Re: [Ayatana] No one will ever use the upper-left Ubuntu button
Let's see what people who try it have to say. Don't worry if there is negative feedback, that's what exploring and testing are all about. Thanks for making the testable mockup. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana] No one will ever use the upper-left Ubuntu button
On 10 March 2011 09:25, Mark Shuttleworth mark.shuttlewo...@canonical.com wrote: Let's see what people who try it have to say. Don't worry if there is negative feedback, that's what exploring and testing are all about. Thanks for making the testable mockup. I really like the flipping* dock idea, it declutters the application area, I like the separation of applications and places. It's touch friendly, easily discoverable (well, as discoverable as the Dash...) and simple. What's not to like? Luke. *Obviously, a vertical rotation of the dock around the Y-axis would look awesome! ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana] No one will ever use the upper-left Ubuntu button
I like it a lot ! With configuration, for those who choose not hiding the dock, to have by default applications launchers, one click on Ubuntu icon switches to dock with Dash, Places, virtual desktops, trash..., another click re-switch back to applications icons etc... It leaves more space on launcher dock to put many applications icons, perfect. On 10/03/2011 14:12, Marc Lajoie wrote: Okay, here is a more elaborate mockup of what I intended, built on top of David Reichling's preliminary mockup (thanks btw!). Unfortunately I don't have anywhere to host it, so I'm just attaching it as an archive. If someone could put it up somewhere that would be great. As it is it can be used locally (it's only html and javascript). I've tested it only in Chromium browser and on a netbook screen, so if it comes out wacky it's probably my fault. Cheers! Marc Lajoie On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Luke Benstead kaz...@gmail.com mailto:kaz...@gmail.com wrote: On 10 March 2011 09:25, Mark Shuttleworth mark.shuttlewo...@canonical.com mailto:mark.shuttlewo...@canonical.com wrote: Let's see what people who try it have to say. Don't worry if there is negative feedback, that's what exploring and testing are all about. Thanks for making the testable mockup. I really like the flipping* dock idea, it declutters the application area, I like the separation of applications and places. It's touch friendly, easily discoverable (well, as discoverable as the Dash...) and simple. What's not to like? Luke. *Obviously, a vertical rotation of the dock around the Y-axis would look awesome! ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana https://launchpad.net/%7Eayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net mailto:ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana https://launchpad.net/%7Eayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ayatana] [ayatana] Enter for quick selection in Unity menu
I have an idea for functionality of the new Unity menu (Ubuntu button menu), when searching for an application/file to launch/open I don't mean to compare the awesome searching/launching functionality of Unity's search to similar searching as done in Gnome-Do, but I find myself trying to press 'Enter' trying to launch the first item when I do a search for an application, to no avail. For instance, when trying to find the application Hydrogen, it's quite easy to: [Super]hydro (as seen http://anthonyrhook.com/ubuntu/unitylaunch.png) and seeing it at the top of the list, assume 'Enter' would launch it. I'm not sure what other issues this may cause, as I would guess the first entry would have to be auto-highlighted for it to be launched/opened/etc. Any other thoughts on this? Perhaps it's been discussed and I'm late to the conversation, too. -- - Anthony Hook ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana] No one will ever use the upper-left Ubuntu button
Hi there, I like it!! But maybe the workspace switcher would fit better on the applications view of the launcher, instead of in the dash view? It is used to switch between workspaces and opened applications, so it does not belong to the dash view... at least imo. Thanks for your mockup and cheers! On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Xavier valeryan...@laposte.net wrote: I like it a lot ! With configuration, for those who choose not hiding the dock, to have by default applications launchers, one click on Ubuntu icon switches to dock with Dash, Places, virtual desktops, trash..., another click re-switch back to applications icons etc... It leaves more space on launcher dock to put many applications icons, perfect. On 10/03/2011 14:12, Marc Lajoie wrote: Okay, here is a more elaborate mockup of what I intended, built on top of David Reichling's preliminary mockup (thanks btw!). Unfortunately I don't have anywhere to host it, so I'm just attaching it as an archive. If someone could put it up somewhere that would be great. As it is it can be used locally (it's only html and javascript). I've tested it only in Chromium browser and on a netbook screen, so if it comes out wacky it's probably my fault. Cheers! Marc Lajoie On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Luke Benstead kaz...@gmail.com wrote: On 10 March 2011 09:25, Mark Shuttleworth mark.shuttlewo...@canonical.com wrote: Let's see what people who try it have to say. Don't worry if there is negative feedback, that's what exploring and testing are all about. Thanks for making the testable mockup. I really like the flipping* dock idea, it declutters the application area, I like the separation of applications and places. It's touch friendly, easily discoverable (well, as discoverable as the Dash...) and simple. What's not to like? Luke. *Obviously, a vertical rotation of the dock around the Y-axis would look awesome! ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana] [ayatana] Enter for quick selection in Unity menu
I posted the same idea in the Ubuntu forums; I think the search shold show the results just like now, but highlighting one of them, that will be launched if the user presses enter. This would make it really useful and fast for the user. And if it was like Gnome-Do, that learns from past user selections, it would really be great. In fact, maybe some code of Gnome-Do or similar applications could be used there. 2011/3/10 Anthony Hook anthony.ho...@gmail.com I have an idea for functionality of the new Unity menu (Ubuntu button menu), when searching for an application/file to launch/open I don't mean to compare the awesome searching/launching functionality of Unity's search to similar searching as done in Gnome-Do, but I find myself trying to press 'Enter' trying to launch the first item when I do a search for an application, to no avail. For instance, when trying to find the application Hydrogen, it's quite easy to: [Super]hydro (as seen http://anthonyrhook.com/ubuntu/unitylaunch.png) and seeing it at the top of the list, assume 'Enter' would launch it. I'm not sure what other issues this may cause, as I would guess the first entry would have to be auto-highlighted for it to be launched/opened/etc. Any other thoughts on this? Perhaps it's been discussed and I'm late to the conversation, too. -- - Anthony Hook ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana] No one will ever use the upper-left Ubuntu button
