The application is responsible for synchronizing access to shared objects. So I 
think only one thing
clEnqueueAcquire/ReleaseGLObjects to do is set the parameter event's status 
correctly.
I will implement them, and remove the other NOT_IMPLEMENTED functions.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Rebecca N. Palmer
> Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 2:46 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Beignet] Status of cl_khr_gl_sharing
> 
> The *missing* functions aren't likely to be a problem: as far as I can tell,
> http://sources.debian.net/src/forge/0.9.2-
> 2/examples/opencl/cl_helpers.h/?hl=72#L72
> is the only place in Debian that tries to use one of them, and it correctly 
> handles
> its absence.
> 
> I'm more worried about the potential consequences (if any) of
> clEnqueueAcquire/ReleaseGLObjects not actually doing anything.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Beignet mailing list
> Beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet






        
_______________________________________________
Beignet mailing list
Beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet

Reply via email to