Re: [AZORES-Genealogy] John Dutra baptism

2015-02-24 Thread Cheri Mello
Only Ancestry.com and VitalSearch has the California birth, marriage, and
death indices.  All are paid subscription sites.  There could be portions
that are free.  You can try Joe Beine's Death Indexes at
www.deathindexes.com  He has all 50 states and states which are free and
which are paid.

Cheri Mello
Listowner, Azores-Gen
Researching: Vila Franca, Ponta Garca, Ribeira Quente, Ribeira das Tainhas,
Achada

-- 
For options, such as changing to List, Digest, Abridged, or No Mail (vacation) 
mode, log into your Google account and visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Azores.  Click in the blue area on the right 
that says Join this group and it will take you to Edit my membership.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Azores Genealogy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to azores+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/azores.


Re: [AZORES-Genealogy] John Dutra baptism

2015-02-24 Thread Elizabeth Migliori
Hi Cheri,
Is there a link for the CA. Birth and Death Indexes?
If so could you send me.

Thx mucho
Liz

On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Cheri Mello gfsche...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Bill,

 I have a lot of experience with the California Birth Index and the
 California Death Index.

 First, a mini lesson on sources.
 1) Primary Sources: Something that is generated AT THE TIME of the event.
 For example, a birth certificate is a primary source for a birth.  A death
 certificate is a primary source for a death.  The U.S. Federal census can
 be considered a primary source for residence.

 2) Secondary Sources: Something that is generated AFTER the event.  For
 example, a birth date obtained from a death certificate.  If a person is
 born in 1905 and that date appears on a 1940 document, then it's not a
 primary source.

 Birth and death indices are created by the state (at least in California)
 by people (same is true for the Social Security Death Index).  To err is
 human.  So an index can have an error.  I suppose technically, the CA Birth
 and Death Indices are not a source.  I utilize them as a source in my
 genealogy program because I don't have the money to order a birth or death
 on every ancestor I find.  I don't do only my direct line.  I try to get
 the whole family (siblings and grandkids).  But these indices are not my
 only source.  If I'm using the CA Birth Index as a source, I try to have
 1-2 others agree with this source.  If they don't agree, I have a lot of
 sources on 1 event!  In all my work with the indices, I've found a mistake
 once. (What I mean by that is they've typed the wrong month of death in the
 death index).  Overall, pretty accurate!

 The CA Birth and Death Indices are getting their information from the
 Birth or Death Certificate.  That certificate has an informant on it, who
 gave the information.  The earlier ones don't ask the name of the
 informant.  The later ones do.  The information is only as good as what the
 informant provides given the circumstances.

 Example of a Death Certificate from 1961 in CA:
 Informant is the wife.  Right off the bat, I question EVERYTHING on the
 death certificate except the death.  The spouse just died.  How upset is
 the wife?  Is the wife an immigrant too and whose information is she
 giving?  The death for my ancestor in 1961 gives the wrong date of birth,
 states he was a U.S. citizen (he wasn't, but his wife was), and something
 else I can't remember.

 Example of a Death Certificate from 1992 in CA:
 Informant was the son.  The death wasn't expected.  I should probably
 question everything, except the informant was my dad.  Almost everything
 checked out.  By 1992, CA wanted to know how many years of education the
 deceased had.  It said 12th grade.  I asked my dad.  My dad said he was
 never asked that question at all, as he knew his father only went to 8th
 grade.  No hesitation in answering that question at all.  Someone forgot to
 ask my dad and just took a guess.

 Example of a Birth Certificate in 1912 in CA:
 Informants weren't listed in 1912.  There still were informants, we just
 don't know who they were. On my grandfather's birth, it lists his dad as
 his dad, and his paternal grandmother as his mom.  Huh, what? She never
 came to America.  I never understood why or how that happened.  One day, I
 pulled his birth and was looking at it again.  I noted there was no box or
 line to list an informant.  At first, I told myself the informant was the
 mom.  Then I thought about it and said, no, moms were told to rest.  Then
 it dawned on me.  It was dad.  They asked dad (the immigrant) for the
 information.  Being the proud papa, he gave the baby's name and even gave
 his name.  When they asked him the name of the mother, he gave the name of
 the mother - HIS MOTHER!  After all, Gloria was his wife.  He misunderstood
 given the level of his English skills at that time.

 Bill, you're going to have to narrow down the freguesia first.  Could the
 attached record by your Joao?  Maybe.  My immigrant ancestor generally had
 his month and day right, but he gave the years of 1884, 1885, 1886, and
 1887!  Who says the person giving Joao's information wasn't off by a year
 or 2?  Maybe your Joao was indeed born Aug 15th...but in 1904 or 1906.

 If your ancestor didn't naturalize, he probably lived long enough to
 register when the Smith Act took place in June, 1940.  We call that Alien
 Registration.  You need to order his naturalization information or his
 Alien Registration information from the USCIS.   In it, he will hopefully
 give his correct freguesia.  If not, you'll get at least the island, maybe
 the council.  You are probably searching 50 freguesias in the central
 island group, hoping for the right one.  Start with your ancestor's death
 in Orange Co, CA and work back in time.  If you hit his immigration into
 America and get that date, you might get lucky and be able to hire Joao
 Ventura, the archivist in Terceira to search 

Re: [AZORES-Genealogy] John Dutra baptism

2015-02-24 Thread Denis Meals
Elizabeth  Cheri:

NorCal Genealogy provides the following:

http://www.sfgenealogy.com/norcal/caldata.htm#calvitals
Some  of what is listed are free, and quite good.

Denis Meals


On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Elizabeth Migliori lizmi...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Hi Cheri,
 Is there a link for the CA. Birth and Death Indexes?
 If so could you send me.

 Thx mucho
 Liz

 On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Cheri Mello gfsche...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Bill,

 I have a lot of experience with the California Birth Index and the
 California Death Index.

 First, a mini lesson on sources.
 1) Primary Sources: Something that is generated AT THE TIME of the
 event.  For example, a birth certificate is a primary source for a birth.
 A death certificate is a primary source for a death.  The U.S. Federal
 census can be considered a primary source for residence.

 2) Secondary Sources: Something that is generated AFTER the event.  For
 example, a birth date obtained from a death certificate.  If a person is
 born in 1905 and that date appears on a 1940 document, then it's not a
 primary source.

 Birth and death indices are created by the state (at least in California)
 by people (same is true for the Social Security Death Index).  To err is
 human.  So an index can have an error.  I suppose technically, the CA Birth
 and Death Indices are not a source.  I utilize them as a source in my
 genealogy program because I don't have the money to order a birth or death
 on every ancestor I find.  I don't do only my direct line.  I try to get
 the whole family (siblings and grandkids).  But these indices are not my
 only source.  If I'm using the CA Birth Index as a source, I try to have
 1-2 others agree with this source.  If they don't agree, I have a lot of
 sources on 1 event!  In all my work with the indices, I've found a mistake
 once. (What I mean by that is they've typed the wrong month of death in the
 death index).  Overall, pretty accurate!

 The CA Birth and Death Indices are getting their information from the
 Birth or Death Certificate.  That certificate has an informant on it, who
 gave the information.  The earlier ones don't ask the name of the
 informant.  The later ones do.  The information is only as good as what the
 informant provides given the circumstances.

 Example of a Death Certificate from 1961 in CA:
 Informant is the wife.  Right off the bat, I question EVERYTHING on the
 death certificate except the death.  The spouse just died.  How upset is
 the wife?  Is the wife an immigrant too and whose information is she
 giving?  The death for my ancestor in 1961 gives the wrong date of birth,
 states he was a U.S. citizen (he wasn't, but his wife was), and something
 else I can't remember.

 Example of a Death Certificate from 1992 in CA:
 Informant was the son.  The death wasn't expected.  I should probably
 question everything, except the informant was my dad.  Almost everything
 checked out.  By 1992, CA wanted to know how many years of education the
 deceased had.  It said 12th grade.  I asked my dad.  My dad said he was
 never asked that question at all, as he knew his father only went to 8th
 grade.  No hesitation in answering that question at all.  Someone forgot to
 ask my dad and just took a guess.

 Example of a Birth Certificate in 1912 in CA:
 Informants weren't listed in 1912.  There still were informants, we just
 don't know who they were. On my grandfather's birth, it lists his dad as
 his dad, and his paternal grandmother as his mom.  Huh, what? She never
 came to America.  I never understood why or how that happened.  One day, I
 pulled his birth and was looking at it again.  I noted there was no box or
 line to list an informant.  At first, I told myself the informant was the
 mom.  Then I thought about it and said, no, moms were told to rest.  Then
 it dawned on me.  It was dad.  They asked dad (the immigrant) for the
 information.  Being the proud papa, he gave the baby's name and even gave
 his name.  When they asked him the name of the mother, he gave the name of
 the mother - HIS MOTHER!  After all, Gloria was his wife.  He misunderstood
 given the level of his English skills at that time.

 Bill, you're going to have to narrow down the freguesia first.  Could the
 attached record by your Joao?  Maybe.  My immigrant ancestor generally had
 his month and day right, but he gave the years of 1884, 1885, 1886, and
 1887!  Who says the person giving Joao's information wasn't off by a year
 or 2?  Maybe your Joao was indeed born Aug 15th...but in 1904 or 1906.

 If your ancestor didn't naturalize, he probably lived long enough to
 register when the Smith Act took place in June, 1940.  We call that Alien
 Registration.  You need to order his naturalization information or his
 Alien Registration information from the USCIS.   In it, he will hopefully
 give his correct freguesia.  If not, you'll get at least the island, maybe
 the council.  You are probably searching 50 freguesias in the central

[AZORES-Genealogy] John Dutra baptism

2015-02-15 Thread bsei2816
What would be the source for the date of birth information on the 
California Death Registry?  Is it simply word from family members or based 
on some kind of passport or other documentation.  I am hoping the attached 
baptism is my grandfather, but some dates are causing me grief.

 After searching extensively for my grandfathers baptism based on a 15 Aug 
1905 date of birth as recorded in the California Death registry in 1940, I 
finally found what I believe to be his baptism, but the date of birth is 20 
Dec 1904.  since I didn't know where he was born, I think I searched from 
15 Aug to the end of the year for many of the parishes in the entire 
central island group starting with Ribeirinha since I knew he lived there 
once.  Now if find that one more click to get me to the first baptism of 
1905 after finishing 1904 and I would have found this a year ago.

The baptism is at 
http://culturacores.azores.gov.pt/biblioteca_digital/TER-AH-RIBEIRINHA-B-1900-1911/TER-AH-RIBEIRINHA-B-1900-1911_item1/P228.html

Pasted below is the California death registry information from 
Familysearch.org  I also note the mother's name is listed as Dejesus, but 
his mother in the baptism is Maria da Esperança. 

Name:*John Dutra* https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/VG58-JZ2 Event 
Type: Death Event Date: 09 Oct 1940 Event Place: Orange, California, United 
States Birth Date: 15 Aug 1905 Birthplace: Other Country Gender: Male Father's 
Name:*Dutra* https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/VG58-JZL Mother's Name:

*Dejesus* https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/VG58-JZG 


Thanks for any insight or advice,


Bill Seidler



-- 
For options, such as changing to List, Digest, Abridged, or No Mail (vacation) 
mode, log into your Google account and visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Azores.  Click in the blue area on the right 
that says Join this group and it will take you to Edit my membership.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Azores Genealogy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to azores+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/azores.


Re: [AZORES-Genealogy] John Dutra baptism

2015-02-15 Thread Cheri Mello
Hi Bill,

I have a lot of experience with the California Birth Index and the
California Death Index.

First, a mini lesson on sources.
1) Primary Sources: Something that is generated AT THE TIME of the event.
For example, a birth certificate is a primary source for a birth.  A death
certificate is a primary source for a death.  The U.S. Federal census can
be considered a primary source for residence.

2) Secondary Sources: Something that is generated AFTER the event.  For
example, a birth date obtained from a death certificate.  If a person is
born in 1905 and that date appears on a 1940 document, then it's not a
primary source.

Birth and death indices are created by the state (at least in California)
by people (same is true for the Social Security Death Index).  To err is
human.  So an index can have an error.  I suppose technically, the CA Birth
and Death Indices are not a source.  I utilize them as a source in my
genealogy program because I don't have the money to order a birth or death
on every ancestor I find.  I don't do only my direct line.  I try to get
the whole family (siblings and grandkids).  But these indices are not my
only source.  If I'm using the CA Birth Index as a source, I try to have
1-2 others agree with this source.  If they don't agree, I have a lot of
sources on 1 event!  In all my work with the indices, I've found a mistake
once. (What I mean by that is they've typed the wrong month of death in the
death index).  Overall, pretty accurate!

The CA Birth and Death Indices are getting their information from the Birth
or Death Certificate.  That certificate has an informant on it, who gave
the information.  The earlier ones don't ask the name of the informant.
The later ones do.  The information is only as good as what the informant
provides given the circumstances.

Example of a Death Certificate from 1961 in CA:
Informant is the wife.  Right off the bat, I question EVERYTHING on the
death certificate except the death.  The spouse just died.  How upset is
the wife?  Is the wife an immigrant too and whose information is she
giving?  The death for my ancestor in 1961 gives the wrong date of birth,
states he was a U.S. citizen (he wasn't, but his wife was), and something
else I can't remember.

Example of a Death Certificate from 1992 in CA:
Informant was the son.  The death wasn't expected.  I should probably
question everything, except the informant was my dad.  Almost everything
checked out.  By 1992, CA wanted to know how many years of education the
deceased had.  It said 12th grade.  I asked my dad.  My dad said he was
never asked that question at all, as he knew his father only went to 8th
grade.  No hesitation in answering that question at all.  Someone forgot to
ask my dad and just took a guess.

Example of a Birth Certificate in 1912 in CA:
Informants weren't listed in 1912.  There still were informants, we just
don't know who they were. On my grandfather's birth, it lists his dad as
his dad, and his paternal grandmother as his mom.  Huh, what? She never
came to America.  I never understood why or how that happened.  One day, I
pulled his birth and was looking at it again.  I noted there was no box or
line to list an informant.  At first, I told myself the informant was the
mom.  Then I thought about it and said, no, moms were told to rest.  Then
it dawned on me.  It was dad.  They asked dad (the immigrant) for the
information.  Being the proud papa, he gave the baby's name and even gave
his name.  When they asked him the name of the mother, he gave the name of
the mother - HIS MOTHER!  After all, Gloria was his wife.  He misunderstood
given the level of his English skills at that time.

Bill, you're going to have to narrow down the freguesia first.  Could the
attached record by your Joao?  Maybe.  My immigrant ancestor generally had
his month and day right, but he gave the years of 1884, 1885, 1886, and
1887!  Who says the person giving Joao's information wasn't off by a year
or 2?  Maybe your Joao was indeed born Aug 15th...but in 1904 or 1906.

If your ancestor didn't naturalize, he probably lived long enough to
register when the Smith Act took place in June, 1940.  We call that Alien
Registration.  You need to order his naturalization information or his
Alien Registration information from the USCIS.   In it, he will hopefully
give his correct freguesia.  If not, you'll get at least the island, maybe
the council.  You are probably searching 50 freguesias in the central
island group, hoping for the right one.  Start with your ancestor's death
in Orange Co, CA and work back in time.  If you hit his immigration into
America and get that date, you might get lucky and be able to hire Joao
Ventura, the archivist in Terceira to search the passaportes out of Angra
for the time period you ancestor could have sailed.  But note that I said
lucky.



Cheri Mello
Listowner, Azores-Gen
Researching: Vila Franca, Ponta Garca, Ribeira Quente, Ribeira das Tainhas,
Achada

-- 
For options, 

Re: [AZORES-Genealogy] John Dutra baptism

2015-02-15 Thread Cheri Mello
Here's a webinar next Friday by someone with the USCIS on the immigration
and naturalization records:
http://goo.gl/PxRazK

Cheri Mello
Listowner, Azores-Gen
Researching: Vila Franca, Ponta Garca, Ribeira Quente, Ribeira das Tainhas,
Achada

-- 
For options, such as changing to List, Digest, Abridged, or No Mail (vacation) 
mode, log into your Google account and visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Azores.  Click in the blue area on the right 
that says Join this group and it will take you to Edit my membership.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Azores Genealogy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to azores+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/azores.