Hi everyone, I really like the idea of having the dash flip on interaction with the ubuntu button. It is surprisingly elegant as a space saver. However, I do find some problems with it. 1. It makes accessing places somewhat harder, and since this is something I use often, it seems to detracts from my work flow at least. 2. It effectively hides the wonderful shortcuts of supera and superf, making it less clear that they could in fact always be available (as you would suspect them to be, i.e. global/universal). 3. I like how from the places icon in the dash you can search for files, and that you can do the same from the applications icon, but in the end I often use universal search (synapse, gnome-do, kupfer) to find what I need, which seems to be something that the ubuntu button could do very well when clicked (it does need some improvements, like selecting the most likely result, etc, such as these launchers do). 4. We cannot DnD to the folded side of the launcher. These seem like harsh critiques, but they're not, really. I'm simply stating that these are some problems with the idea, but I suspect they can be fixed somehow. Some possible solutions: 1. Not too big of a problem, may not need a fix at all... 2. When holding down the super key we could show all icons with shortcuts, so mix the places and app icons in or, maybe show them in a second row of the launcher (sort of like unfolding it) temporarily. 3. We could solve this one by adding an icon on the folded side of the launcher for universal search, or show the current version of the dash, just as we do now, combined with the flipped launcher. 4. When DnDing, unfold the launcher, just like in 2. Thank you all for you're time. I hope we can make this idea work! Greetings, Arian 2011/3/10 Oscar RdG oscar...@gmail.com Hi there, I like it!! But maybe the workspace switcher would fit better on the applications view of the launcher, instead of in the dash view? It is used to switch between workspaces and opened applications, so it does not belong to the dash view... at least imo. Thanks for your mockup and cheers! On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Xavier valeryan...@laposte.net wrote: I like it a lot ! With configuration, for those who choose not hiding the dock, to have by default applications launchers, one click on Ubuntu icon switches to dock with Dash, Places, virtual desktops, trash..., another click re-switch back to applications icons etc... It leaves more space on launcher dock to put many applications icons, perfect. On 10/03/2011 14:12, Marc Lajoie wrote: Okay, here is a more elaborate mockup of what I intended, built on top of David Reichling's preliminary mockup (thanks btw!). Unfortunately I don't have anywhere to host it, so I'm just attaching it as an archive. If someone could put it up somewhere that would be great. As it is it can be used locally (it's only html and javascript). I've tested it only in Chromium browser and on a netbook screen, so if it comes out wacky it's probably my fault. Cheers! Marc Lajoie On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Luke Benstead kaz...@gmail.com wrote: On 10 March 2011 09:25, Mark Shuttleworth mark.shuttlewo...@canonical.com wrote: Let's see what people who try it have to say. Don't worry if there is negative feedback, that's what exploring and testing are all about. Thanks for making the testable mockup. I really like the flipping* dock idea, it declutters the application area, I like the separation of applications and places. It's touch friendly, easily discoverable (well, as discoverable as the Dash...) and simple. What's not to like? Luke. *Obviously, a vertical rotation of the dock around the Y-axis would look awesome! ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- http://avond.schemering.nl ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana] Unity Dock Icons behavior - Context Menu
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Xavier Guillot wrote: - Keep in launcher - Quit and a third one to launch another window of the program ... Now this possibility disappeared, it's available with middle click. Hello Xavier. I've leaned over the table and enquired about this, and John has told me that the middle-click shortcut is supposed to be *in addition* to the means of opening a new window via the right-click QuickList. Apparently it's a co-incidence that one temporarily disappeared whilst the other was being introduced. -Paul ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana] No one will ever use the upper-left Ubuntu button
I really like nr 4 alot! Feels quite natural somehow! 2011/3/10 David david.reichl...@googlemail.com Hi, Stuart Langridge changed the animation (flip over) http://unity.exemo.net/4/ and Marc Lajoie send me his version of the mockup: http://unity.exemo.net/5/ David Reichling ps maybe i should add a dropdown menu to choose the version 2011/3/10 Arian van Gend aria...@gmail.com: Hi everyone, I really like the idea of having the dash flip on interaction with the ubuntu button. It is surprisingly elegant as a space saver. However, I do find some problems with it. 1. It makes accessing places somewhat harder, and since this is something I use often, it seems to detracts from my work flow at least. 2. It effectively hides the wonderful shortcuts of supera and superf, making it less clear that they could in fact always be available (as you would suspect them to be, i.e. global/universal). 3. I like how from the places icon in the dash you can search for files, and that you can do the same from the applications icon, but in the end I often use universal search (synapse, gnome-do, kupfer) to find what I need, which seems to be something that the ubuntu button could do very well when clicked (it does need some improvements, like selecting the most likely result, etc, such as these launchers do). 4. We cannot DnD to the folded side of the launcher. These seem like harsh critiques, but they're not, really. I'm simply stating that these are some problems with the idea, but I suspect they can be fixed somehow. Some possible solutions: 1. Not too big of a problem, may not need a fix at all... 2. When holding down the super key we could show all icons with shortcuts, so mix the places and app icons in or, maybe show them in a second row of the launcher (sort of like unfolding it) temporarily. 3. We could solve this one by adding an icon on the folded side of the launcher for universal search, or show the current version of the dash, just as we do now, combined with the flipped launcher. 4. When DnDing, unfold the launcher, just like in 2. Thank you all for you're time. I hope we can make this idea work! Greetings, Arian 2011/3/10 Oscar RdG oscar...@gmail.com Hi there, I like it!! But maybe the workspace switcher would fit better on the applications view of the launcher, instead of in the dash view? It is used to switch between workspaces and opened applications, so it does not belong to the dash view... at least imo. Thanks for your mockup and cheers! On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Xavier valeryan...@laposte.net wrote: I like it a lot ! With configuration, for those who choose not hiding the dock, to have by default applications launchers, one click on Ubuntu icon switches to dock with Dash, Places, virtual desktops, trash..., another click re-switch back to applications icons etc... It leaves more space on launcher dock to put many applications icons, perfect. On 10/03/2011 14:12, Marc Lajoie wrote: Okay, here is a more elaborate mockup of what I intended, built on top of David Reichling's preliminary mockup (thanks btw!). Unfortunately I don't have anywhere to host it, so I'm just attaching it as an archive. If someone could put it up somewhere that would be great. As it is it can be used locally (it's only html and javascript). I've tested it only in Chromium browser and on a netbook screen, so if it comes out wacky it's probably my fault. Cheers! Marc Lajoie On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Luke Benstead kaz...@gmail.com wrote: On 10 March 2011 09:25, Mark Shuttleworth mark.shuttlewo...@canonical.com wrote: Let's see what people who try it have to say. Don't worry if there is negative feedback, that's what exploring and testing are all about. Thanks for making the testable mockup. I really like the flipping* dock idea, it declutters the application area, I like the separation of applications and places. It's touch friendly, easily discoverable (well, as discoverable as the Dash...) and simple. What's not to like? Luke. *Obviously, a vertical rotation of the dock around the Y-axis would look awesome! ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana] Unity Dock Icons behavior - Context Menu
At the beginning, with mouse right click on an icon, there were 3 lines : - Keep in launcher - Quit and a third one to launch another window of the program (ie a second terminal instance, or a second Nautilus window...) No this possibility disappeared, it's available with middle click. I agree with this, just suppose we are using touchpad (ie laptops, notebooks, netbooks) and not mouse. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ayatana] Introduction and suggestion
Hey All. I'd like to first introduce myself. I'm Ian Santopietro. I currently do tech support for System76, and have for nearly a year. I've been using ubuntu since 6.10, and I love to see all of the progress that it's made since then. So far, I'm delighted with Unity, and barring a few issues of missing features, am ready for natty. (Actually, I should say I really can't wait for natty. It will be totally awesome!) Anyway, I have noticed something that feels inconsistent to me: The Unity Panel. It feels out of place to me. It's hard to describe with words, so I do have a couple of pictures: Here's one at a default configuration: http://ubuntuone.com/p/h8E/ And a possibly tweaked configuration with the transparency set: http://ubuntuone.com/p/h8D/ Most of Unity's central design is dark, solid backgrounds with white outlines and highlights. It's a strong design, and it feels clean, slick, and modern. But the panel doesn't fit this at all. The after shot in my suggestion, in my opinion, does a better job of bringing it all together and making it feel consistent. -- Ian Santopietro CEO - Prodigy Games Eala Earendel enlga beorohtast Ofer middangeard monnum sended Pa gur yv y porthaur? Public GPG key (RSA): http://keyserver.ubuntu.com:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x412F52DB1BBF1234 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ayatana] We need a short-term solution for mail applications and the messaging menu
Hi all, Let me start the discussion by saying I agree with Matthew: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/packageselection-desktop-n-coherent-behavior-for-apps-in-messagingmenu http://design.canonical.com/2011/03/quit/ The engineering solution here is for messaging clients to split out the code that checks for new messages, so that it can optionally run even while the rest of the application is not. However, I don't think this separation is coming anytime soon. Meanwhile, for several releases now Evolution is being the only inconsistent application in the Messaging Menu, the only that quits on close, the only one that needs to be present on both the MM and the taskbar (soon to be Unity Launcher). Thunderbird is getting Messaging Menu support with the exact same problem, and to make things worse we will now not only have redundancy of presence, but also redundancy of information presentation: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~indicator-applet-developers/evolution-indicator/trunk/revision/77 http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/03/thunderbird-getting-some-unity-love/ Evolution/Thunderbird should be on the launcher, or the messaging menu, but *not* on both of them. I don't expect a patch that modularizes Evolution or Thunderbird dropping from the sky, so we need a short term solution instead of continuing to ship the current, horribly redundant, situation. My suggestion is to either accept Geoff Goehle's patch: https://code.launchpad.net/~goehle/evolution-indicator/dont-quit-on-close/+merge/42151 or to remove Evolution from the Messaging Menu entirely, as it can be argued that email is not something you should be interested in being constantly notified about anyway and Evolution consumes a lot of memory. (see pitti's comments in the first link) Thoughts? ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana] Introduction and suggestion
That's quite a good mockup Ian. That's said, if we change the color of the panel, I think we should also change the color of the window borders to that slick black, or the panel will still look inconsistent when comparing to the windows' borders. But I still can not imagine what will happen if we change all the windows' borders to slick black... I don't know if it is a good idea... On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Ian Santopietro isan...@gmail.com wrote: Hey All. I'd like to first introduce myself. I'm Ian Santopietro. I currently do tech support for System76, and have for nearly a year. I've been using ubuntu since 6.10, and I love to see all of the progress that it's made since then. So far, I'm delighted with Unity, and barring a few issues of missing features, am ready for natty. (Actually, I should say I really can't wait for natty. It will be totally awesome!) Anyway, I have noticed something that feels inconsistent to me: The Unity Panel. It feels out of place to me. It's hard to describe with words, so I do have a couple of pictures: Here's one at a default configuration: http://ubuntuone.com/p/h8E/ And a possibly tweaked configuration with the transparency set: http://ubuntuone.com/p/h8D/ Most of Unity's central design is dark, solid backgrounds with white outlines and highlights. It's a strong design, and it feels clean, slick, and modern. But the panel doesn't fit this at all. The after shot in my suggestion, in my opinion, does a better job of bringing it all together and making it feel consistent. -- Ian Santopietro CEO - Prodigy Games Eala Earendel enlga beorohtast Ofer middangeard monnum sended Pa gur yv y porthaur? Public GPG key (RSA): http://keyserver.ubuntu.com:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x412F52DB1BBF1234 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana] We need a short-term solution for mail applications and the messaging menu
Another option, that might not be any more practical than factoring out evolution's mail-checking code: - Fix mail-notification's ssl issues by switching to gnutls - Get mail-notification using the messaging menu instead of the notification area (Optionally) - Let evolution export account settings so mail-notification runs automatically. On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 17:27, Conscious User consciousu...@aol.com wrote: Hi all, Let me start the discussion by saying I agree with Matthew: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/packageselection-desktop-n-coherent-behavior-for-apps-in-messagingmenu http://design.canonical.com/2011/03/quit/ The engineering solution here is for messaging clients to split out the code that checks for new messages, so that it can optionally run even while the rest of the application is not. However, I don't think this separation is coming anytime soon. Meanwhile, for several releases now Evolution is being the only inconsistent application in the Messaging Menu, the only that quits on close, the only one that needs to be present on both the MM and the taskbar (soon to be Unity Launcher). Thunderbird is getting Messaging Menu support with the exact same problem, and to make things worse we will now not only have redundancy of presence, but also redundancy of information presentation: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~indicator-applet-developers/evolution-indicator/trunk/revision/77 http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/03/thunderbird-getting-some-unity-love/ Evolution/Thunderbird should be on the launcher, or the messaging menu, but *not* on both of them. I don't expect a patch that modularizes Evolution or Thunderbird dropping from the sky, so we need a short term solution instead of continuing to ship the current, horribly redundant, situation. My suggestion is to either accept Geoff Goehle's patch: https://code.launchpad.net/~goehle/evolution-indicator/dont-quit-on-close/+merge/42151 or to remove Evolution from the Messaging Menu entirely, as it can be argued that email is not something you should be interested in being constantly notified about anyway and Evolution consumes a lot of memory. (see pitti's comments in the first link) Thoughts? ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Jeremy Nickurak -= Email/XMPP: -= jer...@nickurak.ca =- ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana] Introduction and suggestion
I think we should change both the WINDOWS BORDERS and the UNITY PANEL to slick black like what Ian said (see the quoted text section of this email for more information). http://ubuntuone.com/p/h8E/ http://ubuntuone.com/p/h8D/ Anybody wants to comment? On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Phong Cao phn...@gmail.com wrote: That's quite a good mockup Ian. That's said, if we change the color of the panel, I think we should also change the color of the window borders to that slick black, or the panel will still look inconsistent when comparing to the windows' borders. But I still can not imagine what will happen if we change all the windows' borders to slick black... I don't know if it is a good idea... On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Ian Santopietro isan...@gmail.comwrote: Hey All. I'd like to first introduce myself. I'm Ian Santopietro. I currently do tech support for System76, and have for nearly a year. I've been using ubuntu since 6.10, and I love to see all of the progress that it's made since then. So far, I'm delighted with Unity, and barring a few issues of missing features, am ready for natty. (Actually, I should say I really can't wait for natty. It will be totally awesome!) Anyway, I have noticed something that feels inconsistent to me: The Unity Panel. It feels out of place to me. It's hard to describe with words, so I do have a couple of pictures: Here's one at a default configuration: http://ubuntuone.com/p/h8E/ And a possibly tweaked configuration with the transparency set: http://ubuntuone.com/p/h8D/ Most of Unity's central design is dark, solid backgrounds with white outlines and highlights. It's a strong design, and it feels clean, slick, and modern. But the panel doesn't fit this at all. The after shot in my suggestion, in my opinion, does a better job of bringing it all together and making it feel consistent. -- Ian Santopietro CEO - Prodigy Games Eala Earendel enlga beorohtast Ofer middangeard monnum sended Pa gur yv y porthaur? Public GPG key (RSA): http://keyserver.ubuntu.com:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x412F52DB1BBF1234 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana] Unity Dock Icons behavior - Context Menu
Le jeudi 10 mars 2011 à 17:20 +, Paul Sladen a écrit : On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Xavier Guillot wrote: - Keep in launcher - Quit and a third one to launch another window of the program ... Now this possibility disappeared, it's available with middle click. Hello Xavier. I've leaned over the table and enquired about this, and John has told me that the middle-click shortcut is supposed to be *in addition* to the means of opening a new window via the right-click QuickList. Apparently it's a co-incidence that one temporarily disappeared whilst the other was being introduced. No, it has been done on purpose as asked on bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/709707 See the comment 3. The idea is to add quicklist entries in the desktop files when we know applications support multiple instances (which isn't always the case, like devhelp which doesn't open a new one but focus the existing instance), or when it doesn't do thing wrong (like gimp, opening a new full instance with toolbar and such and not only a new document). Some guidance about how to do that is available there: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Unity/LauncherAPI#Static Quicklist entries We are still discussing on the xdg list about the OnlyShowIn values (Unity or X-Unity) before launching a campaign of community help :) Didier ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ayatana-commits] [Merge] lp:~pitti/indicator-session/extra-launcher-dir into lp:indicator-session
Martin Pitt has proposed merging lp:~pitti/indicator-session/extra-launcher-dir
into lp:indicator-session.
Requested reviews:
Ted Gould (ted)
Related bugs:
Bug #727823 in Session Menu: Enable Gnome-Control-Center in Unity, and add
System Settings link to the session indicator menu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/indicator-session/+bug/727823
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~pitti/indicator-session/extra-launcher-dir/+merge/52813
Hardcoding a single extra launcher path is impractical for distributions, as
multiple packages would collide on the name and wouldn't give any extra
customization possibility for OEMs.
This branch adds support for reading
/usr/share/indicators/session/applications/*.desktop and appending them to the
session indicator. This will allow us to implement bug 727823 for Ubuntu while
retaining the OEM customization possibility.
/usr/share/applications/indicator-session-extra.desktop should be obsoleted. I
didn't rip out the code for this yet, do you want me to?
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~pitti/indicator-session/extra-launcher-dir/+merge/52813
Your team ayatana-commits is subscribed to branch lp:indicator-session.
=== modified file 'src/session-service.c'
--- src/session-service.c 2010-08-12 14:17:03 +
+++ src/session-service.c 2011-03-10 10:18:55 +
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@
#define UP_INTERFACE org.freedesktop.UPower
#define DESKTOP_FILE /usr/share/applications/indicator-session-extra.desktop
+#define EXTRA_LAUNCHER_DIR /usr/share/indicators/session/applications
#define GUEST_SESSION_LAUNCHER /usr/share/gdm/guest-session/guest-session-launch
@@ -517,6 +518,19 @@
return;
}
+static void
+add_extra_separator_once (DbusmenuMenuitem *menu)
+{
+ static gboolean added = FALSE;
+
+ if (!added) {
+ DbusmenuMenuitem * separator = dbusmenu_menuitem_new();
+ dbusmenu_menuitem_property_set(separator, DBUSMENU_MENUITEM_PROP_TYPE, DBUSMENU_CLIENT_TYPES_SEPARATOR);
+ dbusmenu_menuitem_child_append(menu, separator);
+ added = TRUE;
+ }
+}
+
/* Builds up the menu for us */
static void
rebuild_items (DbusmenuMenuitem *root,
@@ -529,6 +543,8 @@
gboolean can_activate;
gboolean can_lockscreen;
GList *children;
+ GDir *extra_launchers_dir;
+ const gchar *extra_launcher_file;
/* Make sure we have a valid GConf client, and build one
if needed */
@@ -713,14 +729,34 @@
update_menu_entries(restart_shutdown_logout_mi);
+ /* now add extra launchers */
+
if (g_file_test(DESKTOP_FILE, G_FILE_TEST_EXISTS)) {
GAppInfo * appinfo = G_APP_INFO(g_desktop_app_info_new_from_filename(DESKTOP_FILE));
if (appinfo != NULL) {
- DbusmenuMenuitem * separator = dbusmenu_menuitem_new();
- dbusmenu_menuitem_property_set(separator, DBUSMENU_MENUITEM_PROP_TYPE, DBUSMENU_CLIENT_TYPES_SEPARATOR);
- dbusmenu_menuitem_child_append(root, separator);
-
+ add_extra_separator_once (root);
+ DbusmenuMenuitem * desktop_mi = dbusmenu_menuitem_new();
+ dbusmenu_menuitem_property_set(desktop_mi, DBUSMENU_MENUITEM_PROP_LABEL, g_app_info_get_name(appinfo));
+ g_signal_connect(G_OBJECT(desktop_mi), DBUSMENU_MENUITEM_SIGNAL_ITEM_ACTIVATED, G_CALLBACK(desktop_activate_cb), appinfo);
+ dbusmenu_menuitem_child_append(root, desktop_mi);
+ }
+ }
+
+ extra_launchers_dir = g_dir_open (EXTRA_LAUNCHER_DIR, 0, NULL);
+ if (extra_launchers_dir != NULL) {
+ for (;;) {
+ extra_launcher_file = g_dir_read_name (extra_launchers_dir);
+ if (extra_launcher_file == NULL)
+break;
+ if (!g_str_has_suffix (extra_launcher_file, .desktop))
+continue;
+
+ gchar *full_path = g_build_filename (EXTRA_LAUNCHER_DIR, extra_launcher_file, NULL);
+ GAppInfo * appinfo = G_APP_INFO(g_desktop_app_info_new_from_filename (full_path));
+ g_free (full_path);
+
+ add_extra_separator_once (root);
DbusmenuMenuitem * desktop_mi = dbusmenu_menuitem_new();
dbusmenu_menuitem_property_set(desktop_mi, DBUSMENU_MENUITEM_PROP_LABEL, g_app_info_get_name(appinfo));
g_signal_connect(G_OBJECT(desktop_mi), DBUSMENU_MENUITEM_SIGNAL_ITEM_ACTIVATED, G_CALLBACK(desktop_activate_cb), appinfo);
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits
Post to : ayatana-commits@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ayatana-commits] [Merge] lp:~mterry/indicator-datetime/fix-show-calendar into lp:indicator-datetime
Michael Terry has proposed merging
lp:~mterry/indicator-datetime/fix-show-calendar into lp:indicator-datetime.
Requested reviews:
Indicator Applet Developers (indicator-applet-developers)
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/indicator-datetime/fix-show-calendar/+merge/52867
This causes the show-calendar setting to work robustly.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/indicator-datetime/fix-show-calendar/+merge/52867
Your team ayatana-commits is subscribed to branch lp:indicator-datetime.
=== modified file 'src/datetime-service.c'
--- src/datetime-service.c 2011-03-04 10:35:22 +
+++ src/datetime-service.c 2011-03-10 15:13:21 +
@@ -336,8 +336,6 @@
check_for_calendar (gpointer user_data)
{
g_return_val_if_fail (calendar != NULL, FALSE);
-
- if (!g_settings_get_boolean(conf, SETTINGS_SHOW_CALENDAR_S)) return FALSE;
gchar *evo = g_find_program_in_path(evolution);
if (evo != NULL) {
=== modified file 'src/indicator-datetime.c'
--- src/indicator-datetime.c 2011-03-04 12:03:49 +
+++ src/indicator-datetime.c 2011-03-10 15:13:21 +
@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@
gboolean custom_show_seconds;
gboolean show_week_numbers;
+ gboolean show_calendar;
gint week_start;
guint idle_measure;
@@ -110,7 +111,8 @@
PROP_SHOW_DAY,
PROP_SHOW_DATE,
PROP_CUSTOM_TIME_FORMAT,
- PROP_SHOW_WEEK_NUMBERS
+ PROP_SHOW_WEEK_NUMBERS,
+ PROP_SHOW_CALENDAR
};
typedef struct _indicator_item_t indicator_item_t;
@@ -129,6 +131,7 @@
#define PROP_SHOW_DATE_Sshow-date
#define PROP_CUSTOM_TIME_FORMAT_S custom-time-format
#define PROP_SHOW_WEEK_NUMBERS_Sshow-week-numbers
+#define PROP_SHOW_CALENDAR_Sshow-calendar
#define INDICATOR_DATETIME_GET_PRIVATE(o) \
(G_TYPE_INSTANCE_GET_PRIVATE ((o), INDICATOR_DATETIME_TYPE, IndicatorDatetimePrivate))
@@ -240,6 +243,13 @@
Shows the week numbers in the monthly calendar in indicator-datetime's menu.,
FALSE, /* default */
G_PARAM_READWRITE | G_PARAM_STATIC_STRINGS));
+ g_object_class_install_property (object_class,
+ PROP_SHOW_CALENDAR,
+ g_param_spec_boolean(PROP_SHOW_CALENDAR_S,
+ Whether to show the calendar.,
+ Shows the monthly calendar in indicator-datetime's menu.,
+ TRUE, /* default */
+ G_PARAM_READWRITE | G_PARAM_STATIC_STRINGS));
return;
}
@@ -303,6 +313,11 @@
self,
PROP_SHOW_WEEK_NUMBERS_S,
G_SETTINGS_BIND_DEFAULT);
+ g_settings_bind(self-priv-settings,
+ SETTINGS_SHOW_CALENDAR_S,
+ self,
+ PROP_SHOW_CALENDAR_S,
+ G_SETTINGS_BIND_DEFAULT);
} else {
g_warning(Unable to get settings for ' SETTINGS_INTERFACE ');
}
@@ -541,6 +556,13 @@
}
break;
}
+ case PROP_SHOW_CALENDAR: {
+ if (g_value_get_boolean(value) != self-priv-show_calendar) {
+ self-priv-show_calendar = g_value_get_boolean(value);
+ gtk_widget_set_visible (GTK_WIDGET (self-priv-ido_calendar), self-priv-show_calendar);
+ }
+ break;
+ }
default:
G_OBJECT_WARN_INVALID_PROPERTY_ID(object, prop_id, pspec);
return;
@@ -599,6 +621,9 @@
case PROP_SHOW_WEEK_NUMBERS:
g_value_set_boolean(value, self-priv-show_week_numbers);
break;
+ case PROP_SHOW_CALENDAR:
+ g_value_set_boolean(value, self-priv-show_calendar);
+ break;
default:
G_OBJECT_WARN_INVALID_PROPERTY_ID(object, prop_id, pspec);
return;
@@ -1228,7 +1253,9 @@
else
flags = ~GTK_CALENDAR_SHOW_WEEK_NUMBERS;
ido_calendar_menu_item_set_display_options (self-priv-ido_calendar, flags);
-
+
+ gtk_widget_set_visible (GTK_WIDGET (self-priv-ido_calendar), self-priv-show_calendar);
+
dbusmenu_gtkclient_newitem_base(DBUSMENU_GTKCLIENT(client), newitem, GTK_MENU_ITEM(ido), parent);
g_signal_connect_after(ido, month-changed, G_CALLBACK(month_changed_cb), (gpointer)newitem);
return TRUE;
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits
Post to : ayatana-commits@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana-commits] [Merge] lp:~ken-vandine/indicator-me/lp_655252 into lp:indicator-me
Review: Approve review approve merge approve -- https://code.launchpad.net/~ken-vandine/indicator-me/lp_655252/+merge/52893 Your team ayatana-commits is subscribed to branch lp:indicator-me. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits Post to : ayatana-commits@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ayatana-commits] [Merge] lp:~mterry/indicator-datetime/disable-clock-prefs-if-no-indicator into lp:indicator-datetime
Michael Terry has proposed merging
lp:~mterry/indicator-datetime/disable-clock-prefs-if-no-indicator into
lp:indicator-datetime.
