Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

[Gyan Mishra]

I support.  I think this is a very important feature that provides
flexibility to operators In upgrading edge bandwidth.  Sorry to chime in
late after the poll closed.

Since this draft is an introduction of a new feature to support EVPN
unequal load balancing,  have any vendors implemented this feature yet.

Also have any vendors see any issues with the evpn unequal cost lb solution
depiction in the draft.  I don’t know of any operators that have
implemented.

Kind regards

Gyan

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 8:54 AM  wrote:

> This poll is now closed without any objection to progress.
>
> However (expect if I have missed it), I haven’t heard about any
> implementation.
>
>
>
> Is there any known implementation ? If NO, is the WG against progressing
> the document without an implementation ?
>
>
>
> Feedback required by the end of the week.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* slitkows.i...@gmail.com 
>
> *Sent:* vendredi 17 janvier 2020 09:56
> *To:* bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.auth...@ietf.org
> *Cc:* bess-cha...@ietf.org
> *Subject:* WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03
>
>
>
> Hi WG,
>
>
>
> This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on 
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03
> [2]
>
>
>
> Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also,
> please indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track
> RFC.
>
>
>
> This poll runs until Fri 31th January 2019.
>
>
>
> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to
> this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with
> IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please
> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
> relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from
> all the Authors and Contributors.
>
> There is currently no IPR disclosed.
>
> We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [1]. Please
> indicate if you are aware of any implementations.
>
>  Thank you,
>
> Stephane
>
>
>
> [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw
>
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/
> ___
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>
-- 

Gyan  Mishra

Network Engineering & Technology

Verizon

Silver Spring, MD 20904

Phone: 301 502-1347

Email: gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

[Anoop Ghanwani]

Here are my comments.

==

Procedural (Chairs can make a call on which of these must be addressed)

- Draft is missing IANA considerations and security considerations sections..
- 6 front page authors may cause issues as the draft moves forward.
- pg 8
>>>

It is work in progress with authors of [BGP-LINK-
BW] to allow for this attribute to be used as transitive in inter-AS
scenarios.

>>>
Has this issue been resolved?  It seems like it should be resolved one way
or another before the draft is allowed to progress to RFC.

Editorial

- general

Suggest adding a section for acronyms.  Many are used and they are not all
well known and some like BW have a new meaning in this draft.

Link bundle, LAG bundle, LAG are all used interchangeably.  Suggest use
only LAG.

Load balance, load-balance, load sharing, load-sharing used
interchangeably.  Suggest use "load balance" everywhere.

What is the difference between EXT-COMM and extended community?  Suggest
use "extended community" everywhere.

In the terminology section, "LOCAL" and "REMOTE" PE are defined, yet
throughout the doc, a mix of LOCAL/local and REMOTE/remote are used.
Suggest make consistent and use non-capitalized versions.  These are
well-understood terms.

- pg 2
There are 2 section 3.1's.

- pg 4
Missing period at end of 3rd bullet.

- pg 5
In title for section 1.1, "PE CE" -> "PE-CE"
"Consider a CE1" -> "Consider CE1"
"link bundle represented" -> "the LAG represented"
"it's bandwidth" -> "its bandwidth"
"it MUST add a link" -> "it must add a link"  (MUST should only be used for
something this spec is mandating, not an observation.)

- pg 6
"hosts MUST also be load-balanced" -> "hosts must also be load balanced"
(there are 2 instances of this, one at the top of the page, one at the
bottom)
In title for section 1.2, "PE CE" -> "PE-CE"

- pg 7
"with Lx being the number of links / bandwidth..." -> "with Lx being the
total bandwidth across all links..."
"Solution proposed..." -> "The solution proposed..."
"who's overlay..." -> "whose overlay"

-pg 8
"advertise a additional..." -> "advertise an additional..."

-pg 10
"link-bandwidth" -> "link bandwidth"

- pg 12
"compute a random hash..." -> "computes a random hash..."
"IP address of PE at ordinal i" -> "IP address of PE(i)"
"PE that has the highest hash..." -> "The PE that has the highest hash..."
"one per-bandwidth..." -> "one per bandwidth..."

- pg 14
"[WEIGHTED-HRW] document describes..." -> "[WEIGHTED-HRW] describes..."

- pg 16
"PE_CE" -> "PE-CE"
There appears to be a formatting issue with the 2nd bullet in section 6.
Missing periods at the end of the first 3 bullets.

- pg 17
Section 7 title "with non-EVPN routing" -> "With Non-EVPN Routing"
Missing periods at end of bullets.

On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 11:27 PM Anoop Ghanwani 
wrote:

> I decided to look at the draft and will send my mostly editorial comments
> in a day or so.  Sorry for the delay.
>
> But what I find really surprising is that the draft made it through WGLC
> without IANA considerations or security considerations sections.  I thought
> those were mandatory.  I haven't been to an IETF meeting in a while.  Has
> something changed?
>
> Anoop
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 5:54 AM  wrote:
>
>> This poll is now closed without any objection to progress.
>>
>> However (expect if I have missed it), I haven’t heard about any
>> implementation.
>>
>>
>>
>> Is there any known implementation ? If NO, is the WG against progressing
>> the document without an implementation ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Feedback required by the end of the week.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* slitkows.i...@gmail.com 
>> *Sent:* vendredi 17 janvier 2020 09:56
>> *To:* bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.auth...@ietf.org
>> *Cc:* bess-cha...@ietf.org
>> *Subject:* WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for
>> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi WG,
>>
>>
>>
>> This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on 
>> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03
>> [2]
>>
>>
>>
>> Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also,
>> please indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track
>> RFC.
>>
>>

Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

[Anoop Ghanwani]

I decided to look at the draft and will send my mostly editorial comments
in a day or so.  Sorry for the delay.

But what I find really surprising is that the draft made it through WGLC
without IANA considerations or security considerations sections.  I thought
those were mandatory.  I haven't been to an IETF meeting in a while.  Has
something changed?

Anoop

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 5:54 AM  wrote:

> This poll is now closed without any objection to progress.
>
> However (expect if I have missed it), I haven’t heard about any
> implementation.
>
>
>
> Is there any known implementation ? If NO, is the WG against progressing
> the document without an implementation ?
>
>
>
> Feedback required by the end of the week.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* slitkows.i...@gmail.com 
> *Sent:* vendredi 17 janvier 2020 09:56
> *To:* bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.auth...@ietf.org
> *Cc:* bess-cha...@ietf.org
> *Subject:* WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03
>
>
>
> Hi WG,
>
>
>
> This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on 
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03
> [2]
>
>
>
> Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also,
> please indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track
> RFC.
>
>
>
> This poll runs until Fri 31th January 2019.
>
>
>
> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to
> this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with
> IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please
> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
> relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from
> all the Authors and Contributors.
>
> There is currently no IPR disclosed.
>
> We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [1]. Please
> indicate if you are aware of any implementations.
>
>  Thank you,
>
> Stephane
>
>
>
> [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw
>
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/
> ___
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

[Jeff Tantsura]

yes/support

Cheers,
Jeff
> From: BESS  on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" 
> 
> Date: Friday, January 17, 2020 at 12:56 AM
> To: "bess@ietf.org" , 
> "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.auth...@ietf.org" 
> 
> Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" 
> Subject: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for 
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03
>
> Hi WG,
>
> This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on 
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03 [2]
>
> Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please 
> indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track RFC.
>
> This poll runs until Fri 31th January 2019.
>
> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
> Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
> rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)..
> If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please 
> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any 
> relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from 
> all the Authors and Contributors.
> There is currently no IPR disclosed.
> We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [1]. Please 
> indicate if you are aware of any implementations.
>  Thank you,
> Stephane
>
> [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/
> ___
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

[slitkows.ietf]

This poll is now closed without any objection to progress.

However (expect if I have missed it), I haven't heard about any
implementation.

 

Is there any known implementation ? If NO, is the WG against progressing the
document without an implementation ?

 

Feedback required by the end of the week.

 

Thanks,

 

 

 

From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com  
Sent: vendredi 17 janvier 2020 09:56
To: bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.auth...@ietf.org
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03 

 

Hi WG,

 

This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03 [2]

 

Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please
indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track RFC.

 

This poll runs until Fri 31th January 2019.

 

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to
this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF
IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from
all the Authors and Contributors. 

There is currently no IPR disclosed.  

We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [1]. Please
indicate if you are aware of any implementations.

 Thank you,

Stephane

 

[1]
<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw>
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw

[2]  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

[Neeraj Malhotra]

Hi,

Support as co-author. Not aware of any IPR.

Thanks,
Neeraj


On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 12:56 AM  wrote:

> Hi WG,
>
>
>
> This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on 
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03
> [2]
>
>
>
> Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also,
> please indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track
> RFC.
>
>
>
> This poll runs until Fri 31th January 2019.
>
>
>
> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to
> this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with
> IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please
> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
> relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from
> all the Authors and Contributors.
>
> There is currently no IPR disclosed.
>
> We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [1]. Please
> indicate if you are aware of any implementations.
>
>  Thank you,
>
> Stephane
>
>
>
> [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw
>
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/
>
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

[Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)]

Support.

Thanks,
--Satya

From: BESS  on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" 

Date: Friday, January 17, 2020 at 12:56 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org" , 
"draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.auth...@ietf.org" 

Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" 
Subject: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

Hi WG,

This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03 [2]

Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please 
indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track RFC.

This poll runs until Fri 31th January 2019.


We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond 
to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the 
Authors and Contributors.

There is currently no IPR disclosed.

We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [1]. Please indicate 
if you are aware of any implementations.

 Thank you,

Stephane

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

[Jeff Tantsura]

yes/support

Cheers,
Jeff
On Jan 17, 2020, 12:56 AM -0800, slitkows.i...@gmail.com, wrote:
> Hi WG,
>
> This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on 
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03 [2]
>
> Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please 
> indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track RFC.
>
> This poll runs until Fri 31th January 2019.
>
> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
> Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
> rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)..
> If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please 
> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any 
> relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from 
> all the Authors and Contributors.
> There is currently no IPR disclosed.
> We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [1]. Please 
> indicate if you are aware of any implementations.
>  Thank you,
> Stephane
>
> [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/
> ___
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

[Krishna Muddenahally Ananthamurthy (kriswamy)]

I Support.

Thanks
Krishna


From: BESS  on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" 

Date: Friday, January 17, 2020 at 12:56 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org" , 
"draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.auth...@ietf.org" 

Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" 
Subject: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

Hi WG,

This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03 [2]

Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please 
indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track RFC.

This poll runs until Fri 31th January 2019.


We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond 
to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the 
Authors and Contributors.

There is currently no IPR disclosed.

We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [1]. Please indicate 
if you are aware of any implementations.

 Thank you,

Stephane

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

[Samir Thoria (sthoria)]

Support as co-author. Not aware of any undisclosed IPR.

Thanks,
Samir.

From: BESS  on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" 

Date: Friday, January 17, 2020 at 12:56 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org" , 
"draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.auth...@ietf.org" 

Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" 
Subject: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

Hi WG,

This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03 [2]

Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please 
indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track RFC.

This poll runs until Fri 31th January 2019.


We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond 
to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the 
Authors and Contributors.

There is currently no IPR disclosed.

We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [1]. Please indicate 
if you are aware of any implementations.

 Thank you,

Stephane

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

[Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)]

Support.

From: BESS  on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" 

Date: Friday, January 17, 2020 at 12:56 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org" , 
"draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.auth...@ietf.org" 

Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" 
Subject: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

Hi WG,

This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03 [2]

Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please 
indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track RFC.

This poll runs until Fri 31th January 2019.


We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond 
to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the 
Authors and Contributors.

There is currently no IPR disclosed.

We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [1]. Please indicate 
if you are aware of any implementations.

 Thank you,

Stephane

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

[John E Drake]

Support, not aware of any IPR

Yours Irrespectively,

John



Juniper Business Use Only
From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com 
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2020 3:56 AM
To: bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.auth...@ietf.org
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

Hi WG,

This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03 [2]

Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please 
indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track RFC.

This poll runs until Fri 31th January 2019.


We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond 
to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the 
Authors and Contributors.

There is currently no IPR disclosed.

We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [1]. Please indicate 
if you are aware of any implementations.

 Thank you,

Stephane

[1] 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!QlrigTItV3QQEdT9NJVenMJCe4r7XUkWWKe4-uPxkdutk6i-hEr8kNyOmHzNylo$>
[2] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!QlrigTItV3QQEdT9NJVenMJCe4r7XUkWWKe4-uPxkdutk6i-hEr8kNyO6dSogOY$>
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

[LINGALA, AVINASH]

Hi,

Support as a co-author. Not aware of any relevant IPR.

Thanks,
Avinash

From: "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" 
Date: Friday, January 17, 2020 at 3:56 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org" , 
"draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.auth...@ietf.org" 

Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" 
Subject: WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03
Resent-From: 
Resent-To: , , , 
, , AVINASH LINGALA 

Resent-Date: Friday, January 17, 2020 at 3:56 AM

Hi WG,

This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03 [2]

Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please 
indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track RFC.

This poll runs until Fri 31th January 2019.


We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond 
to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the 
Authors and Contributors.

There is currently no IPR disclosed.

We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [1]. Please indicate 
if you are aware of any implementations.

 Thank you,

Stephane

[1] 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mailarchive.ietf.org_arch_msg_bess_cG3X1tTqb-5FvPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=Brp6KjSZbKLoy2UkjhwkCg=epaO91ssZq_XIawjN6M6Z2Cyy8RxpsAThpN84l51JvM=E9USn7rvIr_NFOl8LOMOIKjp6jjQLEeeqq51aB6lsI4=>
[2] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dbess-2Devpn-2Dunequal-2Dlb_=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=Brp6KjSZbKLoy2UkjhwkCg=epaO91ssZq_XIawjN6M6Z2Cyy8RxpsAThpN84l51JvM=D_Dgp9DexwcF9ECYyipWzifb6obaXjwVCUd3iiOeRY0=>
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

[Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)]

Support as co-author.
Not aware of any relevant IPR.

Thanks.
Jorge

From: "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" 
Date: Friday, January 17, 2020 at 9:56 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org" , 
"draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.auth...@ietf.org" 

Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" 
Subject: WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03
Resent-From: 
Resent-To: , , , 
, , 
Resent-Date: Friday, January 17, 2020 at 9:56 AM

Hi WG,

This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03 [2]

Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please 
indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track RFC.

This poll runs until Fri 31th January 2019.


We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond 
to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the 
Authors and Contributors.

There is currently no IPR disclosed.

We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [1]. Please indicate 
if you are aware of any implementations.

 Thank you,

Stephane

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

[Acee Lindem (acee)]

Hi Stephane, BESS WG,
I support publication as a proposed standard. The mechanisms require capability 
advertisement and these must be standardized.
Thanks,
Acee

From: BESS  on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" 

Date: Friday, January 17, 2020 at 3:56 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org" , 
"draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.auth...@ietf.org" 

Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" 
Subject: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

Hi WG,

This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03 [2]

Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please 
indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track RFC.

This poll runs until Fri 31th January 2019.


We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond 
to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the 
Authors and Contributors.

There is currently no IPR disclosed.

We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [1]. Please indicate 
if you are aware of any implementations.

 Thank you,

Stephane

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

[UTTARO, JAMES]

Support

Thanks,
  Jim Uttaro

From: BESS  On Behalf Of slitkows.i...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2020 3:56 AM
To: bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.auth...@ietf.org
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

Hi WG,

This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03 [2]

Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please 
indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track RFC.

This poll runs until Fri 31th January 2019.


We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond 
to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the 
Authors and Contributors.

There is currently no IPR disclosed.

We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [1]. Please indicate 
if you are aware of any implementations.

 Thank you,

Stephane

[1] 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mailarchive.ietf.org_arch_msg_bess_cG3X1tTqb-5FvPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=s7ZzB4JbPv3nYuoSx5Gy8Q=-hjhvhQsRi4yGUh2vfpEvh3P24gT0VNVGmCram-OKXw=de2qyRnixM9VNwZM6EITgI1LEJRqbKsS4cMLOaS-IfI=>
[2] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dbess-2Devpn-2Dunequal-2Dlb_=DwMFAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=s7ZzB4JbPv3nYuoSx5Gy8Q=-hjhvhQsRi4yGUh2vfpEvh3P24gT0VNVGmCram-OKXw=bVOY0qGkl4weL8j7V_CMiIObUDke5r9EpGItaG_vs-4=>
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

[bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

[slitkows.ietf]

Hi WG,

 

This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03 [2]

 

Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please
indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track RFC.

 

This poll runs until Fri 31th January 2019.

 

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to
this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF
IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from
all the Authors and Contributors. 

There is currently no IPR disclosed.  

We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [1]. Please
indicate if you are aware of any implementations.

 Thank you,

Stephane

 

[1]

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw

[2]  
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess