[Bacula-users] Partial FileSet encryption
Greetings, The docs seem to be conflicting about data encryption with Bacula. http://www.bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/main/main/Configuring_Director.html#SECTION001813 Here there is a mention that it should be possible to encrypt at the FileSet level (allowing one to choose what to encrypt and what not to). While here (http://www.bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/main/main/Data_Encryption.html) it seems to be on a client (FD) level, i.e. all or nothing. Please clarify. Best regards, Alex -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Partial FileSet encryption
On May 24, 2012, at 2:13 AM, Alex Lucas wrote: Greetings, The docs seem to be conflicting about data encryption with Bacula. http://www.bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/main/main/Configuring_Director.html#SECTION001813 Here there is a mention that it should be possible to encrypt at the FileSet level (allowing one to choose what to encrypt and what not to). While here (http://www.bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/main/main/Data_Encryption.html) it seems to be on a client (FD) level, i.e. all or nothing. Please clarify. Is it possible they are talking about an upcoming feature or maybe in the enterprise edition or undocumented? I can't find the word encryption on the Configuring_Director.html page anywhere but in one place. However, I look all through the FileSet options and don't see anything about encryption. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Migration Job Questions
Hi We are backing up clients to disk and migrate the jobs later to tape. So we defined a migration job. The backup jobs named *.stage. And I defined in job resource Selection Type = Job Selection Pattern = .*\.stage But this seems to try migrate already migrated jobs too. So I looked into the man pages and saw PoolUncopiedJobs which is what I would like to use, but for migration jobs, which does not exist (yet?). However, I know this could be solved using an SQL Query to specify also from pool, but it seems there is no huge benefit using migration jobs. The only benefit I see is the size of the records in catalogue. Right? Should I move to copy job? Thanks for your comments. -- Adfinis SyGroup AG - Be smart. Think Open Source. René Moser, Senior System Engineer Keltenstrasse 98, CH-3018 Bern Tel.: +41 31 550 31 11 | http://www.adfinis-sygroup.ch signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Fatal error: askdir.c:339 NULL Volume name. This shouldn't happen!!!
hello, Anyone run into this error before? We hadn't until we upgraded our bacula server from Centos 5.8 to Redhat 6.2, after which we of course had to recompile bacula. However, we used the same source, version, and options, the exception being that we added readline for improved bconsole functionality. Now every couple of days we have jobs error out like this: 21-May 20:04 SD JobId 236699: Fatal error: askdir.c:339 NULL Volume name. This shouldn't happen!!! 21-May 22:02 DIR JobId 236711: Fatal error: Catalog error updating Media record. sql_update.c:411 Update failed: affected_rows=0 for UPDATE Media SET VolJobs=0,VolFiles=0,VolBlocks=0,VolBytes=0,VolMounts=0,VolErrors=0,VolWrites=0,MaxVolBytes=0,VolStatus='',Slot=0,InChanger=0,VolReadTime=0,VolWriteTime=0,VolParts=0,LabelType=0,StorageId=0,PoolId=0,VolRetention=0,VolUseDuration=0,MaxVolJobs=0,MaxVolFiles=0,Enabled=0,LocationId=0,ScratchPoolId=0,RecyclePoolId=0,RecycleCount=0,Recycle=0,ActionOnPurge=0 WHERE VolumeName='' 23-May 22:02 SD JobId 237069: Fatal error: askdir.c:339 NULL Volume name. This shouldn't happen!!! There is nothing new or strange about our volumes, nothing in DB with null values. My only idea, which is sheer speculation is that we have in the past had some strange behaviours around tape contention, like a set of jobs running with a storage daemon with two drives, and a job being assigned to one drive will want the tape that is in use by another job on the other drive. That happened pretty rarely, though I was wondering if this might perhaps be the new outcome of that contention. Again, sheer speculation as I have nothing but the errors above to go on at the moment. thanks! Stephen -- Stephen Thompson Berkeley Seismological Laboratory step...@seismo.berkeley.edu215 McCone Hall # 4760 404.538.7077 (phone) University of California, Berkeley 510.643.5811 (fax) Berkeley, CA 94720-4760 -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] multi-drive autoch: Job is waiting on Storage storagedev-LTO
Hey guys
Hope you all had a nice weekend
I have a problem which has me stumped at the moment.
Currently running Bacula Version 5.0.3 on Debian connected to a Dell TL2000
autochanger with 2 x drives.
I am trying to run backup jobs across both drives simultaneously but
consistently hit the XXX job is waiting on storage storagedev-LTO despite the
fact that only 1 drive of 2 is in use (1 drive free).
Can anyone please shed any light on this?
Current configuration:
bacula-sd.conf
Autochanger {
Name = DELL-TL2000
Device = LTO4-0, LTO4-1
Changer Device = /dev/changer
Changer Command = /etc/bacula/scripts/mtx-changer %c %o %S %a %d
}
Device {
Name = LTO4-0
Drive Index = 0
Media Type = LTO-4
Archive Device = /dev/nst0
AutomaticMount = yes; # when device opened, read it
AlwaysOpen = yes;
RemovableMedia = yes;
RandomAccess = no;
Autochanger = yes
Alert Command = sh -c 'tapeinfo -f %c |grep TapeAlert| cat'
}
Device {
Name = LTO4-1
Drive Index = 1
Media Type = LTO-4
Archive Device = /dev/nst1
AutomaticMount = yes; # when device opened, read it
AlwaysOpen = yes;
RemovableMedia = yes;
RandomAccess = no;
Autochanger = yes
Alert Command = sh -c 'tapeinfo -f %c |grep TapeAlert| cat'
}
The changer device is symlinked /dev/changer to sg6.
JobsDef.conf:
JobDefs {
Name = testbackup
Type = Backup
Level = VirtualFull
Schedule = DailyVirtualFull
Pool = Default
Messages = Standard
FileSet = Full Set
Prefer Mounted Volumes = no
Priority = 100
Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 2
}
and finally bacula-sd.conf:
# Definition of file storage device
Storage {
Name = bacula-LTO
# Do not use localhost here
Address = bacula# N.B. Use a fully qualified name here
SDPort = 9103
Password = xyz
Device = DELL-TL2000
Media Type = LTO-4
Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 2
Autochanger = yes
TLS Enable = yes
TLS Require = yes
TLS CA Certificate File = xyz
TLS Certificate = xyz
TLS Key = xyz
}
Does anyone have any tips or ideas as to why this is happening? Note I am using
Prefer Mounted Volumes = no - I understand that by default a single pool
utilizes only one drive, perhaps I need to define a second in order to get
around this issue - what do you think?
Thank you for your help
+--
|This was sent by martinjasontho...@gmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] multi-drive autoch: Job is waiting on Storage storagedev-LTO
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Martian333 bacula-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote: Hey guys Hope you all had a nice weekend I have a problem which has me stumped at the moment. Currently running Bacula Version 5.0.3 on Debian connected to a Dell TL2000 autochanger with 2 x drives. I am trying to run backup jobs across both drives simultaneously but consistently hit the XXX job is waiting on storage storagedev-LTO despite the fact that only 1 drive of 2 is in use (1 drive free). Can anyone please shed any light on this? Are both jobs using the same pool? John -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Upgrade Bacula client to 5.0.3
I am running a Kubuntu server 11.04 with Bacula 5.0.3 director and storage. I have 3 clients - 2 Windows (SBS and 2008) and a Ubuntu server 10.04. The Ubuntu (lucid) server has Bacula client 5.0.1 installed and is backed up via SSH tunnel. This backup worked perfectly while the front-end server was 10.04 (Bacula 5.0.1) but fails now the versions differ. The Windows servers are fine. I need to upgrade the Bacula client from 5.0.1 to 5.0.3 'easily' without the ton of dependencies required. It is not possible to upgrade this server to 11.04 as a number of other users depend on it and we are only allocated restricted access. Any assistance will be appreciated. +-- |This was sent by kgme...@mweb.co.za via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-- -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] multi-drive autoch: Job is waiting on Storage storagedev-LTO
On 5/21/2012 12:26 PM, Martian333 wrote:
Hey guys
Hope you all had a nice weekend
I have a problem which has me stumped at the moment.
