Re: [Ayatana] What to do with the menubar on non-full screened windows.

2011-03-30 Thread SorinN
Klevin, you say :
 No, it would take more clicks than the expected, I think that, if
not my idea, the button on titlebar is handlier than this.
, talking about the show / hide menu-bar button.

It will not take many clicks because if I need to see the menubar I
click the button and the menubar will stay there as long as I need, I
will not close the menu-bar in the next 2 seconds - I will set some
menubars to be visible for ever and some menubars to be hidden forever
- so I will use the suplemental click only one time. But my apps will
stay as I've planned for them. One setting - one time - for ever - I
didn't see any actions in plus here ..just economy and ergonomy
..user-based.  if the the same show / hide menubar can present the
menu at the right click - then we can have even more functionality. I
will propose this combined solution to Ayatana but in other context
not on this topic.

btw - this is also about user cases - each approach ( menu-button like
Firefox 4 or a button for show / hide the menu-bar) can have more or
less acceptance from user-base, depend on the specific scenario for
each user category. It's hard to satisfy all peoples with a single
solution so they must have options - at lest the final choice will be
on the user-side so complaints will be reduced to the normal.
 Anyway the purpose of those solutions is to save vertical space.
Both approaches deserve this cause but the show / hide button will let
you to choose which app. will have menu always visible all time and
which not.

For example Bluefish will show the menu for ever, Nautilus Elementary ..never.
If you will think this way you will see also the advantages.

Global menu probably fit well with the Mac user which is not so
multitasking as Linux / Windows users. They do a lot with less
because the good software integration and beside global-menu (which is
not a good global solution), they have other good UI solutions for
any kind of applications. Doing more with less - they usually don't
have so many open windows at a time ( like Linux users have ).

This is why general public will go with Ayatana over Gnome 3 shell.
With Gnome 3  I observed I can do less with more and first impression
was  where I am ? how I can open this ? how I can do that ? .
Ayatana is different  - they search / they try / they adapt / they
wrong  they correct / they go forward. At the end of the day I see
Ayatana UI probably the most effective OS UI paradigm.

2011/3/30 klevi...@gmail.com klevi...@gmail.com:
 No, it would take more clicks than the expected, I think that, if not my
 idea, the button on titlebar is handlier than this.

 2011/3/29 SorinN nemes.so...@gmail.com

 it should be a clearly determined action nor a spontaneous one
 ..probably most of time people just want to move the window.

 the way Nautilus Elementary act now - is quite right - when you hide
 menu-bar a button come up and you can use that button as menu for most
 important functions.

 A button placed on metacity top for show / hide menu bar would be
 welcomed. at least will not broke anything.

 2011/3/30 klevi...@gmail.com klevi...@gmail.com:
  Guys, I just thought on an excelent way to hide de menubar on
  unmaximized
  windows:
 
  When you hover the mouse over the window title, the menu slides out from
  it
  in the same window. How about that?
 
  2011/3/29 SorinN nemes.so...@gmail.com
 
  good question
  when you have more than 2 windows, is very confusing.
  because I don't use small  screens (21 and 24), I almost never use
  full-screen maximised windows.
  I have enough space and I'm happy with that. I've tried global menu
  for a while but it come to be
  a nonsense on a large screen. With Gnome Panel or in KDE you always
  know where you are.
  They question which arise is why you have to cross all screen with the
  mouse when the menubar of a non-maximised application (Bluefish for
  example)
  can be very close to your mouse ?. Global menu - on my personal
  opinion is just a good solution for small screens.
 
  Menu button inside window decorations provide a good alternative for
  saving vertical space on 16:9 and 16:10 screens - even small screens
  and probably more and more applications will use this solution in
  future.
  Most used items can stay visible on front, not-so-widely-used items
  can be hidden under menu button.
 
  2011/3/29 Saleel Velankar svela...@gmail.com:
   In a nonmaximized window on
   a. a large screen
   b. with other nonmaximized windows present
  
   The global-menubar fails for these reasons.
   1. Confusion on which application the menu is for.
   2. Having to move the mouse an obscene amount
  
   In my 1 + 2 = not nice behavior.
  
  
  
  
   http://blog.martin-graesslin.com/blog/2011/03/menu-button-inside-window-decorations/
  
   I have been reading this, and I think that the mockup provides a good
   compromise in non maximized windows. Thoughts?
  
   --
   Saleel
  
  
   ___
   Mailing 

Re: [Ayatana] What to do with the menubar on non-full screened windows.

2011-03-30 Thread Matthew Paul Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Saleel Velankar wrote on 29/03/11 15:16:

 In a nonmaximized window on
 a. a large screen
 b. with other nonmaximized windows present
 
 The global-menubar fails for these reasons.
 1. Confusion on which application the menu is for.

This is a bug in the theme, not the layout. It affects not just using
the menus, but the keyboard too. http://launchpad.net/bugs/534799

 2. Having to move the mouse an obscene amount

If it's an obscene amount, your pointer acceleration settings are wrong:
you'll have just as much trouble getting to the Ubuntu button, the
Trash, or the session menu.

 In my 1 + 2 = not nice behavior.
 
 http://blog.martin-graesslin.com/blog/2011/03/menu-button-inside-window-decorations/
 
 I have been reading this, and I think that the mockup provides a good
 compromise in non maximized windows. Thoughts?
...

Not only would that -- like other single-menu designs -- be much slower
to use, it would also mean the menu structure changed fundamentally
depending solely on how big the window is, which would be bizarre.

- -- 
mpt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk2S/RgACgkQ6PUxNfU6ecrh3QCghwIjRO9TeaXwsK/RFdc87G9z
lsEAn0qEk8eklBauKYFOoy9CGXLo38rV
=Wntf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Ayatana] window and workspace management in unity

2011-03-30 Thread Greg K Nicholson
This is already implemented in Compiz's Scale Addons plugin.

Another, complementary approach would be to have a lower limit for the
zoom factor when scaling—say, around 2/3—and clip windows if necessary
to only show the top-left corner (top-right in RTL locales).

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Ayatana] What to do with the menubar on non-full screened windows.

2011-03-30 Thread SorinN
Matthew

 If it's an obscene amount, your pointer acceleration settings are wrong:
you'll have just as much trouble getting to the Ubuntu button, the
Trash, or the session menu.

The obscene amount is still there - you can not cut it out in just 3
words. It would be easy of course to solve problems this way.
;) Sounds like Me, then Goethe.

I can ask you how do you get this point ? The arguments are vague.

The mouse acceleration has nothing with that - think about a large
amount of users NEVER change the initial mouse settings. In plus,
Global Menu break the eye focus when you follow the mouse to the menu
and back. Think about big screens.

Your analogy with the Trash and Session Menu is not very clear. You
normally visit Trash or Session Menu just very few times per session
but the Global Menu very often because of his role.
If the  focus is disturbed too often - the brain will got tired sooner
..is a normal reaction.

Not only would that -- like other single-menu designs -- be much slower
to use, it would also mean the menu structure changed fundamentally
depending solely on how big the window is, which would be bizarre.

you say which would be bizarre - how bizarre ?
which metric your words describe ?

this is a matter of the application owner / user choice (Like Firefox
personal menu I want this function == I install the add-on). Not any
application must be ruled by the OS using a single measure.

Hide / Show menu-bar button - can solve this problem by letting you to
choose which menu you want to see and which not.

Finally for Global Menu - If the global menu will not be optional, at
least users should choose which app will use Global Menu and not.


2011/3/30 Matthew Paul Thomas m...@canonical.com:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Saleel Velankar wrote on 29/03/11 15:16:

 In a nonmaximized window on
 a. a large screen
 b. with other nonmaximized windows present

 The global-menubar fails for these reasons.
 1. Confusion on which application the menu is for.

 This is a bug in the theme, not the layout. It affects not just using
 the menus, but the keyboard too. http://launchpad.net/bugs/534799

 2. Having to move the mouse an obscene amount

 If it's an obscene amount, your pointer acceleration settings are wrong:
 you'll have just as much trouble getting to the Ubuntu button, the
 Trash, or the session menu.

 In my 1 + 2 = not nice behavior.

 http://blog.martin-graesslin.com/blog/2011/03/menu-button-inside-window-decorations/

 I have been reading this, and I think that the mockup provides a good
 compromise in non maximized windows. Thoughts?
...

 Not only would that -- like other single-menu designs -- be much slower
 to use, it would also mean the menu structure changed fundamentally
 depending solely on how big the window is, which would be bizarre.

 - --
 mpt
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

 iEYEARECAAYFAk2S/RgACgkQ6PUxNfU6ecrh3QCghwIjRO9TeaXwsK/RFdc87G9z
 lsEAn0qEk8eklBauKYFOoy9CGXLo38rV
 =Wntf
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
 Post to     : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




-- 
Nemes Ioan Sorin

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Ayatana] What to do with the menubar on non-full screened windows.

2011-03-30 Thread Ian Santopietro
I use Unity on a 23 full HD monitor, and I don't find it tiring to move the
mouse to the menu at all, and I use it a minimum of 8 hours per day.
On Mar 30, 2011 3:34 PM, SorinN nemes.so...@gmail.com wrote:
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Ayatana] What to do with the menubar on non-full screened windows.

2011-03-30 Thread SorinN
Sure if we compare individual by individual experience we are just few
millions here - each with the best theoretic argument.

That's why this argument should be probably the last fire in the battle.

Fortunately Usability is a science which work with other values.

2011/3/31 Ian Santopietro isan...@gmail.com:
 I use Unity on a 23 full HD monitor, and I don't find it tiring to move the
 mouse to the menu at all, and I use it a minimum of 8 hours per day.

 On Mar 30, 2011 3:34 PM, SorinN nemes.so...@gmail.com wrote:




-- 
Nemes Ioan Sorin

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Ayatana-commits] [Merge] lp:~karl-qdh/indicator-datetime/propupdatefail into lp:indicator-datetime

2011-03-30 Thread Karl Lattimer
I can't reproduce the bug at all so this was the only inconsistency which 
*could* have matched the fact that the show seconds was triggering an update 
but the change in format wasn't. 

Remove the inconsistency, hopefully the bug's gone. 
-- 
https://code.launchpad.net/~karl-qdh/indicator-datetime/propupdatefail/+merge/55119
Your team ayatana-commits is subscribed to branch lp:indicator-datetime.

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits
Post to : ayatana-commits@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Ayatana-commits] [Merge] lp:~mterry/indicator-datetime/more-error-icons into lp:indicator-datetime

2011-03-30 Thread noreply
The proposal to merge lp:~mterry/indicator-datetime/more-error-icons into 
lp:indicator-datetime has been updated.

Status: Needs review = Merged

For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/indicator-datetime/more-error-icons/+merge/55532
-- 
https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/indicator-datetime/more-error-icons/+merge/55532
Your team ayatana-commits is subscribed to branch lp:indicator-datetime.

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits
Post to : ayatana-commits@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp