Re: [Bacula-users] Error with signature for bacula-7.4.4.tar.gz file in sourceforge
Hi Kern, Thanks very much. At the moment the Sourceforge site still shows the sig file as the old date and it still comes up as a Bad signature (fresh download of both files). I also cleared the cache in my browser in case that was causing a problem but no change. Not sure if there is a delay before new uploaded files are visible on Sourceforge. Will check later today or tomorrow morning. Regards Adolf On 26/11/16 16:04, Kern Sibbald wrote: > Hello, > > Yes, I did update the binary since the version had an annoying typo in > it, and as you found out, I forgot to release a new signature file. > Sorry for the inconvenience. I am really please to see people checking > it. Please continue to do so. I have now updated the source code > signature file. Please let me know if the signature file does not > correspond to the current source code (I have double checked it, but ...). > > Best regards, > Kern > > On 11/26/2016 11:30 AM, Adolf Belka wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Can anyone help on this. The bacula-7.4.4.tar.gz file still has a >> modification date after the signature file so still getting a bad >> signature result from it. >> >> I suspect the file is probably OK but the whole point of doing the >> signature check is to get confirmation that the file on the website >> hasn't been messed about with. >> >> Looking in the git repository then there was a modification made on 29th >> Sep 2016 to Tweak correct LSMDATE typo. Maybe this was done and the >> signature file not updated. >> >> If this question is going to the wrong mailing list please let me know. >> I couldn't find any other list that looked more correct as this doesn't >> seem to fit in the Bugs category. >> >> Adolf. >> >> On 21/11/16 13:07, Adolf Belka wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I downloaded the bacula-7.4.4,tar.gz and bacula-7.4.4.tar.gz.sig files >>> from sourceforge but when I checked the signature out it came back as >>> bad. >>> >>> All other files I have checked in the folder all came back good with the >>> signature check. >>> >>> I noticed that the bacula-7.4.4.tar.gz had been modified on 2016-09-29 >>> while all the other files including bacula-7.4.4.tar.gz.sig had >>> modification dates of 2016-09-21. Would this date difference be causing >>> the bad signature result. If yes, can someone update the signature file >>> on sourceforge. If no, what could be wrong. >>> >>> Adolf Belka >> -- >> >> ___ >> Bacula-users mailing list >> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users >> > -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Error with signature for bacula-7.4.4.tar.gz file in sourceforge
Hello, Yes, I did update the binary since the version had an annoying typo in it, and as you found out, I forgot to release a new signature file. Sorry for the inconvenience. I am really please to see people checking it. Please continue to do so. I have now updated the source code signature file. Please let me know if the signature file does not correspond to the current source code (I have double checked it, but ...). Best regards, Kern On 11/26/2016 11:30 AM, Adolf Belka wrote: > Hi All, > > Can anyone help on this. The bacula-7.4.4.tar.gz file still has a > modification date after the signature file so still getting a bad > signature result from it. > > I suspect the file is probably OK but the whole point of doing the > signature check is to get confirmation that the file on the website > hasn't been messed about with. > > Looking in the git repository then there was a modification made on 29th > Sep 2016 to Tweak correct LSMDATE typo. Maybe this was done and the > signature file not updated. > > If this question is going to the wrong mailing list please let me know. > I couldn't find any other list that looked more correct as this doesn't > seem to fit in the Bugs category. > > Adolf. > > On 21/11/16 13:07, Adolf Belka wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I downloaded the bacula-7.4.4,tar.gz and bacula-7.4.4.tar.gz.sig files >> from sourceforge but when I checked the signature out it came back as bad. >> >> All other files I have checked in the folder all came back good with the >> signature check. >> >> I noticed that the bacula-7.4.4.tar.gz had been modified on 2016-09-29 >> while all the other files including bacula-7.4.4.tar.gz.sig had >> modification dates of 2016-09-21. Would this date difference be causing >> the bad signature result. If yes, can someone update the signature file >> on sourceforge. If no, what could be wrong. >> >> Adolf Belka > -- > ___ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Error with signature for bacula-7.4.4.tar.gz file in sourceforge
Hi Adolf, I can offer you the md5sum of the tar.gz file so you can compare it to yours using md5sum-command: -bash-4.1$ md5sum bacula-7.4.4.tar.gz *aed11c1eef1198ffc76c6fca55cea3ad* bacula-7.4.4.tar.gz Best regards, Daniel Am 26.11.2016 um 11:30 schrieb Adolf Belka: Hi All, Can anyone help on this. The bacula-7.4.4.tar.gz file still has a modification date after the signature file so still getting a bad signature result from it. I suspect the file is probably OK but the whole point of doing the signature check is to get confirmation that the file on the website hasn't been messed about with. Looking in the git repository then there was a modification made on 29th Sep 2016 to Tweak correct LSMDATE typo. Maybe this was done and the signature file not updated. If this question is going to the wrong mailing list please let me know. I couldn't find any other list that looked more correct as this doesn't seem to fit in the Bugs category. Adolf. On 21/11/16 13:07, Adolf Belka wrote: Hi, I downloaded the bacula-7.4.4,tar.gz and bacula-7.4.4.tar.gz.sig files from sourceforge but when I checked the signature out it came back as bad. All other files I have checked in the folder all came back good with the signature check. I noticed that the bacula-7.4.4.tar.gz had been modified on 2016-09-29 while all the other files including bacula-7.4.4.tar.gz.sig had modification dates of 2016-09-21. Would this date difference be causing the bad signature result. If yes, can someone update the signature file on sourceforge. If no, what could be wrong. Adolf Belka -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Error with signature for bacula-7.4.4.tar.gz file in sourceforge
Hi All, Can anyone help on this. The bacula-7.4.4.tar.gz file still has a modification date after the signature file so still getting a bad signature result from it. I suspect the file is probably OK but the whole point of doing the signature check is to get confirmation that the file on the website hasn't been messed about with. Looking in the git repository then there was a modification made on 29th Sep 2016 to Tweak correct LSMDATE typo. Maybe this was done and the signature file not updated. If this question is going to the wrong mailing list please let me know. I couldn't find any other list that looked more correct as this doesn't seem to fit in the Bugs category. Adolf. On 21/11/16 13:07, Adolf Belka wrote: > Hi, > > I downloaded the bacula-7.4.4,tar.gz and bacula-7.4.4.tar.gz.sig files > from sourceforge but when I checked the signature out it came back as bad. > > All other files I have checked in the folder all came back good with the > signature check. > > I noticed that the bacula-7.4.4.tar.gz had been modified on 2016-09-29 > while all the other files including bacula-7.4.4.tar.gz.sig had > modification dates of 2016-09-21. Would this date difference be causing > the bad signature result. If yes, can someone update the signature file > on sourceforge. If no, what could be wrong. > > Adolf Belka -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Binaries
Hello, We are working on it. Many of the binaries are already prepared, but the project is being held up because I must first finish an important programming task, then organize the upload and the hard part is making both deb and rpm based repos (probably on Source Forge). Finally, they must be documented as the file structure where Bacula is installed is the Bacula recommended file structure rather than the rather random and varying locations in the various Linux distributions. I seem to be quite poor in my estimations since there always seems to be something more critical, but I imagine we will have the binaries available by the first of 2017. Best regards, Kern On 11/25/2016 02:44 PM, Jaime Ferrer Hepp wrote: Hi Guys; Does anyone knows when the bacula binaries for major linux distributions will be available. I’m planning to upgrade Bacula to the lastes version, but I will want to skip the compilation process. Thanks Jaime Ferrer -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