Currently running Bacula Version 5.0.3 on Debian connected to a Dell TL2000
autochanger with 2 x drives.
I am trying to run backup jobs across both drives simultaneously but
consistently hit the XXX job is waiting on storage storagedev-LTO despite
the fact that only 1 drive of 2 is in use (1 drive free).
Can anyone please shed any light on this?
Don't put MaximumConcurrentJobs=2 in the Jobdef. Rather, put
MaximumConcurrentJobs=1 in each of the two Device definitions (LTO4-0
and LTO4-1) in bacula-sd.conf.
Current configuration:
bacula-sd.conf
Autochanger {
Name = DELL-TL2000
Device = LTO4-0, LTO4-1
Changer Device = /dev/changer
Changer Command = /etc/bacula/scripts/mtx-changer %c %o %S %a %d
}
Device {
Name = LTO4-0
Drive Index = 0
Media Type = LTO-4
Archive Device = /dev/nst0
AutomaticMount = yes; # when device opened, read it
AlwaysOpen = yes;
RemovableMedia = yes;
RandomAccess = no;
Autochanger = yes
Alert Command = sh -c 'tapeinfo -f %c |grep TapeAlert| cat'
}
Device {
Name = LTO4-1
Drive Index = 1
Media Type = LTO-4
Archive Device = /dev/nst1
AutomaticMount = yes; # when device opened, read it
AlwaysOpen = yes;
RemovableMedia = yes;
RandomAccess = no;
Autochanger = yes
Alert Command = sh -c 'tapeinfo -f %c |grep TapeAlert| cat'
}
The changer device is symlinked /dev/changer to sg6.
JobsDef.conf:
JobDefs {
Name = testbackup
Type = Backup
Level = VirtualFull
Schedule = DailyVirtualFull
Pool = Default
Messages = Standard
FileSet = Full Set
Prefer Mounted Volumes = no
Priority = 100
Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 2
}
and finally bacula-sd.conf:
# Definition of file storage device
Storage {
Name = bacula-LTO
# Do not use localhost here
Address = bacula# N.B. Use a fully qualified name here
SDPort = 9103
Password = xyz
Device = DELL-TL2000
Media Type = LTO-4
Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 2
Autochanger = yes
TLS Enable = yes
TLS Require = yes
TLS CA Certificate File = xyz
TLS Certificate = xyz
TLS Key = xyz
}
Does anyone have any tips or ideas as to why this is happening? Note I am
using Prefer Mounted Volumes = no - I understand that by default a single
pool utilizes only one drive, perhaps I need to define a second in order to
get around this issue - what do you think?
Thank you for your help
+--
|This was sent by martinjasontho...@gmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Partial FileSet encryption
On 24/05/12 20:15, Bryan Harris wrote: On May 24, 2012, at 2:13 AM, Alex Lucas wrote: Greetings, The docs seem to be conflicting about data encryption with Bacula. http://www.bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/main/main/Configuring_Director.html#SECTION001813 Here there is a mention that it should be possible to encrypt at the FileSet level (allowing one to choose what to encrypt and what not to). While here (http://www.bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/main/main/Data_Encryption.html) it seems to be on a client (FD) level, i.e. all or nothing. Please clarify. Is it possible they are talking about an upcoming feature or maybe in the enterprise edition or undocumented? Perhaps, I somehow remember reading about this issue on a third party website but cannot find the article anymore. I can't find the word encryption on the Configuring_Director.html page anywhere but in one place. However, I look all through the FileSet options and don't see anything about encryption. Yes, exactly. /The FileSet Resource/ The FileSet resource defines what files are to be included or excluded in a backup job various backup options such as compression, /encryption/, and signatures that are to be applied to each file. Compression -- true, but as for encryption. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
