Re: [Bacula-users] Avoiding monthly full backup ?

2006-04-02 Thread Alan Brown

On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, [windows-1252] Simon }ekar wrote:

So I'm wondering, do I really need to do a Full backup of my servers monthly 
or is there a way, to make a full backup out of previous full backup + 
incrementals and then do an incremental backup on these calculated full 
backup ?


Assuming you have the local disk space to do it

How about using backuppc to synchronise the users to a local disk and then 
backing that local disk up?


AB



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


[Bacula-users] Avoiding monthly full backup ?

2006-03-31 Thread Simon Žekar

hi,

I'm setting bacula to backup few of my servers, some of they are on the 
ADSL, so upload there is very limitied. Full backup of those machines 
takes a week to complete, but incremental backup take only few hours.


So I'm wondering, do I really need to do a Full backup of my servers 
monthly or is there a way, to make a full backup out of previous full 
backup + incrementals and then do an incremental backup on these 
calculated full backup ?


I just don't want to do full backup on those servers except for the 
first time.


The desired retention period is 90 days. Or later maybe a year...

Thanks,
Simon.


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Avoiding monthly full backup ?

2006-03-31 Thread Martin Simmons
 On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 12:57:44 +0200, =?windows-1252?Q?Simon_=8Eekar?= 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
 
 hi,
 
 I'm setting bacula to backup few of my servers, some of they are on the 
 ADSL, so upload there is very limitied. Full backup of those machines 
 takes a week to complete, but incremental backup take only few hours.
 
 So I'm wondering, do I really need to do a Full backup of my servers 
 monthly or is there a way, to make a full backup out of previous full 
 backup + incrementals and then do an incremental backup on these 
 calculated full backup ?

Doing regular full backups is a good idea because incremental/differentual
backups do not track renamed or deleted files completely accurately.  Also,
restoring from many incrementals can be timeconsuming and also increases the
risk of failure if one of the incrementals gets lost or corrupted.

Perhaps you can split the backup into two groups of directories according to
how frequently they change?  Then do full backups of the more frequently
changing data more often.

__Martin


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users