Re: sh script
On 2/10/11 at 01:36, dougl...@macnauchtan.com (Doug McNutt) wrote: What I was thinking is that running the shell script from within bbedit might be done by the Bare Bones folks using procedures that come through AppleScript.. Somewhere I got the idea that your script runs fine from a Terminal.app session but gets in trouble when you start from within bbedit. Have you tried running it from within a bbedit worksheet? It runs fine in Terminal in a BBEdit worksheet so objective achieved (as much as I admire vim, I much prefer to write in BBEdit when using OS X. It just makes a lot more sense to me...). Cheers, Phil. -- Please consider the environment before reading this email... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: keyboard Shortcuts and German Keyboard
On Oct 3, 2011, at 8:19 PM, nils3...@gmx.net wrote: I cannot assign any umlauts (ö,ä,ü,ß). The keys are misinterpreted (e.g. ^, fl, ‰). This worked in previous Versions. I work on a Spanish keyboard layout (much to my chagrin) and sometimes have trouble assigning keyboard shortcuts but in order for us to get this changed/fixed we need to provide Bare Bones with concrete steps/conditions required to recreate the behavior we want to see changed. I've been unable to do that (lack of time, mostly) so I've just grown to live with the fact that things aren't quite as smooth on this keyboard as they were on my U.S. keyboard. Sincerely, Ted Stresen-Reuter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: possible to set upper case tags as the default?
On 03 Oct 2011, at 00:59 , John Delacour wrote: JD: Do you write your validated code in HTML 4.01 (1999) or HTML5? If not then they're illegal Lukreme: Not correct. Uppercase tags are only illegal in XHTML, and there maybe only in 1.0. JD: Please Sir, what comes between HTML 4.01 and HTML5 that allows upper case tags? Charlie Garrison: It's part of the HTML5 spec: Come come, enough of this nonsense! It's quite clear both of you have a problem with logic. To repeat the meaning of my statement -- unless the code is in 4.01 or HTML5, upper case tags will result in invalid HTML. Um, I don’t think any version of HTML has ever required case-sensitive tags. Only XHTML had that requirement. HTML 1.0, 2.0, 3.x, 4.x and 5 all are case-insensitive, though it is possible that early specs required UPPER case tags (there certainly were a lot of upper case tags back in the 90’s). -- 'Everything will be all right. From History's point of view, that is. There really isn't any other.' -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: possible to set upper case tags as the default?
On Oct 3, 2011, at 14:12 , LuKreme wrote: HTML 1.0, 2.0, 3.x, 4.x and 5 all are case-insensitive, though it is possible that early specs required UPPER case tags (there certainly were a lot of upper case tags back in the 90’s). As far as I know the uppercasing of tags was a convention borrowed from SGML. But you're absolutely right about the case-insensitivity. I still know more than one person who writes their HTML using exclusively uppercase, as they insist that it makes it easier to separate tags from text -- and refuse to use editors more capable than Notepad or TextEdit. They complained mightily about XHTML's requirement for lowercase-only tags and will be relieved that HTML5 backtracks from that, but they're still not down with all this crazy new-fangled CSS stuff. - Watts smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: Save document from template preview
i don't really use the feature, but can you preview the template in a browser? or just in bbedit? if the former, you could just 'save' or 'save as...' from there. bruce On Oct 1, 1:15 pm, Seth Dillingham s...@macrobyte.net wrote: On 9/29/2011, jawalsh said: I used the preview template feature quite a bit. I'd like to be able to save the full HTML documents somehow. That is, I create a text file with an HTML fragment. I preview it a template that is creating a virtual complete HTML document. I want to save that complete HTML doc as a new file. Is this possible? Can it be made so? I like this idea, too. It's a small step in a very interesting direction, where BBEdit starts to accept its role as a full, templated HTML publishing system. It's a small step, but I like it. Seth -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: possible to set upper case tags as the default?
guys - can't we all get along? 8-) so... i've been trying to use lowercase tags... struggling to use lowercase tags. bbedit does 'help' by offering them as the default, but it's not what i'm used to. based on the discussions thus far: SHOULD i use all lowercase tags? does it really matter? if so, WHY does it matter? i'm not adverse to learning new things... more the pain of learning new things! 8-) looking forward to your comments, thanks, bruce p.s.: yes, i'm an all lowercase poster and emailer... two sets of standards, as my mother would say. On Oct 3, 3:00 pm, Watts Martin lay...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 3, 2011, at 14:12 , LuKreme wrote: HTML 1.0, 2.0, 3.x, 4.x and 5 all are case-insensitive, though it is possible that early specs required UPPER case tags (there certainly were a lot of upper case tags back in the 90’s). As far as I know the uppercasing of tags was a convention borrowed from SGML. But you're absolutely right about the case-insensitivity. I still know more than one person who writes their HTML using exclusively uppercase, as they insist that it makes it easier to separate tags from text -- and refuse to use editors more capable than Notepad or TextEdit. They complained mightily about XHTML's requirement for lowercase-only tags and will be relieved that HTML5 backtracks from that, but they're still not down with all this crazy new-fangled CSS stuff. - Watts smime.p7s 4KViewDownload -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: keyboard Shortcuts and German Keyboard
3 okt 2011 kl. 21:19 skrev nils3...@gmx.net: I cannot assign any umlauts (ö,ä,ü,ß). The keys are misinterpreted (e.g. ^, fl, ‰). I have filed a bug about this with Bare Bones support and have gotten confirmation that they could recreate the problem and that it is in the queue for fixing. I am afraid I don’t have a case number for this, since I seem to have deleted the reply I got (perhaps I just dreamt it all ;-) . Kind regards, Pihlan -- Fredrik Pihlström, fred...@pihlan.com The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well, on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away, and think this to be normal, is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be. - Douglas Adams -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
