Re: [Bacula-users] Problem installing bacula on Solaris 10
On 10/31/2014 4:53 PM, Kenneth Garges wrote: Thanks for the suggestion. I avoided it because everyone in the office here said stay away from SunStudio, gcc is way better, Solaris compilers are evil, blah blah. They're incompatible with gnu build chains, especially libtool, so most gnuware won't build. Name mangling's different so you can't link c++ objs to g++ libs (and vise versa), etfc. Other than that, there was nothing wrong with 'em back when -- now that there is no sun, they'll presumably get obsolete at some point. :( Dima -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Forcing baccula to purge/recycle a tape instead of appending?!
Hi!
Yes, I know.
But I have 6 clients. And for each client I wrote two jobs:
1) Backup to file (pool: filepool)
2) Backup to tape (pool: monthlytape)
The tape backup is triggered on every first saturday of a month.
The schedule and the job looks like this (from memory):
===
Schedule {
Name = MonthlyBackupToTape
Run = Level=Full Pool=MonthlyTape 1st sat at 2:00
}
Job {
Name = Client1-ToTape
Type = Backup
Level = Full
Client = dns
FileSet=fs-dns
Storage = LTO4
Pool = MonthlyBackupToTape
Schedule = BackupToTape
}
===
But maybe sometimes a backup goes wrong and I want to re-start the
tape backup manually for the specific client. So I'd need jobs like
client1-toFile
client1-toTape-Jan
client1-toTape-Feb
client1-toTape-Mar
client1-toTape-Apr
client1-toTape-Mai
[...]
But to resume the thread's title... can I switch from my monthytape
pool (12 tapes / one pool) to the new 1 tape / one pool pool without
loosing the backup information of the last 11 tapes?
On 30.10.2014 21:18, John Drescher wrote:
No. You can select the pool in the schedule resource.
http://www.bacula.org/5.2.x-manuals/en/main/main/Configuring_Director.html#SECTION00145
John
--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Problem installing bacula on Solaris 10
On 2/11/2014 4:05 AM, Dmitri Maziuk wrote: On 10/31/2014 4:53 PM, Kenneth Garges wrote: Thanks for the suggestion. I avoided it because everyone in the office here said stay away from SunStudio, gcc is way better, Solaris compilers are evil, blah blah. They're incompatible with gnu build chains, especially libtool, so most gnuware won't build. Name mangling's different so you can't link c++ objs to g++ libs (and vise versa), etfc. Other than that, there was nothing wrong with 'em back when -- now that there is no sun, they'll presumably get obsolete at some point. :( Solaris Studio is still free, and being developed by Oracle. In the old days when a lot of gcc development was being performed on Sun systems, gcc would often out perform the Sun compilers, these days it's the other way around. That many so-called open source products are developed by people who have a of course it's portable, it build on both Fedora Core *and* OpenSUSE is the real problem. Cheers, GaryB-) -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
