RE: [Bacula-users] Bacula problems on FreeBSD 5.4
For what it's worth, I'm running it on FreeBSD 5.4 and it's working fine. I didn't think Bacula wrote directly to the hardware when you use disk devices...but I could be wrong. I had problems similar to this with another program, turned out my RAM wasn't fully supported by the motherboard...the system would run fine until this one program (which escapes me at the moment) would run, then that program would core dump. Just a thought... --Brian From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of OleSent: Monday, July 25, 2005 9:46To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula problems on FreeBSD 5.4 Hi again!No, I'm currently testing bacula on an old intel i386 system.Copy of dmesg with the GENERIC core:testbox1# dmesgCopyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project.Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p5 #1: Mon Jul 25 12:00:41 CEST 2005 Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0CPU: Intel Celeron (900.01-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x68a Stepping = 10 Features=0x383f9ffreal memory = 535822336 (511 MB)avail memory = 518877184 (494 MB)npx0: on motherboardnpx0: INT 16 interfacecpu0 on motherboardpcib0: pcibus 0 on motherboardpir0: on motherboardpci0: on pcib0agp0: mem 0xd600-0xd607,0xd000-0xd3ff irq 5 at device 2.0 on pci0pcib1: at device 30.0 on pci0pci1: on pcib1xl0: <3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0x9000-0x907f mem 0xd500-0xd57f irq 12 at device 9.0 on pci1miibus0: on xl0ukphy0: on miibus0ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, autoxl0: Ethernet address: 00:04:75:e1:59:cfatapci0: port 0xa400-0xa4ff,0xa000-0xa003,0x9c00-0x9c07,0x9800-0x9803,0x9400-0x9407 irq 11 at device 10.0 on pci1ata2: channel #0 on atapci0ata3: channel #1 on atapci0xl1: <3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xa800-0xa87f mem 0xd5001000-0xd500107f irq 10 at device 11.0 on pci1miibus1: on xl1ukphy1: on miibus1ukphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, autoxl1: Ethernet address: 00:04:75:fd:09:4bisab0: at device 31.0 on pci0isa0: on isab0atapci1: port 0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 31.1 on pci0ata0: channel #0 on atapci1ata1: channel #1 on atapci1pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached)orm0: at iomem 0xd1000-0xd17ff,0xcc000-0xcc7ff,0xc-0xcbfff on isa0pmtimer0 on isa0atkbdc0: at port 0x64,0x60 on isa0atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0kbd0 at atkbd0sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300>vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0unknown: can't assign resources (port)Timecounter "TSC" frequency 900013610 Hz quality 800Timecounters tick every 10.000 msecacd0: CDROM at ata0-master PIO4ad4: 38204MB [77622/16/63] at ata2-master UDMA133ad6: 38204MB [77622/16/63] at ata3-master UDMA133ar0: 38204MB [4870/255/63] status: READY subdisks: disk0 READY on ad4 at ata2-master disk1 READY on ad6 at ata3-masterMounting root from ufs:/dev/ar0s1apid 391 (bacula-dir), uid 0: exited on signal 10 (core dumped)pid 450 (bacula-dir), uid 0: exited on signal 10 (core dumped)pid 10623 (bacula-dir), uid 0: exited on signal 10 (core dumped)pid 10789 (bacula-dir), uid 0: exited on signal 10 (core dumped)pid 10814 (bacula-dir), uid 0: exited on signal 10 (core dumped)pid 39096 (bacula-dir), uid 0: exited on signal 10 (core dumped)Can it be that bacula has problems reading from and to the RAID contrller ?Other thought to what the problem can be is also appreciated. Ole Morken System Technician WebDeal ASKern Sibbald wrote: On Monday 25 July 2005 15:17, Ole wrote: Hi! I have installed bacula from the ports tree on a server running FreeBSD 5.4. The version of bacula i use is bacula 1.36.3 I have tried to use a custom core and the default core, but i get the same message when i try to start Bacula from the startupscript in /usr/local/etc/rc.d I have not altered the standard config-files, these have worked on a SUSE-system without any hiccups. The errormessages is this: Starting the Bacula Storage daemon Starting the Bacula Director daemon Bus error (core dumped) I currently haven't connected a tape-device on the server, just trying to create backups on disk. Does anyone have any suggestions for a solution ? A bus error, typically indicates a misaligned structure on non-Intel hardware which is much more sensitive to structure alignments. Are you using non-Intel hardware or some 64 bit architecture? If so, there is a potential compiler/header problem -- e.g. using 32 bit headers on a 64 bit architecture could cause a structure misalignment as most 64 bit integers must be aligned on a 64 bit memory boundry and not
Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula problems on FreeBSD 5.4
Hi again! No, I'm currently testing bacula on an old intel i386 system. Copy of dmesg with the GENERIC core: testbox1# dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p5 #1: Mon Jul 25 12:00:41 CEST 2005 Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel Celeron (900.01-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x68a Stepping = 10 Features=0x383f9ff real memory = 535822336 (511 MB) avail memory = 518877184 (494 MB) npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface cpu0 on motherboard pcib0: pcibus 0 on motherboard pir0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xd600-0xd607,0xd000-0xd3ff irq 5 at device 2.0 on pci0 pcib1: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 xl0: <3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0x9000-0x907f mem 0xd500-0xd57f irq 12 at device 9.0 on pci1 miibus0: on xl0 ukphy0: on miibus0 ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto xl0: Ethernet address: 00:04:75:e1:59:cf atapci0: port 0xa400-0xa4ff,0xa000-0xa003,0x9c00-0x9c07,0x9800-0x9803,0x9400-0x9407 irq 11 at device 10.0 on pci1 ata2: channel #0 on atapci0 ata3: channel #1 on atapci0 xl1: <3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xa800-0xa87f mem 0xd5001000-0xd500107f irq 10 at device 11.0 on pci1 miibus1: on xl1 ukphy1: on miibus1 ukphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto xl1: Ethernet address: 00:04:75:fd:09:4b isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci1: port 0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci1 ata1: channel #1 on atapci1 pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) orm0: at iomem 0xd1000-0xd17ff,0xcc000-0xcc7ff,0xc-0xcbfff on isa0 pmtimer0 on isa0 atkbdc0: at port 0x64,0x60 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0 unknown: can't assign resources (port) Timecounter "TSC" frequency 900013610 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec acd0: CDROM at ata0-master PIO4 ad4: 38204MB [77622/16/63] at ata2-master UDMA133 ad6: 38204MB [77622/16/63] at ata3-master UDMA133 ar0: 38204MB [4870/255/63] status: READY subdisks: disk0 READY on ad4 at ata2-master disk1 READY on ad6 at ata3-master Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ar0s1a pid 391 (bacula-dir), uid 0: exited on signal 10 (core dumped) pid 450 (bacula-dir), uid 0: exited on signal 10 (core dumped) pid 10623 (bacula-dir), uid 0: exited on signal 10 (core dumped) pid 10789 (bacula-dir), uid 0: exited on signal 10 (core dumped) pid 10814 (bacula-dir), uid 0: exited on signal 10 (core dumped) pid 39096 (bacula-dir), uid 0: exited on signal 10 (core dumped) Can it be that bacula has problems reading from and to the RAID contrller ? Other thought to what the problem can be is also appreciated. Ole Morken System Technician WebDeal AS Kern Sibbald wrote: On Monday 25 July 2005 15:17, Ole wrote: Hi! I have installed bacula from the ports tree on a server running FreeBSD 5.4. The version of bacula i use is bacula 1.36.3 I have tried to use a custom core and the default core, but i get the same message when i try to start Bacula from the startupscript in /usr/local/etc/rc.d I have not altered the standard config-files, these have worked on a SUSE-system without any hiccups. The errormessages is this: Starting the Bacula Storage daemon Starting the Bacula Director daemon Bus error (core dumped) I currently haven't connected a tape-device on the server, just trying to create backups on disk. Does anyone have any suggestions for a solution ? A bus error, typically indicates a misaligned structure on non-Intel hardware which is much more sensitive to structure alignments. Are you using non-Intel hardware or some 64 bit architecture? If so, there is a potential compiler/header problem -- e.g. using 32 bit headers on a 64 bit architecture could cause a structure misalignment as most 64 bit integers must be aligned on a 64 bit memory boundry and not on a 32 bit boundry. Ole Morken System Technician WebDeal AS --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula problems on FreeBSD 5.4
On Monday 25 July 2005 15:17, Ole wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have installed bacula from the ports tree on a server running FreeBSD
> 5.4. The version of bacula i use is bacula 1.36.3
> I have tried to use a custom core and the default core, but i get the
> same message when i try to start Bacula from the startupscript in
> /usr/local/etc/rc.d
>
> I have not altered the standard config-files, these have worked on a
> SUSE-system without any hiccups.
>
> The errormessages is this:
> Starting the Bacula Storage daemon
> Starting the Bacula Director daemon
> Bus error (core dumped)
>
> I currently haven't connected a tape-device on the server, just trying
> to create backups on disk.
>
> Does anyone have any suggestions for a solution ?
A bus error, typically indicates a misaligned structure on non-Intel hardware
which is much more sensitive to structure alignments. Are you using
non-Intel hardware or some 64 bit architecture? If so, there is a potential
compiler/header problem -- e.g. using 32 bit headers on a 64 bit architecture
could cause a structure misalignment as most 64 bit integers must be aligned
on a 64 bit memory boundry and not on a 32 bit boundry.
>
>
>
> Ole Morken
> System Technician
> WebDeal AS
>
>
> ---
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
> from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
> informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
> speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
> ___
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
--
Best regards,
Kern
(">
/\
V_V
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
