Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

[Wanghaibo (Rainsword)]

Support adoption of this draft.

Regards,
Haibo

发件人: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
发送时间: 2019年11月27日 20:37
收件人: bess@ietf.org
抄送: bess-cha...@ietf.org
主题: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

Hello,

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00 [1] .

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document won't progress 
without answers from all the authors and contributors.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on Wednesday 11th December 2019.

Regards,
Matthew

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision/



___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

[Robert Raszuk]

*I do not support this draft in the current form. *

This document instead of improving the original specification makes it
actually worse.

Point 1 -

Original RFC sec. 6.2:

o Network Address of Next Hop = IPv6 address of Next Hop

Proposed text:


o Network Address of Next Hop = VPN-IPv6 address of Next Hop whose
RD is set to zero

As it has been explained when you negotiate in capability AFI2 as next hop
it is just 16 octets - not 24. Next hop never has an RD. The fact that some
implementations are matching length of NLRI with length of next hop no
where should be made equal that next hop has 8 octet dummy Route
Distinguisher.

If revision is to be made would be to explicitly negotiate capability to
infer next hop encoding from the length.

Point 2 -

Addition of section 6.3 and SAFI 129 is fine, but again next hop encoding
is lightly stating suboptimal.

Conclusion:

As we have discussed on and off line if revision is to be made let's make
it both backwards compatible, Let's make it applicable to both IPv4 and
IPv6 next hop addresses and let's allow explicit capability where
implementations could indicate that it can recognize next hop value from
its length. After all we are talking about just 4 discrete possible values
here.

Cheers,
Robert.









On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 1:36 PM Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) <
matthew.bo...@nokia.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
>
> This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for
> draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00 [1] .
>
>
>
> Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group
> list.
>
>
>
> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to
> this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with
> IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
>
>
> If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please
> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
> relevant undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document won't
> progress without answers from all the authors and contributors.
>
>
>
> Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.
>
>
>
> If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please
> explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been
> disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>
>
> This poll for adoption closes on Wednesday 11th December 2019.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthew
>
>
>
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision/
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

[UTTARO, JAMES]

Support

Thanks,
  Jim Uttaro

From: BESS  On Behalf Of Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - 
US/Mountain View)
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 8:49 AM
To: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) ; bess@ietf.org
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

Support.

Thx
Jorge

From: BESS mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of 
"Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" 
mailto:matthew.bo...@nokia.com>>
Date: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 at 1:37 PM
To: "bess@ietf.org" mailto:bess@ietf.org>>
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" 
mailto:bess-cha...@ietf.org>>
Subject: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

Hello,

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00 [1] .

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document won't progress 
without answers from all the authors and contributors.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on Wednesday 11th December 2019.

Regards,
Matthew

[1] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision/



___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

[Alexander Vainshtein]

Stephane,
Lots of thanks for a prompt and very informative response.

Matthew,
I support adoption of this draft.

Get Outlook for Android


From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com 
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2019, 16:56
To: Alexander Vainshtein; 'Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)'
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

Hi Sasha,

The changes to RFC5549 are:

  *   Changing the NH encoding for AFI/SAFI 1/128
  *   Enable the behavior for AFI/SAFI 1/129 (same as AFI/SAFI 1/128)

The fact of doing it in BESS has been agreed by the ADs (INT and RTG) as we 
only changes the VPN SAFIs.

Martin, our AD, is looking at the right way to proceed and will confirm, but 
this may not be a real bis that obsoletes RFC5549 (that’s why the draft is 
named revision and not bis). One of the opened possibility is to make RFC5549 
historic and not obsolete.

Brgds,

Stephane


From: Alexander Vainshtein 
Sent: mercredi 27 novembre 2019 15:39
To: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) 
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

Matthew and all,
I have a couple of questions about the draft in question that, if answered, 
would help me to define my position with regard to its adoption:

  1.  The draft is a “bis” draft but it does not contain a section that lists 
the changes vs. RFC 5549 (customary in the “bis” drafts). Am I right to guess 
that the changes introduced by this draft deal exclusively with just the routes 
used with mVPN?
  2.  If the answer to the question above is positive, I would agree that BESS 
(that handles mVPN among other things) is the right home for this document 
(SOFTWIRES WG that has delivered RFC 5549 has concluded). Otherwise, I would 
like to understand why adoption by BESS (and not, say, by the IDR WG) is 
considered?

Regards, and lots of thanks in advance,
Sasha

Office: +972-39266302
Cell:  +972-549266302
Email:   
alexander.vainsht...@ecitele.com

From: BESS mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of 
Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 2:37 PM
To: bess@ietf.org
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

Hello,

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00 [1] .

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document won't progress 
without answers from all the authors and contributors.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on Wednesday 11th December 2019.

Regards,
Matthew

[1] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision/




___

This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information 
which is
CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received 
this
transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then 
delete the original
and all copies thereof.
___


___

This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information 
which is 
CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received 
this 
transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then 
delete the original 
and all copies thereof.
__
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

[Jeff Tantsura]

Support the adoption, thanks for doing this work!

Regards,
Jeff

> On Nov 27, 2019, at 04:37, Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) 
>  wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello,
>  
> This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
> draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00 [1] .
>  
> Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.
>  
> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
> Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
> rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>  
> If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any 
> relevant undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document won't 
> progress without answers from all the authors and contributors.
>  
> Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.
>  
> If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
> respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
> conformance with IETF rules.
>  
> This poll for adoption closes on Wednesday 11th December 2019.  
>  
> Regards,
> Matthew
>  
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision/
>  
>  
>  
> ___
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

[Kesavan Thiruvenkatasamy (kethiruv)]

Support.

Regards,
Kesavan


From: BESS  on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" 

Date: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 at 4:37 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org" 
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" 
Subject: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

Hello,

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00 [1] .

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document won't progress 
without answers from all the authors and contributors.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on Wednesday 11th December 2019.

Regards,
Matthew

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision/



___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

[Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)]

support

From: BESS  on behalf of Jorge Rabadan 

Date: Wednesday, 27 November 2019 at 14:49
To: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" , "bess@ietf.org" 

Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" 
Subject: Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

Support.

Thx
Jorge

From: BESS  on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" 

Date: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 at 1:37 PM
To: "bess@ietf.org" 
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" 
Subject: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

Hello,

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00 [1] .

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document won't progress 
without answers from all the authors and contributors.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on Wednesday 11th December 2019.

Regards,
Matthew

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision/



___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

[slitkows.ietf]

Hi Sasha,

 

The changes to RFC5549 are:

*   Changing the NH encoding for AFI/SAFI 1/128
*   Enable the behavior for AFI/SAFI 1/129 (same as AFI/SAFI 1/128)

 

The fact of doing it in BESS has been agreed by the ADs (INT and RTG) as we 
only changes the VPN SAFIs.

 

Martin, our AD, is looking at the right way to proceed and will confirm, but 
this may not be a real bis that obsoletes RFC5549 (that’s why the draft is 
named revision and not bis). One of the opened possibility is to make RFC5549 
historic and not obsolete.

 

Brgds,


Stephane

 

 

From: Alexander Vainshtein  
Sent: mercredi 27 novembre 2019 15:39
To: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) 
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

 

Matthew and all,

I have a couple of questions about the draft in question that, if answered, 
would help me to define my position with regard to its adoption:

1.  The draft is a “bis” draft but it does not contain a section that lists 
the changes vs. RFC 5549 (customary in the “bis” drafts). Am I right to guess 
that the changes introduced by this draft deal exclusively with just the routes 
used with mVPN?
2.  If the answer to the question above is positive, I would agree that 
BESS (that handles mVPN among other things) is the right home for this document 
(SOFTWIRES WG that has delivered RFC 5549 has concluded). Otherwise, I would 
like to understand why adoption by BESS (and not, say, by the IDR WG) is 
considered?

 

Regards, and lots of thanks in advance,

Sasha

 

Office: +972-39266302

Cell:  +972-549266302

Email:   alexander.vainsht...@ecitele.com 
 

 

From: BESS mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org> > On Behalf Of 
Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 2:37 PM
To: bess@ietf.org  
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org  
Subject: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

 

Hello,

 

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00 [1] .

 

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

 

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

 

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document won't progress 
without answers from all the authors and contributors.

 

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

 

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

 

This poll for adoption closes on Wednesday 11th December 2019.  

 

Regards,

Matthew 

 

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision/ 

 

 

 

 


___

This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information 
which is 
CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received 
this 
transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then 
delete the original 
and all copies thereof.
___

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

[Alexander Vainshtein]

Matthew and all,
I have a couple of questions about the draft in question that, if answered, 
would help me to define my position with regard to its adoption:

1.   The draft is a “bis” draft but it does not contain a section that 
lists the changes vs. RFC 5549 (customary in the “bis” drafts). Am I right to 
guess that the changes introduced by this draft deal exclusively with just the 
routes used with mVPN?

2.   If the answer to the question above is positive, I would agree that 
BESS (that handles mVPN among other things) is the right home for this document 
(SOFTWIRES WG that has delivered RFC 5549 has concluded). Otherwise, I would 
like to understand why adoption by BESS (and not, say, by the IDR WG) is 
considered?

Regards, and lots of thanks in advance,
Sasha

Office: +972-39266302
Cell:  +972-549266302
Email:   alexander.vainsht...@ecitele.com

From: BESS  On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 2:37 PM
To: bess@ietf.org
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

Hello,

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00 [1] .

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document won't progress 
without answers from all the authors and contributors.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on Wednesday 11th December 2019.

Regards,
Matthew

[1] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision/




___

This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information 
which is 
CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received 
this 
transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then 
delete the original 
and all copies thereof.
___
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

[Krishna Muddenahally Ananthamurthy (kriswamy)]

Support. I am not aware of any IPR.

Thanks
Krishna

From: BESS  on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" 

Date: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 at 4:37 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org" 
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" 
Subject: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

Hello,

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00 [1] .

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document won't progress 
without answers from all the authors and contributors.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on Wednesday 11th December 2019.

Regards,
Matthew

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision/



___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

[Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)]

Support.

Thx
Jorge

From: BESS  on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" 

Date: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 at 1:37 PM
To: "bess@ietf.org" 
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" 
Subject: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

Hello,

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00 [1] .

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document won't progress 
without answers from all the authors and contributors.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on Wednesday 11th December 2019.

Regards,
Matthew

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision/



___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

[Serge Krier (sekrier)]

Support adoption of this draft.

Regards,
Serge.

From: BESS  on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" 

Date: Wednesday, 27 November 2019 at 13:37
To: "bess@ietf.org" 
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" 
Subject: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

Hello,

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00 [1] .

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document won't progress 
without answers from all the authors and contributors.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on Wednesday 11th December 2019.

Regards,
Matthew

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision/



___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

[Zhuangshunwan]

Support adoption of this draft.  This draft reflects current multiple existing 
running implementations.

Thanks,
Shunwan



From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - 
GB)
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 8:37 PM
To: bess@ietf.org
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

Hello,

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00 [1] .

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document won't progress 
without answers from all the authors and contributors.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on Wednesday 11th December 2019.

Regards,
Matthew

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision/



___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

[Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)]

Support adoption of this document.

Thanks,
Ketan

From: BESS  On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
Sent: 27 November 2019 18:07
To: bess@ietf.org
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

Hello,

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00 [1] .

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document won't progress 
without answers from all the authors and contributors.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on Wednesday 11th December 2019.

Regards,
Matthew

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision/



___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

[slitkows.ietf]

Support,

I’m not aware of any IPR.

 

From: BESS mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org> > on behalf of 
"Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" mailto:matthew.bo...@nokia.com> >
Date: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 at 7:37 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org  " mailto:bess@ietf.org> >
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org  " mailto:bess-cha...@ietf.org> >
Subject: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

 

Hello,

 

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00 [1] .

 

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

 

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

 

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document won't progress 
without answers from all the authors and contributors.

 

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

 

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

 

This poll for adoption closes on Wednesday 11th December 2019.  

 

Regards,

Matthew 

 

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision/

 

 

 

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

[Acee Lindem (acee)]

I support WG adoption. This is update is desperately needed to reflect current 
implementations and deployments.
Thanks,
Acee

From: BESS  on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" 

Date: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 at 7:37 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org" 
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" 
Subject: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

Hello,

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00 [1] .

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document won't progress 
without answers from all the authors and contributors.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on Wednesday 11th December 2019.

Regards,
Matthew

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision/



___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

[bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

[Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)]

Hello,

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00 [1] .

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document won't progress 
without answers from all the authors and contributors.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on Wednesday 11th December 2019.

Regards,
Matthew

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision/



___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess