RE: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Ian Forrester
I'm shocked no ones mentioned the new backstage schwag!!!

We also have some very nice banners - 
http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/news/archives/2006/12/inspire.html

Ian Forrester || backstage.bbc.co.uk || x83965

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Cashmore
Sent: 05 December 2006 11:26
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: RE: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

Hi Dave - you're not being lame, it took me a few moments to see where you 
could download the video - just hit 'Distribute' in the blue bar beneath the 
video... And you get several options to grab the video...

Matthew 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Crossland
Sent: 04 December 2006 17:16
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

On 04/12/06, Ian Forrester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 http://blip.tv/file/get/Cubicgarden-interviewWithTristanNitotPresident
 OfMozillaEurope758.MP4

Sorry to be lame, but how did you arrive at that URL? What did I miss?
:-)

--
Regards,
Dave
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


RE: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Lee Goddard
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Forrester
 
 I'm shocked no ones mentioned the new backstage schwag!!!

You disabled comments on the page :(

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Gareth Rodger

So.. umm..  any going to waste after the christmas bash?

Regards,

Gareth Rodger

W: http://www.garethrodger.com
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


On 5 Dec 2006, at 15:25, Lee Goddard wrote:


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Forrester

I'm shocked no ones mentioned the new backstage schwag!!!


You disabled comments on the page :(

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe,  
please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/ 
mailing_list.html.  Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail- 
archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/




Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Dave Crossland

On 04/12/06, Richard Lockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


for some reason Flash brings the zealots out in force.  ;-)


I'm not sure why you are calling me a 'zealot'. Did I say something
unreasonable?

--
Regards,
Dave
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


RE: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread David Shaw
Can I have a doggy bag too?
 
Preferably wrapped in a backstage T-Shirt :o)
 

David Shaw
Managing Editor 
Scottish Enterprise WebTeam 
Information Services
Tel: +44 (0)141 228 2979   Fax: +44 (0)141 228 2511
Mobile: 0773 3301219 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gareth Rodger
Sent: 05 December 2006 15:35
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview


So.. umm..  any going to waste after the christmas bash? 

Regards,

Gareth Rodger

W: http://www.garethrodger.com
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


On 5 Dec 2006, at 15:25, Lee Goddard wrote:


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ian Forrester

I'm shocked no ones mentioned the new backstage
schwag!!!


You disabled comments on the page :(

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To
unsubscribe, please visit
http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/




__


Scottish Enterprise Network
http://www.scottish-enterprise.com

Address and Contact Numbers

150 Broomielaw
5 Atlantic Quay
Glasgow
G2 8LU.
Tel:  +44 (0)141 248 2700.
Fax:  +44 (0)141 221 3217

Message is sent in confidence for the addressee only.
It may contain legally privileged information. The contents are not to be 
disclosed to anyone other than the addressee. Unauthorised recipients are 
requested to preserve this confidentiality and to advise the sender immediately 
of any error in transmission.




Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Richard Lockwood

No.  Not unreasonable.  Patronising, possibly.

And it wasn't just aimed at you Dave.  It happened a few months ago -
someone suggests Flash as a powerful and (used properly) useful tool,
and the list suddenly fills with vitriolic posts about how evil it is
and how all software should be free and open.

I don't know why it seems to be Flash in particular that brings this
out in folk.

Ah well.

Cheers,

Rich.

On 12/5/06, Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On 04/12/06, Richard Lockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 for some reason Flash brings the zealots out in force.  ;-)

I'm not sure why you are calling me a 'zealot'. Did I say something
unreasonable?

--
Regards,
Dave
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Martin Belam

I don't know why it seems to be Flash in particular that brings this

out in folk.

I can tell you that it is no different on the continent either - I
spent a very entertaining meeting here in Austria the other week
facing exactly the same The horror! The horror! reaction to the
notion of using Flash :-)

all the best,
martin
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Neil Roberts

There is hope

http://osflash.org/

http://www.contentmanager.net/magazine/news_h20882_adobe_and_mozilla_foundation_to_open_source.html

On 12/5/06, Richard Lockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


No.  Not unreasonable.  Patronising, possibly.

And it wasn't just aimed at you Dave.  It happened a few months ago -
someone suggests Flash as a powerful and (used properly) useful tool,
and the list suddenly fills with vitriolic posts about how evil it is
and how all software should be free and open.

I don't know why it seems to be Flash in particular that brings this
out in folk.

Ah well.

Cheers,

Rich.

On 12/5/06, Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 04/12/06, Richard Lockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  for some reason Flash brings the zealots out in force.  ;-)

 I'm not sure why you are calling me a 'zealot'. Did I say something
 unreasonable?

 --
 Regards,
 Dave
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe,
please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial
list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  Unofficial
list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/





--
I like work: it fascinates me. I can sit and look at it for hours.


RE: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Ian Forrester
It wasn't till I met Aral Balkan and Niqui Merret at BarCampLondon that I 
started to accept that my views of Flash were very much old fashioned. Flash 
has moved on quite a lot and there are real problems still with it but its got 
a lot better.

I still won't use it on my own sites unless its for video or audio playback. 
But I was always a huge fan of SVG :)

Cheers,

Ian Forrester || backstage.bbc.co.uk || x83965
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Belam
Sent: 05 December 2006 16:30
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

 I don't know why it seems to be Flash in particular that brings this
out in folk.

I can tell you that it is no different on the continent either - I spent a very 
entertaining meeting here in Austria the other week facing exactly the same 
The horror! The horror! reaction to the notion of using Flash :-)

all the best,
martin
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Dave Crossland

On 05/12/06, Neil Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is hope 
http://osflash.org/
This is very, very interesting. Because Flash blurs the distinctionbetween code 
and data, I wonder if it is inconsisent to object toproprietary Flash player 
software, yet accept proprietary Flash'content' software.
I'll have to think about this! :-)

http://www.contentmanager.net/magazine/news_h20882_adobe_and_mozilla_foundation_to_open_source.html

In a recent ZDnet interview with the lead Gnash developer, therelevance of this 
to Free Flash player software was explained:
-- 8 --  4. How does Adobe's announcement that they are open sourcing 
theActionScript Virtual Machine affect the Gnash project?
Very little, actually. Their released code will help Mozilla, whichhad a poor 
JavaScript engine, but not Gnash much. Tamarin is not aFlash player, it's not 
even close. It's probably about 10% of the coderequired for a Flash player. 
Many of the more advanced ActionScriptclasses, like SharedObj, NetConnection, 
LocalConnection, etc… aren'teven in this donated code. Even when using Tamarin, 
you still need arendering engine, graphics manipulation, etc… We will likely 
pickthrough the code to see what the v9 changes are, but that's about it.We 
still welcome Adobe's an announcement as a good thing.
5. Is there any possibility that Gnash will contribute code to theTamarin 
project?
I seriously doubt it. We already have a good VM in Gnash, and we'vealready 
implemented most of the ActionScript classes. As we won't beusing Tamarin, there 
really isn't anyway we could contribute. They'rewelcome to steal code from us 
though if they don't mind the GPL. :-)-- 8 --- 
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Stewart/index.php?p=177
-- Regards,Dave
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Dave Crossland

On 05/12/06, Martin Belam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I don't know why it seems to be Flash in particular that brings this
out in folk.

I can tell you that it is no different on the continent either - I
spent a very entertaining meeting here in Austria the other week
facing exactly the same The horror! The horror! reaction to the
notion of using Flash :-)


That kind of practical reaction is from people out of touch, imHo :-)

Macromedia took great pains to make Flash a platform for usable and
accessible content delivery. But despite this, publishers still need
to make alternative distribution channels for people on
non-Flash-capable devices like mobile phones or low bandwidth
connections; eg, offering content in a non-interactive form, pr say,
downloads of streams.

--
Regards,
Dave
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


RE: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Luke Dicken
 It wasn't till I met Aral Balkan and Niqui Merret at 
 BarCampLondon that I started to accept that my views of Flash 
 were very much old fashioned. Flash has moved on quite a lot 
 and there are real problems still with it but its got a lot better.
 
 I still won't use it on my own sites unless its for video or 
 audio playback. But I was always a huge fan of SVG :)

Yeah there are some nice uses of flash kicking about. Video, audio in
particular but I've also seen nice gallery implementations that use
flash. The main problem with Flash to my mind is how associated it is
with ads and garish colour schemes - its grown up a lot since then, but
not everyone has made the switch. I swear to god if I have to zap that
damned mosquito one more time to make my PC stop making stupid insect
noises...

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Dave Crossland

On 05/12/06, Ian Forrester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

It wasn't till I met Aral Balkan and Niqui Merret at BarCampLondon
that I started to accept that my views of Flash were very
much old fashioned.


The professional is the man who stays put
- The Medium is the Massage, McLuhan, 1969

;p


Flash has moved on quite a lot and there are real problems still with it
but its got a lot better.

I still won't use it on my own sites unless its for video or
audio playback. But I was always a huge fan of SVG :)


Sexps are sexier than XML.

(If you're not familiar with that joke, I recommend checking out
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Erik_Naggum - especially Perl people :-D

--
Regards,
Dave
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


RE: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Ian Forrester
Flashblock is your friend on Firefox - http://flashblock.mozdev.org/


Ian Forrester || backstage.bbc.co.uk || x83965
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luke Dicken
Sent: 05 December 2006 17:00
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: RE: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

 It wasn't till I met Aral Balkan and Niqui Merret at BarCampLondon 
 that I started to accept that my views of Flash were very much old 
 fashioned. Flash has moved on quite a lot and there are real problems 
 still with it but its got a lot better.
 
 I still won't use it on my own sites unless its for video or audio 
 playback. But I was always a huge fan of SVG :)

Yeah there are some nice uses of flash kicking about. Video, audio in 
particular but I've also seen nice gallery implementations that use flash. The 
main problem with Flash to my mind is how associated it is with ads and garish 
colour schemes - its grown up a lot since then, but not everyone has made the 
switch. I swear to god if I have to zap that damned mosquito one more time to 
make my PC stop making stupid insect noises...

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Gareth Rodger

Ian,

I was just writing the exact same response!

Apollo looks to take Director's place as a RAD tool.

Flex is what they are pushing for enterprise RIA's (Possibly  
succeeding the Flash Communication Server).


'Flash' on the web as I see it is for certain media's where other  
solutions haven't the market saturation or have limited functionality  
e.g. audio / video / drawing / webcams.


All in all, i'm perfectly happy with the Flash player being the front- 
end for these solutions.


The old view I had was of flash being used for blitzing all areas of  
interactivity and multimedia on the web. Now I see it as nothing more  
than a front end to a suite of tools.


In the past i've used abstraction layers to allow me to use a  
different front-end not only for accessibility but primarily for  
future-proofing.


Regards,

Gareth Rodger

W: http://www.garethrodger.com
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



On 5 Dec 2006, at 16:46, Ian Forrester wrote:

It wasn't till I met Aral Balkan and Niqui Merret at BarCampLondon  
that I started to accept that my views of Flash were very much old  
fashioned. Flash has moved on quite a lot and there are real  
problems still with it but its got a lot better.


I still won't use it on my own sites unless its for video or audio  
playback. But I was always a huge fan of SVG :)


Cheers,

Ian Forrester || backstage.bbc.co.uk || x83965
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Belam

Sent: 05 December 2006 16:30
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag  
preview



I don't know why it seems to be Flash in particular that brings this

out in folk.

I can tell you that it is no different on the continent either - I  
spent a very entertaining meeting here in Austria the other week  
facing exactly the same The horror! The horror! reaction to the  
notion of using Flash :-)


all the best,
martin
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe,  
please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/ 
mailing_list.html.  Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail- 
archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe,  
please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/ 
mailing_list.html.  Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail- 
archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/




Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Neil Roberts

Aral Balkan is a vey talented guy, if anyone can convince you that flash can
be used for good its him

Also there is a guy called Niklas Richardson you is exceptionally
knowledgable about Flex which is the XML base development product that is
much more tailored to developers that designers.

Flash has come a long way in the last 4 years as a development tool but as
with most macromedia products it does suffer from a bad reputation due to
duck hunt style ads and the cost

On 12/5/06, Ian Forrester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


It wasn't till I met Aral Balkan and Niqui Merret at BarCampLondon that I
started to accept that my views of Flash were very much old fashioned. Flash
has moved on quite a lot and there are real problems still with it but its
got a lot better.

I still won't use it on my own sites unless its for video or audio
playback. But I was always a huge fan of SVG :)

Cheers,

Ian Forrester || backstage.bbc.co.uk || x83965
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Belam
Sent: 05 December 2006 16:30
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

 I don't know why it seems to be Flash in particular that brings this
out in folk.

I can tell you that it is no different on the continent either - I spent a
very entertaining meeting here in Austria the other week facing exactly the
same The horror! The horror! reaction to the notion of using Flash :-)

all the best,
martin
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  Unofficial
list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  Unofficial
list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/





--
I like work: it fascinates me. I can sit and look at it for hours.


Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Dave Crossland

On 05/12/06, Luke Dicken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I swear to god if I have to zap that
damned mosquito one more time to make my PC stop making stupid insect
noises...


https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/433/

--
Regards,
Dave
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


RE: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Ian Forrester
Interesting

I think this is one of the problems with the Free Software movement.

any tool that is not free-as-in-freedom is unethical

This must have got quite a few people backs up? I'm not saying its wrong, just 
in the language you can see why people object without even understanding the 
principle.

I understand the differences between open source and free software but the fact 
people are at least willing to try an alternative licence to the all right 
reserved is a good thing in my book. Maybe with a less in your face delivery, 
free software will win over even more people and become the poster child of a 
generation like open source currently is.

Ian Forrester || backstage.bbc.co.uk || x83965

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Crossland
Sent: 05 December 2006 16:41
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

However, any tool that is not free-as-in-freedom is unethical, because it 
cannot be shared, and unsustainable, because it cannot be independently 
improved.

Today I'm more interested in Free Software than web standards, because I think 
that the practical problems with Flash about 5 years ago have largely been 
resolved, and the remaining problems are due to the cultural inertia of Flash 
developers.

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Richard Lockwood

 No.  Not unreasonable.  Patronising, possibly.

Okay. Could you point to which paragraph my tone was off?


Mm - the first line.
Have you heard of Free Software? I expect you have heard of
OpenSource software. 

Maybe it's just me but it came across as someone explaining the
concept on CBeebies.  I'm sure it wasn't intended as such and so I
apologise if I was a bit snappy.



Many people have heard of 'open source', but confusion can arise
because they don't understand the difference between 'free software'
and 'open source'.

This is mainly because 'open source' isn't totally honest about whats
going on here. The views espoused by 'open source' culture dont
explain why it is essential to replace all 'closed source' software
with 'open source'; it just explains why its might, perhaps, make more
reliable/powerful software in certain cases.

In this particular case, 'open source' people are able to make use of
Flash-based functionality all over the net because they have no
objections to using the Flash player that Adobe makes available for
GNU+Linux.

But I object to it because it is not Free Software, and believe that
it is essential to use Free Software, because non-free software is
unethical and unsustainable.


And that's where we disagree.  Non-free software isn't unethical in
itself, and it's certainly not unsustainable.  If it was
unsustainable, software companies - whether one man businesses, or
giant companies like Microsoft, Oracle, Adobe and EA just wouldn't
exist by now.  I'd argue the exact opposite - free software is a far
less sustainable business model, and while the free and open source
movements aims and ideals are laudable, and an excellent alternative
option, I don't believe that all software can ever, nor should ever be
free (as in Free Speech).

I liken it to vegetarianism.  If you want to cut meat out of your diet
entirely, then that's entirely up to you, but is arguably a dangerous
and ethically suspect move.  My stance is that there are good reasons
to cut down on red meat and to move to more ethically produced food -
but cutting all meat out of a diet is, I believe a bad thing.  I
certainly don't want an extreme position being rammed down my throat
and being abused for not agreeing with it - which has happened in the
past.

Same with software.

Anyway - this isn't the place to get into this discussion, although if
anyone would like to take this off list then I'm more than happy to
bang on about the analogy above until the hand reared, free range
Jerseys come home.


Cheers,

Rich.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Adrian Lansdown

The videos are ace, Are they going to be a new monthly offering?

The schwag is looking really good, the black really works with the word tag.
How does a poor needy student go about blagging a t-shirt and pen ;)

Adrian

On 12/4/06, Ian Forrester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi All,

A bit of a joy for the first Monday of the month

First up some videos I've collected,
Interview with Mozilla Europe President - http://cubicgarden.blip.tv
/file/109840
Open Street Presentation from OS Mashup day - http://cubicgarden.blip.tv
/file/98294
GeoRSS Presentation from OS Mashup day - http://cubicgarden.blip.tv
/file/98290

Then some sneaky previews of our new tshirts

http://www.flickr.com/groups/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

Enjoy!


Ian Forrester || backstage.bbc.co.uk || x83965

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
 Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@
lists.bbc.co.uk/



Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread George Wright

Luke Dicken wrote:

I love the soap boxes people find to lecture the world from.snip


OK, I'll bite.

I can't look at Flash on my computer at home because Macromedia don't 
make Flash for the OS/ architecture I'm using.


If Flash was free software, there'd be a way to get it to work on my 
computer. It isn't, so there isn't. Even attempting to get it to work 
probably breaks some rule/ law or other.


So, soap boxes and lectures aside, what do you suggest? Might you see 
now why not everyone likes Flash all the time, and that disliking it 
might not be just because of insert awful ad here?


Of course, if we all used the same OS, browser and software stack, it'd 
be much easier, and Tim B-L wouldn't have needed to invent the Web.


Smile and regards

George

(disclaimer.. I work at the BBC)




-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


RE: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Luke Dicken
I wrote a long thing in reply to this, but it all boils down to : access
to people's software is a privilege not a right. Sorry. But there you
go.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Wright
 Sent: 05 December 2006 20:24
 To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
 Subject: Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage 
 Schwag preview
 
 
 Luke Dicken wrote:
  I love the soap boxes people find to lecture the world from.snip
 
 OK, I'll bite.
 
 I can't look at Flash on my computer at home because Macromedia don't 
 make Flash for the OS/ architecture I'm using.
 
 If Flash was free software, there'd be a way to get it to work on my 
 computer. It isn't, so there isn't. Even attempting to get it to work 
 probably breaks some rule/ law or other.
 
 So, soap boxes and lectures aside, what do you suggest? Might you see 
 now why not everyone likes Flash all the time, and that disliking it 
 might not be just because of insert awful ad here?
 
 Of course, if we all used the same OS, browser and software 
 stack, it'd 
 be much easier, and Tim B-L wouldn't have needed to invent the Web.
 
 Smile and regards
 
 George
 
 (disclaimer.. I work at the BBC)
 
 
 
 
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To 
 unsubscribe, please visit 
 http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
  Unofficial list archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.7/569 - Release Date:
05/12/2006


-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Dave Crossland

On 05/12/06, Luke Dicken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I wrote a long thing in reply to this, but it all boils down to : access
to people's software is a privilege not a right. Sorry. But there you
go.


Please post it - I can't really make sense of this :-)

--
Regards,
Dave
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


RE: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Luke Dicken
Well, I deleted it to write the other. Basically my position is I make
the software, therefore I make the rules. At the end of the day,
software is a product and just like every other product, the developer
sets the terms of sale, or use, and for many products that extends
solely to what platform it is available. Mandating that software should
be free is a naieve position that doesn't take a number of factors into
account. From what I read of your initial email for example, you can
charge for your software but then the person who buys it has the right
to redistribute it. And how does original creator get compensated fairly
based on the actual number of people using the product? Business models
built on Faith in human nature tend to be... Y'know... Non-existant.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Crossland
 Sent: 05 December 2006 20:56
 To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
 Subject: Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage 
 Schwag preview
 
 
 On 05/12/06, Luke Dicken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I wrote a long thing in reply to this, but it all boils down to : 
  access to people's software is a privilege not a right. Sorry. But 
  there you go.
 
 Please post it - I can't really make sense of this :-)
 
 -- 
 Regards,
 Dave
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To 
 unsubscribe, please visit 
 http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
  Unofficial list archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.7/569 - Release Date:
05/12/2006


-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


RE: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Luke Dicken
And this would be where the zealotry comes in.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Crossland
 Sent: 05 December 2006 22:21
 To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
 Subject: Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage 
 Schwag preview
 
 
 On 05/12/06, Luke Dicken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I love the soap boxes people find to lecture the world 
 from. Drop me a 
  line when capitalist society starts living up to these idealistic 
  standards.
 
 I'm surprised you think that Free Software is not part of 
 capitalist society.
 
 Free Software is more pro-business than proprietary software is.
 
 If you buy a car, you don't expect that the bonnet is 
 padlocked shut, so you can't do basic small things yourself 
 like changing the oil, and that you can't take it to any 
 independent mechanic.
 
 Instead, you have freedom to fix what you can yourself, and 
 to help a thousand more mechanics make a million more pounds.
 
 All proprietary software developers are monopolists, because 
 only they can pop the bonnet or your car, as it were. Yes, a 
 free market prevents monopolists making _as much_ money as 
 one where they have the market.
 
 But without monopolists - proprietary software developers - 
 everyone else makes more money, overall.
 
  Until then, I'm going to play by the same rules as other 
 people do - 
  holding yourself to a higher standard just to take the moral high 
  ground is the very reason the phrase cutting your nose off 
 to spite 
  your face was coined.
 
 Were people cutting off their noses to spite their faces in 
 their struggle for freedom in the suffragette movement?
 
 Were people cutting off their noses to spite their faces in 
 their struggle for freedom in the anti-apartheid movement?
 
 Consider If I am not for myself, then who will be for me? 
 And if I am only for myself, then what am I? And if not now, 
 when? - http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Hillel_the_Elder
 
 In that spirit, the Free Software movement is willing to 
 undergo the tremendous inconvenience to create a free program 
 that's a replacement for a proprietary program. That's why we 
 have the GNU/Linux system, because a lot of people were 
 prepared to make practical sacrifices so we can have that freedom.
 - http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/04/15/lessig_stallman_drm/
 
 :-)
 
 -- 
 Regards,
 Dave
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To 
 unsubscribe, please visit 
 http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
  Unofficial list archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.7/569 - Release Date:
05/12/2006


-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Dave Crossland

On 05/12/06, Luke Dicken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


And this would be where the zealotry comes in.


Why are you calling me a zealot?

--
Regards,
Dave
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


RE: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Luke Dicken
  And this would be where the zealotry comes in.
 
 Why are you calling me a zealot?

Largely for comic effect...

Also: zealot noun 1 often derog, a single-minded and determined
supporter of a political cause, religion, etc

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Dave Crossland

On 05/12/06, Laurence Samuels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I think it's time you lot stop all these. If you want to continue these
rants, do it privately to yourselves, and not to the list. Your rants
contribute no knowledge. Please stop.


You can ignore my emails? :-)

In general, I think the 'why' of the Free Software movement is quite
important for projects to provide Free access to BBC information, such
as Backstage.

Specifically here, I was asked by some @bbc.co.uk to explain why a
Free Software user such as myself would not use non-free software.

--
Regards,
Dave
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Laurence Samuels

You explained these a long time ago, and you kept on repeating what did not
amount to new knowledge. I hope you wont reply to this email. If you do, I
wont reply to the list, I might reply to you privately.

L

On 05/12/06, Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


On 05/12/06, Laurence Samuels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I think it's time you lot stop all these. If you want to continue these
 rants, do it privately to yourselves, and not to the list. Your rants
 contribute no knowledge. Please stop.

You can ignore my emails? :-)

In general, I think the 'why' of the Free Software movement is quite
important for projects to provide Free access to BBC information, such
as Backstage.

Specifically here, I was asked by some @bbc.co.uk to explain why a
Free Software user such as myself would not use non-free software.

--
Regards,
Dave
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  Unofficial
list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/



Re: [backstage] Mozilla interview and Backstage Schwag preview

2006-12-05 Thread Mr I Forrester

Adrian Lansdown wrote:

The videos are ace, Are they going to be a new monthly offering? 

The schwag is looking really good, the black really works with the 
word tag.


How does a poor needy student go about blagging a t-shirt and pen ;)

Adrian
Not exactly a monthly offering, but when ever I go to an event or 
something of interest.


Wait till you see the T-shirts!

Come to xmas party, otherwise wait till we come to you. :)
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/