Requested reviews:
Indicator Applet Developers (indicator-applet-developers)
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/indicator-datetime/disable-clock-prefs-if-no-indicator/+merge/52912
As per spec, don't enable clock prefs if no clock
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/indicator-datetime/disable-clock-prefs-if-no-indicator/+merge/52912
Your team ayatana-commits is subscribed to branch lp:indicator-datetime.
=== modified file 'src/datetime-prefs.c'
--- src/datetime-prefs.c 2011-03-03 18:14:14 +
+++ src/datetime-prefs.c 2011-03-10 19:51:58 +
@@ -225,7 +225,8 @@
g_variant_unref (answers);
}
-void proxy_ready (GObject *object, GAsyncResult *res, gpointer user_data)
+static void
+proxy_ready (GObject *object, GAsyncResult *res, gpointer user_data)
{
GError * error = NULL;
@@ -244,6 +245,35 @@
NULL, tz_query_answered, NULL);
}
+static void
+service_name_owner_changed (GDBusProxy * proxy, GParamSpec *pspec, gpointer user_data)
+{
+ GtkWidget * widget = GTK_WIDGET (user_data);
+ gchar * owner = g_dbus_proxy_get_name_owner (proxy);
+
+ gtk_widget_set_sensitive (widget, (owner != NULL));
+
+ g_free (owner);
+}
+
+static void
+service_proxy_ready (GObject *object, GAsyncResult *res, gpointer user_data)
+{
+ GError * error = NULL;
+
+ proxy = g_dbus_proxy_new_for_bus_finish (res, error);
+
+ if (error != NULL) {
+g_critical(Could not grab DBus proxy for indicator-datetime-service: %s, error-message);
+g_error_free(error);
+return;
+ }
+
+ /* And now, do initial proxy configuration */
+ g_signal_connect (proxy, notify::g-name-owner, G_CALLBACK (service_name_owner_changed), user_data);
+ service_name_owner_changed (proxy, NULL, user_data);
+}
+
static gboolean
are_spinners_focused (void)
{
@@ -634,6 +664,17 @@
org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.DateTimeMechanism,
NULL, proxy_ready, NULL);
+ /* Grab proxy for datetime service, to see if it's running. It would
+ actually be more ideal to see if the indicator module itself is running,
+ but that doesn't yet claim a name on the bus. Presumably the service
+ would have been started by any such indicator, so this will at least tell
+ us if there *was* a datetime module run this session. */
+ g_dbus_proxy_new_for_bus (G_BUS_TYPE_SESSION, G_DBUS_PROXY_FLAGS_DO_NOT_AUTO_START, NULL,
+com.canonical.indicator.datetime,
+/com/canonical/indicator/datetime/service,
+com.canonical.indicator.datetime.service,
+NULL, service_proxy_ready, WIG (showClockCheck));
+
#undef WIG
g_object_unref (conf);
@@ -678,7 +719,6 @@
unique_app_watch_window (app, GTK_WINDOW (dlg));
gtk_widget_show_all (dlg);
-g_signal_connect (dlg, response, G_CALLBACK(gtk_main_quit), NULL);
g_signal_connect (dlg, destroy, G_CALLBACK(gtk_main_quit), NULL);
gtk_main ();
}
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits
Post to : ayatana-commits@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ayatana-commits] [Merge] lp:~pitti/indicator-session/extra-launcher-dir into lp:indicator-session
The proposal to merge lp:~pitti/indicator-session/extra-launcher-dir into lp:indicator-session has been updated. Status: Needs review = Merged For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~pitti/indicator-session/extra-launcher-dir/+merge/52813 -- https://code.launchpad.net/~pitti/indicator-session/extra-launcher-dir/+merge/52813 Your team ayatana-commits is subscribed to branch lp:indicator-session. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits Post to : ayatana-commits@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ayatana-commits] [Branch ~indicator-applet-developers/indicator-me/trunk] Rev 136: version bump, 0.2.15
revno: 136 tags: 0.2.15 committer: Ken VanDine ken.vand...@canonical.com branch nick: indicator-me-trunk timestamp: Thu 2011-03-10 16:35:18 -0500 message: version bump, 0.2.15 modified: configure.ac -- lp:indicator-me https://code.launchpad.net/~indicator-applet-developers/indicator-me/trunk Your team ayatana-commits is subscribed to branch lp:indicator-me. To unsubscribe from this branch go to https://code.launchpad.net/~indicator-applet-developers/indicator-me/trunk/+edit-subscription === modified file 'configure.ac' --- configure.ac 2011-03-02 19:22:35 + +++ configure.ac 2011-03-10 21:35:18 + @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ -AC_INIT(indicator-me, 0.2.10, david.ba...@canonical.com) +AC_INIT(indicator-me, 0.2.15, david.ba...@canonical.com) AC_COPYRIGHT([Copyright 2009, 2010 Canonical]) AC_PREREQ(2.53) AM_CONFIG_HEADER(config.h) -AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(indicator-me, 0.2.14) +AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(indicator-me, 0.2.15) AM_MAINTAINER_MODE ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits Post to : ayatana-commits@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ayatana-commits] [Branch ~indicator-applet-developers/indicator-me/trunk] Rev 135: Merged
Merge authors:
Ken VanDine (ken-vandine)
Related merge proposals:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ken-vandine/indicator-me/lp_655252/+merge/52893
proposed by: Ken VanDine (ken-vandine)
review: Approve - Ted Gould (ted)
revno: 135 [merge]
committer: Ken VanDine ken.vand...@canonical.com
branch nick: indicator-me-trunk
timestamp: Thu 2011-03-10 16:34:32 -0500
message:
Merged
modified:
src/indicator-me.c
src/me-service.c
--
lp:indicator-me
https://code.launchpad.net/~indicator-applet-developers/indicator-me/trunk
Your team ayatana-commits is subscribed to branch lp:indicator-me.
To unsubscribe from this branch go to
https://code.launchpad.net/~indicator-applet-developers/indicator-me/trunk/+edit-subscription
=== modified file 'src/indicator-me.c'
--- src/indicator-me.c 2011-03-02 19:22:20 +
+++ src/indicator-me.c 2011-03-10 17:53:09 +
@@ -546,12 +546,14 @@
g_debug (%s, __func__);
- if (! entry_hint_is_shown (GTK_WIDGET (entry)))
-if (gtk_entry_get_text_length (entry) == 0)
+ if (! entry_hint_is_shown (GTK_WIDGET (entry))) {
+if (gtk_entry_get_text_length (entry) == 0) {
/* show the hint unconditionnaly, as the focus change
may not have propagated already and entry_maybe_show_hint
could get confused */
entry_hint_show_hint (entry);
+}
+ }
return FALSE;
}
@@ -568,8 +570,7 @@
}
if (g_strcmp0 (prop, DBUSMENU_ENTRY_MENUITEM_PROP_HINT) == 0) {
entry_set_hint (entry, g_variant_get_string (value, NULL));
-if (entry_hint_is_shown (GTK_WIDGET (entry)))
-entry_maybe_show_hint (entry); /* visual update */
+entry_hint_show_hint (entry); /* visual update */
}
}
@@ -605,7 +606,7 @@
}
g_object_set_data (G_OBJECT (ido),
- dbusmenitem,
+ dbusmenuitem,
newitem);
gtk_entry_set_width_chars (entry, 23); /* set some nice aspect ratio for the menu */
=== modified file 'src/me-service.c'
--- src/me-service.c 2011-03-02 21:07:10 +
+++ src/me-service.c 2011-03-10 15:16:31 +
@@ -191,10 +191,11 @@
return;
}
- if (! dbusmenu_menuitem_property_get_bool (broadcast_field, DBUSMENU_MENUITEM_PROP_VISIBLE))
+ dbusmenu_menuitem_property_set (broadcast_field, DBUSMENU_ENTRY_MENUITEM_PROP_HINT, me_gwibber_service_get_accounts_string (instance));
+
+ if (! dbusmenu_menuitem_property_get_bool (broadcast_field, DBUSMENU_MENUITEM_PROP_VISIBLE)) {
dbusmenu_menuitem_property_set_bool (broadcast_field, DBUSMENU_MENUITEM_PROP_VISIBLE, TRUE);
-
- dbusmenu_menuitem_property_set (broadcast_field, DBUSMENU_ENTRY_MENUITEM_PROP_HINT, me_gwibber_service_get_accounts_string (instance));
+ }
return;
}
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits
Post to : ayatana-commits@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ayatana-commits] [Merge] lp:~ken-vandine/indicator-me/lp_655252 into lp:indicator-me
The proposal to merge lp:~ken-vandine/indicator-me/lp_655252 into lp:indicator-me has been updated. Status: Approved = Merged For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~ken-vandine/indicator-me/lp_655252/+merge/52893 -- https://code.launchpad.net/~ken-vandine/indicator-me/lp_655252/+merge/52893 Your team ayatana-commits is subscribed to branch lp:indicator-me. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits Post to : ayatana-commits@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ayatana-commits] [Merge] lp:~gunnarhj/indicator-session/fix-636693 into lp:indicator-session
The proposal to merge lp:~gunnarhj/indicator-session/fix-636693 into lp:indicator-session has been updated. Status: Needs review = Rejected For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/indicator-session/fix-636693/+merge/37200 -- https://code.launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/indicator-session/fix-636693/+merge/37200 Your team ayatana-commits is subscribed to branch lp:indicator-session. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits Post to : ayatana-commits@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ayatana-commits] [Merge] lp:~ted/indicator-session/no-lock into lp:indicator-session
Ted Gould has proposed merging lp:~ted/indicator-session/no-lock into
lp:indicator-session.
Requested reviews:
Indicator Applet Developers (indicator-applet-developers)
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ted/indicator-session/no-lock/+merge/52932
Use the no lock feature of guest-session to ensure we don't lock twice.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~ted/indicator-session/no-lock/+merge/52932
Your team ayatana-commits is subscribed to branch lp:indicator-session.
=== modified file 'src/session-service.c'
--- src/session-service.c 2011-03-10 21:22:57 +
+++ src/session-service.c 2011-03-10 22:04:59 +
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@
g_warning(Unable to activate guest session, falling back to command line activation.);
}
- if (!g_spawn_command_line_async(GUEST_SESSION_LAUNCHER, error)) {
+ if (!g_spawn_command_line_async(GUEST_SESSION_LAUNCHER --no-lock, error)) {
g_warning(Unable to start guest session: %s, error-message);
g_error_free(error);
}
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits
Post to : ayatana-commits@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ayatana-commits] [Merge] lp:~mterry/indicator-datetime/fix-show-calendar into lp:indicator-datetime
The proposal to merge lp:~mterry/indicator-datetime/fix-show-calendar into lp:indicator-datetime has been updated. Status: Needs review = Merged For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/indicator-datetime/fix-show-calendar/+merge/52867 -- https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/indicator-datetime/fix-show-calendar/+merge/52867 Your team ayatana-commits is subscribed to branch lp:indicator-datetime. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits Post to : ayatana-commits@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
