Re: C++ Shared Libraries
On Sep 1, 2000, Morten Eriksen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Boehne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From what I have read about libtool it cannot handle C++ shared
libs. [...]
Well, it works for us (http://www.coin3d.org) with a number of large
and complex C++ libraries. (We're using Libtool v1.3.5, BTW.)
Basically, libtool 1.3.5 only works for C++ on GNU/Linux and,
sometimes, on Solaris with g++ --enable-shared.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicampoliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist*Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
C++ Shared Libraries
From what I have read about libtool it cannot handle C++ shared libs. Is there any work going on in this area, or should I just do my best with shell scripting in configure.in? Anyone have a better answer? -- Robert Boehne Software Engineer Ricardo Software Chicago Technical Center TEL: (630)789-0003 x. 238 FAX: (630)789-0127 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: C++ shared libraries
On 16 Aug 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote: probably this is a FAQ, but i couldn't find an answer: How can I tell automake to check for a C++ library (i.e. that contains no C symbols)? automake doesn't check for libraries at all. Maybe you meant autoconf? Indeed. Such things happen with increasing uptime. :-) But the question still remains: Is there a way to check for C++ only libraries other than trying to link against the mangled symbols? Simon -- PGP public key available from http://phobos.fs.tum.de/pgp/Simon.Richter.asc Fingerprint: 10 62 F6 F5 C0 5D 9E D8 47 05 1B 8A 22 E5 4E C1 Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
