Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Beta release 7.9.2
I can confirm that 7.9.3 builds also fine on Solaris 10 x64 using GCC. Best regards, Daniel Am 07.06.17 um 13:15 schrieb Gary R. Schmidt: On 07/06/2017 20:43, Gary R. Schmidt wrote: On 07/06/2017 17:59, Kern Sibbald wrote: Hello, Bacula does not require g++ to build, but you may need to adjust things. For example, on FreeBSD Bacula is built with clang. On Solaris you can use the Solaris compiler. I don't know what Developer Studio is, so I cannot say. However, you will need to have GNU tools installed. Oracle Developer Studio is the current name for the Solaris Compiler suite, what used to be Sun Studio, and before that Workshop and so on. I will pull down 7.9.3 and see how that goes. After manually correcting the lz4.c file to use pack(1)/pack(), 7.9.3 builds on Solaris 10 x64, using Developer Studio 12.3. I will look into running the regression tests, but I need to make a separate database first. (And steal some time!) Cheers, GaryB-) -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Beta release 7.9.2
On 07/06/2017 20:43, Gary R. Schmidt wrote: On 07/06/2017 17:59, Kern Sibbald wrote: Hello, Bacula does not require g++ to build, but you may need to adjust things. For example, on FreeBSD Bacula is built with clang. On Solaris you can use the Solaris compiler. I don't know what Developer Studio is, so I cannot say. However, you will need to have GNU tools installed. Oracle Developer Studio is the current name for the Solaris Compiler suite, what used to be Sun Studio, and before that Workshop and so on. I will pull down 7.9.3 and see how that goes. After manually correcting the lz4.c file to use pack(1)/pack(), 7.9.3 builds on Solaris 10 x64, using Developer Studio 12.3. I will look into running the regression tests, but I need to make a separate database first. (And steal some time!) Cheers, GaryB-) -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Beta release 7.9.2
On 07/06/2017 17:59, Kern Sibbald wrote: Hello, Bacula does not require g++ to build, but you may need to adjust things. For example, on FreeBSD Bacula is built with clang. On Solaris you can use the Solaris compiler. I don't know what Developer Studio is, so I cannot say. However, you will need to have GNU tools installed. Oracle Developer Studio is the current name for the Solaris Compiler suite, what used to be Sun Studio, and before that Workshop and so on. I will pull down 7.9.3 and see how that goes. Cheers, GaryB-) -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Beta release 7.9.2
Hi,
with these changes version 7.9 can be successfully compiled on Solaris
11 x64 using GCC.
@Gary R. Schmidt: It should now also work on Solaris 10 but I will check
it also.
Best regards,
Daniel
Am 07.06.17 um 10:45 schrieb Kern Sibbald:
Hello,
I have just pushed several fixes for Solaris to the www.bacula.org
repo -- Branch-7.9
1. Fix the missing semi-colon
2. Remove vestiges of crc32_bad, which is not needed and should not be
used.
3. I have also included several other patches ...
Best regards,
Kern
On 06/07/2017 10:32 AM, Daniel Heitepriem wrote:
Hi everyone,
I can second this error for Solaris 11.3 x64 using GCC 4.8. The
"bsys.c" error can be solved by adding the missing semicolon in file
"bacula-7.9.2/src/lib/bsys.c" line 1218.
Best regards,
Daniel Heitepriem
Am 07.06.17 um 10:12 schrieb Kern Sibbald:
Hello,
On 06/07/2017 09:52 AM, Gary R. Schmidt wrote:
Trying to build on Solaris 10 x64, using GCC 5.2.0.
As expected:
Compiling bsys.c
bsys.c: In function 'int baccept(int, sockaddr*, socklen_t*)':
bsys.c:1219:7: error: expected ',' or ';' before 'if'
if (fcntl(fd, F_SETFD, fcntl(fd, F_GETFD) | FD_CLOEXEC) < 0) {
^
Well, I really do not like seeing an fnctl as an argument to fnctl
as it makes it harder to read (you might guess that I am not the
author of that code).
However, I don't immediately see the problem. Could you be more
explict?
Fix, and continue:
Linking bacula-sd ...
.../BETA/bacula-7.9.2/libtool --silent --tag=CXX
--mode=link /opt/csw/bin/g++ -Lpath_to_mysql/lib/mysql
-Rpath_to_mysql/lib/mysql -L/opt/csw/lib -R/opt/csw/lib -L.
-L../lib -o bacula-sd stored.o append.o authenticate.o dircmd.o
fd_cmds.o job.o hello.o status.o vbackup.o stored_conf.o global.o
-lz \
-lbacsd -lbaccfg -lbac -lm -lpthread -lresolv
-lnsl -lsocket -lxnet -lintl -lresolv -lrt \
/opt/csw/lib/libintl.so -R/opt/csw/lib -lssl -lcrypto
ld: warning: file /opt/csw/lib/libintl.so: attempted
multiple inclusion of file
ld: warning: file /opt/csw/lib/libstdc++.so: attempted
multiple inclusion of file
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
bcrc32_bad(unsigned char*, int)
/home/garys/src/bacula/BETA/bacula-7.9.2/src/stored/.libs/libbacsd.so
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to
.libs/bacula-sd
Interesting, bcrc32_bad is in ./src/lib/protos.h, but not defined
anywhere.
This is probably a piece pulled in from the Enterprise version that
I failed to notice.
Unfortunately, bcrc32_bad is referenced in src/stored/block_util.c,
but only for Solaris. I did not include the source for bcrc32_bad,
because I thought it was not needed/used. I will have to check with
the author of the code. For the current time, if you want to build
and link correctly, I recommend deleting the blocks of code that are
#ifdef on Solaris. Sorry about that slip up.
Best regards,
Kern
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Beta release 7.9.2
Hello Daniel,
Great! Thanks for the really fast testing :-)
Best regards,
Kern
On 06/07/2017 11:02 AM, Daniel Heitepriem wrote:
Hi,
with these changes version 7.9 can be successfully compiled on Solaris
11 x64 using GCC.
@Gary R. Schmidt: It should now also work on Solaris 10 but I will
check it also.
Best regards,
Daniel
Am 07.06.17 um 10:45 schrieb Kern Sibbald:
Hello,
I have just pushed several fixes for Solaris to the www.bacula.org
repo -- Branch-7.9
1. Fix the missing semi-colon
2. Remove vestiges of crc32_bad, which is not needed and should not
be used.
3. I have also included several other patches ...
Best regards,
Kern
On 06/07/2017 10:32 AM, Daniel Heitepriem wrote:
Hi everyone,
I can second this error for Solaris 11.3 x64 using GCC 4.8. The
"bsys.c" error can be solved by adding the missing semicolon in file
"bacula-7.9.2/src/lib/bsys.c" line 1218.
Best regards,
Daniel Heitepriem
Am 07.06.17 um 10:12 schrieb Kern Sibbald:
Hello,
On 06/07/2017 09:52 AM, Gary R. Schmidt wrote:
Trying to build on Solaris 10 x64, using GCC 5.2.0.
As expected:
Compiling bsys.c
bsys.c: In function 'int baccept(int, sockaddr*, socklen_t*)':
bsys.c:1219:7: error: expected ',' or ';' before 'if'
if (fcntl(fd, F_SETFD, fcntl(fd, F_GETFD) | FD_CLOEXEC) < 0) {
^
Well, I really do not like seeing an fnctl as an argument to fnctl
as it makes it harder to read (you might guess that I am not the
author of that code).
However, I don't immediately see the problem. Could you be more
explict?
Fix, and continue:
Linking bacula-sd ...
.../BETA/bacula-7.9.2/libtool --silent --tag=CXX
--mode=link /opt/csw/bin/g++ -Lpath_to_mysql/lib/mysql
-Rpath_to_mysql/lib/mysql -L/opt/csw/lib -R/opt/csw/lib -L.
-L../lib -o bacula-sd stored.o append.o authenticate.o dircmd.o
fd_cmds.o job.o hello.o status.o vbackup.o stored_conf.o global.o
-lz \
-lbacsd -lbaccfg -lbac -lm -lpthread -lresolv
-lnsl -lsocket -lxnet -lintl -lresolv -lrt \
/opt/csw/lib/libintl.so -R/opt/csw/lib -lssl -lcrypto
ld: warning: file /opt/csw/lib/libintl.so: attempted
multiple inclusion of file
ld: warning: file /opt/csw/lib/libstdc++.so: attempted
multiple inclusion of file
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
bcrc32_bad(unsigned char*, int)
/home/garys/src/bacula/BETA/bacula-7.9.2/src/stored/.libs/libbacsd.so
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to
.libs/bacula-sd
Interesting, bcrc32_bad is in ./src/lib/protos.h, but not defined
anywhere.
This is probably a piece pulled in from the Enterprise version that
I failed to notice.
Unfortunately, bcrc32_bad is referenced in src/stored/block_util.c,
but only for Solaris. I did not include the source for bcrc32_bad,
because I thought it was not needed/used. I will have to check
with the author of the code. For the current time, if you want to
build and link correctly, I recommend deleting the blocks of code
that are #ifdef on Solaris. Sorry about that slip up.
Best regards,
Kern
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Beta release 7.9.2
Hello,
I have just pushed several fixes for Solaris to the www.bacula.org repo
-- Branch-7.9
1. Fix the missing semi-colon
2. Remove vestiges of crc32_bad, which is not needed and should not be used.
3. I have also included several other patches ...
Best regards,
Kern
On 06/07/2017 10:32 AM, Daniel Heitepriem wrote:
Hi everyone,
I can second this error for Solaris 11.3 x64 using GCC 4.8. The
"bsys.c" error can be solved by adding the missing semicolon in file
"bacula-7.9.2/src/lib/bsys.c" line 1218.
Best regards,
Daniel Heitepriem
Am 07.06.17 um 10:12 schrieb Kern Sibbald:
Hello,
On 06/07/2017 09:52 AM, Gary R. Schmidt wrote:
Trying to build on Solaris 10 x64, using GCC 5.2.0.
As expected:
Compiling bsys.c
bsys.c: In function 'int baccept(int, sockaddr*, socklen_t*)':
bsys.c:1219:7: error: expected ',' or ';' before 'if'
if (fcntl(fd, F_SETFD, fcntl(fd, F_GETFD) | FD_CLOEXEC) < 0) {
^
Well, I really do not like seeing an fnctl as an argument to fnctl as
it makes it harder to read (you might guess that I am not the author
of that code).
However, I don't immediately see the problem. Could you be more
explict?
Fix, and continue:
Linking bacula-sd ...
.../BETA/bacula-7.9.2/libtool --silent --tag=CXX --mode=link
/opt/csw/bin/g++ -Lpath_to_mysql/lib/mysql
-Rpath_to_mysql/lib/mysql -L/opt/csw/lib -R/opt/csw/lib -L. -L../lib
-o bacula-sd stored.o append.o authenticate.o dircmd.o fd_cmds.o
job.o hello.o status.o vbackup.o stored_conf.o global.o -lz \
-lbacsd -lbaccfg -lbac -lm -lpthread -lresolv -lnsl
-lsocket -lxnet -lintl -lresolv -lrt \
/opt/csw/lib/libintl.so -R/opt/csw/lib -lssl -lcrypto
ld: warning: file /opt/csw/lib/libintl.so: attempted
multiple inclusion of file
ld: warning: file /opt/csw/lib/libstdc++.so: attempted
multiple inclusion of file
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
bcrc32_bad(unsigned char*, int)
/home/garys/src/bacula/BETA/bacula-7.9.2/src/stored/.libs/libbacsd.so
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to
.libs/bacula-sd
Interesting, bcrc32_bad is in ./src/lib/protos.h, but not defined
anywhere.
This is probably a piece pulled in from the Enterprise version that I
failed to notice.
Unfortunately, bcrc32_bad is referenced in src/stored/block_util.c,
but only for Solaris. I did not include the source for bcrc32_bad,
because I thought it was not needed/used. I will have to check with
the author of the code. For the current time, if you want to build
and link correctly, I recommend deleting the blocks of code that are
#ifdef on Solaris. Sorry about that slip up.
Best regards,
Kern
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Beta release 7.9.2
Hi everyone,
I can second this error for Solaris 11.3 x64 using GCC 4.8. The "bsys.c"
error can be solved by adding the missing semicolon in file
"bacula-7.9.2/src/lib/bsys.c" line 1218.
Best regards,
Daniel Heitepriem
Am 07.06.17 um 10:12 schrieb Kern Sibbald:
Hello,
On 06/07/2017 09:52 AM, Gary R. Schmidt wrote:
Trying to build on Solaris 10 x64, using GCC 5.2.0.
As expected:
Compiling bsys.c
bsys.c: In function 'int baccept(int, sockaddr*, socklen_t*)':
bsys.c:1219:7: error: expected ',' or ';' before 'if'
if (fcntl(fd, F_SETFD, fcntl(fd, F_GETFD) | FD_CLOEXEC) < 0) {
^
Well, I really do not like seeing an fnctl as an argument to fnctl as
it makes it harder to read (you might guess that I am not the author
of that code).
However, I don't immediately see the problem. Could you be more explict?
Fix, and continue:
Linking bacula-sd ...
.../BETA/bacula-7.9.2/libtool --silent --tag=CXX --mode=link
/opt/csw/bin/g++ -Lpath_to_mysql/lib/mysql -Rpath_to_mysql/lib/mysql
-L/opt/csw/lib -R/opt/csw/lib -L. -L../lib -o bacula-sd stored.o
append.o authenticate.o dircmd.o fd_cmds.o job.o hello.o status.o
vbackup.o stored_conf.o global.o -lz \
-lbacsd -lbaccfg -lbac -lm -lpthread -lresolv -lnsl
-lsocket -lxnet -lintl -lresolv -lrt \
/opt/csw/lib/libintl.so -R/opt/csw/lib -lssl -lcrypto
ld: warning: file /opt/csw/lib/libintl.so: attempted multiple
inclusion of file
ld: warning: file /opt/csw/lib/libstdc++.so: attempted
multiple inclusion of file
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
bcrc32_bad(unsigned char*, int)
/home/garys/src/bacula/BETA/bacula-7.9.2/src/stored/.libs/libbacsd.so
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to
.libs/bacula-sd
Interesting, bcrc32_bad is in ./src/lib/protos.h, but not defined
anywhere.
This is probably a piece pulled in from the Enterprise version that I
failed to notice.
Unfortunately, bcrc32_bad is referenced in src/stored/block_util.c,
but only for Solaris. I did not include the source for bcrc32_bad,
because I thought it was not needed/used. I will have to check with
the author of the code. For the current time, if you want to build and
link correctly, I recommend deleting the blocks of code that are
#ifdef on Solaris. Sorry about that slip up.
Best regards,
Kern
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Beta release 7.9.2
Hello,
On 06/07/2017 09:52 AM, Gary R. Schmidt wrote:
Trying to build on Solaris 10 x64, using GCC 5.2.0.
As expected:
Compiling bsys.c
bsys.c: In function 'int baccept(int, sockaddr*, socklen_t*)':
bsys.c:1219:7: error: expected ',' or ';' before 'if'
if (fcntl(fd, F_SETFD, fcntl(fd, F_GETFD) | FD_CLOEXEC) < 0) {
^
Well, I really do not like seeing an fnctl as an argument to fnctl as it
makes it harder to read (you might guess that I am not the author of
that code).
However, I don't immediately see the problem. Could you be more explict?
Fix, and continue:
Linking bacula-sd ...
.../BETA/bacula-7.9.2/libtool --silent --tag=CXX --mode=link
/opt/csw/bin/g++ -Lpath_to_mysql/lib/mysql -Rpath_to_mysql/lib/mysql
-L/opt/csw/lib -R/opt/csw/lib -L. -L../lib -o bacula-sd stored.o
append.o authenticate.o dircmd.o fd_cmds.o job.o hello.o status.o
vbackup.o stored_conf.o global.o -lz \
-lbacsd -lbaccfg -lbac -lm -lpthread -lresolv -lnsl
-lsocket -lxnet -lintl -lresolv -lrt \
/opt/csw/lib/libintl.so -R/opt/csw/lib -lssl -lcrypto
ld: warning: file /opt/csw/lib/libintl.so: attempted multiple
inclusion of file
ld: warning: file /opt/csw/lib/libstdc++.so: attempted
multiple inclusion of file
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
bcrc32_bad(unsigned char*, int)
/home/garys/src/bacula/BETA/bacula-7.9.2/src/stored/.libs/libbacsd.so
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to
.libs/bacula-sd
Interesting, bcrc32_bad is in ./src/lib/protos.h, but not defined
anywhere.
This is probably a piece pulled in from the Enterprise version that I
failed to notice.
Unfortunately, bcrc32_bad is referenced in src/stored/block_util.c, but
only for Solaris. I did not include the source for bcrc32_bad, because
I thought it was not needed/used. I will have to check with the author
of the code. For the current time, if you want to build and link
correctly, I recommend deleting the blocks of code that are #ifdef on
Solaris. Sorry about that slip up.
Best regards,
Kern
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Beta release 7.9.2
Hello, Bacula does not require g++ to build, but you may need to adjust things. For example, on FreeBSD Bacula is built with clang. On Solaris you can use the Solaris compiler. I don't know what Developer Studio is, so I cannot say. However, you will need to have GNU tools installed. See comments below ... On 06/07/2017 09:17 AM, Gary R. Schmidt wrote: On 2017-06-06 21:57, Kern Sibbald wrote: Hello, This is to inform you that we have release Bacula BETA version 7.9.2 Hi Kern, Trying to build on Solaris 10 x64, using Developer Studio 12.3. Can't disable libtool - oh great, can't work out what is going on underneath, just ducky. Yes, we rely on libtool. It is complicated, but it is less complicated than trying to have different linking on each different OS. It is portable in the sense that gnu tools are everywhere. Configure: ./configure \ CC=cc CXX=CC \ CFLAGS="-g -O" \ LDFLAGS="-Lpath_to/lib/mysql -Rpath_to/lib/mysql" \ ... --with-mysql=path_to_mysql \ --enable-smartalloc \ --enable-batch-insert \ ... I have removed the options that just set the prefix and names of things and so on. ... checking term.h usability... no checking term.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: term.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: term.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: term.h: see the Autoconf documentation configure: WARNING: term.h: section "Present But Cannot Be Compiled" configure: WARNING: term.h: proceeding with the compiler's result checking for term.h... no ... The real problem is that you shouldn't be including term.h on it's own, you should use curses.h. Making it: Requires GNU make to build - portable? Oh yes, it builds on Fedora Core *and* Ubuntu. It builds on Mac OSX, Windows, FreeBSD, Solaris and others. gmake[1]: Entering directory `.../bacula/BETA/bacula-7.9.2/src/lib' Compiling bsys.c "../lib/bsock.h", line 293: Warning: Identifier expected instead of "}". "../lib/bsock.h", line 311: Warning: Identifier expected instead of "}". Sigh. Trailing ',' on the last element in a struct. Yes, I know the new standards allow it. "bsys.c", line 1219: Error: Use ";" to terminate declarations. Oh, line 1218: int tmp_errno = errno How did that one get through? This is brand new code, and apparently is not enabled on Linux. Thanks for pointing it out. I have fixed it in the source. Okay, fix this lot, try again... Ignoring warnings for the moment, next! Compiling lz4.c "lz4.c", line 174: Error: Syntax error in pragma. "lz4.c", line 174: Error: Missing ')' in #pragma. "lz4.c", line 174: Error: Syntax error in pragma. "lz4.c", line 182: Error: Syntax error in pragma. "lz4.c", line 182: Error: Missing ')' in #pragma. "lz4.c", line 182: Error: Syntax error in pragma. So, what's at these lines... You will have to ask the lz4 guys, but I admit, it looks pretty ugly. #if !defined(LZ4_FORCE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) && !defined(__GNUC__) # pragma pack(push, 1) #endif ... #if !defined(LZ4_FORCE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) && !defined(__GNUC__) # pragma pack(pop) #endif That's a new one, a pragma that pushes and pops state, not part of 12.3, nor part of 12.5. I wonder if it's in 12.6??? No, I wonder what compiler supplies it? Should probably be, unless there is a test for push/pop?: #if !defined(LZ4_FORCE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) && !defined(__GNUC__) # pragma pack(1) #endif ... #if !defined(LZ4_FORCE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) && !defined(__GNUC__) # pragma pack() #endif Giving up at this point, I will try with GCC 5.2.0 after I send this. You will probably have better luck with gcc. I have not tried building on Solaris recently, so you will undoubtedly face a few goof ups. This is a BETA release, so these problems do not surprise me, though I certainly would rather not have them. Thanks for testing this new version. Best regards, Kern -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Beta release 7.9.2
Trying to build on Solaris 10 x64, using GCC 5.2.0.
As expected:
Compiling bsys.c
bsys.c: In function 'int baccept(int, sockaddr*, socklen_t*)':
bsys.c:1219:7: error: expected ',' or ';' before 'if'
if (fcntl(fd, F_SETFD, fcntl(fd, F_GETFD) | FD_CLOEXEC) < 0) {
^
Fix, and continue:
Linking bacula-sd ...
.../BETA/bacula-7.9.2/libtool --silent --tag=CXX --mode=link
/opt/csw/bin/g++ -Lpath_to_mysql/lib/mysql -Rpath_to_mysql/lib/mysql
-L/opt/csw/lib -R/opt/csw/lib -L. -L../lib -o bacula-sd stored.o
append.o authenticate.o dircmd.o fd_cmds.o job.o hello.o status.o
vbackup.o stored_conf.o global.o -lz \
-lbacsd -lbaccfg -lbac -lm -lpthread -lresolv -lnsl
-lsocket -lxnet -lintl -lresolv -lrt \
/opt/csw/lib/libintl.so -R/opt/csw/lib -lssl -lcrypto
ld: warning: file /opt/csw/lib/libintl.so: attempted multiple
inclusion of file
ld: warning: file /opt/csw/lib/libstdc++.so: attempted multiple
inclusion of file
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
bcrc32_bad(unsigned char*, int)
/home/garys/src/bacula/BETA/bacula-7.9.2/src/stored/.libs/libbacsd.so
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to
.libs/bacula-sd
Interesting, bcrc32_bad is in ./src/lib/protos.h, but not defined
anywhere.
Cheers,
GaryB-)
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Beta release 7.9.2
On 2017-06-06 21:57, Kern Sibbald wrote: Hello, This is to inform you that we have release Bacula BETA version 7.9.2 Hi Kern, Trying to build on Solaris 10 x64, using Developer Studio 12.3. Can't disable libtool - oh great, can't work out what is going on underneath, just ducky. Configure: ./configure \ CC=cc CXX=CC \ CFLAGS="-g -O" \ LDFLAGS="-Lpath_to/lib/mysql -Rpath_to/lib/mysql" \ ... --with-mysql=path_to_mysql \ --enable-smartalloc \ --enable-batch-insert \ ... I have removed the options that just set the prefix and names of things and so on. ... checking term.h usability... no checking term.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: term.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: term.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: term.h: see the Autoconf documentation configure: WARNING: term.h: section "Present But Cannot Be Compiled" configure: WARNING: term.h: proceeding with the compiler's result checking for term.h... no ... The real problem is that you shouldn't be including term.h on it's own, you should use curses.h. Making it: Requires GNU make to build - portable? Oh yes, it builds on Fedora Core *and* Ubuntu. gmake[1]: Entering directory `.../bacula/BETA/bacula-7.9.2/src/lib' Compiling bsys.c "../lib/bsock.h", line 293: Warning: Identifier expected instead of "}". "../lib/bsock.h", line 311: Warning: Identifier expected instead of "}". Sigh. Trailing ',' on the last element in a struct. Yes, I know the new standards allow it. "bsys.c", line 1219: Error: Use ";" to terminate declarations. Oh, line 1218: int tmp_errno = errno How did that one get through? Okay, fix this lot, try again... Ignoring warnings for the moment, next! Compiling lz4.c "lz4.c", line 174: Error: Syntax error in pragma. "lz4.c", line 174: Error: Missing ')' in #pragma. "lz4.c", line 174: Error: Syntax error in pragma. "lz4.c", line 182: Error: Syntax error in pragma. "lz4.c", line 182: Error: Missing ')' in #pragma. "lz4.c", line 182: Error: Syntax error in pragma. So, what's at these lines... #if !defined(LZ4_FORCE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) && !defined(__GNUC__) # pragma pack(push, 1) #endif ... #if !defined(LZ4_FORCE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) && !defined(__GNUC__) # pragma pack(pop) #endif That's a new one, a pragma that pushes and pops state, not part of 12.3, nor part of 12.5. I wonder if it's in 12.6??? No, I wonder what compiler supplies it? Should probably be, unless there is a test for push/pop?: #if !defined(LZ4_FORCE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) && !defined(__GNUC__) # pragma pack(1) #endif ... #if !defined(LZ4_FORCE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) && !defined(__GNUC__) # pragma pack() #endif Giving up at this point, I will try with GCC 5.2.0 after I send this. Cheers, GaryB-) -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
