Re: Awesome 3.5 split different behaviour than in 3.4.15

2013-07-31 Thread Wojciech Daniło
That's strange because my awesome 3.14 config always when opening new
window keeped the one on the left and added new windows to the right stack
- anyway is it possible somehow to change the bahavior to the one I'm
describing here?


2013/7/31 jk121...@gmail.com

 Actually the behavior you describe is how it has always worked for me

 Gerald Klein DBA
 contac...@geraldklein.com
 www.geraldklein.com
 geraldklein.wordpress.com
 j...@zognet.com
 708-599-0352

 Arch/Gentoo Awesome, Ranger  Vim the coding triple threat.
 Linux registered user #548580

 *From:* Wojciech Daniło
 *Sent:* Tuesday, July 30, 2013 5:27 PM
 *To:* awesome@naquadah.org

 Hi! I've upgraded today awesome from 3.4.15 to 3.5.1 and noticed that the
 behaviour of awesome when using split layout changed.
 Lets imagine we have 3 windows (1 on the left and 2 on the right).
 In the old awesome while openning the fourth one it will apper on the
 right stack. In new awesome it appears on the left and thew one, which was
 on the left is moved to the right side.

 Is there any way to reverse this behaviour to the old one ?



Re: Awesome 3.5 split different behaviour than in 3.4.15

2013-07-31 Thread Marco
On 2013–07–31 Wojciech Daniło wrote:

 That's strange because my awesome 3.14 config always when opening new
 window keeped the one on the left and added new windows to the right stack
 - anyway

I can confirm Gerald's findings, it's the same here.

1) Which layout do you use?
2) Did you try with a default config?

Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Opening Apps On Screens

2013-07-31 Thread Gerald Klein
Hi, I have a little problem, I load MPlayer into screen 2 tag 1, now when I
start VMWare (vmplayer)  it loads into screen 2 tag 1,

Not earth shattering problem but kind of annoying because I load multiple
vm's at once and they all head for that tag. I tested it by changing the
rule to put MPlayer into another screen and tag and that's where vmware
ended up.

The classes for the windows are similar but not the same and it seems like
the matching is using a contains and not an equals, is there a way to make
this work right?

Vmplayer and vmplayer

MPlayer and mplayer


I am using version v3.4.15


thanks for any help




Gerald Klein DBA

contac...@geraldklein.com

www.geraldklein.com http://geraldklein.com/

geraldklein.wordpress.com

j...@zognet.com

708-599-0352


Arch Awesome, Ranger  Vim the coding triple threat.

Linux registered user #548580


Re: Opening Apps On Screens

2013-07-31 Thread Ignas Anikevičius
Hi,

On Wednesday 31 July 2013 04:52:59 Gerald Klein wrote:
 The classes for the windows are similar but not the same and it seems like
 the matching is using a contains and not an equals, is there a way to make
 this work right?
 
 Vmplayer and vmplayer
 
 MPlayer and mplayer

Could you post your rules somewhere? It depends how you match the mplayer,
that's why I'm interested in seeing those. My suspicion is that you have the
mplayer being matched with rule_any and the vmplayer then gets matched as
well. You could have an exception there as in:

{ rule_any = { class = { mplayer2, mplayer } }
  except = { class = vmplayer },
  props  = { tag = mytags[2][1] }
  }

Or something similar. And then vmplayer wouldn't be matched by this rule.

Hope that it helps,

I.


-- 
To unsubscribe, send mail to awesome-unsubscr...@naquadah.org.


Re: Opening Apps On Screens

2013-07-31 Thread jk121960
HI and thanks, I don’t use that part of the command structure but here are my 
rules


awful.rules.rules = {
-- All clients will match this rule.
{ rule = { },
--  properties = { border_width = beautiful.border_width,
-- border_color = beautiful.border_normal,
-- maximized_vertical   = false,
-- maximized_horizontal = false,
-- focus = true,
-- keys = clientkeys,
-- buttons = clientbuttons } },


  properties = { border_width = beautiful.border_width,
 maximized_vertical   = false,
  size_hints_honor = false, 
 maximized_horizontal = false,
 focus = true,
 keys = clientkeys,
 buttons = clientbuttons } },
{ rule = { class = Kruler },
  properties = { floating = true } },
{ rule = { class = Remmina },
  properties = { floating = true } },
{ rule = { class = Gimp-2.6 },
  properties = { floating = true, ontop = false } },
{ rule = { class = Gimp },
  properties = { floating = true } },
{ rule = { class = xfce4-appfinder },
  properties = { floating = true } },
{ rule = { class = Xfce4-appfinder },
  properties = { floating = true } },
{ rule = { class = Kcalc },
  properties = { floating = true } },
{ rule = { class = toolbox },
  properties = { floating = true } },
{ rule = { class = Shutter },
  properties = { floating = true } },
{ rule = { class = MPlayer },
 properties = { tag = tags[2][1] } },
{ rule = { class = mplayer },
 properties = { tag = tags[2][1] } },
{ rule = { class = feh },
 properties = { tag = tags[1][1] } },
{ rule = { class = Feh },
 properties = { tag = tags[1][1] } },
{ rule = { class = vdpau },
 properties = { tag = tags[1][1] } },
{ rule = { class = Conky },
properties = {
  tag = tags[2][1], 
  floating = true,
  sticky = true,
  ontop = false,
  focusable = false,
  size_hints = {program_position, program_size}
  } },


--{ rule = { class = Htop },
-- properties = { tag = tags[3][10] } },
-- Set Firefox to always map on tags number 1 of screen 2 (3)?
--{ rule = { class = Firefox },
-- properties = { tag = tags[3][1] } },
}
-



Gerald Klein DBA
contac...@geraldklein.com
www.geraldklein.com
geraldklein.wordpress.com
j...@zognet.com
708-599-0352

Arch/Gentoo Awesome, Ranger  Vim the coding triple threat.
Linux registered user #548580 




From: Ignas Anikevičius
Sent: ‎Wednesday‎, ‎July‎ ‎31‎, ‎2013 ‎9‎:‎20‎ ‎AM
To: awesome@naquadah.org
Cc: Gerald Klein

Hi,

On Wednesday 31 July 2013 04:52:59 Gerald Klein wrote:
 The classes for the windows are similar but not the same and it seems like
 the matching is using a contains and not an equals, is there a way to make
 this work right?
 
 Vmplayer and vmplayer
 
 MPlayer and mplayer

Could you post your rules somewhere? It depends how you match the mplayer,
that's why I'm interested in seeing those. My suspicion is that you have the
mplayer being matched with rule_any and the vmplayer then gets matched as
well. You could have an exception there as in:

{ rule_any = { class = { mplayer2, mplayer } }
  except = { class = vmplayer },
  props  = { tag = mytags[2][1] }
  }

Or something similar. And then vmplayer wouldn't be matched by this rule.

Hope that it helps,

I.


-- 
To unsubscribe, send mail to awesome-unsubscr...@naquadah.org.