[Ayatana] make adding ppas easier
For newbies its very hard to install their first ppa and also if you know the way it takes you some time to install a ppa. Why don't just enable a short link like href=ppa://ppa:matthaeus123/mrw-gimp-svn which addes this ppa automatically after asking whether you trust this source and entering your password.http://dict.leo.org/ende?lp=endep=Ci4HO3kMAAsearch=automaticallytrestr=0x8004 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana] make adding ppas easier
I don't agree. PPA should be used only to install unstable / unsupported features. I think the problem is that a lot of very good programs aren't in the default repository and need to be installed via PPA. PPA installation shouldn't be too easy for newbies, because it can be risky for their system, even if they don't realize that. Kévin 2011/9/4 Christian Rupp christ...@r-k-r.de ** For newbies its very hard to install their first ppa and also if you know the way it takes you some time to install a ppa. Why don't just enable a short link like href=ppa://ppa:matthaeus123/mrw-gimp-svn which addes this ppa automatically after asking whether you trust this source and entering your password.http://dict.leo.org/ende?lp=endep=Ci4HO3kMAAsearch=automaticallytrestr=0x8004 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Envoyé depuis Gmail, messagerie gratuite, puissante et SANS SPAM !! (signature personnalisée) ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ayatana] Balsamiq
Hi all, thanks to a kind reply from Jono to a comment I did on one of his posts, I discovered Balsamiq. I installed it and tested a bit and later I discovered this: http://www.mail-archive.com/launchpad-users@lists.launchpad.net/msg01068.html Since I was going to use it to prepare some mockups for Unity-2d I did think I could use it and I used the serial provided. At the beginning it worked, telling me that the software was correctly registered, then when I started it again it said my demo period was expired and trying to use that serial again gave me an error: this serial key has been blacklisted Is the Balsamiq offer no more valid for Ubuntu contributors? Do we have an update serial to use? Thanks for your help! -- Andrea Grandi - Nokia Qt Ambassador website: http://www.andreagrandi.it ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana] make adding ppas easier
Christian Rupp christ...@r-k-r.de writes: For newbies its very hard to install their first ppa and also if you know the way it takes you some time to install a ppa. Just add 'ppa:diesch/testing' (or whatever PPA you want) using the Software Sources dialog. Why don't just enable a short link like href=ppa://ppa:matthaeus123/mrw-gimp-svn which addes this ppa automatically after asking whether you trust this source and entering your password How would a newbie know if he could trust that source? Just clicking on a link should not make you to answer such important technical questions. Making people to use the Software Sources dialog teaches them where to see what PPA are enabled and how to disable them. IMHO that's important for usability. Florian -- Indicator applet for Unity that provides the main menu of Gnome Classic: http://www.florian-diesch.de/software/classicmenu-indicator/ ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana] make adding ppas easier
2011/9/4 a.gra...@gmail.com a.gra...@gmail.com Hi, On 4 September 2011 14:04, Kévin PEIGNOT winniemie...@gmail.com wrote: I don't agree. PPA should be used only to install unstable / unsupported features. I think the problem is that a lot of very good programs aren't in the default repository and need to be installed via PPA. PPA installation shouldn't be too easy for newbies, because it can be risky for their system, even if they don't realize that. when you're making something difficoult for the end user by design, you're limiting his freedom. Just advise the user that enabling/adding a PPA could make the system unstable and the user will be able to choose. An even better solution would be to (a) check and warn whether a given PPA is potentially dangerous to stability (e.g. because it modifies system libraries) and (b) make rollbacks simple in case of system damage. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana] make adding ppas easier
There are a few things we need before we can consider making adding PPAs easy. First of all, we need an easy way to limit what packages can be upgraded/installed from that PPA. If you add a PPA because you want a set of fancy wallpapers, for instance, then that PPA should not be able to push a patched SSHd. It should only be able to add and update wallpapers. Nothing else. I think those kinds of PPAs are ticking bombs right now. How this should be done, I don't know. The second thing we need, is a peer review system and vouchers for PPAs. This is also challenging, of course, because the majority is not always right. If the peers would give the PPA a good review because the wallpapers are nice, but didn't have a look at what packages it contains, install scripts, etc, then it would be better to not have a peer review at all. Perhaps only Ubuntu Members would get a vote, following the assumption that all members would know how important this is? So, no, there are too many unresolved issues to make adding PPAs a matter of simple point and clicks. This is why it was removed/hidden from apturl. Jo-Erlend Schinstad ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana] make adding ppas easier
add-apt-repository does it pretty easily. On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Christian Rupp christ...@r-k-r.de wrote: For newbies its very hard to install their first ppa and also if you know the way it takes you some time to install a ppa. Why don't just enable a short link like href=ppa://ppa:matthaeus123/mrw-gimp-svn which addes this ppa automatically after asking whether you trust this source and entering your password. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ayatana] How do I get to a lense without a mouse?
We used to be able to use super+a to open the Applications lense and super+f to go to the Files and Folders lense. That appears to no longer be functional. So I press super to open the dash and I search, which seems to only show opened files. I can search for applications by tapping super, arrow down twice, then right arrow twice, enter and then search. It is very cumbersome, but it does work. The same goes for the Files and Folders lense. But I have no idea how to get to the Music lense... at all. Some time ago, I proposed that we should use alt+num to switch between lenses, since that's how other tabbed interfaces work and it will not interfere with anything. Any chance of that happening in 11.10? Because not being able to comfortably use the keyboard, is a seriously annoying regression from 11.04. Jo-Erlend Schinstad ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana] make adding ppas easier
I would really like it if people would stop using freedom of choice as a club to bash any design decision that has to be made. It is a balancing act instead. Too little choice and you get GNOME 3.0, too much choice and you get the mess that is KDE. Forcing users to make a choice for which they have insufficient information and/or expertise is a complete design cop-out. This whole PPA situation should be fixed by allowing STABLE FEATURE updates of GUI applications in stable Ubuntu releases that are reviewed by Ubuntu developers and volunteers. Basically make a Mac App Store. Those applications should also be packaged by the developers themselves. Statically link them if you need newer libraries for your app. This would also fix the LTS releases because they wouldn't get obsolete so quickly. Upgrading my entire system so that I can get newer applications/features is ridiculous, as is adding 3rd party PPAs that might upgrade packages I have no interest in upgrading and in the process possibly breaking my entire system. On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 3:12 PM, a.gra...@gmail.com a.gra...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On 4 September 2011 14:04, Kévin PEIGNOT winniemie...@gmail.com wrote: I don't agree. PPA should be used only to install unstable / unsupported features. I think the problem is that a lot of very good programs aren't in the default repository and need to be installed via PPA. PPA installation shouldn't be too easy for newbies, because it can be risky for their system, even if they don't realize that. when you're making something difficoult for the end user by design, you're limiting his freedom. Just advise the user that enabling/adding a PPA could make the system unstable and the user will be able to choose. -- Andrea Grandi - Nokia Qt Ambassador website: http://www.andreagrandi.it ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana] make adding ppas easier
Hi, On 4 September 2011 17:57, zekopeko zekop...@gmail.com wrote: I would really like it if people would stop using freedom of choice as a club to bash any design decision that has to be made. It is a balancing act instead. Too little choice and you get GNOME 3.0, too much choice and you get the mess that is KDE. dear Zekopeko, maybe we can have different points of view, but it's not polite at all to say that someone should stop expressing his own hopinion. Forcing users to make a choice for which they have insufficient information and/or expertise is a complete design cop-out. This whole PPA situation should be fixed by allowing STABLE FEATURE updates of GUI applications in stable Ubuntu releases that are maybe we could improve the PPA structure, don't you think? I make an example. At the moment everyone can publish packages to Launchpad PPA and this is good, BUT We should make difference from PPA to PPA. What I mean is that there should be people who test PPAs and express a vote to promote as stable. It's a similar thing there was in maemo-extras / maemo-extras-devel repository of N900. Developers publish a package, it stays in -devel until it has been tested enough. When the package is considered stable it's promoted to the maemo-extras and end-user is quite safe to use it without the risk to break something. Once we have those PPAs marked correctly we can let the user to easily install the safer one and make the procedure more complicated for -devel one. I think this could work. -- Andrea Grandi - Nokia Qt Ambassador website: http://www.andreagrandi.it ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana] Thunderbird needs tighter panel integration
I totally agree. But this have been discussed times ago (with evolution) and it seems not every one want this. 2011/9/3 Carl Ansell afccarl1...@hotmail.com At present, the only use for the mail icon in the panel is to set up thunderbird (for email anyway). Once an account has been set up, it would be useful for thunderbird to check emails in the background, and turn blue when new emails are available. This would mean the user does not need to keep thunderbird open to check emails and justify the use of a mail icon in the panel. It should at least list the accounts that have already been set up, rather than just showing 'set up mail'. __**_ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/**ListHelphttps://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Envoyé depuis Gmail, messagerie gratuite, puissante et SANS SPAM !! (signature personnalisée) ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana] Thunderbird needs tighter panel integration
On 04/09/11 17:39, a.gra...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On 4 September 2011 18:12, Kévin PEIGNOTwinniemie...@gmail.com wrote: I totally agree. But this have been discussed times ago (with evolution) and it seems not every one want this. 2011/9/3 Carl Ansellafccarl1...@hotmail.com At present, the only use for the mail icon in the panel is to set up thunderbird (for email anyway). Once an account has been set up, it would be useful for thunderbird to check emails in the background, and turn blue when new emails are available. This would mean the user does not need to keep thunderbird open to check emails and justify the use of a mail icon in the panel. it's a nice idea, we could have an option for that. Probably other user will prefer to have a Unity-launcher icon that does it, but it's better to have both and let the user decide which one to enable. What do you think about? Exactly. Personally, I would want to use the messaging menu, as I feel this is what it is designed for, and would allow me to save space on the launcher for something else. However, I know others would prefer keeping it in the launcher. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana] Thunderbird needs tighter panel integration
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Carl Ansell afccarl1...@hotmail.com wrote: On 04/09/11 17:39, a.gra...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On 4 September 2011 18:12, Kévin PEIGNOTwinniemie...@gmail.com wrote: I totally agree. But this have been discussed times ago (with evolution) and it seems not every one want this. 2011/9/3 Carl Ansellafccarl1...@hotmail.com At present, the only use for the mail icon in the panel is to set up thunderbird (for email anyway). Once an account has been set up, it would be useful for thunderbird to check emails in the background, and turn blue when new emails are available. This would mean the user does not need to keep thunderbird open to check emails and justify the use of a mail icon in the panel. it's a nice idea, we could have an option for that. Probably other user will prefer to have a Unity-launcher icon that does it, but it's better to have both and let the user decide which one to enable. What do you think about? Exactly. Personally, I would want to use the messaging menu, as I feel this is what it is designed for, and would allow me to save space on the launcher for something else. However, I know others would prefer keeping it in the launcher. Why have the option at all? Thunderbird (or any e-mail client for that matter) should continue to check for messages in the background without having the main window open at all. If there is a message you blue the messaging menu and add a badge to the launcher if there is an icon in the launcher. Opening Thunderbird via the Launcher or the messaging menu would simply clear the badge and the blue envelope of the messaging menu. Two things would be nice. A global DO NOT DISTURB mode and a option to check for e-mail messages in the background if there is at least one email account active. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana] Thunderbird needs tighter panel integration
On 04/09/11 19:22, zekopeko wrote: On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Carl Ansellafccarl1...@hotmail.com wrote: On 04/09/11 17:39, a.gra...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On 4 September 2011 18:12, Kévin PEIGNOTwinniemie...@gmail.comwrote: I totally agree. But this have been discussed times ago (with evolution) and it seems not every one want this. 2011/9/3 Carl Ansellafccarl1...@hotmail.com At present, the only use for the mail icon in the panel is to set up thunderbird (for email anyway). Once an account has been set up, it would be useful for thunderbird to check emails in the background, and turn blue when new emails are available. This would mean the user does not need to keep thunderbird open to check emails and justify the use of a mail icon in the panel. it's a nice idea, we could have an option for that. Probably other user will prefer to have a Unity-launcher icon that does it, but it's better to have both and let the user decide which one to enable. What do you think about? Exactly. Personally, I would want to use the messaging menu, as I feel this is what it is designed for, and would allow me to save space on the launcher for something else. However, I know others would prefer keeping it in the launcher. Why have the option at all? Thunderbird (or any e-mail client for that matter) should continue to check for messages in the background without having the main window open at all. If there is a message you blue the messaging menu and add a badge to the launcher if there is an icon in the launcher. Opening Thunderbird via the Launcher or the messaging menu would simply clear the badge and the blue envelope of the messaging menu. Two things would be nice. A global DO NOT DISTURB mode and a option to check for e-mail messages in the background if there is at least one email account active. Really its checking emails in the background that I would want most of all, and when I heard about all of the work they had done integrating Thunderbird with Unity, I did think that this would be one of the things they had done. I suppose you are right, an option wouldn't really be needed, though I don't know how hard it would be to implement something like this. The notify-osd bubble would also inform you of emails while the blue icon would remain until you read them. I honestly can't think why this hasn't been implemented already tbh. I also like the DO NOT DISTURB idea, though I know a similar idea for the IM accounts was discussed and not implemented so I wouldn't hold my breath on that. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana] Thunderbird needs tighter panel integration
Hi, On 4 September 2011 20:38, Carl Ansell afccarl1...@hotmail.com wrote: Really its checking emails in the background that I would want most of all, and when I heard about all of the work they had done integrating Thunderbird with Unity, I did think that this would be one of the things they had done. a technical question: how is Unity supposed to communicate with Thunderbird? Does Thunderbird expose any d-bus methods? Thanks. -- Andrea Grandi - Nokia Qt Ambassador website: http://www.andreagrandi.it ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana] Thunderbird needs tighter panel integration
I have absolutely no idea :( All I know is that there is an extension added for Unity support that seemingly adds a number badge to the launcher icon. And isn't working for me. Maybe someone else can give a better answer. On 04/09/11 20:31, a.gra...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On 4 September 2011 20:38, Carl Ansellafccarl1...@hotmail.com wrote: Really its checking emails in the background that I would want most of all, and when I heard about all of the work they had done integrating Thunderbird with Unity, I did think that this would be one of the things they had done. a technical question: how is Unity supposed to communicate with Thunderbird? Does Thunderbird expose any d-bus methods? Thanks. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana] make adding ppas easier
Maybe we should find a way in the middle. I mean: if you want a secure system you should make installation of ppas harder. If you want a system which can be easily extented and is very end-user friendly you need a easier setup for ppas. So wouldn't it best to check the ppas and give them different rights. And the checked ppas get an easy to add link. An other solution is updating software more often by the official sources and providing a better structure to add new programs and commercial content which is free, cause it's strange to find programs for $0.00 at the to buy section. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ayatana] make adding ppas easier
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011, Christian Rupp wrote: Hello Christian, find a way in the middle. …checked ppas get an easy to add link. Indeed, at the moment any PPA can provide (and override) any package in the system. Separating out archives that can provide core system infrastructure, from leaf-node PPAs providing add-on functionality would probably enable much of what you're after. This could be done with signing keys; large organisations (clusters, universities, corporates) who still want to override core functionality locally could just add their own trusted keys to the Ubuntu-derived system images they give users. -Paul ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ayatana-commits] [Merge] lp:~sargentd/libindicate/opional-mono into lp:libindicate
Evgeni Golov has proposed merging lp:~sargentd/libindicate/opional-mono into lp:libindicate. Requested reviews: Indicator Applet Developers (indicator-applet-developers) For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~sargentd/libindicate/opional-mono/+merge/73989 Sometimes, one wants to build libindicate w/o Mono bindings, like on Sparc, where there is just no mono at all. This branch makes it possible (and is used in debian for quite some time) -- https://code.launchpad.net/~sargentd/libindicate/opional-mono/+merge/73989 Your team ayatana-commits is subscribed to branch lp:libindicate. === modified file 'bindings/Makefile.am' --- bindings/Makefile.am 2010-06-02 16:19:59 + +++ bindings/Makefile.am 2011-09-04 09:48:26 + @@ -1,1 +1,5 @@ -SUBDIRS = mono python +SUBDIRS = python + +if HAS_MONO +SUBDIRS += mono +endif === modified file 'configure.ac' --- configure.ac 2011-09-03 04:34:54 + +++ configure.ac 2011-09-04 09:48:26 + @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ AC_PATH_PROG(AL, al, no) if test x$AL = xno ; then - AC_MSG_ERROR([No al tool found. You need to install Mono.]) + AC_MSG_NOTICE([No al tool found. You need to install Mono.]) fi if test x$has_mono = xtrue ; then @@ -149,12 +149,12 @@ fi if test x$CSC = xno ; then - AC_MSG_ERROR([No Mono compiler found.]) + AC_MSG_NOTICE([No Mono compiler found.]) fi AC_PATH_PROG(GACUTIL, gacutil, no) if test x$GACUTIL = xno ; then - AC_MSG_ERROR([No gacutil tool found]) + AC_MSG_NOTICE([No gacutil tool found]) fi AC_SUBST(RUNTIME) @@ -166,11 +166,11 @@ GLIB_SHARP_REQ_VERSION=2.12.1 GTK_SHARP_REQ_VERSION=2.12 -PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GTK_SHARP, gtk-sharp-2.0 = $GTK_SHARP_REQ_VERSION) +PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GTK_SHARP, gtk-sharp-2.0 = $GTK_SHARP_REQ_VERSION, has_gtksharp=true, has_gtksharp=false) AC_SUBST(GTK_SHARP_LIBS) AC_SUBST(GTK_SHARP_CFLAGS) -PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GAPI, gapi-2.0 = $GLIB_SHARP_REQ_VERSION) +PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GAPI, gapi-2.0 = $GLIB_SHARP_REQ_VERSION, has_gapi=true, has_gapi=false) AC_PATH_PROG(GAPI_PARSER, gapi2-parser, no) AC_SUBST(GAPI_PARSER) AC_PATH_PROG(GAPI_CODEGEN, gapi2-codegen, no) @@ -265,7 +265,9 @@ # Files ### -AC_OUTPUT([ +AM_CONDITIONAL([HAS_MONO], [test x$has_mono = xtrue]) + +AC_CONFIG_FILES([ Makefile libindicate/Makefile libindicate/indicate-0.6.pc @@ -273,24 +275,31 @@ libindicate-gtk/indicate-gtk-0.6.pc libindicate-gtk/indicate-gtk3-0.6.pc examples/Makefile -examples/indicator-mono-example tests/Makefile docs/Makefile docs/reference/Makefile docs/reference/version.xml bindings/Makefile bindings/python/Makefile -bindings/mono/Makefile -bindings/mono/indicate/Makefile -bindings/mono/indicate/indicate-sharp.dll.config -bindings/mono/indicate/indicate-sharp-0.1.pc -bindings/mono/indicate/AssemblyInfo.cs -bindings/mono/indicate-gtk/Makefile -bindings/mono/indicate-gtk/indicate-gtk-sharp.dll.config -bindings/mono/indicate-gtk/indicate-gtk-sharp-0.1.pc -bindings/mono/indicate-gtk/AssemblyInfo.cs ]) +if test x$has_mono = xtrue ; then + AC_CONFIG_FILES([ + examples/indicator-mono-example + bindings/mono/Makefile + bindings/mono/indicate/Makefile + bindings/mono/indicate/indicate-sharp.dll.config + bindings/mono/indicate/indicate-sharp-0.1.pc + bindings/mono/indicate/AssemblyInfo.cs + bindings/mono/indicate-gtk/Makefile + bindings/mono/indicate-gtk/indicate-gtk-sharp.dll.config + bindings/mono/indicate-gtk/indicate-gtk-sharp-0.1.pc + bindings/mono/indicate-gtk/AssemblyInfo.cs + ]) +fi + +AC_OUTPUT + ### # Results ### === modified file 'examples/Makefile.am' --- examples/Makefile.am 2011-09-03 05:13:02 + +++ examples/Makefile.am 2011-09-04 09:48:26 + @@ -104,4 +104,6 @@ $(CSC) $(CSFLAGS) -out:$(ASSEMBLY) -target:exe $(references) $(srcdir)/$(CSFILES) chmod a+x indicator-mono-example +if HAS_MONO check: $(ASSEMBLY) +endif ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits Post to : ayatana-commits@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
