[Bacula-users] Building CentOS 5 RPMs for Bacula 5.0.0-1
Hello. I'm having trouble with building 5.0.0-1 srpms on centos 5.4. rpmbuild --rebuild bacula-5.0.0-1.src.rpm --define 'build_centos5 1' --define 'build_postgresql 1' results in Checking for unpackaged file#40;s#41;#58; /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/bacula-root RPM build errors#58; nbsp; nbsp; InstallSourcePackage#58; Header V3 DSA signature#58; NOKEY, key ID 10a792ad nbsp; nbsp; user sbarn does not exist - using root nbsp; nbsp; user sbarn does not exist - using root nbsp; nbsp; user sbarn does not exist - using root nbsp; nbsp; user sbarn does not exist - using root nbsp; nbsp; user sbarn does not exist - using root nbsp; nbsp; File not found#58; /var/tmp/bacula-root/etc/bacula/bconsole.conf nbsp; nbsp; File not found#58; /var/tmp/bacula-root/usr/sbin/bconsole nbsp; nbsp; File not found#58; /var/tmp/bacula-root/etc/bacula/bconsole.conf nbsp; nbsp; File not found#58; /var/tmp/bacula-root/usr/sbin/bconsole How do I resolve it? +-- |This was sent by sc...@gorodok.net via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-- -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Bacula and Fedora 12
Here you go... the issue lies in the version of the OpenSSL libraries, so here are your choices (as I found out) a) ./configure . --with-openssl=no b) do not run mysql personally, I am running on a closed in network, and am more comfortable with mysql. So I went the no openssl route. But either path works. +-- |This was sent by r...@wyattaccelerator.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-- -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Restore Dir/Files recursively
Hi All, Help needed with Restore! In Bconsole, restore, select #3, enter jobid(s), now in 'file selection mode' cwd is: / $ help CommandDescription ====== addadd dir/file to be restored recursively, wildcards allowed mark mark dir/file to be restored recursively, wildcards allowed I read that as meaning that I can enter a path with wildcards and the directories and files will be restored recursively, but $ add /public/share/120 SALES DIVISION/*.* No files marked. $ add /public/share/120 SALES DIVISION/ No files marked. $ mark /public/share/120 SALES DIVISION No files marked. $ mark /public/share/120 SALES DIVISION/*.* No files marked. Am I misunderstanding something here? If I continue to cd further into the path, the files are there (still in the catalog). What I need is to restore every file and directory below /120 SALES DIVISION/. Is that possible? Thanks in advance, Ken Barclay -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Restore Dir/Files recursively
Hi, On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Ken Barclay wrote: $ add /public/share/120 SALES DIVISION/*.* No files marked. $ add /public/share/120 SALES DIVISION/ No files marked. The command prompt you get from the bacula console is a little bit primitive. Off the top of my head, I'd suggest you try mark /public/share/120 SALES DIVISION add /public/share/120 SALES DIVISION Gavin -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Restore Dir/Files recursively
-Original Message- From: Gavin McCullagh [mailto:gavin.mccull...@gcd.ie] Sent: Wednesday, 10 February 2010 4:54 PM To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Restore Dir/Files recursively Hi, On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Ken Barclay wrote: $ add /public/share/120 SALES DIVISION/*.* No files marked. $ add /public/share/120 SALES DIVISION/ No files marked. The command prompt you get from the bacula console is a little bit primitive. Off the top of my head, I'd suggest you try mark /public/share/120 SALES DIVISION add /public/share/120 SALES DIVISION Gavin Thanks Gavin, but $ mark /public/share/120 SALES DIVISION No files marked. $ add /public/share/120 SALES DIVISION/ No files marked. Any other ideas? Ken --- --- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Restore Dir/Files recursively
On the other you can try entering in the subdir, make 'ls or dir' and mark the files CIAO --- Carlo Filippetto 2010/2/10 Gavin McCullagh gavin.mccull...@gcd.ie: Hi, On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Ken Barclay wrote: $ add /public/share/120 SALES DIVISION/*.* No files marked. $ add /public/share/120 SALES DIVISION/ No files marked. The command prompt you get from the bacula console is a little bit primitive. Off the top of my head, I'd suggest you try mark /public/share/120 SALES DIVISION add /public/share/120 SALES DIVISION Gavin -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Building CentOS 5 RPMs for Bacula 5.0.0-1
I don't know you response, but why you don't try to build it from the source code? CIAO --- Carlo Filippetto 2010/2/9 Burn bacula-fo...@backupcentral.com: Hello. I'm having trouble with building 5.0.0-1 srpms on centos 5.4. rpmbuild --rebuild bacula-5.0.0-1.src.rpm --define 'build_centos5 1' --define 'build_postgresql 1' results in Checking for unpackaged file#40;s#41;#58; /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/bacula-root RPM build errors#58; nbsp; nbsp; InstallSourcePackage#58; Header V3 DSA signature#58; NOKEY, key ID 10a792ad nbsp; nbsp; user sbarn does not exist - using root nbsp; nbsp; user sbarn does not exist - using root nbsp; nbsp; user sbarn does not exist - using root nbsp; nbsp; user sbarn does not exist - using root nbsp; nbsp; user sbarn does not exist - using root nbsp; nbsp; File not found#58; /var/tmp/bacula-root/etc/bacula/bconsole.conf nbsp; nbsp; File not found#58; /var/tmp/bacula-root/usr/sbin/bconsole nbsp; nbsp; File not found#58; /var/tmp/bacula-root/etc/bacula/bconsole.conf nbsp; nbsp; File not found#58; /var/tmp/bacula-root/usr/sbin/bconsole How do I resolve it? +-- |This was sent by sc...@gorodok.net via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-- -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Restore Dir/Files recursively
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Ken Barclay wrote: Thanks Gavin, but $ mark /public/share/120 SALES DIVISION No files marked. $ add /public/share/120 SALES DIVISION/ No files marked. Sorry, I wasn't thinking. I'd suggest you do: cd public cd share mark 120 SALES DIVISION Gavin -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Feature / Project request - support for file-system / volume / san dedup for file devices
* Kern Sibbald schrieb am 10.02.10 um 08:56 Uhr: Hello, Hi Kern, very interesting to hear that more dedup features are in the queue! Great news! [...] With all the above, I do not think that it is yet time to discuss changing the Bacula Volume format (though a new (second) Volume format is one of the options I am considering for item 3. I think to make that filesystem-based dedup actually work, only a new Volume format would do the job. With blocks aligned and metadata seperated from the bulk data. In that case bacula does not even have to care about dedup. -Marc -- :: WSS://WebServices Schiffbauer :: Domains :: DNS :: eMail :: Hosting -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Bacula Compression - other then GZIP
Hi folks... I need to know if the Compression flag on FileSet must be gzip or I can use another compress program... I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more efficient... Thanks for any help... Regards Gilberto Nunes Ferreira TI Selbetti Gestão de Documentos Telefone: +55 (47) 3441-6004 Celular: +55 (47) 8861-6672 -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] storagetek timberwolf STK9714
FYI, I have just heard about Bacula being used with a Storagetek Timberwolf STK9714 http://www.bigkey.com/pic/Storage%20Tec/8097_9714%20Tape%20Library.jpg ** 100 tape slot ** 4 x DLT7000 (35/70G) I heard about it from a person I know in a Linux User Group. -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Restore all files from a partial, failed full backup?
Hi all, a machine of mine died during a full backup. I did restore it from previous backups, but I would want to get at the data which is in said partial backup as it is obviously the newest. bconsole obviously does not allow me to restore from a partial restore, so I am looking for pointers on how to manually extract as much data as possible and merge everything that remains by hand. As we are talking Maildirs, this is relatively trivial to do once I get ahold of said data. Getting at it seems to be more complicated. Thanks, Richard -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Feature / Project request - support for file-system / volume / san dedup for file devices
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 12:08:57 Marc Schiffbauer wrote: * Kern Sibbald schrieb am 10.02.10 um 08:56 Uhr: Hello, Hi Kern, very interesting to hear that more dedup features are in the queue! Great news! [...] With all the above, I do not think that it is yet time to discuss changing the Bacula Volume format (though a new (second) Volume format is one of the options I am considering for item 3. I think to make that filesystem-based dedup actually work, only a new Volume format would do the job. When I talked about filesystem deduplication, I meant deduplication based on raw device block changes, which is generally done by some program rather than the OS. I was not referring to automatic deduplication that is implemented in an OS filesystem. I probably need to rethink my terminology to ensure that this is clear in the future. With blocks aligned and metadata seperated from the bulk data. In that case bacula does not even have to care about dedup. We are not planning to change Bacula's Volume format in the near future; it would destabilize the project too much, and it is very well adapted to keeping backup data. However, since it is Open Source, you are free to experiment. We would be interested to hear what you come up with. Best regards, Kern -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Restore all files from a partial, failed full backup?
Got it to work via bconsole. Thanks, though :) Richard -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Compression - other then GZIP
On 10.02.2010 / 09:05:19 -0200, Gilberto Nunes wrote: Hi folks... I need to know if the Compression flag on FileSet must be gzip or I can use another compress program... I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more efficient... or even Parallel BZIP2, see http://compression.ca/pbzip2/ Thanks. -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Compression - other then GZIP
On 02/10/10 06:05, Gilberto Nunes wrote: Hi folks... I need to know if the Compression flag on FileSet must be gzip or I can use another compress program... I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more efficient... It is true that bzip2 is more efficient than gzip, but it is also slower and very much more CPU-intensive. These are things to keep in mind. gzip may not be the best compression out there, but it is fast. -- Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355 ala...@caerllewys.net ala...@metrocast.net p...@co.ordinate.org Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, Free Stater It's not the years, it's the mileage. -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Compression - other then GZIP
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 09:05:19AM -0200, Gilberto Nunes wrote: (...) gzip or I can use another compress program... No. I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more efficient... Really? $ du -m /tmp/foo.iso 625 /tmp/foo.iso $ gzip -c /tmp/foo.iso | dd bs=64K /dev/null 0+34388 records in 0+34388 records out 563405802 bytes (563 MB) copied, 64.9428 s, 8.7 MB/s $ bzip2 -c /tmp/foo.iso | dd bs=64K /dev/null 0+137488 records in 0+137488 records out 563150276 bytes (563 MB) copied, 445.201 s, 1.3 MB/s 255526 bytes less while six times slower.. Petar Bogdanovic -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Compression - other then GZIP
On 2/10/2010 8:16 AM, Petar Bogdanovic wrote: I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more efficient... Really? $ du -m /tmp/foo.iso 625 /tmp/foo.iso $ gzip -c/tmp/foo.iso | dd bs=64K/dev/null 0+34388 records in 0+34388 records out 563405802 bytes (563 MB) copied, 64.9428 s, 8.7 MB/s $ bzip2 -c/tmp/foo.iso | dd bs=64K/dev/null 0+137488 records in 0+137488 records out 563150276 bytes (563 MB) copied, 445.201 s, 1.3 MB/s 255526 bytes less while six times slower.. Petar Bogdanovic This is extremely dependent on the contents of foo.iso. I don't think its a good test because you are only seeing 10% compression either way. There is a good chance that much of the data within your ISO is already compressed. When using data which is typically more compressible (text and other data that is not already compressed), the resulting size of something compressed with bzip2 can be much smaller than when compressed using gzip. It's true that it is much slower, but if he's talking about it being more efficient in terms of disk space used, then he is correct. -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Compression - other then GZIP
On 2010Feb10 8:50 AM, Steve Polyack wrote: On 2/10/2010 8:16 AM, Petar Bogdanovic wrote: I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more efficient... Really? [...] 255526 bytes less while six times slower.. This is extremely dependent on the contents of foo.iso. I don't think its a good test because you are only seeing 10% compression either way. There is a good chance that much of the data within your ISO is already compressed. When using data which is typically more compressible (text and other data that is not already compressed), the resulting size of something compressed with bzip2 can be much smaller than when compressed using gzip. It's true that it is much slower, but if he's talking about it being more efficient in terms of disk space used, then he is correct. xz/lzma is another consideration. At moderate compression levels, lzma seems to be about the same or slightly faster than bzip2 with a little better compression. At lower compression levels it seems like it's about as fast as gzip while compressing noticeably farther - at least in the small amount of testing I've done so far with the xz implementation of lzma compression. (The small amount of testing I've done so far suggests to me that xz with a compression level of 1 runs about as fast as gzip4 with compression at or better than gzip7, approaching bzip2 for some types of files. Cranking up to xz 6 or 7 runs a bit faster than bzip2 default but tends to give better compression.) -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Compression - other then GZIP
On 2/10/2010 10:36 AM, Sean M Clark wrote: On 2010Feb10 8:50 AM, Steve Polyack wrote: On 2/10/2010 8:16 AM, Petar Bogdanovic wrote: I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more efficient... Really? [...] 255526 bytes less while six times slower.. This is extremely dependent on the contents of foo.iso. I don't think its a good test because you are only seeing 10% compression either way. There is a good chance that much of the data within your ISO is already compressed. When using data which is typically more compressible (text and other data that is not already compressed), the resulting size of something compressed with bzip2 can be much smaller than when compressed using gzip. It's true that it is much slower, but if he's talking about it being more efficient in terms of disk space used, then he is correct. xz/lzma is another consideration. At moderate compression levels, lzma seems to be about the same or slightly faster than bzip2 with a little better compression. At lower compression levels it seems like it's about as fast as gzip while compressing noticeably farther - at least in the small amount of testing I've done so far with the xz implementation of lzma compression. (The small amount of testing I've done so far suggests to me that xz with a compression level of 1 runs about as fast as gzip4 with compression at or better than gzip7, approaching bzip2 for some types of files. Cranking up to xz 6 or 7 runs a bit faster than bzip2 default but tends to give better compression.) On the other side of the spectrum, LZO/LZO2 compression is available which greatly favors compression speed while still providing a decent compression ratio. I'd like to see these algorithms make their way into Bacula, but their doesn't seem to be much interest in doing so. I suppose its understandable, as GZIP is fairly flexible. -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] How to backup the catalog
One question, how to backup the catalog. We are using MySQL for the bacula catalog. This database is approximately 46 Gb in size. When we use the backup script make_catalog_backup (supplied with bacula) to dump the database, bacula is not usable during the mysqldump process due to locked tables. In this case its not possible to make a backup of the catalog every day. We don’t like a not responding bacula system ;) My question is how do you make a good backup of the catalog without interrupting the bacula functionality? Can't you backup the database after all of your backups are finished? My database is around 30GB and it takes less than 20 minutes to backup on a 5 year old Opteron 246 server. John -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] How to backup the catalog
Am Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:52:54 +0100 schrieb JanJaap Scholing: Hi List, One question, how to backup the catalog. We are using MySQL for the bacula catalog. This database is approximately 46 Gb in size. When we use the backup script make_catalog_backup (supplied with bacula) to dump the database, bacula is not usable during the mysqldump process due to locked tables. In this case its not possible to make a backup of the catalog every day. We don’t like a not responding bacula system ;) My question is how do you make a good backup of the catalog without interrupting the bacula functionality? thoughts: * take an lvm snapshot and backup the db files directly or * configure a replicated mysql setup and take the backup on the second server or * use mysqlhotcopy (never used myself) or * split the catalog in x catalogs to get smaller databases (hmm.. size doesnt change but maybe bacula remains usable while backup) or * there are for sure other ways to do it (like buying a faster server). ;) - Thomas -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] How to backup the catalog
On 2/10/2010 10:52 AM, JanJaap Scholing wrote: Hi List, One question, how to backup the catalog. We are using MySQL for the bacula catalog. This database is approximately 46 Gb in size. When we use the backup script make_catalog_backup (supplied with bacula) to dump the database, bacula is not usable during the mysqldump process due to locked tables. In this case its not possible to make a backup of the catalog every day. We don’t like a not responding bacula system ;) My question is how do you make a good backup of the catalog without interrupting the bacula functionality? Thanks and regards Jan Jaap So you want to back up a database while still being allowed to write to that database at the same time? It's simply not possible as stated. Your options, as far as I know, are these: 1) Dump the database, as the Bacula script does, and wait for it to complete. 2) Flush the tables and copy the database files (if MyISAM), which may or may not be faster (still must prevent DB writes). 3) Set up a slave database that uses MySQL replication to mirror the master database. When you want to backup, take the slave offline to do a dump or copy, leaving the master free to continue working. You will not back up whatever changes were made since the slave was taken offline. I haven't messed around with MySQL replication just yet, so I don't know how easily option 3 will work in practice. But if you don't want Bacula to be offline while doing a DB backup, that's your only real option. Even the expensive commercial DBMS's don't have a very good solution to doing live backups. -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Compression - other then GZIP
From: Sean M Clark smcl...@tamu.edu xz/lzma is another consideration. At moderate compression levels, lzma seems to be about the same or slightly faster than bzip2 with a little better compression. At lower compression levels it seems like it's about as fast as gzip while compressing noticeably farther - at least in the small amount of testing I've done so far with the xz implementation of lzma compression. (The small amount of testing I've done so far suggests to me that xz with a compression level of 1 runs about as fast as gzip4 with compression at or better than gzip7, approaching bzip2 for some types of files. Cranking up to xz 6 or 7 runs a bit faster than bzip2 default but tends to give better compression.) Judjing by the following becnhmarks, lzma seems quite resource hungry... http://tukaani.org/lzma/benchmarks.html JD -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Compression - other than GZIP {xz/lzma]
On 2010Feb10 10:31 AM, John Doe wrote: From: Sean M Clark smcl...@tamu.edu xz/lzma is another consideration. At moderate compression levels, lzma seems to be about the same or slightly faster than bzip2 with a little better compression. At lower compression levels it seems like it's about as fast as gzip while compressing noticeably farther - at least in the small amount of testing I've done so far with the xz implementation of lzma compression. [...] Judjing by the following becnhmarks, lzma seems quite resource hungry... http://tukaani.org/lzma/benchmarks.html Hmmm, those results more or less reflect what I remember from the testing I did. I don't remember the difference in compression speed between xz and bzip2 being quite as high as this, but that could either be due to xz being more efficient than lzmash and/or my own faulty memory. I note that lzma -2 tended to compress better than bzip2 could manage at any setting, and faster than default bzip2. I had forgotten about the much larger memory usage of xz, though in a modern context the amount still looks pretty trivial (even at the default setting it requires less than 90MB [the me of 5 years ago would be appalled to see me describe 90MB as trivial, but still...). lzma -2 only requires 12M in those results. Wouldn't necessarily bother with lzma compression on a tiny NAS box with only 32-64MB RAM in it, but I think it'd be a useful option on a real computer. I have no idea what would be involved in adding additional compression options to bacula-fd/bacula-sd, though. -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Building CentOS 5 RPMs for Bacula 5.0.0-1
Burn wrote: Hello. I'm having trouble with building 5.0.0-1 srpms on centos 5.4. rpmbuild --rebuild bacula-5.0.0-1.src.rpm --define 'build_centos5 1' --define 'build_postgresql 1' results in Checking for unpackaged file#40;s#41;#58; /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/bacula-root RPM build errors#58; nbsp; nbsp; InstallSourcePackage#58; Header V3 DSA signature#58; NOKEY, key ID 10a792ad nbsp; nbsp; user sbarn does not exist - using root nbsp; nbsp; user sbarn does not exist - using root nbsp; nbsp; user sbarn does not exist - using root nbsp; nbsp; user sbarn does not exist - using root nbsp; nbsp; user sbarn does not exist - using root nbsp; nbsp; File not found#58; /var/tmp/bacula-root/etc/bacula/bconsole.conf nbsp; nbsp; File not found#58; /var/tmp/bacula-root/usr/sbin/bconsole nbsp; nbsp; File not found#58; /var/tmp/bacula-root/etc/bacula/bconsole.conf nbsp; nbsp; File not found#58; /var/tmp/bacula-root/usr/sbin/bconsole How do I resolve it? Burn, I built it on CentOS 5.4 without any problem. The only difference is I edited the bacula.spec file for the options I wanted. I used the same options as you, plus added python support: diff bacula.spec bacula.spec.5.0.0.1-working 306c306 %define centos5 0 --- %define centos5 1 397c397 %define postgresql 0 --- %define postgresql 1 468c468 %define python 0 --- %define python 1 My guess is the build is not completing earlier, maybe some required package is missing? I can rebuild and send you the output of the build if that helps. Regards, Andy -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] How to backup the catalog
Mike Ruskai wrote: On 2/10/2010 10:52 AM, JanJaap Scholing wrote: Hi List, One question, how to backup the catalog. We are using MySQL for the bacula catalog. This database is approximately 46 Gb in size. When we use the backup script make_catalog_backup (supplied with bacula) to dump the database, bacula is not usable during the mysqldump process due to locked tables. In this case its not possible to make a backup of the catalog every day. We don’t like a not responding bacula system ;) My question is how do you make a good backup of the catalog without interrupting the bacula functionality? Thanks and regards Jan Jaap So you want to back up a database while still being allowed to write to that database at the same time? It's simply not possible as stated. Your options, as far as I know, are these: 1) Dump the database, as the Bacula script does, and wait for it to complete. 2) Flush the tables and copy the database files (if MyISAM), which may or may not be faster (still must prevent DB writes). 3) Set up a slave database that uses MySQL replication to mirror the master database. When you want to backup, take the slave offline to do a dump or copy, leaving the master free to continue working. You will not back up whatever changes were made since the slave was taken offline. I haven't messed around with MySQL replication just yet, so I don't know how easily option 3 will work in practice. But if you don't want Bacula to be offline while doing a DB backup, that's your only real option. Even the expensive commercial DBMS's don't have a very good solution to doing live backups. If you use Postgresql, you could put database in backup mode for hot backup = http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/backup-online.html. Regards, Heitor Faria www.bacula.com.br -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Full Backup After Previously Successful Full with Ignore FileSet Changes Enabled
Hello, I'm a fairly new Bacula user (all daemons running on same machine-Ubuntu804 and a FD on Windows XP Home client). I've set up a Full backup of a drive on the client that ran on Saturday and have an incremental backup of the same fileset done on Monday. Having noticed that the file size was large for the two day's worth of data, I excluded the Windows swap file from the fileset. Today's incremental however wouldn't run. Bacula insisted on running a new full backup. I'm aware that this is because I have changed the fileset, but read about an option (Ignore FileSet Changes = yes) that is supposed to ignore that fact and continue to perform incrementals. After adding this and reloading the configuration, Bacula still won't perform an incremental backup. Is there a reason why it still refuses to run an incremental backup (I deleted the JobID for the failed promoted Full backup with the delete JobIB command)? Have a try if restarting the director helps. Reload should be enough, but recently I noticed that 3.0.3 didn't recognize fileset option changes reliably after reload. -- TiN I performed as restart (and a separate start/stop) but it's the same. I've tested it with a smaller job and it seems to be the case that the IgnoreFileSetChanges option only takes effect if present in the FileSet definition when the original Full backup runs (adding it in afterwards doesn't make a difference). Many thanks for the reply though! Graham _ Send us your Hotmail stories and be featured in our newsletter http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/-- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Compression - other then GZIP
On 02/10/10 10:36, Sean M Clark wrote: xz/lzma is another consideration. At moderate compression levels, lzma seems to be about the same or slightly faster than bzip2 with a little better compression. At lower compression levels it seems like it's about as fast as gzip while compressing noticeably farther - at least in the small amount of testing I've done so far with the xz implementation of lzma compression. I was going to mention xz myself. I just completed some rather more extensive tests. I'm using three example test files here. The first, a 590MB ISO of Windows XP Pro SP3, contains a large amount of already-compressed data, and can be expected to compress poorly. The second, an 8.5MB stripped ELF 32-bit LSB executable, can probably be expected to compress moderately well. The third, a ebook resaved in text format, isabout 1.5MB of English ASCII text and should compress very well. I'm compressing each with gzip default options, gzip -9, bzip2, xz default options, and xz -7. (The xz man page notes that compression settings above 7 are not recommended unless absolute maximum compression is necessary due to time and memory usage.) First, the WinXP ISO (whitespace adjusted for clarity): babylon5:alaric:~:10 $ ls -l winxp.iso -rw-r- 1 alaric users 617754624 Feb 10 10:24 winxp.iso babylon5:alaric:~:11 $ time gzip -c winxp.iso | dd bs=64K /dev/null 0+35022 records in 0+35022 records out 573799160 bytes (574 MB) copied, 78.782 s, 7.3 MB/s real1m18.935s user0m53.804s sys 0m4.357s compression: 7.12% compression/time: 0.0901 babylon5:alaric:~:12 $ time gzip -9 -c winxp.iso | dd bs=64K /dev/null 0+35013 records in 0+35013 records out 573652786 bytes (574 MB) copied, 111.185 s, 5.2 MB/s real1m51.207s user1m11.860s sys 0m4.905s compression: 7.14% compression/time: 0.0643 babylon5:alaric:~:13 $ time bzip2 -c winxp.iso | dd bs=64K /dev/null 0+140444 records in 0+140444 records out 575258513 bytes (575 MB) copied, 808.258 s, 712 kB/s real13m28.370s user10m11.257s sys 0m6.221s compression: 6.88% compression/time: 0.0085 babylon5:alaric:~:14 $ time xz -c winxp.iso | dd bs=64K /dev/null 0+69111 records in 0+69111 records out 566328660 bytes (566 MB) copied, 1395.3 s, 406 kB/s real23m15.341s user17m39.189s sys 0m9.664s compression: 8.43% compression/time: 0.0060 babylon5:alaric:~:15 $ time xz -7 -c winxp.iso | dd bs=64K /dev/null 0+69040 records in 0+69040 records out 565609576 bytes (566 MB) copied, 1512.2 s, 374 kB/s real25m12.247s user19m7.363s sys 0m10.943s compression: 8.45% compression/time: 0.0055 With this poorly compressible data, both gzip and gzip -9 yield better compression than bzip2, with roughly an order of magnitude higher throughput and lower CPU usage. The best compression on this file, by a hair, is achieved by xz -7, with default xz only 0.02% behind but taking 8% less time. The worst compression of 6.88% is bzip2, but it takes around half the time xz takes to do it, resulting in an actual compression/time score 50% better than xz. gzip achieves about 1.3% less compression than xz and about 0.25% better than bzip2, but does it 7 to 10 times faster than bzip2 and 12 to 20 times faster than xz. The best compression per unit time score is achieved by default gzip. The worst, xz -7, is an order of magnitude worse than gzip -9 in compression/time and achieves only 1.29% additional compression. Next, the ELF executable. babylon5:alaric:~:21 $ ls -l mplayer -rwxr-x--- 1 alaric users 8485168 Feb 10 12:04 mplayer babylon5:alaric:~:22 $ time gzip -c mplayer | dd bs=64K /dev/null 0+230 records in 0+230 records out 3752190 bytes (3.8 MB) copied, 1.26176 s, 3.0 MB/s real0m1.266s user0m1.032s sys 0m0.055s compression: 55.8% compression/time: 44.075 babylon5:alaric:~:23 $ time gzip -9 -c mplayer | dd bs=64K /dev/null 0+228 records in 0+228 records out 3734027 bytes (3.7 MB) copied, 2.76918 s, 1.3 MB/s real0m2.779s user0m2.119s sys 0m0.054s compression: 56% compression/time: 20.173 babylon5:alaric:~:24 $ time bzip2 -c mplayer | dd bs=64K /dev/null 0+880 records in 0+880 records out 3603587 bytes (3.6 MB) copied, 6.41314 s, 562 kB/s real0m6.426s user0m5.128s sys 0m0.050s compression: 57.5% compression/time: 8.948 babylon5:alaric:~:25 $ time xz -c mplayer | dd bs=64K /dev/null 0+362 records in 0+362 records out 2964084 bytes (3.0 MB) copied, 21.0693 s, 141 kB/s real0m21.098s user0m15.434s sys 0m0.316s compression: 65% compression/time: 3.081 babylon5:alaric:~:26 $ time xz -7 -c mplayer | dd bs=64K /dev/null 0+362 records in 0+362 records out 2964084 bytes (3.0 MB) copied, 19.8819 s, 149 kB/s real0m19.913s user0m15.347s sys 0m0.301s compression: 65% compression/time: 3.264 This is not all that dissimilar a picture. Interestingly, here, default xz and xz -7 achieve identical compression, but xz -7 accomplishes it slightly over a second faster. Both
[Bacula-users] Fatal error: fd_cmds.c:177 FD command not found: 8F~8D
Hi,
bacula 3.0.3 SD+ DIR, 2.4.4 FD, Debian Lenny, psql 8.4
The backup job 19429 was running for nearly two days and then failed while
changing the LTO3 tape. The job failed two times now. No messages in syslog.
The message ERR=Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden means ERR=file or
directory not found
I deleted the 06D132L3 tape in the bacula catalog, erased the bacula label with
mt and labled it again. No problem while loading/unloading or writing the lable.
The strage thing is that this error blocked an other job (19427) that was
running at the same time but on a different storage daemon! The other SD just
stoped writing. The status was still running but no activity on the SD side.
Any ideas?
[...]
10-Feb 16:17 VU0EA003-sd JobId 19427: Despooling elapsed time = 00:03:33,
Transfer rate = 100.8 M bytes/second
10-Feb 16:17 VU0EA003-sd JobId 19427: Spooling dat ...
10-Feb 16:18 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: Despooling elapsed time = 00:05:49,
Transfer rate = 61.53 M bytes/second
10-Feb 16:18 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: Spooling data again ...
10-Feb 16:26 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: User specified spool size reached.
10-Feb 16:26 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: Writing spooled data to Volume.
Despooling 21,474,877,357 bytes ...
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: End of Volume 06D142L3 at 575:9470 on
device LTO3 (/dev/ULTRIUM-TD3). Write of 64512 bytes got -1.
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: Re-read of last block succeeded.
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: End of medium on Volume 06D142L3
Bytes=575,574,128,640 Blocks=8,921,969 at 10-Feb-2010 16:31.
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: 3307 Issuing autochanger unload slot 23,
drive 0 command.
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: 3995 Bad autochanger unload slot 23,
drive 0: ERR=Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden
Results=
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-dir JobId 19429: There are no more Jobs associated with
Volume 06D132L3. Marking it purged.
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-dir JobId 19429: All records pruned from Volume
06D132L3; marking it Purged
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-dir JobId 19429: Recycled volume 06D132L3
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: 3301 Issuing autochanger loaded? drive
0 command.
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: 3991 Bad autochanger loaded? drive 0
command: ERR=Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden.
Results=
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: 3301 Issuing autochanger loaded? drive
0 command.
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: 3991 Bad autochanger loaded? drive 0
command: ERR=Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden.
Results=
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: 3304 Issuing autochanger load slot 13,
drive 0 command.
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: Fatal error: 3992 Bad autochanger load
slot 13, drive 0: ERR=Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden.
Results=
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: Fatal error: spool.c:302 Fatal append
error on device LTO3 (/dev/ULTRIUM-TD3): ERR=
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: Despooling elapsed time = 00:04:37,
Transfer rate = 77.52 M bytes/second
10-Feb 16:32 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: Fatal error: fd_cmds.c:177 FD command not
found: 8F~8DD7_96F0DCee905lEDFF^\EF=FBF89A
ESC8EACC2C1^\zF98CCE`9DRD4F8`EA=BEFA#F0I^X?q+A3EB^N̖FFE1D7cۈF6#w^C+kg^KCFUBD{9BuLj9EF196^^D6a
E784^^B7mAC^^^QBAy99)N9FFA^C9A2D0scD83kX9FA6IA4+O\šB4%D1FC
^U^R^KJDDE6^G3DF:̢B9C4˨BCE981D2̿NJ
^VE1^A7^P9D^H83B9C0A^GtٴC4rwAD젼RDC1F3E0E2^ZC9^?r҃^ZC0^H^Mu9E568EF6FAFCE2\99^?E9x`14E8wB2Q,A0:骘:6
DD^?^XQ4^]F986^YD2^\^]D3FE8F^EB5qB8B3^G8C86@C0C5cESCoFACD^As1fB7C2i{A18DF6vADBF^AB790)-8C^V^C
EA
DEFAA6^AE^F87]^V9EC0B6jb2D4$6`ӅCED2V949FHF482593]CF00X^L8A98FB\ACѵFD90h|8F/A7^ODCD^UG5^D{
CEF7~F9GZk80CCF892BEABo^L938DhF1dDE9B7-C18C^]8B3^O82^_DB^\UAA88F388EB^\F6^Sf989DS#D7FC
99BF):11^_^Ol
2'^_DBC8EB
D7E78CCEE2nx8E
B3^UC8A^G^BD9F6M}PZpC09^TA0C6r]EF8A
AEAS85D7j/G^W84C4CBBC6F3CBE6!...@t^m^u80]oF2E6^D}CF*^T%87MFB^VyC2dFEX~t^O^ACIC9G^ZfA6ACD71\3H8E}yB7B7ސIMD7ϱBEyQB7D7pD3U؟E7A8ЦA8kyF9)ABFFE1EBK1A5D5F5^KdD2ἮFED7`G9CEBAFvFA
10-Feb 16:32 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: Job write elapsed time = 47:21:16,
Transfer rate = 19.25 M bytes/second
10-Feb 16:32 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: Fatal error: fd_cmds.c:166 Command error
with FD, hanging up. Append data error.
10-Feb 16:32 VU0EM003 JobId 19429: Fatal error: backup.c:892 Network send error
to SD. ERR=Connection reset by peer
10-Feb 16:32 VUMEM004-dir JobId 19429: Error: Bacula VUMEM004-dir 3.0.3
(18Oct09): 10-Feb-2010 16:32:20
Build OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu debian 4.0
JobId: 19429
Job:VU0EM003.2010-02-08_16.26.19_08
Backup Level: Full
Client: VU0EM003 2.4.4 (28Dec08)
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu,debian,4.0
FileSet:VU0EM003 2007-06-12 00:05:01
Pool: Full (From Job FullPool override)
Catalog:MyCatalog (From Client resource)
Storage:NEC-T40A_B-Net (From user selection)
Scheduled time: 08-Feb-2010 16:25:56
Start time: 08-Feb-2010
Re: [Bacula-users] How to backup the catalog
Hi, On 02/10/10 04:52 PM, JanJaap Scholing wrote: Hi List, One question, how to backup the catalog. We are using MySQL for the bacula catalog. This database is approximately 46 Gb in size. Are you using MyISAM or InnoDB ? Backup procedures can vary according to the MySQL storage engine being used. When we use the backup script make_catalog_backup (supplied with bacula) to dump the database, bacula is not usable during the mysqldump process due to locked tables. In this case its not possible to make a backup of the catalog every day. We don’t like a not responding bacula system ;) My question is how do you make a good backup of the catalog without interrupting the bacula functionality? For MyISAM I would either deploy filesystem snapshots or replication to another server for backups of large MySQL databases. InnoDB is generally more suited for hot backups - google should be able to provide you with both commercial and / or open source solutions for that. We use filesystem snapshots for MySQL backup (both MyISAM InnoDB) and it works very well. Thanks and regards Jan Jaap Ontdek nu Windows phone. De smartphone van dit moment http://www.microsoft.com/windowsmobile/nl-nl/default.mspx -- Med venlig hilsen / Best Regards Henrik Johansen hen...@scannet.dk Tlf. 75 53 35 00 ScanNet Group A/S ScanNet -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] How to backup the catalog
Heitor Medrado de Faria wrote: If you use Postgresql, you could put database in backup mode for hot backup = http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/backup-online.html. I just use pg_dump without doing anything special -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: fd_cmds.c:177 FD command not found: 8F~8D
follow up
Cacti shows that swap started growing this morning and reached it's
maximum when the job failed...
Ralf Gross schrieb:
Hi,
bacula 3.0.3 SD+ DIR, 2.4.4 FD, Debian Lenny, psql 8.4
The backup job 19429 was running for nearly two days and then failed while
changing the LTO3 tape. The job failed two times now. No messages in syslog.
The message ERR=Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden means ERR=file or
directory not found
I deleted the 06D132L3 tape in the bacula catalog, erased the bacula label
with
mt and labled it again. No problem while loading/unloading or writing the
lable.
The strage thing is that this error blocked an other job (19427) that was
running at the same time but on a different storage daemon! The other SD just
stoped writing. The status was still running but no activity on the SD side.
Any ideas?
[...]
10-Feb 16:17 VU0EA003-sd JobId 19427: Despooling elapsed time = 00:03:33,
Transfer rate = 100.8 M bytes/second
10-Feb 16:17 VU0EA003-sd JobId 19427: Spooling dat ...
10-Feb 16:18 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: Despooling elapsed time = 00:05:49,
Transfer rate = 61.53 M bytes/second
10-Feb 16:18 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: Spooling data again ...
10-Feb 16:26 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: User specified spool size reached.
10-Feb 16:26 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: Writing spooled data to Volume.
Despooling 21,474,877,357 bytes ...
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: End of Volume 06D142L3 at 575:9470 on
device LTO3 (/dev/ULTRIUM-TD3). Write of 64512 bytes got -1.
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: Re-read of last block succeeded.
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: End of medium on Volume 06D142L3
Bytes=575,574,128,640 Blocks=8,921,969 at 10-Feb-2010 16:31.
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: 3307 Issuing autochanger unload slot
23, drive 0 command.
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: 3995 Bad autochanger unload slot 23,
drive 0: ERR=Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden
Results=
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-dir JobId 19429: There are no more Jobs associated with
Volume 06D132L3. Marking it purged.
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-dir JobId 19429: All records pruned from Volume
06D132L3; marking it Purged
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-dir JobId 19429: Recycled volume 06D132L3
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: 3301 Issuing autochanger loaded? drive
0 command.
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: 3991 Bad autochanger loaded? drive 0
command: ERR=Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden.
Results=
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: 3301 Issuing autochanger loaded? drive
0 command.
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: 3991 Bad autochanger loaded? drive 0
command: ERR=Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden.
Results=
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: 3304 Issuing autochanger load slot 13,
drive 0 command.
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: Fatal error: 3992 Bad autochanger load
slot 13, drive 0: ERR=Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden.
Results=
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: Fatal error: spool.c:302 Fatal append
error on device LTO3 (/dev/ULTRIUM-TD3): ERR=
10-Feb 16:31 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: Despooling elapsed time = 00:04:37,
Transfer rate = 77.52 M bytes/second
10-Feb 16:32 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: Fatal error: fd_cmds.c:177 FD command
not found: 8F~8DD7_96F0DCee905lEDFF^\EF=FBF89A
ESC8EACC2C1^\zF98CCE`9DRD4F8`EA=BEFA#F0I^X?q+A3EB^N̖FFE1D7cۈF6#w^C+kg^KCFUBD{9BuLj9EF196^^D6a
E784^^B7mAC^^^QBAy99)N9FFA^C9A2D0scD83kX9FA6IA4+O\šB4%D1FC
^U^R^KJDDE6^G3DF:̢B9C4˨BCE981D2̿NJ
^VE1^A7^P9D^H83B9C0A^GtٴC4rwAD젼RDC1F3E0E2^ZC9^?r҃^ZC0^H^Mu9E568EF6FAFCE2\99^?E9x`14E8wB2Q,A0:骘:6
DD^?^XQ4^]F986^YD2^\^]D3FE8F^EB5qB8B3^G8C86@C0C5cESCoFACD^As1fB7C2i{A18DF6vADBF^AB790)-8C^V^C
EA
DEFAA6^AE^F87]^V9EC0B6jb2D4$6`ӅCED2V949FHF482593]CF00X^L8A98FB\ACѵFD90h|8F/A7^ODCD^UG5^D{
CEF7~F9GZk80CCF892BEABo^L938DhF1dDE9B7-C18C^]8B3^O82^_DB^\UAA88F388EB^\F6^Sf989DS#D7FC
99BF):11^_^Ol
2'^_DBC8EB
D7E78CCEE2nx8E
B3^UC8A^G^BD9F6M}PZpC09^TA0C6r]EF8A
AEAS85D7j/G^W84C4CBBC6F3CBE6!...@t^m^u80]oF2E6^D}CF*^T%87MFB^VyC2dFEX~t^O^ACIC9G^ZfA6ACD71\3H8E}yB7B7ސIMD7ϱBEyQB7D7pD3U؟E7A8ЦA8kyF9)ABFFE1EBK1A5D5F5^KdD2ἮFED7`G9CEBAFvFA
10-Feb 16:32 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: Job write elapsed time = 47:21:16,
Transfer rate = 19.25 M bytes/second
10-Feb 16:32 VUMEM004-sd JobId 19429: Fatal error: fd_cmds.c:166 Command
error with FD, hanging up. Append data error.
10-Feb 16:32 VU0EM003 JobId 19429: Fatal error: backup.c:892 Network send
error to SD. ERR=Connection reset by peer
10-Feb 16:32 VUMEM004-dir JobId 19429: Error: Bacula VUMEM004-dir 3.0.3
(18Oct09): 10-Feb-2010 16:32:20
Build OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu debian 4.0
JobId: 19429
Job:VU0EM003.2010-02-08_16.26.19_08
Backup Level: Full
Client: VU0EM003 2.4.4 (28Dec08)
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu,debian,4.0
FileSet:VU0EM003 2007-06-12 00:05:01
Pool: Full (From
[Bacula-users] Building CentOS 5 RPMs for Bacula 5.0.0-1
Carlo Filippetto wrote: I don't know you response, but why you don't try to build it from the source code? because it is not scalable nor mantainable. Andy Howell wrote: My guess is the build is not completing earlier, maybe some required package is missing? I can rebuild and send you the output of the build if that helps. Regards, Andy Thanks for your comment. After some research I discovered that configure script does not detect termcap.h: checking for msgfmt... #40;cached#41; /usr/bin/msgfmt checking termcap.h usability... no checking termcap.h presence... no checking for termcap.h... no checking curses.h usability... yes ... ==Entering directory /home/rpmbuilder/rpmbuild/BUILD/bacula-5.0.0/src/console make#91;1#93;#58; Entering directory `/home/rpmbuilder/rpmbuild/BUILD/bacula-5.0.0/src/console' conio.c#58;87#58;21#58; error#58; termcap.h#58; No such file or directory make#91;1#93;#58; *** #91;depend#93; Error 1 make#91;1#93;#58; Leaving directory `/home/rpmbuilder/rpmbuild/BUILD/bacula-5.0.0/src/console' I checked permissions, reinstalled both ncurses and ncurses-devel, that didn't help. Then I tried cdnbsp; /usr/include ln -s ncurses/termcap.h and that actually did the trick. Looks like script looking in the wrong place. Installed version of ncurses is ncurses-5.5-24.20060715, ncurses-devel-5.5-24.20060715 +-- |This was sent by sc...@gorodok.net via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-- -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] How to backup the catalog
Hey, for innodb should mysqldump with the --single-transaction option work. http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/mysqldump.html#option_mysqldump_s ingle-transaction Kinds regards Julian -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Building CentOS 5 RPMs for Bacula 5.0.0-1
Burn wrote: Thanks for your comment. After some research I discovered that configure script does not detect termcap.h: checking for msgfmt... #40;cached#41; /usr/bin/msgfmt checking termcap.h usability... no checking termcap.h presence... no checking for termcap.h... no checking curses.h usability... yes ... ==Entering directory /home/rpmbuilder/rpmbuild/BUILD/bacula-5.0.0/src/console make#91;1#93;#58; Entering directory `/home/rpmbuilder/rpmbuild/BUILD/bacula-5.0.0/src/console' conio.c#58;87#58;21#58; error#58; termcap.h#58; No such file or directory make#91;1#93;#58; *** #91;depend#93; Error 1 make#91;1#93;#58; Leaving directory `/home/rpmbuilder/rpmbuild/BUILD/bacula-5.0.0/src/console' I checked permissions, reinstalled both ncurses and ncurses-devel, that didn't help. Then I tried cdnbsp; /usr/include ln -s ncurses/termcap.h and that actually did the trick. Looks like script looking in the wrong place. Installed version of ncurses is ncurses-5.5-24.20060715, ncurses-devel-5.5-24.20060715 Burn, My system has termcap.h from libtermcap-devel: rpm -qf /usr/include/termcap.h libtermcap-devel-2.0.8-46.1 Regards, Andy -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Restore Dir/Files recursively
Thanks Gavin, you got it! cwd is: /public/share/ $ mark 120 SALES DIVISION 11,234 files marked. Restore currently in progress. Thanks again, Ken -Original Message- From: Gavin McCullagh [mailto:gavin.mccull...@gcd.ie] Sent: Wednesday, 10 February 2010 5:11 PM To: Ken Barclay Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Restore Dir/Files recursively On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Ken Barclay wrote: Thanks Gavin, but $ mark /public/share/120 SALES DIVISION No files marked. $ add /public/share/120 SALES DIVISION/ No files marked. Sorry, I wasn't thinking. I'd suggest you do: cd public cd share mark 120 SALES DIVISION Gavin -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] AUTO: Lars Breimo är inte på kontoret. (tillbaka 2010-02-14)
Jag kommer inte att vara på kontoret och kommer inte tillbaka förrän 2010-02-14. Jag kommer att svara på meddelandet när jag kommer tillbaka. Obs! Det här är ett automatiskt svar på ditt meddelande [Bacula-users] Building CentOS 5 RPMs for Bacula 5.0.0-1 sänt 2/10/10 8:45:44 PM. Det här är det enda meddelande du kommer att få om att den här personen inte är på kontoret. -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Overhead of incremental backup ???
Hi , I'm Using bacula 3.0.3 for to backup number of servers,in which some servers got lot of data around 110 GB .So due to the lack of space in the backup server to constantly maintain a backup for more than one month period, I forced to remove the differential backup from the schedule and now it take only full and incremental backup for all my serves (one month cycling). This is the schedule for this month period for all the clients. --- 2010-01-24 23:55 : mail.net-pool (Full) 2010-01-27 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental) 2010-01-31 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental) 2010-02-03 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental) 2010-02-07 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental) 2010-02-10 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental) 2010-02-14 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental) 2010-02-17 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental) 2010-02-21 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental) 2010-02-24 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental) 2010-02-28 23:55 : mail.net-pool (Full) 2010-03-03 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental) 2010-03-07 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental) 2010-03-10 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental) 2010-03-14 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental) 2010-03-17 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental) 2010-03-21 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental) 2010-03-24 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental) Now I have one doubt about, if we increase the number of incremental backups this would have any problem to the backup time.I need only for one month period for my clients. So please help me to know more about this .. Thanks and Regards, Haridas N. -- Have a nice day... -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] bextract consumes 3+Gb memory
Hello, I was testing extracting the catalog from disk volume, only to find the machine swapping, and bextract using more the 3Gb res mem, 4+Gb virtual. I had compression turned on in the catalog fileset. When I turned that off, ran BackupCatalog again to a new disk volume, I was able to extract the bacula.sql file. I tried it on another disk voluem that was compressed and had the same problem. This is bacula 5.0.0 on CentOS 5.4. Any ideas? Thanks, Andy -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Building CentOS 5 RPMs for Bacula 5.0.0-1
Andy Howell wrote: Burn wrote: Burn, My system has termcap.h from libtermcap-devel: rpm -qf /usr/include/termcap.h libtermcap-devel-2.0.8-46.1 I removed the symlink, installed libtermcap-devel and rebuilt package, that also worked ok. Looking into spec, turned out that I hadn't a bunch of other dependencies, also. Not sure why it wasn't complaining about that. Might have something to do with the fact I'm building in an OpenVZ container, not physical machine. +-- |This was sent by sc...@gorodok.net via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-- -- SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
