Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc-avr 4.9.2 -Os messes with interrupt vectors

2016-05-08 Thread avr
Thank you for your reply! I solved the issue thanks to Senthil, but FYI

PORTB |= (1 << PB5)

does *not* toggle the LED, it is OR, not XOR. It was actually a problem with 
some linker flags.

8. Mai 2016 15:53 von tomd...@speakeasy.org:


> On 05/08/16 06:22, > a...@tuta.io>  wrote:
>
> Looks like you are toggling the LED too fast to see it.
>
> Try adding a delay in the while loop
>
> while (1) {
>   PORTB |= (1 << PB5);
>   delay_ms(500); /* or something */
> }
>
> Look at the avr-libc documentation.
> http://nongnu.org/avr-libc/user-manual
>
> Tom Dean
>
> ___
> AVR-GCC-list mailing list
> AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list___
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list


Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc-avr 4.9.2 -Os messes with interrupt vectors

2016-05-08 Thread avr
God, thank you so much! I have had this issue for days without finding a 
solution! Using avr-gcc with mmcu=atmega168 instead of avr-ld with mavr5 
appears to have solved the problem!

As you suggested, I used -v to see what is going on and you are right, I was 
missing the correct CRT file!

Thank you so much, Senthil! You saved me a lot of time and headache!

8. Mai 2016 16:16 von senthil_kumar.selva...@atmel.com:


>
> a...@tuta.io>  writes:
>
>> No, I will try to explain where my problem is. The code I posted before
>> should turn the LED connected to PB5 on. The code also contains an ISR, 
>> but
>> it is empty and as I never enable interrupts, it should never be called.
>
> I guess you're not linking in the crt file for the device. The crt file
> has startup code and the correct vector table for the device. Without
> it, and without an alternate startup/vector table init code, you will
> miss things like global variable initialization, SP setup etc., and
> interrupt handlers won't run.
>
> Instead of
 avr-ld -mavr5 -o led-test.elf main.o
>
> Can you invoke the compiler driver with the correct device i.e.?
>
> avr-gcc -mmcu=atmega168 -o led-test.elf main.o
>
> That way, the driver will invoke the linker with the correct crt object
> file and other libraries. You can pass -v to see what exactly goes to
> the linker.
>
> Regards
> Senthil
>
>>
>> The code works without optimizations, but with -Os enabled, the LED does
>> *not* turn on! If I remove the (empty) ISR and keep everything else the 
>> same,
>> the LED *does* turn on with optimizations enabled!
>>
>> My problem is not how to toggle the LED, I know how to do that. My problem 
>> is
>> that the code behaves differently when using the optimization option -Os.
>>
>> 8. Mai 2016 14:36 von >> partha_nay...@yahoo.com>> :
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> "> I do *not* want the ISR to be called". I guess you do not want the
>>> interrupt to be enabled. If you do not start the timer (as the interrupt 
>>> is
>>> timer related) this interrupt will never occur. If you are using the 
>>> timer
>>> for something else and need the timer running, then you need not 
>>> explicitly
>>> enable timer overflow interrupt (see TIMSK register bits). In the while
>>> loop, you are always setting the port bit which I guess is connected to 
>>> the
>>> LED and the LED will glow when this bit is 1. Suggest toggling the LED
>>> through a while loop with delays (large enough to be able to see LED
>>> flashing) inserted.> > Regards,
>>> Parthasaradhi
>>> Hyderabad
>>>
>>>
>>>  >  >  >  On Sunday, May 8, 2016 3:06 PM, "> >>> a...@tuta.io>>> > " <> 
>>> >>> a...@tuta.io>>> >
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>  > Thank you for your instant response.
>>>
>>> I am sorry if I was unclear about that: I do *not* want the ISR to be
>>> called. The LED should turn on because I enable it in main(), however, 
>>> the
>>> uC goes straight to the ISR!
>>>
>>> For example, if I set the LED to high in the ISR and set it to low in
>>> main(), it will be set to high and the LED will turn on when I flash it.
>>> Even though I used cli()!
>>>
>>> This behavior appears to depend on -Os, so I guess I am either using the
>>> tools incorrectly, or there is a bug in the optimization code.
>>>
>>> 8. Mai 2016 11:22 von > >>> partha_nay...@yahoo.com>>> > :
>>>
>>>
 First off, you are disabling global interrupts (cli ()). You need to
 enable them (sei ()). I presume you are toggling the LED in ISR, if so 
 the
 LED will not toggle as interrupts are disabled.>> >> Regards,
 Parthasaradhi
 Hyderabad


  >>  >>  >>  On Sunday, May 8, 2016 2:40 PM, ">>  a...@tuta.io >> 
 " <>>
 a...@tuta.io >> > wrote:


  >>   >> Hello,

 I have been working on a project for some time and at some point,
 everything just stopped working. It appears that as soon as I include an
 ISR in my C code, the main function won't even be called anymore. I
 reduced my code to this:


 #include 
 #include 

 int main (void) {
  cli();
  DDRB = 0xff;
  while(1) PORTB |= (1 << PB5);
  return 0;
 }

 ISR(TIMER0_OVF_vect) {}

 But the LED just won't turn on. The strange thing is: If I remove the 
 ISR
 at the bottom without changing anything else, even keeping the include,
 everything works. If I remove the -Os option from gcc but keep the ISR,
 everything works.

 I use these commands to compile, link and flash it:

 F_CPU=1600L
 avr-gcc -Wall -DF_CPU=$F_CPU -c -mmcu=atmega168 -Os main.c -o main.o
 avr-ld -mavr5 -o led-test.elf main.o
 avr-objcopy -O ihex led-test.elf led-test.hex
 sudo avrdude -c avrisp2 -p atmega168 -P usb -b 57600 -U
 flash:w:led-test.hex


 I am quite new to the avr tools so I might just have made a silly 
 mistake,
 so I would appreciate any tips!
 Thank you!


 LSB:
 Distributor ID: 

Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc-avr 4.9.2 -Os messes with interrupt vectors

2016-05-08 Thread Senthil Kumar Selvaraj

a...@tuta.io writes:

> No, I will try to explain where my problem is. The code I posted before 
> should turn the LED connected to PB5 on. The code also contains an ISR, but 
> it is empty and as I never enable interrupts, it should never be called.

I guess you're not linking in the crt file for the device. The crt file
has startup code and the correct vector table for the device. Without
it, and without an alternate startup/vector table init code, you will
miss things like global variable initialization, SP setup etc., and
interrupt handlers won't run. 

Instead of
>>> avr-ld -mavr5 -o led-test.elf main.o

Can you invoke the compiler driver with the correct device i.e.?

avr-gcc -mmcu=atmega168 -o led-test.elf main.o

That way, the driver will invoke the linker with the correct crt object
file and other libraries. You can pass -v to see what exactly goes to
the linker.

Regards
Senthil

>
> The code works without optimizations, but with -Os enabled, the LED does 
> *not* turn on! If I remove the (empty) ISR and keep everything else the same, 
> the LED *does* turn on with optimizations enabled!
>
> My problem is not how to toggle the LED, I know how to do that. My problem is 
> that the code behaves differently when using the optimization option -Os.
>
> 8. Mai 2016 14:36 von partha_nay...@yahoo.com:
>
>
>> Hi,
>> "> I do *not* want the ISR to be called". I guess you do not want the 
>> interrupt to be enabled. If you do not start the timer (as the interrupt is 
>> timer related) this interrupt will never occur. If you are using the timer 
>> for something else and need the timer running, then you need not explicitly 
>> enable timer overflow interrupt (see TIMSK register bits). In the while 
>> loop, you are always setting the port bit which I guess is connected to the 
>> LED and the LED will glow when this bit is 1. Suggest toggling the LED 
>> through a while loop with delays (large enough to be able to see LED 
>> flashing) inserted.> > Regards,
>> Parthasaradhi
>> Hyderabad
>>
>>
>>  >  >  >  On Sunday, May 8, 2016 3:06 PM, "> a...@tuta.io> " <> 
>> a...@tuta.io> 
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>>  > Thank you for your instant response.
>>
>> I am sorry if I was unclear about that: I do *not* want the ISR to be 
>> called. The LED should turn on because I enable it in main(), however, the 
>> uC goes straight to the ISR!
>>
>> For example, if I set the LED to high in the ISR and set it to low in 
>> main(), it will be set to high and the LED will turn on when I flash it. 
>> Even though I used cli()!
>>
>> This behavior appears to depend on -Os, so I guess I am either using the 
>> tools incorrectly, or there is a bug in the optimization code.
>>
>> 8. Mai 2016 11:22 von > partha_nay...@yahoo.com> :
>>
>>
>>> First off, you are disabling global interrupts (cli ()). You need to 
>>> enable them (sei ()). I presume you are toggling the LED in ISR, if so the 
>>> LED will not toggle as interrupts are disabled.>> >> Regards,
>>> Parthasaradhi
>>> Hyderabad
>>>
>>>
>>>  >>  >>  >>  On Sunday, May 8, 2016 2:40 PM, ">> a...@tuta.io>> " <>> 
>>> a...@tuta.io>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>  >>   >> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have been working on a project for some time and at some point, 
>>> everything just stopped working. It appears that as soon as I include an 
>>> ISR in my C code, the main function won't even be called anymore. I 
>>> reduced my code to this:
>>>
>>>
>>> #include 
>>> #include 
>>>
>>> int main (void) {
>>>  cli();
>>>  DDRB = 0xff;
>>>  while(1) PORTB |= (1 << PB5);
>>>  return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> ISR(TIMER0_OVF_vect) {}
>>>
>>> But the LED just won't turn on. The strange thing is: If I remove the ISR 
>>> at the bottom without changing anything else, even keeping the include, 
>>> everything works. If I remove the -Os option from gcc but keep the ISR, 
>>> everything works.
>>>
>>> I use these commands to compile, link and flash it:
>>>
>>> F_CPU=1600L
>>> avr-gcc -Wall -DF_CPU=$F_CPU -c -mmcu=atmega168 -Os main.c -o main.o
>>> avr-ld -mavr5 -o led-test.elf main.o
>>> avr-objcopy -O ihex led-test.elf led-test.hex
>>> sudo avrdude -c avrisp2 -p atmega168 -P usb -b 57600 -U 
>>> flash:w:led-test.hex
>>>
>>>
>>> I am quite new to the avr tools so I might just have made a silly mistake, 
>>> so I would appreciate any tips!
>>> Thank you!
>>>
>>>
>>> LSB:
>>> Distributor ID: Ubuntu
>>> Description: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
>>> Release: 16.04
>>> Codename: xenial
>>>
>>> Output of avr-gcc -v:
>>> Using built-in specs.
>>> Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/avr/4.9.2/device-specs/specs-avr2
>>> COLLECT_GCC=avr-gcc
>>> COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/avr/4.9.2/lto-wrapper
>>> Target: avr
>>> Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++ 
>>> --prefix=/usr/lib --infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/share/man 
>>> --bindir=/usr/bin --libexecdir=/usr/lib --libdir=/usr/lib --enable-shared 
>>> --with-system-zlib --enable-long-long --enable-nls 
>>> --without-included-gettext --disable-libssp 

Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc-avr 4.9.2 -Os messes with interrupt vectors

2016-05-08 Thread Thomas D. Dean

On 05/08/16 06:22, a...@tuta.io wrote:

Looks like you are toggling the LED too fast to see it.

Try adding a delay in the while loop

while (1) {
  PORTB |= (1 << PB5);
  delay_ms(500); /* or something */
}

Look at the avr-libc documentation.
http://nongnu.org/avr-libc/user-manual/

Tom Dean

___
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list


Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc-avr 4.9.2 -Os messes with interrupt vectors

2016-05-08 Thread avr
No, I will try to explain where my problem is. The code I posted before 
should turn the LED connected to PB5 on. The code also contains an ISR, but 
it is empty and as I never enable interrupts, it should never be called.

The code works without optimizations, but with -Os enabled, the LED does 
*not* turn on! If I remove the (empty) ISR and keep everything else the same, 
the LED *does* turn on with optimizations enabled!

My problem is not how to toggle the LED, I know how to do that. My problem is 
that the code behaves differently when using the optimization option -Os.

8. Mai 2016 14:36 von partha_nay...@yahoo.com:


> Hi,
> "> I do *not* want the ISR to be called". I guess you do not want the 
> interrupt to be enabled. If you do not start the timer (as the interrupt is 
> timer related) this interrupt will never occur. If you are using the timer 
> for something else and need the timer running, then you need not explicitly 
> enable timer overflow interrupt (see TIMSK register bits). In the while 
> loop, you are always setting the port bit which I guess is connected to the 
> LED and the LED will glow when this bit is 1. Suggest toggling the LED 
> through a while loop with delays (large enough to be able to see LED 
> flashing) inserted.>  > Regards,
> Parthasaradhi
> Hyderabad
>
>
>  >  >  >  On Sunday, May 8, 2016 3:06 PM, "> a...@tuta.io> " <> a...@tuta.io> 
> > wrote:
>
>
>  > Thank you for your instant response.
>
> I am sorry if I was unclear about that: I do *not* want the ISR to be 
> called. The LED should turn on because I enable it in main(), however, the 
> uC goes straight to the ISR!
>
> For example, if I set the LED to high in the ISR and set it to low in 
> main(), it will be set to high and the LED will turn on when I flash it. 
> Even though I used cli()!
>
> This behavior appears to depend on -Os, so I guess I am either using the 
> tools incorrectly, or there is a bug in the optimization code.
>
> 8. Mai 2016 11:22 von > partha_nay...@yahoo.com> :
>
>
>> First off, you are disabling global interrupts (cli ()). You need to 
>> enable them (sei ()). I presume you are toggling the LED in ISR, if so the 
>> LED will not toggle as interrupts are disabled. >>  >> Regards,
>> Parthasaradhi
>> Hyderabad
>>
>>
>>  >>  >>  >>  On Sunday, May 8, 2016 2:40 PM, ">> a...@tuta.io>> " <>> 
>> a...@tuta.io>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>>  >>   >> Hello,
>>
>> I have been working on a project for some time and at some point, 
>> everything just stopped working. It appears that as soon as I include an 
>> ISR in my C code, the main function won't even be called anymore. I 
>> reduced my code to this:
>>
>>
>> #include 
>> #include 
>>
>> int main (void) {
>>   cli();
>>   DDRB = 0xff;
>>   while(1) PORTB |= (1 << PB5);
>>   return 0;
>> }
>>
>> ISR(TIMER0_OVF_vect) {}
>>
>> But the LED just won't turn on. The strange thing is: If I remove the ISR 
>> at the bottom without changing anything else, even keeping the include, 
>> everything works. If I remove the -Os option from gcc but keep the ISR, 
>> everything works.
>>
>> I use these commands to compile, link and flash it:
>>
>> F_CPU=1600L
>> avr-gcc -Wall -DF_CPU=$F_CPU -c -mmcu=atmega168 -Os main.c -o main.o
>> avr-ld -mavr5 -o led-test.elf main.o
>> avr-objcopy -O ihex led-test.elf led-test.hex
>> sudo avrdude -c avrisp2 -p atmega168 -P usb -b 57600 -U 
>> flash:w:led-test.hex
>>
>>
>> I am quite new to the avr tools so I might just have made a silly mistake, 
>> so I would appreciate any tips!
>> Thank you!
>>
>>
>> LSB:
>> Distributor ID: Ubuntu
>> Description:    Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
>> Release:    16.04
>> Codename:   xenial
>>
>> Output of avr-gcc -v:
>> Using built-in specs.
>> Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/avr/4.9.2/device-specs/specs-avr2
>> COLLECT_GCC=avr-gcc
>> COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/avr/4.9.2/lto-wrapper
>> Target: avr
>> Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++ 
>> --prefix=/usr/lib --infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/share/man 
>> --bindir=/usr/bin --libexecdir=/usr/lib --libdir=/usr/lib --enable-shared 
>> --with-system-zlib --enable-long-long --enable-nls 
>> --without-included-gettext --disable-libssp --build=x86_64-linux-gnu 
>> --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=avr CFLAGS='-g -O2 
>> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat ' CPPFLAGS=-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 
>> CXXFLAGS='-g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat ' FCFLAGS='-g -O2 
>> -fstack-protector-strong' FFLAGS='-g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong' 
>> GCJFLAGS='-g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong' 
>> LDFLAGS='-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-z,relro' OBJCFLAGS='-g -O2 
>> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat ' OBJCXXFLAGS='-g -O2 
>> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat '
>> Thread model: single
>> gcc version 4.9.2 (GCC)
>>
>> ___
>> AVR-GCC-list mailing list
>> AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
>>
>>
>>   >>  >>
>
>
>   >  >   

Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc-avr 4.9.2 -Os messes with interrupt vectors

2016-05-08 Thread Parthasaradhi Nayani
Hi,
"I do *not* want the ISR to be called". I guess you do not want the interrupt 
to be enabled. If you do not start the timer (as the interrupt is timer 
related) this interrupt will never occur. If you are using the timer for 
something else and need the timer running, then you need not explicitly enable 
timer overflow interrupt (see TIMSK register bits). In the while loop, you are 
always setting the port bit which I guess is connected to the LED and the LED 
will glow when this bit is 1. Suggest toggling the LED through a while loop 
with delays (large enough to be able to see LED flashing) inserted. Regards,
Parthasaradhi
Hyderabad
 

On Sunday, May 8, 2016 3:06 PM, "a...@tuta.io"  wrote:
 

 Thank you for your instant response.

I am sorry if I was unclear about that: I do *not* want the ISR to be called. 
The LED should turn on because I enable it in main(), however, the uC goes 
straight to the ISR!

For example, if I set the LED to high in the ISR and set it to low in main(), 
it will be set to high and the LED will turn on when I flash it. Even though I 
used cli()!

This behavior appears to depend on -Os, so I guess I am either using the tools 
incorrectly, or there is a bug in the optimization code.

8. Mai 2016 11:22 von partha_nay...@yahoo.com:


First off, you are disabling global interrupts (cli ()). You need to enable 
them (sei ()). I presume you are toggling the LED in ISR, if so the LED will 
not toggle as interrupts are disabled.  Regards,
Parthasaradhi
Hyderabad
 

On Sunday, May 8, 2016 2:40 PM, "a...@tuta.io"  wrote:
 

  Hello,

I have been working on a project for some time and at some point, everything 
just stopped working. It appears that as soon as I include an ISR in my C code, 
the main function won't even be called anymore. I reduced my code to this:


#include 
#include 

int main (void) {
  cli();
  DDRB = 0xff;
  while(1) PORTB |= (1 << PB5);
  return 0;
}

ISR(TIMER0_OVF_vect) {}

But the LED just won't turn on. The strange thing is: If I remove the ISR at 
the bottom without changing anything else, even keeping the include, everything 
works. If I remove the -Os option from gcc but keep the ISR, everything works.

I use these commands to compile, link and flash it:

F_CPU=1600L
avr-gcc -Wall -DF_CPU=$F_CPU -c -mmcu=atmega168 -Os main.c -o main.o
avr-ld -mavr5 -o led-test.elf main.o
avr-objcopy -O ihex led-test.elf led-test.hex
sudo avrdude -c avrisp2 -p atmega168 -P usb -b 57600 -U flash:w:led-test.hex


I am quite new to the avr tools so I might just have made a silly mistake, so I 
would appreciate any tips!
Thank you!


LSB:
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:    Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
Release:    16.04
Codename:   xenial

Output of avr-gcc -v:
Using built-in specs.
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/avr/4.9.2/device-specs/specs-avr2
COLLECT_GCC=avr-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/avr/4.9.2/lto-wrapper
Target: avr
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++ --prefix=/usr/lib 
--infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/share/man --bindir=/usr/bin 
--libexecdir=/usr/lib --libdir=/usr/lib --enable-shared --with-system-zlib 
--enable-long-long --enable-nls --without-included-gettext --disable-libssp 
--build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=avr CFLAGS='-g -O2 
-fstack-protector-strong -Wformat ' CPPFLAGS=-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 CXXFLAGS='-g 
-O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat ' FCFLAGS='-g -O2 
-fstack-protector-strong' FFLAGS='-g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong' GCJFLAGS='-g 
-O2 -fstack-protector-strong' LDFLAGS='-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-z,relro' 
OBJCFLAGS='-g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat ' OBJCXXFLAGS='-g -O2 
-fstack-protector-strong -Wformat '
Thread model: single
gcc version 4.9.2 (GCC)
 
