Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR, implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility

[LINGALA, AVINASH]

I’m not aware of any undisclosed IPR.

Thanks,
Avinash

From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com 
Date: Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 2:45 AM
To: bess@ietf.org , 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobil...@ietf.org 

Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org 
Subject: WGLC, IPR, implementation poll for 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility
Hi WG, This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-14 [1]. Note that the document 
already had a WGLC and comments were raised by the WG. These comments are 
normally addressed by the Authors

Hi WG,

This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-14 [1]. Note that the document 
already had a WGLC and comments were raised by the WG. These comments are 
normally addressed by the Authors but feel free to review again and provide 
feedback.

This poll runs until Tuesday 3rd October.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the 
Authors and Contributors.
There is currently no IPR disclosed.

If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [2]. Please indicate 
if you are aware of any implementations.



Thank you,
Stephane, Matthew, Jeffrey

[1] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility/
[2] 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-01

[LINGALA, AVINASH]

Hi,

Support as co-author. Not aware of any undisclosed IPR.

Thanks,
Avinash

From: BESS  on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" 

Date: Monday, January 18, 2021 at 3:58 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org" 
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" 
Subject: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-01


This email starts a two-week working group last call for 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-01 [1]







Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please 
indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track RFC.







This poll runs until February 1st.







We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).



If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this document please respond 
to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the 
Authors and Contributors.



There is currently no IPR disclosed.


In addition, we are polling for knowledge of implementations of this draft, per 
the BESS policy in [2].





Thank you,



Matthew & Stephane

[1] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility/
[2] 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

[LINGALA, AVINASH]

Hi,

Support as a co-author. Not aware of any relevant IPR.

Thanks,
Avinash

From: "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" 
Date: Friday, January 17, 2020 at 3:56 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org" , 
"draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.auth...@ietf.org" 

Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" 
Subject: WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03
Resent-From: 
Resent-To: , , , 
, , AVINASH LINGALA 

Resent-Date: Friday, January 17, 2020 at 3:56 AM

Hi WG,

This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03 [2]

Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please 
indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track RFC.

This poll runs until Fri 31th January 2019.


We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond 
to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the 
Authors and Contributors.

There is currently no IPR disclosed.

We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [1]. Please indicate 
if you are aware of any implementations.

 Thank you,

Stephane

[1] 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw
[2] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-04

[LINGALA, AVINASH]

Support as a co-author. Not aware of any undisclosed IPR.

-Avinash

From: "mitesh kanjariya" 
mailto:mitesh.kanjar...@gmail.com>>
Date: Monday, March 18, 2019 at 4:50:04 PM
To: "bess@ietf.org" mailto:bess@ietf.org>>, 
"draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobil...@ietf.org" 
mailto:draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobil...@ietf.org>>,
 "stephane.litkow...@orange.com" 
mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>>
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" mailto:bess-cha...@ietf.org>>
Subject: WG adoption and IPR poll for 
draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-04


Support.


-Mitesh



Hi,



This email begins a two-week poll for adoption of 
draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-04

[1]



Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.



We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).



If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document won't progress 
without answers from all the authors and contributors.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.



If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.



This poll for adoption closes on 19th March 2019.



Regards,

Stephane and Matthew



[1] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility/



_


Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.


This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.





--

Regards,

Mitesh
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-04

[LINGALA, AVINASH]

Support… not aware of any IPR..

-Avinash

​
From: stephane.litkow...@orange.com 
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2019 3:43 AM
To: bess@ietf.org; draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobil...@ietf.org
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: WG adoption and IPR poll for 
draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-04

Hi,


This email begins a two-week poll for adoption of 
draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-04
[1]

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document won't progress 
without answers from all the authors and contributors.
Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on 19th March 2019.

Regards,
Stephane and Matthew

[1] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility/



_



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane => MISSING your IPR reply

[LINGALA, AVINASH]

I am not aware of any IPR related to this document..

-Avinash
​
From: stephane.litkow...@orange.com 
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 3:40 AM
To: UTTARO, JAMES ; wsmac...@juinper.net; Keyur Patel 
; LINGALA, AVINASH ; Eric C Rosen 
(ero...@juniper.net) 
Subject: FW: WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for 
draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane => MISSING your IPR reply

Hi,

We are missing your IPR poll reply on this draft.
Could you please reply to the BESS list ? (bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>)

Thanks in advance,

Stephane

From: stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com> 
[mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 14:06
To: bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:bess-cha...@ietf.org>
Subject: WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for 
draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane


Hello Working Group,



This email starts a three weeks Working Group Last Call on  
draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane [1].



This poll runs until *the 4th of February*.



We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond 
to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the 
Authors and Contributors.



We have several IPRs already disclosed.



If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.



We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [2].



Thank you,

Stephane & Matthew



[1] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dbess-2Dnsh-2Dbgp-2Dcontrol-2Dplane_=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=Brp6KjSZbKLoy2UkjhwkCg=H7hWK9WaKtgHeQbNOPFSLtOJbGfQS1WrH48u76zV8ak=Hy5Evt_s9r3kghe4r79z5mVg-V7Ynap17U5X1jWa9T8=>



[2] 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mailarchive.ietf.org_arch_msg_bess_cG3X1tTqb-5FvPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=Brp6KjSZbKLoy2UkjhwkCg=H7hWK9WaKtgHeQbNOPFSLtOJbGfQS1WrH48u76zV8ak=pBpxU4mFWzPupa3QxhWU-X2TmMz9PXZ-X4Ba7FcG2EM=>



_



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.

_



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane => MISSING your IPR reply

[LINGALA, AVINASH]

Support.

-Avinash
​
From: stephane.litkow...@orange.com 
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 3:40 AM
To: UTTARO, JAMES ; wsmac...@juinper.net; Keyur Patel 
; LINGALA, AVINASH ; Eric C Rosen 
(ero...@juniper.net) 
Subject: FW: WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for 
draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane => MISSING your IPR reply

Hi,

We are missing your IPR poll reply on this draft.
Could you please reply to the BESS list ? (bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>)

Thanks in advance,

Stephane

From: stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com> 
[mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 14:06
To: bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:bess-cha...@ietf.org>
Subject: WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for 
draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane


Hello Working Group,



This email starts a three weeks Working Group Last Call on  
draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane [1].



This poll runs until *the 4th of February*.



We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond 
to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the 
Authors and Contributors.



We have several IPRs already disclosed.



If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.



We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [2].



Thank you,

Stephane & Matthew



[1] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dbess-2Dnsh-2Dbgp-2Dcontrol-2Dplane_=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=Brp6KjSZbKLoy2UkjhwkCg=H7hWK9WaKtgHeQbNOPFSLtOJbGfQS1WrH48u76zV8ak=Hy5Evt_s9r3kghe4r79z5mVg-V7Ynap17U5X1jWa9T8=>



[2] 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mailarchive.ietf.org_arch_msg_bess_cG3X1tTqb-5FvPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=Brp6KjSZbKLoy2UkjhwkCg=H7hWK9WaKtgHeQbNOPFSLtOJbGfQS1WrH48u76zV8ak=pBpxU4mFWzPupa3QxhWU-X2TmMz9PXZ-X4Ba7FcG2EM=>



_



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.

_



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04

[LINGALA, AVINASH]

As a co-author , I support for WG adoption.
I am not aware of any IPR relevant to this document.

​
Thanks,
Avinash Lingala


From: BESS  On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2018 3:29 AM
To: bess@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04

Hi WG,

This email begins a two-week poll for BESS working group adoption 
draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04 [1]

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list, 
stating whether or not you support adoption.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document won't progress 
without answers from all the authors and contributors.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

The poll for working group adoption closes on Tue 18th September.

Regards,
Stéphane and Matthew

[1] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/






_



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment-03

[LINGALA, AVINASH]

I support for adoption.

-Avinash





From: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" 
mailto:matthew..bo...@nokia.com>>
Date: Friday, June 1, 2018 at 8:48:24 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org" mailto:bess@ietf.org>>
Cc: "draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segm...@ietf.org" 
mailto:draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segm...@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for 
draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment-03

We’ve only had a couple of responses from people who are not co-authors of the 
draft. It would be good to see some wider interest, so please review the draft 
and indicate to the list if you support adoption or not, especially if you are 
not a co-author. I will extend the poll for adoption for another week, 
accordingly.

Thanks to those who have already commented.

Regards

Matthew and Stephane

From: BESS  on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" 

Date: Thursday, 17 May 2018 at 11:24
To: "bess@ietf.org" 
Cc: "draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segm...@ietf.org" 

Subject: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for 
draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment-03

This email begins a two-week poll for adoption of 
draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment-03.txt

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document won't progress 
without answers from all the authors and contributors.
Currently there is one IPR declaration against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on Thursday 31st May 2018.

Regards,
Matthew and Stéphane

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc-03.txt

[LINGALA, AVINASH]

Support.

-Avinash


From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - 
GB)
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 9:23 AM
To: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-vpws-...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for 
draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc-03.txt

This email begins a two-week poll for BESS working group adoption of 
draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc-03.txt.

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list, 
stating whether or not you support adoption.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document won't progress 
without answers from all the authors and contributors.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

The poll for working group adoption closes on Monday 23rd April.

Regards,
Matthew and Stéphane

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] [sfc] [mpls] Progress with draft-farrel-mpls-sfc

[LINGALA, AVINASH]

I support this effort and I agree with Jim.  As an operator we would like to 
see various encapsulation options for SFC. This would help an operator to pick 
the suitable encapsulation option for their networks.

Same approach that IETF took for EVPN  with various encap options like MPLS, 
VXLAN, GENEVE,..

​
Thanks,
Avinash Lingala


From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of 
mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 10:25 AM
To: UTTARO, JAMES ; Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) 
; Robert Raszuk ; Adrian Farrel 

Cc: mpls ; SPRING WG List ; bess@ietf.org; 
s...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] [sfc] [mpls] Progress with draft-farrel-mpls-sfc

Re-,

This is really a matter of taste.

Jim, whatever scheme we use for identifying service chains, there are 
requirements/constraints/new practices/new OAM procedures that need to be 
supported/honored for service chaining purposes.

Those are not simple nor complex in MPLS vs. NSH over MPLS. I’m wrong?

Cheers,
Med

De : UTTARO, JAMES [mailto:ju1...@att.com]
Envoyé : lundi 19 mars 2018 14:10
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN; Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp); Robert 
Raszuk; Adrian Farrel
Cc : mpls; SPRING WG List; s...@ietf.org; 
bess@ietf.org
Objet : RE: [sfc] [mpls] Progress with draft-farrel-mpls-sfc

Med,

When I say simply, I am speaking as an operator. The 
operations, systems, tools, institutional knowledge etc… in this space is 
around MPLS. There is a simpler path to creating simple chains by using MPLS 
instead of introducing a new encap.

Thanks,
Jim Uttaro

From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com 
[mailto:mohamed.boucad...@orange.com]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 10:03 AM
To: UTTARO, JAMES >; Henderickx, Wim 
(Nokia - BE/Antwerp) 
>; Robert Raszuk 
>; Adrian Farrel 
>
Cc: mpls >; SPRING WG List 
>; s...@ietf.org; 
bess@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [sfc] [mpls] Progress with draft-farrel-mpls-sfc

Re-,

I’m afraid that you cannot ‘simply’ re-use MPLS for chaining purposes without 
any code upgrade.


NSH does provide the simple functionality you need; that is the information to 
identify a chain + avoid infinite loops. This is known as: MD Type 0x2 with 
length is 0x2.

Of course you can encode that information using another channel, but still code 
change is needed.

Please note that NSH is not at the same level as “GENEVE, VXLAN”.

Cheers,
Med

De : UTTARO, JAMES [mailto:ju1...@att.com]
Envoyé : lundi 19 mars 2018 13:48
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN; Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp); Robert 
Raszuk; Adrian Farrel
Cc : mpls; SPRING WG List; s...@ietf.org; 
bess@ietf.org
Objet : RE: [sfc] [mpls] Progress with draft-farrel-mpls-sfc

Med,

We run an MPLS network so there is no NSH deployed anywhere. I 
want to create simple chains that we can make available to our WAN customers 
and I want to keep it simple from a technology and operations POV.. At this 
point I do not see the need to introduce NSH for what we need to do. I can 
simply re-use MPLS.

Not sure why NSH is the winner here there are folks who advocate for GENEVE, 
NSH, VXLAN etc… If IETF is pushing for one encap than it would be helpful to 
define the set of requirements/criteria and compare the encaps.

Thanks,
Jim Uttaro

From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com 
[mailto:mohamed.boucad...@orange.com]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 9:22 AM
To: UTTARO, JAMES >; Henderickx, Wim 
(Nokia - BE/Antwerp) 
>; Robert Raszuk 
>; Adrian Farrel 
>
Cc: mpls >; SPRING WG List 
>; s...@ietf.org; 
bess@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [sfc] [mpls] Progress with draft-farrel-mpls-sfc

Hi Jim,

Perhaps I missed your point, but I’m not asking to disallow whatever transport 
encapsulation scheme deployed in a network for SFC purposes.

What I’m saying is:
* the IETF has defined a generic SFC architecture and went with a 
transport-agnostic approach that can be deployed in conjunction with one’s 
favorite transport encapsulation protocol.
* Having a transport-agnostic approach get us away from redundant solutions to 
solve the same problem, redundant codes, etc.
* If 

Re: [bess] [sfc] Extra time to reflect on draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane adoption following the IPR disclosure

[LINGALA, AVINASH]

I still support the adoption.

Thanks,
Avinash 

-Original Message-
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John E Drake
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 3:04 PM
To: BESS 
Cc: s...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] [sfc] Extra time to reflect on 
draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane adoption following the IPR disclosure

M,

I still support the adoption.  I looked at the subject patent and it appears to 
have very little to do with draft-mackie.  I think this means that the IPR 
assertion would be similarly made against *any* solution developed by BESS.

Yours Irrespectively,

John


> -Original Message-
> From: sfc [mailto:sfc-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 2:04 PM
> To: BESS 
> Cc: s...@ietf.org
> Subject: [sfc] Extra time to reflect on 
> draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane
> adoption following the IPR disclosure
> 
> WG
> 
> Given the IPR disclosed [1] against
> draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane, we are starting a call for 
> comment specifically to let people express a revised opinion on how 
> draft-ietf-bess-nsh- bgp-control-plane should be pursued in BESS.
> 
> This call for comment is open until the 5th of May
> 
> Thanks
> M
> 
> [1] 
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.
> org_ipr_2980_=DwICAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=Brp6KjSZbKLoy2Ukjhwk
> Cg=ehMaQDD-dPc_aAvjT9K9ornHKFsasBzQssYKQYdShn4=9bX6EnFiFVIJKujVItH
> 4RkKo597AyFSnYMqrfdXh09I=
> 
> ___
> sfc mailing list
> s...@ietf.org
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mail
> man_listinfo_sfc=DwICAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=Brp6KjSZbKLoy2Ukj
> hwkCg=ehMaQDD-dPc_aAvjT9K9ornHKFsasBzQssYKQYdShn4=8kpNlzV6glIyOofc
> Wti-2MnPBPXhixi3LNv5vJt-Tq0=

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_bess=DwICAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=Brp6KjSZbKLoy2UkjhwkCg=ehMaQDD-dPc_aAvjT9K9ornHKFsasBzQssYKQYdShn4=afbSOZlylyqyYgt13eNgSrNn0q63XptOW9vecNk51l4=
 

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess