Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and german special chars "umlauts"
Not using bacularis, but accented characters, used in all languages, except English and some odd language spoken by about 1000 people on an island in the Pacific, work for us. Try restoring from bconsole to rule out that it is a bacula issue and not just a bacularis one. -- Med vänlig hälsning Anders Gustafsson, ingenjör anders.gustafs...@pedago.fi | Support +358 18 12060 | Direkt +358 9 315 45 121 | Mobil +358 40506 7099 Pedago interaktiv ab, Nygatan 7 B , AX-22100 MARIEHAMN, ÅLAND, FINLAND >>> "Stefan G. Weichinger" 2024-04-09 08:06 >>> I am in the process of installing and configuring Bacula-13.0.4 and Bacularis-2.7.0 on a Debian-12.5 server. (moving over from using Amanda, I might ask a few questions around that soon) What I noticed: when I access "Restore" in Bacularis, there are files displayed with strange chars instead of the correct german special chars or "Umlauts". That's something I would like to get correct from the start. I installed from the deb-packages and use postgresql as database. Didn't notice any specific choice of charsets or so. Does that maybe come from the language I chose for Bacularis? Right now I have it in english ... pls advise, thanks, Stefan ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Bacula and german special chars "umlauts"
I am in the process of installing and configuring Bacula-13.0.4 and Bacularis-2.7.0 on a Debian-12.5 server. (moving over from using Amanda, I might ask a few questions around that soon) What I noticed: when I access "Restore" in Bacularis, there are files displayed with strange chars instead of the correct german special chars or "Umlauts". That's something I would like to get correct from the start. I installed from the deb-packages and use postgresql as database. Didn't notice any specific choice of charsets or so. Does that maybe come from the language I chose for Bacularis? Right now I have it in english ... pls advise, thanks, Stefan ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] connecting bacularis to an existing bacula setup
Hello Steven, Yes, web servers by default listen on port 80 but it is possible to change. Bacularis uses only one port 9097. I mean that after installing Bacularis with the web server, you can just disable listening on port 80 or change it to any other port number. Best regards, Marcin Haba (gani) On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 06:29, steven wrote: > Hi, > > It will not run on bare metal as it tries to run on port80, but I have > apache containers on port 80 and 443 already which was why I went for a > docker container to isolate bacularis that runs on 9097 OK but the wizard > lacks connectivity to bacula. > regards > > Steven > > On 9/04/2024 2:16 pm, Marcin Haba wrote: > > Hello Steven, > > Bacularis API and Bacularis Web are one application called just Bacularis. > So, as I see you already have it. > > In the installation wizard there is possible to choose if you want to > configure API or Web or both (typical case). After installation you need > just to go to: > > http://yourhost:9097 > > Best regards, > Marcin Haba (gani) > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 01:15, Thing wrote: > >> Google it seems does not like my email server...lets try again, sorry if >> we get a duplicate. >> >> Hi, >> >> I dont see a bacualris API to install? >> >> root@bacula:~# dpkg -l bacula* >> Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold >> | >> Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend >> |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) >> ||/ Name VersionArchitecture Description >> >> +++--==--= >> ii bacula-bscan 9.6.7-7amd64network backup >> service - bscan tool >> ii bacula-client9.6.7-7all network backup >> service - client metapackage >> ii bacula-common9.6.7-7amd64network backup >> service - common support files >> ii bacula-common-mysql 9.6.7-7amd64network backup >> service - MySQL common files >> un bacula-common-pgsql (no description >> available) >> un bacula-common-sqlite3(no description >> available) >> ii bacula-console 9.6.7-7amd64network backup >> service - text console >> ii bacula-director 9.6.7-7amd64network backup >> service - Director daemon >> un bacula-director-database (no description >> available) >> ii bacula-director-mysql9.6.7-7all network backup >> service - MySQL storage for Director >> un bacula-director-pgsql(no description >> available) >> un bacula-director-sqlite3 (no description >> available) >> un bacula-doc (no description >> available) >> ii bacula-fd9.6.7-7amd64network backup >> service - file daemon >> ii bacula-sd9.6.7-7amd64network backup >> service - storage daemon >> un bacula-sd-mysql (no description >> available) >> un bacula-sd-pgsql (no description >> available) >> un bacula-sd-sqlite3(no description >> available) >> ii bacula-server9.6.7-7all network backup >> service - server metapackage >> ii bacularis2.7.0~bullseye all The Bacularis >> WebGUI enables administration and managing Bacula jobs. >> ii bacularis-apache22.7.0~bullseye all This package >> provides the Apache configuration for Bacularis. >> un bacularis-lighttpd (no description >> available) >> un bacularis-nginx (no description >> available) >> root@bacula:~# >> >> >> I am finding the naming convention /description difficult to understand. >> So, I have a bacularis web container running. It appears I need something >> between the container and the director? but I cannot see what. >> >> regards >> >> Steven >> >> On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 05:17, Marcin Haba wrote: >> >>> Hello Steven, >>> >>> Of course, you don't need to uninstall anything. Bacula daemons stay >>> where they are. Don't worry, nothing changes here. >>> >>> In that container image description is a sentence: >>> >>> "It can be used to connect external Bacularis API server(s) in >>> containers or outside them." >>> >>> This "outside them" means that you can install Bacularis API in any way >>> that you want, Docker image is only one of the ways. >>> >>> Reading your description for that, what you would like to have, the >>> easiest is to install only one Bacularis using binary packages on the >>> Bacula Director host. It contains the Bacularis Web and Bacularis API >>> together, so you don't need to split it or install anything else, just this >>> one Bacularis instance. The installation wizard, that you will see
Re: [Bacula-users] connecting bacularis to an existing bacula setup
Hi, It will not run on bare metal as it tries to run on port80, but I have apache containers on port 80 and 443 already which was why I went for a docker container to isolate bacularis that runs on 9097 OK but the wizard lacks connectivity to bacula. regards Steven On 9/04/2024 2:16 pm, Marcin Haba wrote: Hello Steven, Bacularis API and Bacularis Web are one application called just Bacularis. So, as I see you already have it. In the installation wizard there is possible to choose if you want to configure API or Web or both (typical case). After installation you need just to go to: http://yourhost:9097 Best regards, Marcin Haba (gani) On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 01:15, Thing wrote: Google it seems does not like my email server...lets try again, sorry if we get a duplicate. Hi, I dont see a bacualris API to install? root@bacula:~# dpkg -l bacula* Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name VersionArchitecture Description +++--==--= ii bacula-bscan 9.6.7-7 amd64 network backup service - bscan tool ii bacula-client 9.6.7-7 all network backup service - client metapackage ii bacula-common 9.6.7-7 amd64 network backup service - common support files ii bacula-common-mysql 9.6.7-7 amd64 network backup service - MySQL common files un bacula-common-pgsql (no description available) un bacula-common-sqlite3 (no description available) ii bacula-console 9.6.7-7 amd64 network backup service - text console ii bacula-director 9.6.7-7 amd64 network backup service - Director daemon un bacula-director-database (no description available) ii bacula-director-mysql 9.6.7-7 all network backup service - MySQL storage for Director un bacula-director-pgsql (no description available) un bacula-director-sqlite3 (no description available) un bacula-doc (no description available) ii bacula-fd 9.6.7-7 amd64 network backup service - file daemon ii bacula-sd 9.6.7-7 amd64 network backup service - storage daemon un bacula-sd-mysql (no description available) un bacula-sd-pgsql (no description available) un bacula-sd-sqlite3 (no description available) ii bacula-server 9.6.7-7 all network backup service - server metapackage ii bacularis 2.7.0~bullseye all The Bacularis WebGUI enables administration and managing Bacula jobs. ii bacularis-apache2 2.7.0~bullseye all This package provides the Apache configuration for Bacularis. un bacularis-lighttpd (no description available) un bacularis-nginx (no description available) root@bacula:~# I am finding the naming convention /description difficult to understand. So, I have a bacularis web container running. It appears I need something between the container and the director? but I cannot see what. regards Steven On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 05:17, Marcin Haba wrote: Hello Steven, Of course, you don't need to uninstall anything. Bacula daemons stay where they are. Don't worry, nothing changes here. In that container image description is a sentence: "It can be used to connect external Bacularis API server(s) in containers or outside them." This "outside them" means that you can install Bacularis API in any way that you want, Docker image is only one of the ways. Reading your description for that, what you would like to have, the easiest is to install only one Bacularis using binary packages on the Bacula Director host. It contains the Bacularis Web and Bacularis API together, so you don't need to split it or install anything else, just this one Bacularis instance. The installation wizard, that you will see after installing, will lead you on all the configuration process. In case problems or questions, please let us know. Thanks! Best regards, Marcin Haba (gani) On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 09:22, steven wrote: hi, Ok I
Re: [Bacula-users] Install.sh error trying to install manually Bacularis
Hello Neil, I have checked installing Bacularis on FreeBSD and I have one more note. By default in Apache is used PHP as Apache module. If you want to use it this way, it is fine. Nothing else to do. If you will need to use PHP through PHP-FPM, then you need to do a few changes in your httpd.conf to disable the Apache PHP module and enable PHP-FPM. First, you need to disable/comment the MPM Prefork module and libphp: #LoadModule mpm_prefork_module libexec/apache24/mod_mpm_prefork.so #LoadModule php_module libexec/apache24/libphp.so and enable/uncomment these modules: LoadModule mpm_event_module libexec/apache24/mod_mpm_event.so LoadModule proxy_module libexec/apache24/mod_proxy.so LoadModule proxy_fcgi_module libexec/apache24/mod_proxy_fcgi.so Then you need to add these lines to the same httpd.conf: SetEnvIfNoCase ^Authorization$ "(.+)" HTTP_AUTHORIZATION=$1 SetHandler "proxy:unix:/tmp/php-fpm.sock|fcgi://localhost/" At the end in /usr/local/etc/php-fpm.d/www.conf you need to set permissions for PHP-FPM unix socket: listen.owner = www listen.group = www listen.mode = 0660 and restart the services: # service php-fpm restart # service apache24 restart Best regards, Marcin Haba (gani) On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 04:54, Marcin Haba wrote: > Hello Neil, > > Thanks for your feedback with installing Bacularis on FreeBSD. > > It looks that in your environment this script uses the default FreeBSD > shell /bin/sh (or any other) that does not support arrays. > > This is the Bash script so to use it you need to install Bash: > > # pkg install bash > > After that you need to update shebang in the install.sh script to: > > #!/usr/local/bin/bash > > Once it is done, it should start working well. In case problems, please > let us know. > > Good luck! > > Best regards, > Marcin Haba (gani) > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 02:38, Neil Balchin wrote: > >> I’ve installed Bacula in a Freebsd Jail and all is well, Also installed >> Apache24, and the requisite php mods to run bacularis. >> >> I’ve followed the manual instructions to the letter but when I get to the >> install.sh step I get this error output : >> >> root@Bacula1:/usr/local/www/bacularis/protected/tools # sh ./install.sh >> -p /tmp/php-fpm.sock >> >> >> +===+ >> >> | Welcome in the Bacularis install script | >> >> +---+ >> >> | This script will help you to adjust privileges | >> >> | for Bacularis files and it will prepare | >> >> | configuration files for popular web servers. | >> >> +---+ >> >> >> >> ./install.sh: 34: Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting ")") >> >> root@Bacula1:/usr/local/www/bacularis/protected/tools # >> >> >> >> >> ___ >> Bacula-users mailing list >> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users >> > > > -- > > "Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his > friends." Jesus Christ > > "Większej miłości nikt nie ma nad tę, jak gdy kto życie swoje kładzie za > przyjaciół swoich." Jezus Chrystus > > -- "Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends." Jesus Christ "Większej miłości nikt nie ma nad tę, jak gdy kto życie swoje kładzie za przyjaciół swoich." Jezus Chrystus ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Install.sh error trying to install manually Bacularis
Hello Neil, Thanks for your feedback with installing Bacularis on FreeBSD. It looks that in your environment this script uses the default FreeBSD shell /bin/sh (or any other) that does not support arrays. This is the Bash script so to use it you need to install Bash: # pkg install bash After that you need to update shebang in the install.sh script to: #!/usr/local/bin/bash Once it is done, it should start working well. In case problems, please let us know. Good luck! Best regards, Marcin Haba (gani) On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 02:38, Neil Balchin wrote: > I’ve installed Bacula in a Freebsd Jail and all is well, Also installed > Apache24, and the requisite php mods to run bacularis. > > I’ve followed the manual instructions to the letter but when I get to the > install.sh step I get this error output : > > root@Bacula1:/usr/local/www/bacularis/protected/tools # sh ./install.sh > -p /tmp/php-fpm.sock > > > +===+ > > | Welcome in the Bacularis install script | > > +---+ > > | This script will help you to adjust privileges | > > | for Bacularis files and it will prepare | > > | configuration files for popular web servers. | > > +---+ > > > > ./install.sh: 34: Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting ")") > > root@Bacula1:/usr/local/www/bacularis/protected/tools # > > > > > ___ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > -- "Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends." Jesus Christ "Większej miłości nikt nie ma nad tę, jak gdy kto życie swoje kładzie za przyjaciół swoich." Jezus Chrystus ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] connecting bacularis to an existing bacula setup
Hello Steven, Bacularis API and Bacularis Web are one application called just Bacularis. So, as I see you already have it. In the installation wizard there is possible to choose if you want to configure API or Web or both (typical case). After installation you need just to go to: http://yourhost:9097 Best regards, Marcin Haba (gani) On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 01:15, Thing wrote: > Google it seems does not like my email server...lets try again, sorry if > we get a duplicate. > > Hi, > > I dont see a bacualris API to install? > > root@bacula:~# dpkg -l bacula* > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold > | > Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend > |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) > ||/ Name VersionArchitecture Description > > +++--==--= > ii bacula-bscan 9.6.7-7amd64network backup > service - bscan tool > ii bacula-client9.6.7-7all network backup > service - client metapackage > ii bacula-common9.6.7-7amd64network backup > service - common support files > ii bacula-common-mysql 9.6.7-7amd64network backup > service - MySQL common files > un bacula-common-pgsql (no description > available) > un bacula-common-sqlite3(no description > available) > ii bacula-console 9.6.7-7amd64network backup > service - text console > ii bacula-director 9.6.7-7amd64network backup > service - Director daemon > un bacula-director-database (no description > available) > ii bacula-director-mysql9.6.7-7all network backup > service - MySQL storage for Director > un bacula-director-pgsql(no description > available) > un bacula-director-sqlite3 (no description > available) > un bacula-doc (no description > available) > ii bacula-fd9.6.7-7amd64network backup > service - file daemon > ii bacula-sd9.6.7-7amd64network backup > service - storage daemon > un bacula-sd-mysql (no description > available) > un bacula-sd-pgsql (no description > available) > un bacula-sd-sqlite3(no description > available) > ii bacula-server9.6.7-7all network backup > service - server metapackage > ii bacularis2.7.0~bullseye all The Bacularis > WebGUI enables administration and managing Bacula jobs. > ii bacularis-apache22.7.0~bullseye all This package > provides the Apache configuration for Bacularis. > un bacularis-lighttpd (no description > available) > un bacularis-nginx (no description > available) > root@bacula:~# > > > I am finding the naming convention /description difficult to understand. > So, I have a bacularis web container running. It appears I need something > between the container and the director? but I cannot see what. > > regards > > Steven > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 05:17, Marcin Haba wrote: > >> Hello Steven, >> >> Of course, you don't need to uninstall anything. Bacula daemons stay >> where they are. Don't worry, nothing changes here. >> >> In that container image description is a sentence: >> >> "It can be used to connect external Bacularis API server(s) in containers >> or outside them." >> >> This "outside them" means that you can install Bacularis API in any way >> that you want, Docker image is only one of the ways. >> >> Reading your description for that, what you would like to have, the >> easiest is to install only one Bacularis using binary packages on the >> Bacula Director host. It contains the Bacularis Web and Bacularis API >> together, so you don't need to split it or install anything else, just this >> one Bacularis instance. The installation wizard, that you will see after >> installing, will lead you on all the configuration process. >> >> In case problems or questions, please let us know. Thanks! >> >> Best regards, >> Marcin Haba (gani) >> >> On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 09:22, steven wrote: >> >>> hi, >>> >>> Ok I am confused. The way I read it, >>> >>> - for File Daemons bacularis-api-fd, >>> - for Storage Daemons bacularis-api-sd, >>> - for Directors bacularis-api-dir. >>> >>> All have the particular bacula daemon built in?I dont need a daemon, >>> I already have all the daemons running and have been for 6 odd years >>> now. What I was hoping for was to have a web interface on top of Bacula. >>> The docker container is running on the bacula director so it is local >>> stuff. So I have to remove the bacula-director and add in the >>>
[Bacula-users] Install.sh error trying to install manually Bacularis
I’ve installed Bacula in a Freebsd Jail and all is well, Also installed Apache24, and the requisite php mods to run bacularis. I’ve followed the manual instructions to the letter but when I get to the install.sh step I get this error output : root@Bacula1:/usr/local/www/bacularis/protected/tools # sh ./install.sh -p /tmp/php-fpm.sock +===+ | Welcome in the Bacularis install script | +---+ | This script will help you to adjust privileges | | for Bacularis files and it will prepare | | configuration files for popular web servers. | +---+ ./install.sh: 34: Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting ")") root@Bacula1:/usr/local/www/bacularis/protected/tools # ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] connecting bacularis to an existing bacula setup
Google it seems does not like my email server...lets try again, sorry if we get a duplicate. Hi, I dont see a bacualris API to install? root@bacula:~# dpkg -l bacula* Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name VersionArchitecture Description +++--==--= ii bacula-bscan 9.6.7-7amd64network backup service - bscan tool ii bacula-client9.6.7-7all network backup service - client metapackage ii bacula-common9.6.7-7amd64network backup service - common support files ii bacula-common-mysql 9.6.7-7amd64network backup service - MySQL common files un bacula-common-pgsql (no description available) un bacula-common-sqlite3(no description available) ii bacula-console 9.6.7-7amd64network backup service - text console ii bacula-director 9.6.7-7amd64network backup service - Director daemon un bacula-director-database (no description available) ii bacula-director-mysql9.6.7-7all network backup service - MySQL storage for Director un bacula-director-pgsql(no description available) un bacula-director-sqlite3 (no description available) un bacula-doc (no description available) ii bacula-fd9.6.7-7amd64network backup service - file daemon ii bacula-sd9.6.7-7amd64network backup service - storage daemon un bacula-sd-mysql (no description available) un bacula-sd-pgsql (no description available) un bacula-sd-sqlite3(no description available) ii bacula-server9.6.7-7all network backup service - server metapackage ii bacularis2.7.0~bullseye all The Bacularis WebGUI enables administration and managing Bacula jobs. ii bacularis-apache22.7.0~bullseye all This package provides the Apache configuration for Bacularis. un bacularis-lighttpd (no description available) un bacularis-nginx (no description available) root@bacula:~# I am finding the naming convention /description difficult to understand. So, I have a bacularis web container running. It appears I need something between the container and the director? but I cannot see what. regards Steven On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 05:17, Marcin Haba wrote: > Hello Steven, > > Of course, you don't need to uninstall anything. Bacula daemons stay where > they are. Don't worry, nothing changes here. > > In that container image description is a sentence: > > "It can be used to connect external Bacularis API server(s) in containers > or outside them." > > This "outside them" means that you can install Bacularis API in any way > that you want, Docker image is only one of the ways. > > Reading your description for that, what you would like to have, the > easiest is to install only one Bacularis using binary packages on the > Bacula Director host. It contains the Bacularis Web and Bacularis API > together, so you don't need to split it or install anything else, just this > one Bacularis instance. The installation wizard, that you will see after > installing, will lead you on all the configuration process. > > In case problems or questions, please let us know. Thanks! > > Best regards, > Marcin Haba (gani) > > On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 09:22, steven wrote: > >> hi, >> >> Ok I am confused. The way I read it, >> >> - for File Daemons bacularis-api-fd, >> - for Storage Daemons bacularis-api-sd, >> - for Directors bacularis-api-dir. >> >> All have the particular bacula daemon built in?I dont need a daemon, >> I already have all the daemons running and have been for 6 odd years >> now. What I was hoping for was to have a web interface on top of Bacula. >> The docker container is running on the bacula director so it is local >> stuff. So I have to remove the bacula-director and add in the >> bacularis-api-dir instead? >> >> If I need to do serious alterations to the running setup, that is a step >> to far for me. >> >> >> regards >> >> Steven >> On 8/04/2024 7:07 pm, Marcin Haba wrote: >> >> Hello Steven, >> >> Thanks for your question and feedback after installing the bacularis-web >> container. I will try to explain it below. >> >> For your question if the Bacularis Web wizard wants a Bacularis API - yes >> Bacularis Web in this container connects to external Bacularis API. >> Description and purpose of each of these container images you can
Re: [Bacula-users] connecting bacularis to an existing bacula setup
Hi, I dont see a bacualris API to install? root@bacula:~# dpkg -l bacula* Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name VersionArchitecture Description +++--==--= ii bacula-bscan 9.6.7-7amd64network backup service - bscan tool ii bacula-client9.6.7-7all network backup service - client metapackage ii bacula-common9.6.7-7amd64network backup service - common support files ii bacula-common-mysql 9.6.7-7amd64network backup service - MySQL common files un bacula-common-pgsql (no description available) un bacula-common-sqlite3(no description available) ii bacula-console 9.6.7-7amd64network backup service - text console ii bacula-director 9.6.7-7amd64network backup service - Director daemon un bacula-director-database (no description available) ii bacula-director-mysql9.6.7-7all network backup service - MySQL storage for Director un bacula-director-pgsql(no description available) un bacula-director-sqlite3 (no description available) un bacula-doc (no description available) ii bacula-fd9.6.7-7amd64network backup service - file daemon ii bacula-sd9.6.7-7amd64network backup service - storage daemon un bacula-sd-mysql (no description available) un bacula-sd-pgsql (no description available) un bacula-sd-sqlite3(no description available) ii bacula-server9.6.7-7all network backup service - server metapackage ii bacularis2.7.0~bullseye all The Bacularis WebGUI enables administration and managing Bacula jobs. ii bacularis-apache22.7.0~bullseye all This package provides the Apache configuration for Bacularis. un bacularis-lighttpd (no description available) un bacularis-nginx (no description available) root@bacula:~# I am finding the naming convention difficult to understand. I have a bacularis webb container running. It appears I need something between the container and the director? On 2024-04-09 05:15, Marcin Haba wrote: Hello Steven, Of course, you don't need to uninstall anything. Bacula daemons stay where they are. Don't worry, nothing changes here. In that container image description is a sentence: "It can be used to connect external Bacularis API server(s) in containers or outside them." This "outside them" means that you can install Bacularis API in any way that you want, Docker image is only one of the ways. Reading your description for that, what you would like to have, the easiest is to install only one Bacularis using binary packages on the Bacula Director host. It contains the Bacularis Web and Bacularis API together, so you don't need to split it or install anything else, just this one Bacularis instance. The installation wizard, that you will see after installing, will lead you on all the configuration process. In case problems or questions, please let us know. Thanks! Best regards, Marcin Haba (gani) On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 09:22, steven wrote: hi, Ok I am confused. The way I read it, - for File Daemons bacularis-api-fd, - for Storage Daemons bacularis-api-sd, - for Directors bacularis-api-dir. All have the particular bacula daemon built in?I dont need a daemon, I already have all the daemons running and have been for 6 odd years now. What I was hoping for was to have a web interface on top of Bacula. The docker container is running on the bacula director so it is local stuff. So I have to remove the bacula-director and add in the bacularis-api-dir instead? If I need to do serious alterations to the running setup, that is a step to far for me. regards Steven On 8/04/2024 7:07 pm, Marcin Haba wrote: Hello Steven, Thanks for your question and feedback after installing the bacularis-web container. I will try to explain it below. For your question if the Bacularis Web wizard wants a Bacularis API - yes Bacularis Web in this container connects to external Bacularis API. Description and purpose of each of these container images you can find in the "About this image" section in each of the Bacularis Docker Hub repositories. This description for the 'bacularis-web' container is the following: It contains a pure the Bacularis web interface without API layer. It can be used to connect
Re: [Bacula-users] connecting bacularis to an existing bacula setup
Hello Steven, Of course, you don't need to uninstall anything. Bacula daemons stay where they are. Don't worry, nothing changes here. In that container image description is a sentence: "It can be used to connect external Bacularis API server(s) in containers or outside them." This "outside them" means that you can install Bacularis API in any way that you want, Docker image is only one of the ways. Reading your description for that, what you would like to have, the easiest is to install only one Bacularis using binary packages on the Bacula Director host. It contains the Bacularis Web and Bacularis API together, so you don't need to split it or install anything else, just this one Bacularis instance. The installation wizard, that you will see after installing, will lead you on all the configuration process. In case problems or questions, please let us know. Thanks! Best regards, Marcin Haba (gani) On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 09:22, steven wrote: > hi, > > Ok I am confused. The way I read it, > > - for File Daemons bacularis-api-fd, > - for Storage Daemons bacularis-api-sd, > - for Directors bacularis-api-dir. > > All have the particular bacula daemon built in?I dont need a daemon, I > already have all the daemons running and have been for 6 odd years now. > What I was hoping for was to have a web interface on top of Bacula. > The docker container is running on the bacula director so it is local > stuff. So I have to remove the bacula-director and add in the > bacularis-api-dir instead? > > If I need to do serious alterations to the running setup, that is a step > to far for me. > > > regards > > Steven > On 8/04/2024 7:07 pm, Marcin Haba wrote: > > Hello Steven, > > Thanks for your question and feedback after installing the bacularis-web > container. I will try to explain it below. > > For your question if the Bacularis Web wizard wants a Bacularis API - yes > Bacularis Web in this container connects to external Bacularis API. > Description and purpose of each of these container images you can find in > the "About this image" section in each of the Bacularis Docker Hub > repositories. This description for the 'bacularis-web' container is the > following: > > > It contains a pure the Bacularis web interface without API layer. It can > be used to connect external Bacularis API server(s) in containers or > outside them. If you would like to connect Bacularis API ran in containers, > you can use dedicated for this purpose images: > > - for File Daemons bacularis-api-fd, > - for Storage Daemons bacularis-api-sd, > - for Directors bacularis-api-dir. > > > The Bacularis Web to work needs at least one API host with bconsole and > catalog access (and Bacula configuration capability if needed). So you can > set up the Bacularis API in any way (installing binary packages, container, > Composer, tar archives) and then connect it using the wizard from the > bacularis-web container. > > Worth mentioning is that for the Bacula configuration part Bacularis API > needs access to Bacula config files so easier is to work with Bacularis API > instances outside the container. Otherwise you need to bind the Bacula > configuration paths to Bacularis API container or use Bacula config files > from Bacula in container. > > Your question also indicated me that this first step section needs to be > better explained in the documentation. I will try to prepare it soon. > > Thanks! > > Best regards, > Marcin Haba (gani) > > On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 07:16, steven wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Seeing the release I thought I would give bacularis a go.I have the >> bacularis-web docker container running but I cant see any documentation >> telling me how to connect it to my existing bacula setup. >> >> The wizard wants a baculum API? but this isnt explained. >> >> Is there any set by set explanation of how to connect the bacularis-web >> docker container to an existing bacula setup ? >> >> >> TY >> >> >> >> ___ >> Bacula-users mailing list >> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users >> > > > -- > > "Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his > friends." Jesus Christ > > "Większej miłości nikt nie ma nad tę, jak gdy kto życie swoje kładzie za > przyjaciół swoich." Jezus Chrystus > > ___ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > -- "Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends." Jesus Christ "Większej miłości nikt nie ma nad tę, jak gdy kto życie swoje kładzie za przyjaciół swoich." Jezus Chrystus ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] New release Bacularis 2.7.0
Hello Unkdef, In this case it might be good to do the catalog database tuning. For your MySQL database there is a great tool called MySQLTuner. You can find it here: https://github.com/major/MySQLTuner-perl Please follow on the advices given by MySQLTuner. Best regards, Marcin Haba (gani) On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 15:38, Unkdef unkdef wrote: > So, i update bacula to 15.0.2 and bacularis 2.7.0 but problem with slow > loading web interface exists. how to fix it ? > > > Marcin Haba 7 апреля 2024 г. 22:31:03 написал: > >> Hello Everybody, >> >> We are pleased to announce a new Bacularis version 2.7.0. This is a new >> feature and bug fix release. It provides two new functions: the network >> test between file daemon and storage daemon and also the advanced sudo >> settings. >> >> From the bug fixes side we fixed a few important bugs. >> >> New functions in 2.7.0: >> - Network test: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmxYW-eMkCo >> >> Useful links: >> Release announcement: >> https://bacularis.app/news/76/36/New-release-Bacularis-2.7.0 >> Documentation: https://bacularis.app/doc >> Online demo: https://demo.bacularis.app >> >> As always binary packages 2.7.0 for popular Linux distributions are >> available already in the package repositories. Docker container images >> 2.7.0 are available in the Docker Hub repositories. >> >> We wish you successful installations and upgrades. >> >> On behalf of the Bacularis Team >> Marcin Haba (gani) >> >> -- >> >> "Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his >> friends." Jesus Christ >> >> "Większej miłości nikt nie ma nad tę, jak gdy kto życie swoje kładzie za >> przyjaciół swoich." Jezus Chrystus >> >> ___ >> Bacula-users mailing list >> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users >> >> > -- "Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends." Jesus Christ "Większej miłości nikt nie ma nad tę, jak gdy kto życie swoje kładzie za przyjaciół swoich." Jezus Chrystus ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] New release Bacularis 2.7.0
So, i update bacula to 15.0.2 and bacularis 2.7.0 but problem with slow loading web interface exists. how to fix it ? Marcin Haba 7 апреля 2024 г. 22:31:03 написал: Hello Everybody, We are pleased to announce a new Bacularis version 2.7.0. This is a new feature and bug fix release. It provides two new functions: the network test between file daemon and storage daemon and also the advanced sudo settings. From the bug fixes side we fixed a few important bugs. New functions in 2.7.0: - Network test: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmxYW-eMkCo Useful links: Release announcement: https://bacularis.app/news/76/36/New-release-Bacularis-2.7.0 Documentation: https://bacularis.app/doc Online demo: https://demo.bacularis.app As always binary packages 2.7.0 for popular Linux distributions are available already in the package repositories. Docker container images 2.7.0 are available in the Docker Hub repositories. We wish you successful installations and upgrades. On behalf of the Bacularis Team Marcin Haba (gani) -- "Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends." Jesus Christ "Większej miłości nikt nie ma nad tę, jak gdy kto życie swoje kładzie za przyjaciół swoich." Jezus Chrystus ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Version of openssl supported (bacula with postgresql)
Hello Eduardo, On 4/8/24 09:57, Eduardo Rothe via Bacula-users wrote: While installing bacula-postgresql in fedora39 (package downloaded from the bacula repositories) I am getting the following messages: - nothing provides libcrypto.so.10()(64bit) needed by bacula-postgresql-15.0.2-24032211.el7.x86_64 from Bacula-Community> - nothing provides libssl.so.10()(64bit) needed by bacula-postgresql-15.0.2-24032211.el7.x86_64 from Bacula-Community I believe this is because bacula requires an older version of openssl. What is the latest version of openssl supported by bacula ? Can I infer openssl-1.0.* ? A very nice beginning of week to all Eduardo bacula 15.0.2 postgresql 15.6 openssl 3.1.1fedora 39 I would not try to install Centos7 packages to a Fedora system, it's two different things. In this case, you can take the Fedora version if it's recent (it should), or compile it yourself, the recent OpenSSL should be ok with some warnings about their constant need of breaking their API. Hope it helps! Best Regards, Eric ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] MD5 Fatal Error
Hello, My backups were working fine but yesterday I had a problem with one of my jobs which apparently has a problem with MD5. Here are the job logs: pbckall004-dir JobId 5387: Error: Unable to flush file records! pbckall004-dir JobId 5387: Fatal error: Error detected between digest[466172]="zxdWYCUt+beniiSsYO+d6w" and name[466171]="/var/opt/gitlab/gitlab-rails/shared/artifacts/12/53/1253e9373e781b7500266caa55150e08e210bc8cd8cc70d89985e3600155e860/2024_04_01/" pbckall004-dir JobId 5387: Fatal error: MD5 digest not same FileIndex=466172 as attributes FI=466171 pbckall004-sd JobId 5387: Sending spooled attrs to the Director. Despooling 237,369,878 bytes ... pbckall004-sd JobId 5387: Elapsed time=02:20:45, Transfer rate=7.303 M Bytes/second pbckall004-sd JobId 5387: End of Volume "Vol0197" at addr=898996114 on device "DEV-dedup-DRV19" (/zfs/bacula). pbckall004-sd JobId 5387: Forward spacing Volume "Vol0197" to addr=893762478 pbckall004-sd JobId 5387: Ready to read from volume "Vol0197" on Aligned device "DEV-dedup-DRV19" (/zfs/bacula). pbckall004-sd JobId 5387: End of Volume "Vol0165" at addr=515616168 on device "DEV-dedup-DRV19" (/zfs/bacula). pbckall004-sd JobId 5387: New volume "Vol0159" mounted on device "DEV-dedup-DRV1" (/zfs/bacula) at 07-avril-2024 18:22. pbckall004-sd JobId 5387: Recycled volume "Vol0159" on Aligned device "DEV-dedup-DRV1" (/zfs/bacula), all previous data lost. pbckall004-dir JobId 5387: Using Volume "Vol0159" from 'Scratch' pool. pbckall004-dir JobId 5387: Recycled volume "Vol0159" pbckall004-dir JobId 5387: All records pruned from Volume "Vol0131"; marking it "Purged" pbckall004-dir JobId 5387: New Pool is: Scratch pbckall004-dir JobId 5387: There are no more Jobs associated with Volume "Vol0131". Marking it purged. pbckall004-dir JobId 5387: All records pruned from Volume "Vol0124"; marking it "Purged" pbckall004-dir JobId 5387: New Pool is: Scratch pbckall004-dir JobId 5387: There are no more Jobs associated with Volume "Vol0124". Marking it purged. pbckall004-dir JobId 5387: All records pruned from Volume "Vol0184"; marking it "Purged" pbckall004-dir JobId 5387: New Pool is: Scratch pbckall004-dir JobId 5387: There are no more Jobs associated with Volume "Vol0184". Marking it purged. pbckall004-dir JobId 5387: All records pruned from Volume "Vol0186"; marking it "Purged" pbckall004-dir JobId 5387: New Pool is: Scratch pbckall004-dir JobId 5387: There are no more Jobs associated with Volume "Vol0186". Marking it purged. pbckall004-dir JobId 5387: All records pruned from Volume "Vol0159"; marking it "Purged" pbckall004-dir JobId 5387: New Pool is: Scratch pbckall004-dir JobId 5387: There are no more Jobs associated with Volume "Vol0159". Marking it purged. pbckall004-sd JobId 5387: End of medium on Volume "Vol0179" Bytes=53,686,844,017 Blocks=409,600 at 07-avril-2024 18:22. pbckall004-sd JobId 5387: User defined maximum volume size 53,687,091,200 will be exceeded on device "DEV-dedup-DRV1" (/zfs/bacula). Marking Volume "Vol0179" as Full. I have no idea how this could have happened or how to resolve the error. Any helps will be great. Regards, ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Version of openssl supported (bacula with postgresql)
While installing bacula-postgresql in fedora39 (package downloaded from the bacula repositories) I am getting the following messages: > - nothing provides libcrypto.so.10()(64bit) needed by > bacula-postgresql-15.0.2-24032211.el7.x86_64 from Bacula-Community> - nothing > provides libssl.so.10()(64bit) needed by > bacula-postgresql-15.0.2-24032211.el7.x86_64 from Bacula-Community I believe this is because bacula requires an older version of openssl. What is the latest version of openssl supported by bacula ? Can I infer openssl-1.0.* ? A very nice beginning of week to all Eduardo bacula 15.0.2 postgresql 15.6 openssl 3.1.1fedora 39 ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] connecting bacularis to an existing bacula setup
hi, Ok I am confused. The way I read it, - for File Daemons bacularis-api-fd, - for Storage Daemons bacularis-api-sd, - for Directors bacularis-api-dir. All have the particular bacula daemon built in? I dont need a daemon, I already have all the daemons running and have been for 6 odd years now. What I was hoping for was to have a web interface on top of Bacula. The docker container is running on the bacula director so it is local stuff. So I have to remove the bacula-director and add in the bacularis-api-dir instead? If I need to do serious alterations to the running setup, that is a step to far for me. regards Steven On 8/04/2024 7:07 pm, Marcin Haba wrote: Hello Steven, Thanks for your question and feedback after installing the bacularis-web container. I will try to explain it below. For your question if the Bacularis Web wizard wants a Bacularis API - yes Bacularis Web in this container connects to external Bacularis API. Description and purpose of each of these container images you can find in the "About this image" section in each of the Bacularis Docker Hub repositories. This description for the 'bacularis-web' container is the following: It contains a pure the Bacularis web interface without API layer. It can be used to connect external Bacularis API server(s) in containers or outside them. If you would like to connect Bacularis API ran in containers, you can use dedicated for this purpose images: - for File Daemons bacularis-api-fd, - for Storage Daemons bacularis-api-sd, - for Directors bacularis-api-dir. The Bacularis Web to work needs at least one API host with bconsole and catalog access (and Bacula configuration capability if needed). So you can set up the Bacularis API in any way (installing binary packages, container, Composer, tar archives) and then connect it using the wizard from the bacularis-web container. Worth mentioning is that for the Bacula configuration part Bacularis API needs access to Bacula config files so easier is to work with Bacularis API instances outside the container. Otherwise you need to bind the Bacula configuration paths to Bacularis API container or use Bacula config files from Bacula in container. Your question also indicated me that this first step section needs to be better explained in the documentation. I will try to prepare it soon. Thanks! Best regards, Marcin Haba (gani) On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 07:16, steven wrote: Hi, Seeing the release I thought I would give bacularis a go. I have the bacularis-web docker container running but I cant see any documentation telling me how to connect it to my existing bacula setup. The wizard wants a baculum API? but this isnt explained. Is there any set by set explanation of how to connect the bacularis-web docker container to an existing bacula setup ? TY ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- "Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends." Jesus Christ "Większej miłości nikt nie ma nad tę, jak gdy kto życie swoje kładzie za przyjaciół swoich." Jezus Chrystus___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] New release Bacularis 2.7.0
i update bacula 13.0.4 to bacula 15.0.2 and backup speed rate fall down from 95mb/s to 30mb/s , how to fix it? Marcin Haba 7 апреля 2024 г. 22:31:03 написал: Hello Everybody, We are pleased to announce a new Bacularis version 2.7.0. This is a new feature and bug fix release. It provides two new functions: the network test between file daemon and storage daemon and also the advanced sudo settings. From the bug fixes side we fixed a few important bugs. New functions in 2.7.0: - Network test: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmxYW-eMkCo Useful links: Release announcement: https://bacularis.app/news/76/36/New-release-Bacularis-2.7.0 Documentation: https://bacularis.app/doc Online demo: https://demo.bacularis.app As always binary packages 2.7.0 for popular Linux distributions are available already in the package repositories. Docker container images 2.7.0 are available in the Docker Hub repositories. We wish you successful installations and upgrades. On behalf of the Bacularis Team Marcin Haba (gani) -- "Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends." Jesus Christ "Większej miłości nikt nie ma nad tę, jak gdy kto życie swoje kładzie za przyjaciół swoich." Jezus Chrystus ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] connecting bacularis to an existing bacula setup
Hello Steven, Thanks for your question and feedback after installing the bacularis-web container. I will try to explain it below. For your question if the Bacularis Web wizard wants a Bacularis API - yes Bacularis Web in this container connects to external Bacularis API. Description and purpose of each of these container images you can find in the "About this image" section in each of the Bacularis Docker Hub repositories. This description for the 'bacularis-web' container is the following: It contains a pure the Bacularis web interface without API layer. It can be used to connect external Bacularis API server(s) in containers or outside them. If you would like to connect Bacularis API ran in containers, you can use dedicated for this purpose images: - for File Daemons bacularis-api-fd, - for Storage Daemons bacularis-api-sd, - for Directors bacularis-api-dir. The Bacularis Web to work needs at least one API host with bconsole and catalog access (and Bacula configuration capability if needed). So you can set up the Bacularis API in any way (installing binary packages, container, Composer, tar archives) and then connect it using the wizard from the bacularis-web container. Worth mentioning is that for the Bacula configuration part Bacularis API needs access to Bacula config files so easier is to work with Bacularis API instances outside the container. Otherwise you need to bind the Bacula configuration paths to Bacularis API container or use Bacula config files from Bacula in container. Your question also indicated me that this first step section needs to be better explained in the documentation. I will try to prepare it soon. Thanks! Best regards, Marcin Haba (gani) On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 07:16, steven wrote: > Hi, > > Seeing the release I thought I would give bacularis a go.I have the > bacularis-web docker container running but I cant see any documentation > telling me how to connect it to my existing bacula setup. > > The wizard wants a baculum API? but this isnt explained. > > Is there any set by set explanation of how to connect the bacularis-web > docker container to an existing bacula setup ? > > > TY > > > > ___ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > -- "Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends." Jesus Christ "Większej miłości nikt nie ma nad tę, jak gdy kto życie swoje kładzie za przyjaciół swoich." Jezus Chrystus ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
