Re: [Aus-soaring] Theories about mammatus Cloud (serious post)

2008-07-16 Thread Gus Stewart
Well technically Wikipedia IS peer-reviewed, that's the whole point !

Just not the kind of peers that have sound opinions (much of the time)

On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Texler, Michael 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The conventional teaching is that mammatus indicates downdraughts and
 turbulence, hence we should avoid flying under it.

 The cause and significance of mammatus cloud is not a clear cut as people
 may think:

 See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mammatus

 (Noting that wikipedia is not peer reviewed, any meteorologists out there?)


 ___
 Aus-soaring mailing list
 Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 To check or change subscription details, visit:
 http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

[Aus-soaring] Theories about mammatus Cloud (serious post)

2008-07-15 Thread Texler, Michael
The conventional teaching is that mammatus indicates downdraughts and 
turbulence, hence we should avoid flying under it.

The cause and significance of mammatus cloud is not a clear cut as people may 
think:

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mammatus

(Noting that wikipedia is not peer reviewed, any meteorologists out there?)


___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring