Re: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

[Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal]

Hi Stephane,

That's fine. Hoping to hear from the authors on my comments..

Regards,
Muthu

On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 9:14 PM  wrote:

> Hi Muthu,
>
>
>
> (Speaking as co-chair)
>
>
>
> Thanks for the feedback on the intended status. This has to be clarified
> however this is not a blocking point for the adoption. We have time to
> figure out the intended status of the document with the authors/WG and
> adjust the text accordingly.
>
>
>
>
>
> Brgds,
>
>
>
> Stephane
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal 
> *Sent:* vendredi 23 avril 2021 13:15
> *To:* slitkows.i...@gmail.com
> *Cc:* bess@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for
> draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop
>
>
>
> I support the adoption. However, have a few comments:
>
>
>
> The intended status of the draft is Informational, but it doesn't look
> right.
>
>
>
> The abstract says:
>
>   This document specifies how the different EVPN
>
>functional modes and types can interoperate with each other. This
>document doesn't aim to redefine the existing functional modes
> *but   extend them for interoperability*.
>
>
>
> In addition, the draft has multiple normative statements. Hence,
> believe the intended status should be standards track instead..
>
>
>
> Section 4.2 says:
>
>With PE2 operating in Symmetric IRB and with enabled interop mode,
>the MAC/IP route from PE1 (Asymmetric IRB) is processed in the
>respective bridging, routing and adjacency table. Based on the Route-
>Target for MAC-VRF1, the MAC address M1 will be imported into MAC-
>VRF1 respectively and placed within BD0.
>
> * In addition, the host-   binding information M1/IP1 MUST be installed
> within PE2s adjacency   table.*
>
>
>
> For a PE operating in symmetric IRB mode, it is not required to install
> M1/P1 in the ARP/ND/adjacency table as
> per draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding. Hence, I think this draft
> is updating/extending draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding.
>
>
>
> The draft has the foll. description for Figure 2:
>
>The IRB interfaces for a common MAC-VRF/BD on
>PE1 and PE2 use the *same IP address*. With the difference of the IRB
>modes between PE1 (Asymmetric IRB) and PE2 (Symmetric IRB), there is
>a difference in the MPLS Label presence as part of the MAC/IP routes
>exchanged between the PEs.
>
>
>
> I guess it should say "same IP address and MAC address". Otherwise, it is
> not necessary to install M1/P1 in PE2's adj table. If PE2 receives a packet
> destined to P1, PE2 will initiate a glean procedure causing the host having
> (M1, P1) to respond. The response will reach PE2, so PE2 will install in
> its adjacency. The problem occurs only when both PE1 and PE2 use the same
> anycast default gateway IP and MAC addresses (which is also the recommended
> option as per draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding), in which case
> the response from the host will be locally consumed by PE1.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Muthu
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:36 PM  wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for
> draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop-03 [1].
>
>
>
> Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group
> list.
>
>
>
> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to
> this document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with
> IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
>
>
> If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please
> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
> relevant undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document will
> not  progress without answers from all of the authors and contributors.
>
>
>
> Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.
>
>
>
> If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please
> explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been
> disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>
>
> This poll for adoption closes on 4th May 2021.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthew and Stephane
>
>
>
>
>
> [1]  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop/
>
>
>
> ___
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>
>
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

[slitkows.ietf]

Hi Muthu,

 

(Speaking as co-chair)

 

Thanks for the feedback on the intended status. This has to be clarified 
however this is not a blocking point for the adoption. We have time to figure 
out the intended status of the document with the authors/WG and adjust the text 
accordingly.

 

 

Brgds,

 

Stephane

 

 

From: Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal  
Sent: vendredi 23 avril 2021 13:15
To: slitkows.i...@gmail.com
Cc: bess@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for 
draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

 

I support the adoption. However, have a few comments:

 

The intended status of the draft is Informational, but it doesn't look right. 

 

The abstract says:

  This document specifies how the different EVPN

   functional modes and types can interoperate with each other. This
   document doesn't aim to redefine the existing functional modes but
   extend them for interoperability.

 

In addition, the draft has multiple normative statements. Hence, believe the 
intended status should be standards track instead..

 

Section 4.2 says:

   With PE2 operating in Symmetric IRB and with enabled interop mode,
   the MAC/IP route from PE1 (Asymmetric IRB) is processed in the
   respective bridging, routing and adjacency table. Based on the Route-
   Target for MAC-VRF1, the MAC address M1 will be imported into MAC-
   VRF1 respectively and placed within BD0. In addition, the host-
   binding information M1/IP1 MUST be installed within PE2s adjacency
   table.

 

For a PE operating in symmetric IRB mode, it is not required to install M1/P1 
in the ARP/ND/adjacency table as per 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding. Hence, I think this draft is 
updating/extending draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding.

 

The draft has the foll. description for Figure 2:

   The IRB interfaces for a common MAC-VRF/BD on
   PE1 and PE2 use the same IP address. With the difference of the IRB
   modes between PE1 (Asymmetric IRB) and PE2 (Symmetric IRB), there is
   a difference in the MPLS Label presence as part of the MAC/IP routes
   exchanged between the PEs.

 

I guess it should say "same IP address and MAC address". Otherwise, it is not 
necessary to install M1/P1 in PE2's adj table. If PE2 receives a packet 
destined to P1, PE2 will initiate a glean procedure causing the host having 
(M1, P1) to respond. The response will reach PE2, so PE2 will install in its 
adjacency. The problem occurs only when both PE1 and PE2 use the same anycast 
default gateway IP and MAC addresses (which is also the recommended option as 
per draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding), in which case the response 
from the host will be locally consumed by PE1.

 

Regards,

Muthu

 

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:36 PM mailto:slitkows.i...@gmail.com> > wrote:

Hello,

 

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop-03 [1].

 

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

 

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

 

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document will not  progress 
without answers from all of the authors and contributors.

 

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

 

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

 

This poll for adoption closes on 4th May 2021.

 

Regards,

Matthew and Stephane

 

 

[1]  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop/

 

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org <mailto:BESS@ietf.org> 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

[slitkows.ietf]

Hi WG,

 

We had good support on this document, the document is adopted as a WG doc.

 

Authors,

 

Please publish the doc as -ietf-

 

 

Thanks,

 

 

From: Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)  
Sent: vendredi 23 avril 2021 23:48
To: slitkows.i...@gmail.com; bess@ietf.org
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for 
draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

 

Support.

 

Thanks,

Satya

 

From: BESS mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org> > on behalf of 
"slitkows.i...@gmail.com <mailto:slitkows.i...@gmail.com> " 
mailto:slitkows.i...@gmail.com> >
Date: Monday, April 19, 2021 at 11:07 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org <mailto:bess@ietf.org> " mailto:bess@ietf.org> >
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org <mailto:bess-cha...@ietf.org> " mailto:bess-cha...@ietf.org> >
Subject: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for 
draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

 

Hello,

 

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop-03 [1].

 

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

 

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

 

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document will not  progress 
without answers from all of the authors and contributors.

 

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

 

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

 

This poll for adoption closes on 4th May 2021.

 

Regards,

Matthew and Stephane

 

 

[1]  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop/

 

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

[Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)]

Support.

Thanks,
Satya

From: BESS  on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" 

Date: Monday, April 19, 2021 at 11:07 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org" 
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" 
Subject: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for 
draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

Hello,

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop-03 [1].

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document will not  progress 
without answers from all of the authors and contributors.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on 4th May 2021.

Regards,
Matthew and Stephane


[1]  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop/

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

[John E Drake]

Support, and I'm not aware of any IPR

Yours Irrespectively,

John



Juniper Business Use Only
From: BESS  On Behalf Of slitkows.i...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 2:06 PM
To: bess@ietf.org
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for 
draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

[External Email. Be cautious of content]

Hello,

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop-03 [1].

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document will not  progress 
without answers from all of the authors and contributors.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on 4th May 2021.

Regards,
Matthew and Stephane


[1]  
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!XMMXSt8wvRWsH9lEajjO5sfbkPjKCPNtpX6H4TZWUSRdoGcNqZN4MzmNiJqSbSw$>

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

[Gyan Mishra]

+1 on Standards Track for interoperability extension, however in IANA
section I don’t see any new codepoint requests as its  set to TBD.

Is the draft describing interoperability extensions that exist today and
caveats or is this new pertinent extensions changes to EVPN specification.

Does this draft update RFC 7432 or RFC 8365 in any way and if it does then
it should be Standards Track.

Kind Regards

Gyan

On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 7:15 AM Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal <
muthu.a...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I support the adoption. However, have a few comments:
>
> The intended status of the draft is Informational, but it doesn't look
> right.
>
> The abstract says:
>   This document specifies how the different EVPN
>functional modes and types can interoperate with each other. This
>document doesn't aim to redefine the existing functional modes
> *but   extend them for interoperability*.
>
> In addition, the draft has multiple normative statements. Hence,
> believe the intended status should be standards track instead..
>
> Section 4.2 says:
>With PE2 operating in Symmetric IRB and with enabled interop mode,
>the MAC/IP route from PE1 (Asymmetric IRB) is processed in the
>respective bridging, routing and adjacency table. Based on the Route-
>Target for MAC-VRF1, the MAC address M1 will be imported into MAC-
>VRF1 respectively and placed within BD0.
>
> * In addition, the host-   binding information M1/IP1 MUST be installed
> within PE2s adjacency   table.*
>
> For a PE operating in symmetric IRB mode, it is not required to install
> M1/P1 in the ARP/ND/adjacency table as
> per draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding. Hence, I think this draft
> is updating/extending draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding.
>
> The draft has the foll. description for Figure 2:
>The IRB interfaces for a common MAC-VRF/BD on
>PE1 and PE2 use the *same IP address*. With the difference of the IRB
>modes between PE1 (Asymmetric IRB) and PE2 (Symmetric IRB), there is
>a difference in the MPLS Label presence as part of the MAC/IP routes
>exchanged between the PEs.
>
> I guess it should say "same IP address and MAC address". Otherwise, it is
> not necessary to install M1/P1 in PE2's adj table. If PE2 receives a packet
> destined to P1, PE2 will initiate a glean procedure causing the host having
> (M1, P1) to respond. The response will reach PE2, so PE2 will install in
> its adjacency. The problem occurs only when both PE1 and PE2 use the same
> anycast default gateway IP and MAC addresses (which is also the recommended
> option as per draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding), in which case
> the response from the host will be locally consumed by PE1.
>
> Regards,
> Muthu
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:36 PM  wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for
>> draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop-03 [1].
>>
>>
>>
>> Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group
>> list.
>>
>>
>>
>> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to
>> this document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with
>> IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>>
>>
>>
>> If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please
>> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
>> relevant undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document will
>> not  progress without answers from all of the authors and contributors.
>>
>>
>>
>> Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.
>>
>>
>>
>> If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please
>> explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been
>> disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>>
>>
>>
>> This poll for adoption closes on 4th May 2021.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthew and Stephane
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [1]  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop/
>>
>>
>> ___
>> BESS mailing list
>> BESS@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>>
> ___
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>
-- 



*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com *



*M 301 502-1347*
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

[Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal]

I support the adoption. However, have a few comments:

The intended status of the draft is Informational, but it doesn't look
right.

The abstract says:
  This document specifies how the different EVPN
   functional modes and types can interoperate with each other. This
   document doesn't aim to redefine the existing functional modes
*but   extend them for interoperability*.

In addition, the draft has multiple normative statements. Hence,
believe the intended status should be standards track instead..

Section 4.2 says:
   With PE2 operating in Symmetric IRB and with enabled interop mode,
   the MAC/IP route from PE1 (Asymmetric IRB) is processed in the
   respective bridging, routing and adjacency table. Based on the Route-
   Target for MAC-VRF1, the MAC address M1 will be imported into MAC-
   VRF1 respectively and placed within BD0.

* In addition, the host-   binding information M1/IP1 MUST be installed
within PE2s adjacency   table.*

For a PE operating in symmetric IRB mode, it is not required to install
M1/P1 in the ARP/ND/adjacency table as
per draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding. Hence, I think this draft
is updating/extending draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding.

The draft has the foll. description for Figure 2:
   The IRB interfaces for a common MAC-VRF/BD on
   PE1 and PE2 use the *same IP address*. With the difference of the IRB
   modes between PE1 (Asymmetric IRB) and PE2 (Symmetric IRB), there is
   a difference in the MPLS Label presence as part of the MAC/IP routes
   exchanged between the PEs.

I guess it should say "same IP address and MAC address". Otherwise, it is
not necessary to install M1/P1 in PE2's adj table. If PE2 receives a packet
destined to P1, PE2 will initiate a glean procedure causing the host having
(M1, P1) to respond. The response will reach PE2, so PE2 will install in
its adjacency. The problem occurs only when both PE1 and PE2 use the same
anycast default gateway IP and MAC addresses (which is also the recommended
option as per draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding), in which case
the response from the host will be locally consumed by PE1.

Regards,
Muthu

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:36 PM  wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
>
> This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for
> draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop-03 [1].
>
>
>
> Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group
> list.
>
>
>
> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to
> this document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with
> IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
>
>
> If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please
> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
> relevant undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document will
> not  progress without answers from all of the authors and contributors.
>
>
>
> Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.
>
>
>
> If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please
> explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been
> disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>
>
> This poll for adoption closes on 4th May 2021.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthew and Stephane
>
>
>
>
>
> [1]  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop/
>
>
> ___
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

[Keyur Patel]

Support the adoption.

Regards,
Keyur

On Apr 19, 2021, at 11:06 AM, slitkows.i...@gmail.com wrote:


Hello,

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop-03 [1].

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document will not  progress 
without answers from all of the authors and contributors.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on 4th May 2021.

Regards,
Matthew and Stephane


[1]  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop/

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

[Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)]

As others mentioned, very important document.
I support.

Regards,
Patrice Brissette, Principal Engineer
Cisco Systems

http://e-vpn.io
http://go2.cisco.com/evpn




From: BESS  on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" 

Date: Monday, April 19, 2021 at 14:07
To: "bess@ietf.org" 
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" 
Subject: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for 
draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

Hello,

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop-03 [1].

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document will not  progress 
without answers from all of the authors and contributors.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on 4th May 2021.

Regards,
Matthew and Stephane


[1]  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop/

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

[Kesavan Thiruvenkatasamy (kethiruv)]

Support for adoption

Kesavan


From: BESS  on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" 

Date: Monday, April 19, 2021 at 11:07 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org" 
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" 
Subject: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for 
draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

Hello,

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop-03 [1].

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document will not  progress 
without answers from all of the authors and contributors.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on 4th May 2021.

Regards,
Matthew and Stephane


[1]  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop/

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

[Neeraj Malhotra]

Hi,

Support adoption. Indeed, much needed!!

Thanks,
Neeraj

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:06 AM  wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
>
> This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for
> draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop-03 [1].
>
>
>
> Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group
> list.
>
>
>
> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to
> this document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with
> IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
>
>
> If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please
> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
> relevant undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document will
> not  progress without answers from all of the authors and contributors.
>
>
>
> Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.
>
>
>
> If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please
> explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been
> disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>
>
> This poll for adoption closes on 4th May 2021.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthew and Stephane
>
>
>
>
>
> [1]  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop/
>
>
> ___
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

[Gyan Mishra]

I support WG Adoption.

Thanks

Gyan

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:23 AM Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) <
jorge.raba...@nokia.com> wrote:

> As co-author, I support this document for WG adoption.
>
> Not aware of any related IPR, except for the one already stated by other
> co-authors.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jorge
>
>
>
> *From: *BESS  on behalf of slitkows.i...@gmail.com
> 
> *Date: *Monday, April 19, 2021 at 8:06 PM
> *To: *bess@ietf.org 
> *Cc: *bess-cha...@ietf.org 
> *Subject: *[bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for
> draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for
> draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop-03 [1].
>
>
>
> Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group
> list.
>
>
>
> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to
> this document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with
> IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
>
>
> If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please
> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
> relevant undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document will
> not  progress without answers from all of the authors and contributors.
>
>
>
> Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.
>
>
>
> If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please
> explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been
> disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>
>
> This poll for adoption closes on 4th May 2021.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthew and Stephane
>
>
>
>
>
> [1]  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop/
>
>
> ___
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com *



*M 301 502-1347*
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

[Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)]

As co-author, I support this document for WG adoption.
Not aware of any related IPR, except for the one already stated by other 
co-authors.

Thanks.
Jorge

From: BESS  on behalf of slitkows.i...@gmail.com 

Date: Monday, April 19, 2021 at 8:06 PM
To: bess@ietf.org 
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org 
Subject: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for 
draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop
Hello,

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop-03 [1].

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document will not  progress 
without answers from all of the authors and contributors.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on 4th May 2021.

Regards,
Matthew and Stephane


[1]  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop/

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

[Krishnaswamy Ananthamurthy (kriswamy)]

Support for WG adoption.

Thanks
Krishnaswamy

From: BESS  on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" 

Date: Monday, April 19, 2021 at 11:07 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org" 
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" 
Subject: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for 
draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

Hello,

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop-03 [1].

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document will not  progress 
without answers from all of the authors and contributors.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on 4th May 2021.

Regards,
Matthew and Stephane


[1]  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop/

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

[Lukas Krattiger (lkrattig)]

Support as co-author.
We are awaiting an update on the IPR disclosure for this IETF draft. There is a 
pending request with the legal department (11/2020).
Thanks
-Lukas

On Apr 19, 2021, at 11:05 AM, 
slitkows.i...@gmail.com wrote:

Hello,

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop-03 [1].

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document will not  progress 
without answers from all of the authors and contributors.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on 4th May 2021.

Regards,
Matthew and Stephane


[1]  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop/

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

[Samir Thoria (sthoria)]

Support as a co-author. We requested our legal department in Nov/2020 to 
disclose an IPR related to this draft to IETF. We will follow it up to see why 
it hasn’t been disclosed yet.

Thanks,
Samir.


From: BESS  on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" 

Date: Monday, April 19, 2021 at 11:07 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org" 
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" 
Subject: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for 
draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

Hello,

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop-03 [1].

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document will not  progress 
without answers from all of the authors and contributors.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on 4th May 2021.

Regards,
Matthew and Stephane


[1]  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop/

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

[Ali Sajassi (sajassi)]

Support as a co-author. We requested our legal department in Nov/2020 to 
disclose an IPR related to this draft to IETF. We will follow it up to see why 
it hasn’t been disclosed yet.

Cheers,
Ali

From: BESS  on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" 

Date: Monday, April 19, 2021 at 11:07 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org" 
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" 
Subject: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for 
draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

Hello,

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop-03 [1].

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document will not  progress 
without answers from all of the authors and contributors.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on 4th May 2021.

Regards,
Matthew and Stephane


[1]  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop/

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

[Ayan Banerjee]

Support.
Ayan

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:06 AM  wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
>
> This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for
> draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop-03 [1].
>
>
>
> Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group
> list.
>
>
>
> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to
> this document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with
> IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
>
>
> If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please
> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
> relevant undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document will
> not  progress without answers from all of the authors and contributors.
>
>
>
> Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.
>
>
>
> If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please
> explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been
> disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>
>
> This poll for adoption closes on 4th May 2021.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthew and Stephane
>
>
>
>
>
> [1]  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop/
>
>
> ___
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

[Jeff Tantsura]

Very useful document!
Support the adoption

Regards,
Jeff

> On Apr 19, 2021, at 11:06, slitkows.i...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello,
>  
> This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
> draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop-03 [1].
>  
> Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.
>  
> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
> document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
> rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>  
> If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any 
> relevant undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document will 
> not  progress without answers from all of the authors and contributors.
>  
> Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.
>  
> If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
> respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
> conformance with IETF rules.
>  
> This poll for adoption closes on 4th May 2021.
>  
> Regards,
> Matthew and Stephane
>  
>  
> [1]  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop/
>  
> ___
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

[Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)]

Support the adoption.

From: "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" 
Date: Monday, April 19, 2021 at 11:06 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org" 
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" 
Subject: WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop
Resent-From: 
Resent-To: , , 

Resent-Date: Monday, April 19, 2021 at 11:06 AM

Hello,

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for 
draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop-03 [1].

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document will not  progress 
without answers from all of the authors and contributors.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

This poll for adoption closes on 4th May 2021.

Regards,
Matthew and Stephane


[1]  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop/

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

[bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

[slitkows.ietf]

Hello,

 

This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for
draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop-03 [1].

 

Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group
list.

 

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to
this document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF
IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

 

If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
relevant undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document will
not  progress without answers from all of the authors and contributors.

 

Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.

 

If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in
conformance with IETF rules.

 

This poll for adoption closes on 4th May 2021.

 

Regards,

Matthew and Stephane

 

 

[1]  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop/

 

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess