On Sunday, March 11, 2018 at 11:28:05 PM UTC+7, Michael Droogleever wrote:
>
> I believe it is against the design of beancount, but is there any existing
> code which attempts to add transactions to an existing beancount file.
> Assuming the entries in the file are grouped by asset account, it would
> need to append the entry to the subsection of entries all from the same
> account.
>
I think this would be something that would fit into a (rewritten, more
advanced) bean-format. That way you add transactions wherever (e.g. just
using shell redirection) but can then reformat it to be ordered into
sections. I'm not really sure how the usage of includes fits into this. I
break up my accounts into several files -- e.g. all US accounts are in
us.bean, all Australian accounts are in au.bean, and so on. And I'm sure
other people have other ways of splitting things up!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Beancount" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to beancount+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to beancount@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/41eef2cc-2708-47d5-ae30-596b83b05cfb%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
