RE: [backstage] Voting data ideas
I was in a class of four people in the sixth form that did a Statistics A-Level There's a statistics joke in there somewhere but it is too early for me. Just to be clear here, the BBC has strong editorial guidelines that online votes are to be effectively taken with a pinch of salt, and not used with editorial prominence in other media i.e. you can't on the News say And 79% of people prefered crisps to chocolate in the results of our online poll. They are always meant to be called 'votes' rather than 'polls' as well, as polls implies some sort of scientific methodology, rather than a self-selecting bunch of web users. This doesn't, of course, stop producers getting it wrong from time to time http://www.bbc.co.uk/guidelines/editorialguidelines/onguide/interacting/ onlinevoting.shtml And I don't think Vijay is being too paranoid about BBC releases personal data! scare stories cropping up either - look at the fuss made over the release of the AOL search log data that wasn't properly made anonymous m From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Butterworth Sent: 26 September 2007 22:58 To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Subject: Re: [backstage] Voting data ideas My apologies... I was in a class of four people in the sixth form that did a Statistics A-Level On 26/09/2007, vijay chopra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 26/09/2007, Christopher Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Leaving the last digit from the last octet out would be fine, though? Then you could group by IP addresses for purposes like fraud checking and suchlike. I'm sure the BBC sites always say that standard information such as browser and IP address will be collected whenever you submit information to the server, so that's a fairly standard get-out clause. That's actually a really good idea, and to add to my previous email, it would certainly be intresting to see what topics inspire the most vote fraud. Having Geographic and ISP info aswell would be good. Are Northerners or Southerners more honest online? NTL customers or BT customers etc. What utter tosh. I'm sorry, but aside from the fact that you cannot determine anything at all from an IP address, because of NAT and corporate gateways and proxy servers, firewalls and so forth, it misses out the principles of: - Psephology - IP addresses might not be pebbles, but you need to understand the actual system you are considering and not make generalisations about questions not yet even asked. - Statistical weighting. Unless you do a universal poll, you should weight the incoming votes you get so that they represent the population as a whole. So, if you ask people to vote, and 25% of the voters are men, you need to weight the male votes up so they match the 50% in the population as a whole and unweight the female votes from 75% to 50%. - Secret ballots. The whole point of a secret ballot is that you do not know the votes of other people and cannot be influenced by votes already cast. This is not the case with most web, radio and telly voting where you are being encouraged to part with money, not provide a statistically correct outcome. Remember that ALL the voting where you are asked to pay for the call or text are simply revenue collection systems, not statistically valid ones. The adjudicators (on Big Brother for example) simple verify that the number of calls have been made, not the meaning of the votes. As far as I know the only systems that the BBC uses on a regular basis that are statistically valid is the popular music chart and the BARB figures. There's bugger all you can really do with an IP address, even a complete one, unless you're a malicious fellow with a botnet behind you. I know that, you know that and everyone on this list knows that, but it doesn't make as good a headline in the daily mail as BBC giving out information about your computers or BBC helps spammers then going on to detail all the evil things that can be done with a botnet... Or am I being too cynical? There is no reason why the BBC could not use a table where random values are assigned to each IP address as they are encountered - as long as a reverse look up was not published Vijay. -- Brian Butterworth www.ukfree.tv
Re: [backstage] Voting data ideas
On 26/09/2007, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Remember that ALL the voting where you are asked to pay for the call or text are simply revenue collection systems, not statistically valid ones. The adjudicators (on Big Brother for example) simple verify that the number of calls have been made, not the meaning of the votes. As far as I know the only systems that the BBC uses on a regular basis that are statistically valid is the popular music chart and the BARB figures. That was my point, you could see how statistaclilly *invalid* they were. Then correct accordingly using things like GeoIP and ISP data. And since when are the popcharts valid, even if they're not rigged, they're widely believed to be making them meaningless for most uses. There is no reason why the BBC could not use a table where random values are assigned to each IP address as they are encountered - as long as a reverse look up was not published That's a much better idea than actual IP aaddress, for the media anyway if not for us. Vijay.
Re: [backstage] Re: Sshhh... I've added a bit to my Backstage project...
Hi Rich, nice one.. just a couple of points I found when playing around with it: - adding a programme to Google Calendar doesn't seem to work in FF (on Win and OSX), I just get the autorization required alert, but the rest of the page is blank. IE7 shows the login to google calendar button, and work ok. - if selecting a series, the RSS feed contains all programmes of that series. It would be nice if I could add the entire series to google calendar as well, rather than having to add the individual programmes (as I think I have to do at the moment) Cheers, Mario. On 9/25/07, Richard Lockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, sorry... me again... That's www.tvplanner.co.uk - the www is important. Cheers, Rich. On 9/25/07, Richard Lockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know we don't talk about mashups (VILE word), or development or anything here anymore (when's the development list coming???), but I thought I'd quietly mention the first draft of a new feature on TVPlanner.co.uk - you can now add programmes to your Google calendar (if you use it). You don't need to register with the site to use this. That's it really, nothing very exciting. Nothing to see here, move along... Now, who's next to slag off / fellate an iPhone / iPlayer? Cheers, Rich. - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
Re: [backstage] Re: Sshhh... I've added a bit to my Backstage project...
Hmm - it doesn't, does it? Strange - I'm sure it did at one point. Something to fix. And yes, the whole series add would be a nice addition to it. I'll get onto that when I get a few spare minutes. Thanks for the feedback! Cheers, Rich. On 9/27/07, Mario Menti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Rich, nice one.. just a couple of points I found when playing around with it: - adding a programme to Google Calendar doesn't seem to work in FF (on Win and OSX), I just get the autorization required alert, but the rest of the page is blank. IE7 shows the login to google calendar button, and work ok. - if selecting a series, the RSS feed contains all programmes of that series. It would be nice if I could add the entire series to google calendar as well, rather than having to add the individual programmes (as I think I have to do at the moment) Cheers, Mario. On 9/25/07, Richard Lockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, sorry... me again... That's www.tvplanner.co.uk - the www is important. Cheers, Rich. On 9/25/07, Richard Lockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know we don't talk about mashups (VILE word), or development or anything here anymore (when's the development list coming???), but I thought I'd quietly mention the first draft of a new feature on TVPlanner.co.uk - you can now add programmes to your Google calendar (if you use it). You don't need to register with the site to use this. That's it really, nothing very exciting. Nothing to see here, move along... Now, who's next to slag off / fellate an iPhone / iPlayer? Cheers, Rich. - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/ -- SilverDisc Ltd is registered in England no. 2798073 Registered address: 4 Swallow Court, Kettering, Northamptonshire, NN15 6XX - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
Re: [backstage] Re: Sshhh... I've added a bit to my Backstage project...
On 27/09/2007, Richard Lockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm - it doesn't, does it?
If it helps Firefox complains about line 79 which contains:
if (selectObj.options[f].value == ) {
It also complains that startList is not defined (line 362) and
document.getElementById(loginNotice) has no properties (line 194)
The div element that has the id loginNotice is shown as commented out
in the source code highlighting.
IIRC there is some weird thing about how many '-'s there can be in a comment.
Using client side editing of HTML to remove all the '-' in the
comments made the login to Google calender button appear.
Maybe all you need to do is remove all the hyphens in the comments,
not entirely sure why though.
Andy
--
Computers are like air conditioners. Both stop working, if you open windows.
-- Adam Heath
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
