Re: Path submission

2002-01-31 Thread Matt Sergeant

On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Yanick wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 12:02:52PM +, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> > It is considered *really* poor form to post a bug report against AxKit
> > simply because nobody answered your question.
>
>   Probably a dumb question, but do patches should be sent directly
> to you or piped through rt.cpan.org too?

AxKit patches should be sent to the -dev mailing list, which is now
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (though feel free to send to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] until we migrate the lists).

> I just have squeezed
> import_template() in XML::XPathScript along with a silly hack
> in xpathscript (the utility) that fake the Apache $request
> with arguments passed on the command line, and thought it might
> be fun to share the fun.

Since those aren't directly AxKit related they should come direct to me.

-- 

<:->Get a smart net


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Path submission

2002-01-31 Thread Yanick

On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 12:02:52PM +, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> It is considered *really* poor form to post a bug report against AxKit
> simply because nobody answered your question.

Probably a dumb question, but do patches should be sent directly
to you or piped through rt.cpan.org too? I just have squeezed 
import_template() in XML::XPathScript along with a silly hack
in xpathscript (the utility) that fake the Apache $request 
with arguments passed on the command line, and thought it might 
be fun to share the fun.

Joy,
`/anick

-- 
1. Protect and Nurture Yours.
2. Never Unnecessarily Hurt.
3. Create Beauty.
4. For the Rest, Go Wild.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]