[backstage] TV Anytime Data

2007-06-20 Thread Adam Leach

Hi,

The TV Anytime data for today only appears to have tv information for 
BBC World Service, BBC Radio 1  BBC Radio2.


The file is only 163k, whilst the file is normally 825k.  Could you 
investigate.


http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/feeds/tvradio/
http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/feeds/tvradio/20070620.tar.gz

Thanks

Adam
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


[backstage] Re: Google Map Symbols Key

2007-06-20 Thread ~:'' ありがとうございました 。

Ed,

have difficulty believing your reply:
would a printed map that uses a single icon for 'town' with a  
gazetteer of locations and additional information be as usable?


The current Google idiom is but one possibility, some user testing of  
other well tried methods might be helpful. could you test a sliding  
scale of symbol vocabulary so that the user could select their  
breadth of symbol usage, and visually guage their competence?
on a similar theme I have asked TV Raman and Chris Dibona to consider  
the benefits of ranking search results using readability scores.


to discuss:

how does an originator or author introduce a new value  
myNewToYouSymbol?
this evidently requires negotiation as the user may or may not wish  
to know about and learn this symbol.
this was described as the red bus, green bus issue during the ccf  
conference some years ago.


implementation of the concept coding framework would enable the  
users application to display symbols known to the user.


in your example of places of worship, the slider could have 4 values:  
marker only, generic worship symbols, common religious symbols,  
author values.


regards

Jonathan Chetwynd



On 19 Jun 2007, at 09:36, Ed Parsons wrote:

Hi Jonathan,

Yes the point I was making is that given a web map is interactive you  
don't need as many symbols to represent features for which you have  
additional information or are classified. So for example rather than  
having different symbols representing the type of place or worship,  
church, temple, mosque etc. a single symbol on icon could be used and  
the additional information made available by clicking on it and  
getting an info bubble, or playing some audio or showing a picture  
etc...


Happy to discuss ..

ed

On 19 Jun 2007, at 07:28, ~:'' ありがとうございました。  
wrote:



Ed,

such an extensive collection of symbols will not be needed.
could you expand on this as your meaning isn't clear?

currently Google relies on individuals creating symbols for their  
own mashups which might seem to create more libraries rather than a  
few standard ones.


I work with people who use symbols to communicate rather than text.
People with low literacy or learning disabilities.
Have you come across the concept coding framework which was  
specifically created to consider the issue that different  
communities use different symbols.
That is to label a resource or location in this instance with a  
concept, the user's application then applies a symbol.
There are difficulties, which if your are interested we could  
discuss further...


regards

Jonathan Chetwynd



On 18 Jun 2007, at 09:16, Ed Parsons wrote:

Hi Jonathan,

Ok now I understand, yes you are right google supports only a  
limited number of pin icons, but then map symbology is a rather  
cultural phenomena so what is familer to a user in the England  
brought up on OS mapping will appear alien to a resident of Zurich  
brought up using the excellent maps of Swiss Topo. Over time  
perhaps a standard form of representation may develop for web  
mapping, but as by their nature such maps are dynamic and can  
display information as the user interacts with them perhaps such an  
extensive collection of symbols will not be needed.


You are of course free to create you own symbols and share them  
with the community.


ed

On 18 Jun 2007, at 08:07, ~:'' ありがとうございました。  
wrote:



Ed,

Icons, but where is the key? what icons are standard for google maps?
OS maps provide a key for churches, post offices and much more...
much of this information is static over decades.
markers or drawing pins provide a very limited common vocabulary.

regards

Jonathan Chetwynd

http://labs.google.com/ridefinder/images/ is forbidden



On 13 Jun 2007, at 12:13, Ed Parsons wrote:

Hi Jonathan,

Do you mean icons ? http://www.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/ 
#Creating_Icons


ed


On 13 Jun 2007, at 10:59, ~:'' ありがとうございました。  
wrote:



Re: Google Map Symbols Key

an interactive version with improved graphics is now available:
http://www.peepo.co.uk/temp/moulin/moulin.svg
using CSS only ~:

cheers

Jonathan Chetwynd



On 12 Jun 2007, at 15:42, ~:'' ありがとうございまし 
た。 wrote:


Google Map Symbols Key

how is it possible to add symbols to google maps?
in addition to the current drawing-pin or text-bubbles.

my hack demo: http://www.peepo.co.uk/temp/moulin/moulin.svg
valuable prize for adding location and text.

Example keys:
Ordinance Survey:   http://tinyurl.com/3axdny
streetmap:  http://www.streetmap.co.uk/mapkey.htm

cheers

~:

Jonathan Chetwynd

Jonathan Chetwynd
Accessibility Consultant on Learning Disabilities and the Internet

29 Crimsworth Road
SW8 4RJ

020 7978 1764

http://www.eas-i.co.uk







Ed Parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Geospatial Technologist

Google UK
Belgrave House 76 Buckingham Palace Road London SW1W 9TQ
Mobile:   +44 (0) 7825 382263 Direct:  +44 (0) 20 7881 4629

It's better to be a pirate than to join the Navy.









Ed Parsons 

Re: [backstage] TV Anytime Data

2007-06-20 Thread Andrew McParland
Thanks Adam,

Rogue cron processes caused chaos - now fixed.

Andrew
BBC Research

On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:03:29AM +0100, Adam Leach wrote:
 Hi,
 
 The TV Anytime data for today only appears to have tv information for 
 BBC World Service, BBC Radio 1  BBC Radio2.
 
 The file is only 163k, whilst the file is normally 825k.  Could you 
 investigate.
 
 http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/feeds/tvradio/
 http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/feeds/tvradio/20070620.tar.gz
 
 Thanks
 
 Adam
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
 visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
 Unofficial list archive: 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


[backstage] Re: Google Map Symbols Key

2007-06-20 Thread ~:'' ありがとうございました 。

Ed,

massive abstractions of reality are immensely helpful, most  
especially when they are held in common. They are normally used as  
words, though in some instances symbols may obtain ~:
ease of learning them should be greatly enhanced given the  
interactive and photo illustration available.


regarding Concept Coding Framework:
http://dewey.computing.dundee.ac.uk/andy/?q=node/43
People with Learning Disabilities may rely on symbols for communication.


Jonathan Chetwynd
Accessibility Consultant on Learning Disabilities and the Internet

29 Crimsworth Road
SW8 4RJ

020 7978 1764

http://www.eas-i.co.uk


On 20 Jun 2007, at 09:14, Ed Parsons wrote:

Jonathan,

What is so unbelievable? the key point is that we are not talking  
about the printed map paradigm anymore, where you were restricted to  
a massive abstraction of reality to allow communication using a  
single static symbol.


I like the idea of a range of symbology, which could work in the same  
way we have scale dependent symbols now.. as you zoom-in more  
symbols appear - but this could be a preference for a single scale..


I need to understand more on the concept coding framework where would  
be a good place to start ?


ed





On 20 Jun 2007, at 09:06, ~:'' ありがとうございました。  
wrote:



Ed,

have difficulty believing your reply:
would a printed map that uses a single icon for 'town' with a  
gazetteer of locations and additional information be as usable?


The current Google idiom is but one possibility, some user testing  
of other well tried methods might be helpful. could you test a  
sliding scale of symbol vocabulary so that the user could select  
their breadth of symbol usage, and visually guage their competence?
on a similar theme I have asked TV Raman and Chris Dibona to  
consider the benefits of ranking search results using readability  
scores.


to discuss:

how does an originator or author introduce a new value  
myNewToYouSymbol?
this evidently requires negotiation as the user may or may not wish  
to know about and learn this symbol.
this was described as the red bus, green bus issue during the ccf  
conference some years ago.


implementation of the concept coding framework would enable the  
users application to display symbols known to the user.


in your example of places of worship, the slider could have 4  
values: marker only, generic worship symbols, common religious  
symbols, author values.


regards

Jonathan Chetwynd



On 19 Jun 2007, at 09:36, Ed Parsons wrote:

Hi Jonathan,

Yes the point I was making is that given a web map is interactive  
you don't need as many symbols to represent features for which you  
have additional information or are classified. So for example  
rather than having different symbols representing the type of  
place or worship, church, temple, mosque etc. a single symbol on  
icon could be used and the additional information made available by  
clicking on it and getting an info bubble, or playing some audio  
or showing a picture etc...


Happy to discuss ..

ed

On 19 Jun 2007, at 07:28, ~:'' ありがとうございました。  
wrote:



Ed,

such an extensive collection of symbols will not be needed.
could you expand on this as your meaning isn't clear?

currently Google relies on individuals creating symbols for their  
own mashups which might seem to create more libraries rather than  
a few standard ones.


I work with people who use symbols to communicate rather than text.
People with low literacy or learning disabilities.
Have you come across the concept coding framework which was  
specifically created to consider the issue that different  
communities use different symbols.
That is to label a resource or location in this instance with a  
concept, the user's application then applies a symbol.
There are difficulties, which if your are interested we could  
discuss further...


regards

Jonathan Chetwynd



On 18 Jun 2007, at 09:16, Ed Parsons wrote:

Hi Jonathan,

Ok now I understand, yes you are right google supports only a  
limited number of pin icons, but then map symbology is a rather  
cultural phenomena so what is familer to a user in the England  
brought up on OS mapping will appear alien to a resident of Zurich  
brought up using the excellent maps of Swiss Topo. Over time  
perhaps a standard form of representation may develop for web  
mapping, but as by their nature such maps are dynamic and can  
display information as the user interacts with them perhaps such  
an extensive collection of symbols will not be needed.


You are of course free to create you own symbols and share them  
with the community.


ed

On 18 Jun 2007, at 08:07, ~:'' ありがとうございました。  
wrote:



Ed,

Icons, but where is the key? what icons are standard for google  
maps?

OS maps provide a key for churches, post offices and much more...
much of this information is static over decades.
markers or drawing pins provide a very limited common vocabulary.

regards

Jonathan Chetwynd


Re: [backstage] www.FreeTheBBC.info

2007-06-20 Thread vijay chopra

On 19/06/07, Andy Leighton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 07:31:03PM +0100, vijay chopra wrote:
 On 19/06/07, David Greaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 vijay chopra wrote:
  On 19/06/07, *David Woodhouse* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  legal ways. The only thing I have downloaded unlawfully is an out of
  print RPG book, that I would be happy to pay for, if only I could
find
  someone selling it!


 If the book is ever republished (or if I see it second hand etc.), I'll
buy
 it, however  it's unusual for companies  who write RPGs to republish old
 editions; they like being able to charge their player base over and
over,
 so  keep changing the rules.

What RPG is it for?  What book?  A lot of the old stuff is being
republished
as PDFs.

--
Andy Leighton = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Lord is my shepherd, but we still lost the sheep dog trials
  - Robert Rankin, _They Came And Ate Us_
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  Unofficial
list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/



It's Vampire the Masquerade (and a bunch of source books), if you know where
I can buy it, mail me off-list as this is now totally off topic.

Thanks,

Vijay.