Good morning Emilis and Rachel,
I came in from mowing the lawn and flicked on the computer. I havent gone 
back yet.
Your white paper is facinating reading. I have read it twice and will read 
it again and again. Brilliant.
Now all we need is for people to read it with the same intensity and with an 
open mind to what may happen and what is acheivable.

Congratulations to both of you.
I will be in touch.
Ian P
- Original Message - 
From: Emilis Prelgauskas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. 
aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net

Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Soaring Australia November


The attached white paper was available to interested parties at the
September Adelaide glider pilots gathering


On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 08:04:15 +1000, Anne Elliott wrote:

A reminder that articles for inclusion in the November issue of
Soaring Australia should reach me by September 25.









___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring 


___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Re: [Aus-soaring] 180 degree turns - teardrop

2008-09-16 Thread Texler, Michael
To throw the cat amongst the pigeons.

Here are some links with attached research, regarding the best way to do a 180 
(if required).
Any comments or disagreements?

OK, if people want to poo-poo this, please provide a rational and reasoned 
explanation why (i.e. use a scientific and objective argument). 

http://www.nar-associates.com/technical-flying/impossible/possible.html 

http://jeremy.zawodny.com/flying/turnback.pdf

Conclusions A simplified model of the turnback maneuver after engine failure 
during the take-off climb segment has been developed. The model shows that 
optimum conditions for returning to the departure runway result from climbing 
at Vmax , executing a gliding turn through a 190-220deg heading change, using a 
45deg bank angle at 5% above the stall velocity in the turn using a teardrop 
shaped flight path. 

P.S. Thanks to Daryl McKay for providing these links. 
 

___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Re: [Aus-soaring] 180 degree turns - teardrop

2008-09-16 Thread Peter Stephenson
I now know why I prefer to fly gliders more than tugs/power. :-) 
A very interesting article: note he says sailplane pilots practise at 
200 feet: not me!

PeterS

/What about safety? Can the average pilot successfully complete this 
maneuver. The simulator study indicates that training makes this 
maneuver reasonably safe. This should not be surprising. The turnback 
maneuver is well known to sailplane pilots. It is the standard maneuver 
when the tow rope breaks. For a sailplane, a typical starting altitude 
is 200 feet. Sailplane pilots are required to train for this maneuver 
and to perform the maneuver to successfully complete the check ride for 
the rating. Why not power pilots? Power pilots are required to train for 
and to demonstrate level stalls, departure stalls, approach stalls, 
forced landings, etc. to qualify for the private pilot rating. There's a 
lot of hostile terrain at the end of the runway, e.g., at island 
airports, mountain valley airports, city airports and almost any airport 
at night. If the engine quits on climb out, frequently, the best choice 
of terrain for a forced landing is behind you, on the runway. Let's 
train to be able to use it.


/
Texler, Michael wrote:

To throw the cat amongst the pigeons.

Here are some links with attached research, regarding the best way to do a 180 
(if required).
Any comments or disagreements?

OK, if people want to poo-poo this, please provide a rational and reasoned explanation why (i.e. use a scientific and objective argument). 

http://www.nar-associates.com/technical-flying/impossible/possible.html 


http://jeremy.zawodny.com/flying/turnback.pdf

Conclusions A simplified model of the turnback maneuver after engine failure during the take-off climb segment has been developed. The model shows that optimum conditions for returning to the departure runway result from climbing at Vmax , executing a gliding turn through a 190-220deg heading change, using a 45deg bank angle at 5% above the stall velocity in the turn using a teardrop shaped flight path. 

P.S. Thanks to Daryl McKay for providing these links. 
 


___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

  
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Re: [Aus-soaring] 180 degree turns - teardrop

2008-09-16 Thread Mike Borgelt
Don't see much to argue about. They did the math. Although there's 
one little thing I'd like to check.


They don't think the optimum is 60 degrees though.

Mike


At 11:38 AM 17/09/2008, you wrote:

To throw the cat amongst the pigeons.

Here are some links with attached research, regarding the best way 
to do a 180 (if required).

Any comments or disagreements?

OK, if people want to poo-poo this, please provide a rational and 
reasoned explanation why (i.e. use a scientific and objective argument).


http://www.nar-associates.com/technical-flying/impossible/possible.html

http://jeremy.zawodny.com/flying/turnback.pdf

Conclusions A simplified model of the turnback maneuver after 
engine failure during the take-off climb segment has been developed. 
The model shows that optimum conditions for returning to the 
departure runway result from climbing at Vmax , executing a gliding 
turn through a 190-220deg heading change, using a 45deg bank angle 
at 5% above the stall velocity in the turn using a teardrop shaped 
flight path.


P.S. Thanks to Daryl McKay for providing these links.


___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Borgelt Instruments - manufacturers of quality soaring instruments
phone Int'l + 61 746 355784
fax   Int'l + 61 746 358796
cellphone Int'l + 61 428 355784
  Int'l + 61 429 355784
email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
website: www.borgeltinstruments.com

___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Re: [Aus-soaring] 180 degree turns - teardrop

2008-09-16 Thread Texler, Michael

They don't think the optimum is 60 degrees though.

Yep, I found that interesting too.

___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring