Re: [backstage] Ashley Highfield on iPlayer - 26min Interview

2007-10-30 Thread dantes inferno
I think the point made is a philosophical one or approach -
incremental rollout is obviously one way - but a decision to design
something for the main 3 platforms at the start is another way - as
was said, using Java and open APIs - even a layman would think that
the BBC approach is eccentric, I think - and the explanation given - a
bit on the naughty side.

Its a bit like saying we'll design a transport system for able-bodied
people first (as they are the majority) - and gradually roll out to
others - this is also thought to be morally wrong, as well as a poor
design decision.

In the BBCs case - as they are using public funds they need to include
everyone as an upfront design decision

On 30/10/2007, Andrew Bowden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Andy
  On 29/10/2007, Ian Forrester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Hi All, from the latest podcast just uploaded...

  3 minutes in and the guy speaking has already made a mistake or is
  trying to mislead.
  Incremental role out across platforms does not, can not and will not work.

 And here was me thinking all those incremental role outs across three 
 platforms I did, went well.

 Well that's me told!



-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] Thoughts from a previous BBC employee

2007-10-12 Thread dantes inferno
Is there a campaign anywhere to abolish the license fee?

Anyone want tostart one?

On 11/10/2007, Gordon Joly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 At 17:12 +0100 11/10/07, Jason Cartwright wrote:
 Well, like it or not big corps are often the gatekeepers sat between
 the audience masses and content owners. That doesn't seem to be
 changing (*cough* Google).
 
 J

 And there you have the case in point. Auntie, for better or worse, is
 the best we have. Radio, television, and now Internet. BBC
 Worldservice is a world brand, because of the quality and the
 veracity of the content. It never had to sell itself, it just was on
 the only voice of authority and truth that reason so many nations in
 the world.

 The masses can have the mass media. I want quality. At the moment for
 me that means Radio 4. I don't do telly at the moment.

 Public service broadcasting (the BBC, Channel 4 etc) cannot and
 should not compete in the market place.

 Gordo

 --
 Think Feynman/
 http://pobox.com/~gordo/
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]///
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
 visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
 Unofficial list archive: 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/