Re: [BackupPC-users] Integration with SNMP for monitoring backups?

2010-05-19 Thread Max Hetrick
Colin Yates wrote:

 How are people monitoring their backup servers?  I use nagios (actually 
 zabbix) and it would be great if there was some integration between 
 them?  Ideally, an SNMP event if backup failed, for example?

I'm not using SNMP, but I am using this plugin across NRPE. It works 
great for me.

http://n-backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Regards,
Max

--

___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/


Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC-wiki on CentOS site that moved

2010-05-19 Thread Max Hetrick
Sorin Srbu wrote:

 Yeah, speaking of which, I had a look at the CentOS-wiki and it seems you
 have to apply for membership and whatnot to be able to add and maintain a
 wiki-page there. I don't know how the BPC-wiki is with regard to this, ie if
 it's simpler. For now the howto will remain at the previously mentioned url
 on my own server.

The process for contributing to the CentOS wiki is difficult, along with 
a community of admins that differ very much on what's considered 
on-topic and off-topic to post. Not only that, you have to go through a 
submission process for everything on a page-by-page basis. So, basically 
if you wanted to post something, you have to ask permission to have a 
page created and give you write access to that page.

Once you contribute awhile, you're given some more rights, but you still 
feel compelled to ask permission before you just start creating pages. 
Given they have no set of standards for what they want authors and 
contributors to follow, you get folks criticizing of what should or 
should not be posted, leaving the author confused as to what he/she 
should be doing.

Maybe you'll have better luck than I did there, but this is exactly why 
I left helping them out. Until they put some standards together for what 
they feel is on-topic articles, and get all their team members on board, 
to me it's not worth it. Many people have left the CentOS wiki project 
over the last year.

Regards,
Max

--

___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/


Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC-wiki on CentOS site that moved

2010-05-17 Thread Max Hetrick
Sorin Srbu wrote:
 A guy called Max wrote some time ago; 
 
 I don't maintain those pages any longer on the CentOS wiki due to some
 issues I had there with interactions. You can find the most recent page
 at my website.
 
 http://www.maxsworld.org/index.php/how-tos/backuppc-on-centos;
 
 Is this above wiki still maintained, as I get a 404 when I try to go there.

No, I'm no longer maintaining the website. Anyone that would like to 
take over the guide, feel free to contact me. I no longer have time to 
maintain things. The CentOS wiki article should be just fine to work off of.

Thanks,
Max

--

___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/


Re: [BackupPC-users] pre-backup encryption? user wants files to be inaccessible even to me :-)

2010-03-29 Thread Max Hetrick
Frank J. Gómez wrote:

 Our conversation centered around the importance of being able to recover 
 any given employee's files in the event of their death (which is why 
 encrypting the files pre-backup in such a way that the IT Department 
 could not read them was not acceptable).  Well, what about me?  I'm the 
 only IT person on staff, and I'm the only one with numerous credentials 
 (logins to numerous servers, etc) that the org would need in order to 
 continue to function without me.  Currently, I'm keeping a plain-text 
 password file on an encrypted partition of my hard drive.  No one else 
 has access to these passwords because no one else needs them in the 
 course of their day-to-day activities.  If I get hit by a bus, they are 
 going to be in a bit of trouble.  What measures do y'all have in place 
 to ensure your employer can continue on without you?

I keep all important passwords and information in our inventory software 
that I use GLPI. Only three admins have access to this software. I'm 
just an assistant, but at least others can gain access to things in case 
something happens.

We just had to go through a pandemic type deal for backup plans not 
too long ago. My boss was forced to write down where we store all 
passwords, and give an admin username and password to access the 
inventory software to the VPs. This is stored and locked then in the VPs 
office, from what I understand.

Basically, as long as they know they have access, or can at least get 
access, there are no issues then in case the IT department vanishes.

Regards,
Max




--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/


Re: [BackupPC-users] pre-backup encryption? user wants files to be inaccessible even to me :-)

2010-03-23 Thread Max Hetrick
Frank J. Gómez wrote:
 I have an interesting situation here.  One of my users refuses to 
 participate in the system of backups because she's concerned about the 
 security of her files.  She agreed to participate if I can make the 
 system work such that even I am unable to see the contents of her 
 files.  She's running Windows -- XP Home, I believe.
 
 A little Googling and some brainstorming leads me to consider three 
 courses of action.
 
1. Use a pre-dump command to encrypt the files before BackupPC reads
   her files.  I've not used pre-dump commands before, so I'm not
   entirely sure how they work, but I imagine I could tell BackupPC
   to read only c:\foo, but, prior to doing that, run a script which
   takes the files in c:\my\sensitive\junk and creates an encrypted
   archive in c:\foo.  I assume the pre-dump script would live in the
   cygwin environment, which is probably better for me anyway, since
   I don't know anything about Windows scripting.  If this were a
   Linux system, I'd tar the files up and then pass the tar to gnupg,
   but I don't know if this is possible in a cygwin environment. 
   Then, post-dump, I'd shred (or rm, if shred is unavailable) the
   temporary file in c:\foo.
2. Some post I read somewhere suggested you could simply change your
   compression method or transfer method to a script that does the
   encryption before writing to disk.  Nice thing about this idea is
   I can do all the configuration on the server.  Does sound a little
   scary though!
3. Use scheduled tasks (or whatever the Windows equivalent of cron
   is) to periodically create/delete encrypted archives, independent
   of BackupPC scheduling.
 
 How would you do it?  What encryption software would you use?

My entire backup partition is encrypted, so if someone steals the 
server, we're protected at least from that standpoint. I'm just using 
LUKS, so after it boots up I have to manually mount the partition and 
provide the passphrase for the encrypted device. So, if anyone did take 
the server, nothing is automounted with the backups either.

It remains in a locked room then, with no mouse or keyboard either, and 
the building is alarmed. Once it's online then, online two 
administrators, myself and my boss, are able to view the backups threw 
BackupPC's web interface.

The user seems awfully demanding. Is there items in her files that you 
are not allowed to see by policy of your company? I guess I'm just 
wondering why you would have to go jump through all these hoops, if the 
user is demanding it and not management.

Regards,
Max


--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/


Re: [BackupPC-users] pre-backup encryption? user wants files to be inaccessible even to me :-)

2010-03-23 Thread Max Hetrick
Max Hetrick wrote:
 It remains in a locked room then, with no mouse or keyboard either, and 
 the building is alarmed. Once it's online then, online two 
 administrators, myself and my boss, are able to view the backups threw 
 BackupPC's web interface.

... through not threw. My typing and thinking skills aren't on par today. :)

--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/


Re: [BackupPC-users] Trouble setting up backup to a Windows host

2010-03-16 Thread Max Hetrick
Les Mikesell wrote:

 This should work with smbclient - not sure about the kernel cifs module. 
   If you aren't able to make smb authentication work, you might try 
 cwrsync - I think in the latest versions running rsync under sshd 
 actually works.
 

I'm mounting shares inside a domain just fine, but I'm also mounting 
these shares at home on a Windows machine where I have no domain 
running. I'm just passing the local administrator username and password 
from BackupPC. The only issue I had was the Windows firewall not 
allowing this traffic to pass.

Regards,
Max

--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/


Re: [BackupPC-users] Trouble setting up backup to a Windows host

2010-03-15 Thread Max Hetrick
Sorin Srbu wrote:

 Same settings as before, but tried your mount.cifs-command instead.
 Something interesting is happening; I now get a question for password, I
 assume it's the one in /etc/.autofs.smbpasswd, right? So I enter it and get
 an error 13, Permission denied. If it's not the same password pre-entered in
 /etc/.autofs.smbpasswd, which one is it??

Sorin,

I just made some corrections on my personal website regarding that page. 
I was having issues using a credentials file last month, perhaps it's 
the same issue you are having.

All my backups started failing where a credentials file was being used. 
I don't know if it's a bug with autofs, or something else wrong within 
CentOS. I did away with using the credentials file, and instead passed 
the username and password in the autofs file itself. Everything started 
working again, and I just haven't had time to investigate what caused 
the issue.

I don't maintain those pages any longer on the CentOS wiki due to some 
issues I had there with interactions. You can find the most recent page 
at my website.

http://www.maxsworld.org/index.php/how-tos/backuppc-on-centos

Did you try passing the username and password directly in the autofs entry?

machinename  -fstype=cifs,ro,username=$username,password=$password 
://machinename/C\$

Regards,
Max




--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/


Re: [BackupPC-users] Trouble setting up backup to a Windows host

2010-03-15 Thread Max Hetrick
Sorin Srbu wrote:

 
 The mount works, but when I cd to /windows/Starforge, I still get -bash:
 cd: /windows/Starforge/: No such file or directory
 
 I'll take a look at your site. Thanks for the info
 
 /Sorin

Unmount /windows/Starforge, stop autofs service, and then delete the 
Starforge directory.

Then start autofs back up. Starforge should be re-created then. Try to 
cd to it after it appears back in the /windows directory. Perhaps with 
all the messing around, something was corrupted with the directory on 
the Linux side.

Regards,
Max

--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/


Re: [BackupPC-users] ext3 filesystem limitations

2010-01-27 Thread Max Hetrick
Huw Wyn Jones wrote:
 Hi people,
 
 OK I've tried swapping out hardware. I found an identical server, known to be 
 working, and moved the RAID controller and the five drives over to that. In a 
 stroke that meant different memory, cpu, power supply and motherboard. The 
 result though stays the same :-( Kernel panic within a few seconds of 
 reaching the login prompt. Interactive boot with no services running seems to 
 be fine.
 
 Has anyone on this list come across a similar issue? This is new to me so I'd 
 appreciate any words of wisdom.

I'd say you have an issue with one of the drives and/or the RAID 
controller then...

Check with the drive manufacturer, usually they have utilities to check 
for bad drives. The ones I've use in the past you boot from a CD and 
then go through a scan process to check the drives.

You've ruled out all the other hardware except the drives and controller.

Regards,
Max


--
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/


Re: [BackupPC-users] Distro choice

2010-01-27 Thread Max Hetrick
John Hudak wrote:

 Thanks for posting the pointer.  After reading thorough it, I strongly 
 disagree with the statement Easiest choice for WinXXEasiest is a 
 matter of perspective, and trying to figure out XP/Win7 file protection 
 protocols so that it will play nice with Samba, is more than a little 
 challenging.  Finding out the file protection mechanisms is one thing, 
 and then figuring out how in Windoz to modify them is another. 
 
  From my perspective the problems I've been having could be mitigated 
 with stronger documentation in the BackupPC doc about how Samba and XP 
 should be configured. 
 
 In retrospect, what is implied in the BackupPC doc is 'if you already 
 are running a samba server and talking to Xp machines, then using SMB 
 protocol is quite easy'
 
 Your mileage may vary
 John


This section actually comes out of the BackupPC documentation, and not 
my own. This section was just copied and pasted from BackupPC's docs to 
my doc to explain the various methods.

You are correct, this is the easiest method if you are already running a 
Samba domain, which I am at work. However, I'm not at home.

But, I'm also using autofs to mount across Samba to back up a Windows 
machine or two on my home network, and I'm NOT running Samba as a 
domain, I'm simply mounting the file systems as CIFS/SMB using the 
appropriate local LOCAL_COMPUTER\USERNAME account on the Windows boxes. 
I had very little effort and trouble doing so myself.

My autofs line looks something similar to this to pass the correct 
credentials.

-fstype=cifs,ro,username=Administrator,password=mypassword

Again, this is all local and I'm not running a domain admin account or 
anything at home.

Max

--
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/


Re: [BackupPC-users] Distro choice

2010-01-27 Thread Max Hetrick
John Hudak wrote:
 Hmmm would you detail the steps needed to do this?:
 
  But, I'm also using autofs to mount across Samba to back up a Windows
 machine or two on my home network, and I'm NOT running Samba as a
 domain, I'm simply mounting the file systems as CIFS/SMB using the
 appropriate local LOCAL_COMPUTER\USERNAME account on the Windows boxes.
 I had very little effort and trouble doing so myself.

It is documented in my guide under the Configure autofs section...

Max

--
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/


Re: [BackupPC-users] Distro choice

2010-01-27 Thread Max Hetrick
John Hudak wrote:
 Hmmm would you detail the steps needed to do this?:
 
  But, I'm also using autofs to mount across Samba to back up a Windows
 machine or two on my home network, and I'm NOT running Samba as a
 domain, I'm simply mounting the file systems as CIFS/SMB using the
 appropriate local LOCAL_COMPUTER\USERNAME account on the Windows boxes.
 I had very little effort and trouble doing so myself.

Just substitute DOMAIN\user with LOCALCOMPUTER\user is all I did to make 
it work.

--
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/


Re: [BackupPC-users] ext3 filesystem limitations

2010-01-26 Thread Max Hetrick
Huw Wyn Jones wrote:

 Has anyone experienced BackupPC crashing? I'm trying to recover our backup 
 server. I can log-in with all the services switched off (interactive boot) 
 but a normal start causes full blown kernel panics :( The server was running 
 for about two years before this started to happen. Has anyone had any similar 
 experiences? I'm trying to figure out what might be going on! 
 
 The OS is CentOS 4.4, the system log files shown nothing untoward and the 
 /backup/data directory has about 950Gb of data in it.

Any updates to packages recently that you can think of?

Max



--
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/


Re: [BackupPC-users] ext3 filesystem limitations

2010-01-26 Thread Max Hetrick
Max Hetrick wrote:
 Any updates to packages recently that you can think of?

Often times, and not allows, kernel panics are caused by some sort of 
hardware starting to fail or get funky. Is there any hardware you can 
start shutting off or disconnecting to test that?

Regards,
Max

--
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/


Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup local machine?

2009-08-11 Thread Max Hetrick
bubbagump wrote:
 How do I do a simple backup of the local machine? I want to bypass SSH 
 completely and just use rsync. Any ideas?

I would start here.

http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/faq/localhost.html

Careful as it suggests to not backup the backuppc pool and files, or 
you'll get into space issues and a double backup.

Regards,
Max

--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/


Re: [BackupPC-users] Problem with $Conf{BackupFilesExclude}

2009-01-19 Thread Max Hetrick
Nick Bright wrote:
 In my /etc/BackupPC/pc/host.pl file, I have the 
 $Conf{BackupFilesExclude} directive configured as:
 
 $Conf{BackupFilesExclude} = {
'/usr/local/vpopmail/domains' = [
  ''
],
'/usr/local/MPP/working' = [
  ''
],
'/proc' = [
  ''
],
'/var/qmail/queue' = [
  ''
],
'/backup' = [
  ''
]
 };
 
 This was configured through the web interface, on BackupPC v3.1.0. 
 Backup method is rsync.
 
 The backup runs, but it disregards my exclude directives and backs up 
 the directories I'm telling it not to back up. Unfortunately, because of 
 the first exclude line not being excluded, this is making the backup 
 take about 20 hours to run!
 
 Any thoughts as to why these directories aren't being excluded?

Perhaps I have my understanding of of BackupPC's exclude files, but I 
have mine as follows, and I think things are relative to the path, or 
something of the sort. I had problems with mine too when I had 
/var/cache on one line. When I made it look like the following, it worked.

$Conf{BackupFilesExclude} = {
   '/var' = [
 '/cache'
   ]
};

So, perhaps try:

$Conf{BackupFilesExclude} = {
'/usr/local/vpopmail' = [
  '/domains'
],
'/usr/local/MPP/' = [
  '/working'
],
'/proc' = [
  ''
],
'/var/qmail' = [
  '/queue'
],
'/backup' = [
  ''
]
};

Regards,
Max

--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/


Re: [BackupPC-users] Change target directory

2009-01-07 Thread Max Hetrick
Renke Brausse wrote:
 the directory is hard coded, you can only change it at compile time.
 
 The easiest solution is to bind mount /var/lib/backuppc to a directory
 of your choice.

If you've installed with RPMs, say on CentOS or RHEL, then it's not hard 
coded. Or if you've installed it with Debian packages, you can change 
the path.

 From the web GUI:
Edit Config - Server - Install Path - TopDir

 From the config.pl file:

$Conf{TopDir} = '/path/to/location';

Only thing I've heard is there is a bug with the RHEL/CentOS package 
where the pool directory remains in /var/lib/backuppc if you've 
installed from the RPMs.

Regards,
Max

--
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It is the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/