___
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list


   
 

  ___
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list


Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc-avr 4.9.2 -Os messes with interrupt vectors

2016-05-08 Thread avr
Thank you for your instant response.

I am sorry if I was unclear about that: I do *not* want the ISR to be called. 
The LED should turn on because I enable it in main(), however, the uC goes 
straight to the ISR!

For example, if I set the LED to high in the ISR and set it to low in main(), 
it will be set to high and the LED will turn on when I flash it. Even though 
I used cli()!

This behavior appears to depend on -Os, so I guess I am either using the 
tools incorrectly, or there is a bug in the optimization code.

8. Mai 2016 11:22 von partha_nay...@yahoo.com:


> First off, you are disabling global interrupts (cli ()). You need to enable 
> them (sei ()). I presume you are toggling the LED in ISR, if so the LED 
> will not toggle as interrupts are disabled. >  > Regards,
> Parthasaradhi
> Hyderabad
>
>
>  >  >  >  On Sunday, May 8, 2016 2:40 PM, "> a...@tuta.io> " <> a...@tuta.io> 
> > wrote:
>
>
>  >   > Hello,
>
> I have been working on a project for some time and at some point, 
> everything just stopped working. It appears that as soon as I include an 
> ISR in my C code, the main function won't even be called anymore. I reduced 
> my code to this:
>
>
> #include 
> #include 
>
> int main (void) {
>   cli();
>   DDRB = 0xff;
>   while(1) PORTB |= (1 << PB5);
>   return 0;
> }
>
> ISR(TIMER0_OVF_vect) {}
>
> But the LED just won't turn on. The strange thing is: If I remove the ISR 
> at the bottom without changing anything else, even keeping the include, 
> everything works. If I remove the -Os option from gcc but keep the ISR, 
> everything works.
>
> I use these commands to compile, link and flash it:
>
> F_CPU=1600L
> avr-gcc -Wall -DF_CPU=$F_CPU -c -mmcu=atmega168 -Os main.c -o main.o
> avr-ld -mavr5 -o led-test.elf main.o
> avr-objcopy -O ihex led-test.elf led-test.hex
> sudo avrdude -c avrisp2 -p atmega168 -P usb -b 57600 -U 
> flash:w:led-test.hex
>
>
> I am quite new to the avr tools so I might just have made a silly mistake, 
> so I would appreciate any tips!
> Thank you!
>
>
> LSB:
> Distributor ID: Ubuntu
> Description:    Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
> Release:    16.04
> Codename:   xenial
>
> Output of avr-gcc -v:
> Using built-in specs.
> Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/avr/4.9.2/device-specs/specs-avr2
> COLLECT_GCC=avr-gcc
> COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/avr/4.9.2/lto-wrapper
> Target: avr
> Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++ 
> --prefix=/usr/lib --infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/share/man 
> --bindir=/usr/bin --libexecdir=/usr/lib --libdir=/usr/lib --enable-shared 
> --with-system-zlib --enable-long-long --enable-nls 
> --without-included-gettext --disable-libssp --build=x86_64-linux-gnu 
> --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=avr CFLAGS='-g -O2 
> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat ' CPPFLAGS=-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 
> CXXFLAGS='-g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat ' FCFLAGS='-g -O2 
> -fstack-protector-strong' FFLAGS='-g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong' 
> GCJFLAGS='-g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong' 
> LDFLAGS='-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-z,relro' OBJCFLAGS='-g -O2 
> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat ' OBJCXXFLAGS='-g -O2 
> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat '
> Thread model: single
> gcc version 4.9.2 (GCC)
>
> ___
> AVR-GCC-list mailing list
> AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
>
>
>   >  >   ___
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list