Re: [backstage] Windows Home Server RC1 available for download

2007-06-17 Thread Gordon Joly

At 18:55 +0100 13/6/07, Andy wrote:

On 13/06/07, Ian Forrester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The whole point of home server is that you connect to it like a 
appliance over a

http connection. So it should run with no display.


I would personally go for SSH. It's designed for remote admining, http isn't.
Though a HTTP interface would be good for the higher level stuff.




Hmmm secure shell was designed for  shell access.

And cpanel/WHM runs over secure HTTP, and I guess many of us many 
have used cpanel/WHM?


Gordo

--
Think Feynman/
http://pobox.com/~gordo/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]///
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


RE: [backstage] Windows Home Server RC1 available for download

2007-06-13 Thread Christopher Woods
I've both accepted and done it for quite a few years now. Just makes sense.

An old Xbox with XBMC on it makes a cracking media centre machine, and hell,
I had so many computer bits lying around I just bunged together an old
server and slapped WS2003 on it (OS provided gratis by my Uni!) I know many
aren't quite as inclined as I am to have more than one computer in their
house, never mind one which is running headless and has to be adminned via
remote desktop, but with the advent of little gadgets like the Drobo from
datarobotics.com (think simplified best-of-both-worlds NAS/RAID which you
can just plug into any device that'll support USB Mass Storage - including
that new Netgear with the USB port, giving you huge amounts of networked
storage without another PC!) we're on the cusp of something very cool.

Obviously MS are pushing people to do this, and I suppose Apple are as well
(and they have some cool new innovations for dotmac tie-ins including
intelligent, self-discovering filesharing across several WANs in the
Finder). It just makes sense really, doesn't it? That new Asus router which
has the integrated harddrive and can carry on bittorrenting whilst your PC
is turned off, now I like that (wouldn't mind getting my mitts on a unit,
too!) It's when those kinda bits of hardware come into the £100-£150 range
when we'll see mass adoption, combined with n-spec wifi for HD streaming,
and then it'll be all about networked media access.

I applied for the WHS RC1 beta, not sure if I'll receive a key for it though
- and I doubt I'd want to replace WS2003 with it on my server. It doesn’t
look tweakable enough.

 -Original Message-
 From: Ian Forrester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: 13 June 2007 14:31
 To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
 Subject: [backstage] Windows Home Server RC1 available for download
 
 From Engadget
 
 Microsoft has just announced a tasty banana for all you code 
 monkeys out there, in the form of the first publicly 
 available download (well, for non-beta testers at least) of 
 the widely anticipated Windows Home Server operating system. 
 Release Candidate 1, as this build is known, is said to offer 
 a number of improvements over previous betas, and is the 
 first version that participants in the Code2Fame Challenge 
 can use to work on their entries.
 
 http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/124341635/
 
 What I find interesting is the new focus on home servers. Are 
 we finally started to accept that people will store tons of 
 films, music and pictures on there local network and use 
 something like the AppleTV, Xbox media centre or Xbox360/PS3 
 to stream stuff over the network?
 
 Just a quick thought...
 
 Ian Forrester
 
 This e-mail is: [ x ] private; [  ] ask first; [  ] bloggable
 
 Senior Producer, BBC Backstage
 BC5 C3, Media Village, 201 Wood Lane, London W12 7TP
 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 p: +44 (0)2080083965
 
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To 
 unsubscribe, please visit 
 http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
   Unofficial list archive: 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


RE: [backstage] Windows Home Server RC1 available for download

2007-06-13 Thread Ian Forrester
The whole point of home server is that you connect to it like a appliance over 
a http connection. So it should run with no display.

Although when setting it up you do need a monitor :( 

What I like about home server is the automatic backup and one drive/many drives 
feature. Basically you can throw in 5 drives and they come up as one big drive. 
You can also RAID it but home server makes that really easy for you to setup. 
Its all a bit like one of these - http://www.drobo.com/

Ian Forrester

This e-mail is: [ x ] private; [  ] ask first; [  ] bloggable

Senior Producer, BBC Backstage
BC5 C3, Media Village, 201 Wood Lane, London W12 7TP
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
p: +44 (0)2080083965

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Woods
Sent: 13 June 2007 16:25
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: RE: [backstage] Windows Home Server RC1 available for download

From the screens it looks like it has all the same innovations as Vista does 
- heavier reliance on graphics acceleration (my server's running with a PCI 
Voodoo 3 3000 in it... One of the last cards I ever bought with a fanless 
heatsink!) and it's only got a 1.5ghz Athlon in it. WS2003 runs nicely, it 
boots in an alright time considering the amount of services it's running and 
it's an interface I'm far more familiar with both in terms of general daily 
usage and administration. I bet it's a right pain getting to grips with WHS if 
you're used to the familiar layout of the 2000/XP design.

Old dog, new tricks and all that.

 -Original Message-
 From: Ben Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 13 June 2007 15:29
 To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
 Subject: Re: [backstage] Windows Home Server RC1 available for 
 download
 
 WHS is built ontop of Windows 2003 Small Business and you can remote 
 desktop into it the same you would with a normal server.  You then 
 have the added support the backup built in.
 
 Just downloaded the RC, just need some harddrives now.
 
 On 13/06/07, Christopher Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I've both accepted and done it for quite a few years now. 
 Just makes sense.
 
  An old Xbox with XBMC on it makes a cracking media centre
 machine, and
  hell, I had so many computer bits lying around I just
 bunged together
  an old server and slapped WS2003 on it (OS provided gratis
 by my Uni!)
  I know many aren't quite as inclined as I am to have more than one 
  computer in their house, never mind one which is running
 headless and
  has to be adminned via remote desktop, but with the advent
 of little
  gadgets like the Drobo from datarobotics.com (think simplified 
  best-of-both-worlds NAS/RAID which you can just plug into
 any device
  that'll support USB Mass Storage - including that new
 Netgear with the
  USB port, giving you huge amounts of networked storage
 without another PC!) we're on the cusp of something very cool.
 
  Obviously MS are pushing people to do this, and I suppose
 Apple are as
  well (and they have some cool new innovations for dotmac tie-ins 
  including intelligent, self-discovering filesharing across several 
  WANs in the Finder). It just makes sense really, doesn't
 it? That new
  Asus router which has the integrated harddrive and can carry on 
  bittorrenting whilst your PC is turned off, now I like that
 (wouldn't
  mind getting my mitts on a unit,
  too!) It's when those kinda bits of hardware come into the
 £100-£150
  range when we'll see mass adoption, combined with n-spec
 wifi for HD
  streaming, and then it'll be all about networked media access.
 
  I applied for the WHS RC1 beta, not sure if I'll receive a
 key for it
  though
  - and I doubt I'd want to replace WS2003 with it on my server. It 
  doesn't look tweakable enough.
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Ian Forrester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: 13 June 2007 14:31
   To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
   Subject: [backstage] Windows Home Server RC1 available
 for download
  
   From Engadget
  
   Microsoft has just announced a tasty banana for all you
 code monkeys
   out there, in the form of the first publicly available download 
   (well, for non-beta testers at least) of the widely anticipated 
   Windows Home Server operating system.
   Release Candidate 1, as this build is known, is said to offer a 
   number of improvements over previous betas, and is the
 first version
   that participants in the Code2Fame Challenge can use to work on 
   their entries.
  
   http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/124341635/
  
   What I find interesting is the new focus on home servers. Are we 
   finally started to accept that people will store tons of films, 
   music and pictures on there local network and use
 something like the
   AppleTV, Xbox media centre or Xbox360/PS3 to stream stuff
 over the
   network?
  
   Just a quick thought...
  
   Ian Forrester
  
   This e-mail is: [ x ] private; [  ] ask first; [  ] bloggable
  
   Senior Producer

Re: [backstage] Windows Home Server RC1 available for download

2007-06-13 Thread Andy

On 13/06/07, Ian Forrester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

The whole point of home server is that you connect to it like a appliance over a
http connection. So it should run with no display.


I would personally go for SSH. It's designed for remote admining, http isn't.
Though a HTTP interface would be good for the higher level stuff.

Completely agree that it should not run with a monitor though.


Although when setting it up you do need a monitor :(


Can't you connect a serial cable between the server and a laptop/PC or
something?
I also remembering reading about a server system that could be
installed over a network (you probably want to make sure your the only
person with access to that network first), or maybe I just imagined
that bit.


You certainly should not need a powerful graphics card.

Should be able to install a server from a text console anyway.

Graphics card are for your Desktop. or those boxes you plug straight
into the T.V.

Andy

--
SELECT * FROM remarks WHERE witty=1 LIMIT 1
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] Windows Home Server RC1 available for download

2007-06-13 Thread Richard P Edwards

For sure Ian,

We already have our own network broadcasting/server units at  
home :--) Have had for three years or more.

In my case.
Mac G5 plus 30 inch screen as desktop, with a 23 inch as a TV or  
second screen. add bittorrent, or DVD, or iTunes plus iChat..  
with a terrabyte of disk space, 14 days of music, etc...etc.. etc. On  
a wifi network running over 5Kms radius. `Within which are another 3  
networked Macs, one of which is attached to a Sony HD TV, with  
wireless mouse and keyboard, in another houseand a PC in fact  
Backstage is a part of my true network.

It is great.
Add Protools, and a 1500 watt surround speaker system, with the  
ability to play it very loud outside, with sunshine, and life is even  
better :-) In and output, plus sharing is totally second nature at  
home  here.


RichE

On 13 Jun 2007, at 14:30, Ian Forrester wrote:


From Engadget

Microsoft has just announced a tasty banana for all you code  
monkeys out there, in the form of the first publicly available  
download (well, for non-beta testers at least) of the widely  
anticipated Windows Home Server operating system. Release Candidate  
1, as this build is known, is said to offer a number of  
improvements over previous betas, and is the first version that  
participants in the Code2Fame Challenge can use to work on their  
entries.


http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/124341635/

What I find interesting is the new focus on home servers. Are we  
finally started to accept that people will store tons of films,  
music and pictures on there local network and use something like  
the AppleTV, Xbox media centre or Xbox360/PS3 to stream stuff over  
the network?


Just a quick thought...

Ian Forrester

This e-mail is: [ x ] private; [  ] ask first; [  ] bloggable

Senior Producer, BBC Backstage
BC5 C3, Media Village, 201 Wood Lane, London W12 7TP
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
p: +44 (0)2080083965

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe,  
please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/ 
mailing_list.html.  Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail- 
archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/